Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kerala and Tamilnadu Liquor Laws
Kerala and Tamilnadu Liquor Laws
ALCOHOL IN INDIA
India is the fastest growing alcohol market in the world. The alcohol
consumption in India is about 6,700 million litres. It grows approximately at a
rate of 30% annually. It is expected to cross 19,000 million litres by 2015.
Whisky is the most preferred alcoholic beverage.
The legal drinking age in India and the laws which regulate the sale and
consumption of alcohol vary significantly from state to state. In India,
consumption of alcohol is prohibited in the states of Gujarat, Manipur, Mizoram
and Nagaland, as well as the union territory of Lakshadweep (except on the
island of Bangaram). All other Indian states permit alcohol consumption but fix
a legal drinking age of between 1825 years. In some states, the legal drinking
age can be different for different types of alcoholic beverages.
Whisky is the most preferred alcoholic beverage, comprising 80% of the 6,700
million litres of liquor sold through authorised liquor shops annually. The Indian
whiskey market which currently stands around 40,500 crore is expected to
cross 54,000 crore (US$11.88 billion) by 2013.
Beer made from malt is popular among the youth and its consumption is
expected to reach 2.4 billion litres by 2012. The market comprising beer, wine
and spirits would cross 140,000 crore (US$30.8 billion), selling 19,000 million
litres, in 2015 from the current 50,700 crore (US$11.15 billion) market.
India produces almost 70% of alcohol and accounts for 10% of the imports in
southeast Asia, counterfeit bottles form 15-20% of the total outtake.
with even the President expressing deep concern about the rising alcoholism in
Kerala.
The monopoly trade has led to widespread irregularities like adulteration,
corruption, overpricing and black marketing in the retail outlets.
Alcohol as a major source of Indirect tax revenue has always been the centrepoint of the policy makers thinking and little pain and consideration were given
to look on to the social aspect and economic consequences. Alcohol policies
especially those relating to production, consumption and taxation have varied
widely across the states. Alcohol policy and legislation in India is based on
political compulsions rather than interests of public health. Part of the reason is
that there has been little attempt to examine the economic and social burden
generated by misuse to provide a sound guide for policy makers.
Article 47 of the directive principles of state policy described in the Indian
constitution says: the state shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition
and standard of living of its people as among its primary duties and in
particular, the state shall endeavour to bring about prohibition of the use
except for medicinal purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are
injurious to health.
This study is done to check whether the states, Kerala and TamilNadu, uphold
the constitutional promise. The study also focuses to trace the sales and revenue
trend of liquor market in the states. Apart from that, the growing necessity of the
revenue raised from the liquor market for the respective state governments
exchequer is also explained.
OBJECTIVES
3
The objectives of our study are focused to bring the comparison between liquor
policies of Kerala and TamilNadu, two states in India, where there is a large
consumption of alcohol.
CHAPTER: 3
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
REVIEW OF
LITERATURE
the many different influences in that history. The evolution of alcohol use
patterns in India can be divided into four broad historical periods (time of
written records), beginning with the Vedic era (ca. 1500-700 BCE). From 700
BCE to 1100 CE, ("Reinterpretation and Synthesis") is the time of emergence of
Buddhism and Jainism, with some new anti-alcohol doctrines, as well as postVedic developments in the Hindu traditions and scholarly writing. The writings
of the renowned medical practitioners, Charaka and Susruta, added new lines of
thought, including arguments for "moderate alcohol use." The Period of Islamic
Influence (1100-1800 CE), including the Mughal era from the 1520s to 1800,
exhibited a complex interplay of widespread alcohol use, competing with the
clear Quranic opposition to alcohol consumption. The fourth period (1800 to the
present) includes the deep influence of British colonial rule and the recent half
century of Indian independence, beginning in 1947. The contradictions and
ambiguities-with widespread alcohol use in some sectors of society, including
the high status caste of warriors/rulers (Kshatriyas), versus prohibitions and
condemnation of alcohol use, especially for the Brahmin (scholar-priest) caste,
have produced alcohol use patterns that include frequent high-risk, heavy and
hazardous drinking. The recent increases in alcohol consumption in many
sectors of the general Indian population, coupled with the strong evidence of the
role of alcohol in the spread of HIV/STI infections and other health risks, point
to the need for detailed understanding of the complex cross-currents emerging
from the past history of alcohol use and abuse in India.
drug use, recorded alcohol use in only 21% of adult males. Expectedly, this
figure cannot accurately mirror the wide variation that obtains in a large and
complex country like India. The prevalence of current use of alcohol ranged
from a low of 7% in the western state of Gujarat (officially under Prohibition) to
75% in the Northeastern state of Arunachal Pradesh. There is also an extreme
gender difference. Prevalence among women has consistently been estimated at
less than 5 per cent but is much higher in the Northeastern states. Significantly
higher use has been recorded among tribal, rural and lower socioeconomic
urban sections).
The per capita consumption is 2 litres/adult /year (calculated from official 2003
sales and population figures). After adjusting for undocumented consumption,
which accounts for 45-50% of total consumption, this is likely to be around 4
litres, but still low compared to that in wet nations. Licit and illicit spirits i.e.
government licensed country liquor (rectified spirit mixed with water at Indian
made foreign liquors like whisky, rum, vodka and gin (42.8%v/v); and illicitly
distilled spirits (of indeterminate composition) constitute more than 95% of the
beverages drunk by both men and women. Beer accounts for less than 5% of
consumption (70% of beer sales is dominated by strong beers at strengths over
8% v/v). Wine is a nascent but growing market.
The various rules formulated under the Abkari Act, NDPS Act, M & TP
Act are furnished below:
1.
2.
3.
4.
1975.
5. Abkari Shops Departmental Management Rules 1972.
6. Kerala Rectified Spirits Rule 1972.
7. Kerala Winery Rules 1970
8. The Kerala Distillery & Warehouse Rules 1968.
9. The Kerala Spirituous Preparation Control Rules 1969.
10.The Brewery Rule 1967.
11.Cochin Denatured Spirit & Methyl Alcohol Rules 1965.
12.Varnish Rules 1965.
13.Foreign Liquor (Storage in Bond) Rules 1961.
14.Tree Tax Rules 1959.
Form
Details of Licences
I -- Indian Made Foreign Liquor
L-1
L-2
L-3
L-4
L-5
L-5A
L-6
L-6A
Retail vend of foreign liquor in duty free shops off the premises.
L-7
Source:ksbc.kerala.gov.in
The principal duties of the Department are protection, augmentation and
collection of Excise Revenue and enforcement of the above acts and various
10
Rules made there under. The Department prevents leakage of revenue, and
exerts effective control on the abuse of liquor and Intoxicating Drugs. The
duties of Excise Department are broadly classified as Collection of Revenue,
Enforcement activity to prevent illicit liquor production, sale and trafficking and
Campaign against Alcoholism.
Liquor includes spirits of wine, arrack, spirits, wine, toddy, beer and all liquid
consisting of or containing alcohol. Individual has no fundamental right over the
manufacture and trade of liquor. Absolute right on liquor is vested with the
State. Government formulates Abkari policy of the state every year. The policy
formulated by the State Government is implemented by the Excise Department.
11
liquor
trade
in
the
state
recommended
In line with the suggestion the Government decided to set up a Public Sector
Corporation to procure spirit and arrange blending, bottling, sealing and
distribution of arrack and also for dealing with the sale of IMFL. An amendment
was made in the Abkari Act in 1984 to give effect to the same.
tenders for entering into rate contract for sales and supply of Indian Made
Foreign Liquor /BEER for the ensuing financial year (April to March). This is
being done as per directions of the government. From Financial Year 2001-2002
the offer was extended for supply of Foreign Made Foreign Liquor also.
rolls
of
the
Corporation
for
the
ensuing
financial
year.
The rate contract agreement for supply of liquor is not a competitive tender.
Each supplier has definite approved brands. Only the approved supplier who
owns the brand can supply the respective brands to the Corporation Eg. Mc
Dowelll brandy can only be supplied by Mc Dowell & Co. Ltd., Hercules Rum
by M/S Khoday Industries and King Fisher by Premier Breweries Ltd.
Therefore the choice of the Corporation is to accept the rate offered or to decide
13
not to purchase the brand. As per the provision in the rate contract agreed the
Board of Directors of the Corporation is empowered to fix the supply prices.
Accordingly the Board of Directors fixes the supply prices at the time of
finalization of the rate contract agreement, which will be FIRM during the rate
contract period. The Corporation has however fixed a minimum price of
Rs.235/- for a case of Indian Made Foreign Liquor. This is done on
consideration of cost analysis of various elements that constitute cost and
thereby the minimum price at which supply could be made is arrived at. The
quality of Foreign Made Foreign Liquor and Indian Made Foreign Liquor and
BEER supplied confirm to the standards indicated in the offer condition. This
has been fixed in consultation with the Chief Chemical Examiner to the
Government of Kerala. The Chemical Examination Certificate and a certificate
showing that ENA has been used in production (in case of Indian Made Foreign
Liquor) is to be sent to the Corporation against dispatch of each batch of Indian
Made Foreign Liquor/Beer. For Indian Made Foreign Liquor such Chemical
Certificates
should
be
duly
authenticated
by
the
Chief
Chemical
based on the average monthly sales of the respective supplier. The average is of
the previous three month sales. The average monthly sales are reviewed every
month and a re-order quantity (ROQ) based on the requirement is placed. The
ROQ is normally 30 days, 40 days, 45 days requirement as the case may be.
When the stock plus the order pending execution falls below the ROQ, the
shortfall
is
replenished
on
daily
basis.
is
being
given.
Special orders are also placed on trade discount basis to the supplies depending
upon the requirement. That is if a company offers a trade discount of 10% for
IMFL and 5% for Beer, special orders are placed to the extent of a maximum of
two
loads
when
the
stock
is
nil
or
meager.
15
16
KLPD of alcohol (ii) Tvl. Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Limited, Villupuram
District with production capacity of 100 KLPD of alcohol and (iii) Tvl. Rajshree
Sugars and Chemicals Limited, Villupuram District with production capacity of
80 KLPD of alcohol.
Accordingly, from 1.9.2009, the following rates of fee are being collected.
Fee prior
Reduced fee
to 1.9.2009
w.e.f. 1.9.2009
Rs.
Rs.
i) Privilege fee
40,000/-
10,000/-
400/-
100/-
200/-
50/-
Source: tasmac.tn.gov.in
Import of Foreign Liquor
Consequent to General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994,
restrictions on import of foreign liquor has been removed. The Government
have, therefore issued necessary amendments to Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act,
1937 (Tamil Nadu Act X of 1937) and relevant rules made thereunder to make
them compatible to World Trade Organisation agreements. With a view to levy
special privilege fee on the IMFS Products and spirits imported from foreign
countries and from outside the State, the Tamil Nadu Indian Made Foreign
Spirit (Supply by Wholesale) Rules, 1983, has been amended so as to adopt a
uniform special privilege fee.
1. Tamil Nadu Molasses Control and Regulation Rules 1958 - Prohibition &
Excise Dept
2. TN Liquor (License and Permit) Rules 1981 - Prohibition & Excise Dept
3.
The Tamil Nadu Spirituous Preparations (Control) Rules, 1984. Prohibition & Excise Dept
4. The Tamil Nadu Narcotic Drugs Rules, 1985 - Prohibition & Excise Dept
5. The Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (In Shops And Bars) Rules, 2003 Prohibition & Excise Dept
6. Tamil Nadu Distillery Rules, 1981 - Prohibition & Excise Dept
7. The Tamil Nadu Disposal of Articles (Confiscated under theTamil Nadu
Prohibition Act) Rules, 1979 - Prohibition & Excise Dept
8. Denatured Spirit - FP Rules 1959 (Updated) - Prohibition & Excise Dept
9. Tamil Nadu Indian-Made Foreign Spirits (Manufacture) Rules, 1981
10.The Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956
11.Tamil Nadu Rectified Spirit Rules, 1959
12.The Tamil Nadu Liquor (Transit) Rules, 1982
13.Tamil Nadu Mass Wine Rules , 1984
14. Tamil Nadu Spirituous Essences Rules 1972
21
FORM
DETAILS OF LICENSE
The licences issued under this class are for privilege of sale of Indian
Made Foreign Spirits in retail under section 17-C of the Act or for sale of
F.L. 1
foreign liquor
Licence for the grant of privilege of
retail sale of bottled Indian
Made foreign spirits or sale of foreign
F.L. 2.
liquor.
Licence for possession of liquor by a
non-proprietory club for
Supply to members.
F.L. 3.
22
F.L.3(A)
F.L. 4.
F.L.4(A)
F.L. 5.
F.L. 6.
Merchant Navy
Licence for possession and use of
liquor for Scientific Industrial or
such like purposes.
23
F.L. 7.
F.L. 8.
F.L. 9.
F.L. 10.
FORM
F.M. 1.
DETAILS OF LICENSE
Licences for liquor used for medicinal purposes.
Licence for possession and vend of
medicated wines to F.M. 1,
F.M. 2, F.M. 3 or F.M. 4 licences.
F.M. 2.
F.M. 3.
F.M. 4.
Duration of licence:25
Every licence granted under these rules shall be valid for the financial year
beginning from the 1st of April or the date of issue of the licence and ending
with the 31st March, immediately following unless otherwise stated in the
licence issued in a particular case.
Refusal of licence:If the licensing authority decides that the applicant is not eligible for the grant of
privilege and issue of licence or that the grant of the privilege and issue of
licence are not justified with reference to conditions and circumstances
specified in rule 19, he shall, by an order in writing, refuse to grant the privilege
and issue of the licence for reasons to be specified in the order. In that case, the
licence fee, if any, paid by the applicant, shall be refunded to him.
Renewal of licence:A licence holder desiring to renew the licence shall make an application in the
prescribed form (the same as for the original grant of the licence) atleast one
month before the date of expiry of the licence. The application may be sent to
the licensing authority direct. The provisions of rules 18 to 20 shall, as far as
may be, apply to an application for renewal of licence as if it were an
application for the original grant of a licence, where an application for renewal
of the licence has not been made within a period of one month before the expiry
as specified herein, but in no case after the expiry of the licence, the licensing
authority may admit such application, provided there are good and sufficient
reasons for the delay on payment of an additional fee of twenty five per cent of
the prescribed licence fee.
26
TAMILNADU
STATE
MARKETING
CORPORATION
LIMITED
(TASMAC)
HISTORY
TASMAC was established in 1983 by the government of M. G. Ramachandran
(MGR) for wholesale vending of alcohol in Tamil Nadu. The state has a long
history of prohibition, first implemented in 1937 by the Indian National
Congress government of C. Rajagopalachari. Between 1937 and 2001, it was
lifted briefly during 1971-74, 198187 and 1990-91. After 1983, TASMAC was
in charge of wholesale liquor sales in the state whenever prohibition was lifted.
In 2001, prohibition was lifted again and TASMAC became the wholesale
monopoly for alcohol. For retail vending, the state auctioned off licenses for
running liquor shops and bars. But this led to the formation of cartels and loss of
revenue to the state. The government tried to counter this by introducing a lot
system from the financial year 2001-02, where potential bidders bid for shops
grouped by revenue. But the lot system could not prevent cartelisation, as
bidders later withdrew in favour of others. In October 2003, the government
passed an amendment to the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, making
TASMAC the sole retail vendor of alcohol in the state. By 2004 all private
outlets selling alcohol were either shut down or taken over by the company.
This monopoly established by the ADMK government of J. Jayalalitha came
into effect on 29 November 2003. The DMK government of M. Karunanidhi
which took power in 2006, did not revise its predecessor's policy and TASMAC
continues to control the alcohol industry in the state.
The reorganisation of retail alcohol trade in the state has brought record
revenues for the government allowing it to increase spending on welfare
27
schemes. The revenue from alcohol sales constitutes nearly half of the states
annual tax revenues. Tamil Nadu ranks first among the states of India in alcohol
sales by volume. While consumption of alcohol has increased among the
population, deaths due to consumption of contaminated illicit liquor (common
during the prohibition era) have gone down. The monopoly trade has led to
widespread irregularities like adulteration, corruption, overpricing and black
marketing in the retail outlets. It has also led to increased complaints about
disturbances created by drunk patrons from residents in areas where the retail
outlets are situated. High retail prices (due to a higher tax rate) and absence of a
wide range of choices have led to a thriving alcohol tourism industry in the
neighbouring union territory of Pondicherry, where alcohol prices are low and
different brands are available. TASMAC has been forced to offer more choices
of brands to counter the increase in smuggling of non-available alcohol brands
into the state
FORMATION
OF
RETAIL
VENDING
DIVISION:
In order to completely eliminate the sale of contraband, spurious and non- duty
paid liquor in some licensed premises under the system of retail vending by
private persons, which can affect the public health of the liquor consuming
public and wide spread violations of Maximum Retail Price (MRP) of liquor
fixed by the Government, both of which also cause loss of revenue to the
Government and in order to curb the organized groups and cartels, who act in
groups to ensure that applications are not made for a substantially large number
of shops so as to keep them vacant and thereby to corner the retail vending trade
causing loss of revenue to the Government, it was considered necessary by the
Government to grant the exclusive privilege of retail vending of Indian Made
Foreign Spirits to the State owned public sector under taking, TASMAC.
Accordingly, the exclusive privilege of Retail Vending of IMFS was granted to
TASMAC under Sec.17 (C) (1-B) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937.
28
TASMAC is doing the retail business also successfully with effect from
29.11.2003.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
(i)
Authorised
(ii)
(100%
capital
Paidup
contributed
by
capital
Tamil
Nadu
Rs.
15.00
Crores
Rs.
15.00
Crores
State
Government
are
procured
through
import
from
other
States.
Distribution of IMFS & BEER items to the licensees is being done through the
41 depots of TASMAC located throughout the State.
INVENTORY
MANAGEMENT
29
ii) The monthly order for IMFS and Beer is generated based on the Weighted
average sales per day multiplied by 39 days in the case of local IMFS and 52
days in the case of import IMFS and in case of Beer the Weighted average sale
per
day
is
multiplied
by
39
days.
iii) 39 working days in 1 months and 52 working days and 2 months is taken
for calculating the order to be generated, since we need atleast a months stock
to be generated on the first of every month. The extra days is allowed for the
transhipment
of
the
stock.
iv) Stock in transit i.e. indent issued but not despatched, goods despatched but
not unloaded and the closing balance available at the Depot on the last day of
that month will be deducted from the monthly requirement arrived at as per the
working
mentioned
at
Point
No.(ii)
above.
v) The net requirement for IMFS will be rounded off to the nearest multiples of
5 and the net requirement for fast moving Beer 650ml/325ml pack will be
rounded off to the nearest multiples of 700/600 cases. In respect of slow moving
Beer brands the net requirement will be rounded off to the nearest multiples of
50
cases.
II.
ISSUE
OF
INDENTS
On 1st of every month the order is placed with all the local manufacturers and
import suppliers and indent is regulated in order to have 15 days stock of a
particular item in the depots including stock in transit. This ensures that the
brand
does
not
go
out
of
stock
at
any
point
of
time.
Day to day indents are issued based on the previous day sale, closing balance of
30
that day, demand of the fast moving items etc., which is reflected in the daily
statement showing depots with Nil stock and low stock (inclusive of
cumulative stock in Transit) of fast moving items. This statement shows the
depots which have NIL stock, 1-3 days stock, 4-7 days stock, 8-10 days stock,
11-14 days stock and 15-21 days stock for particular brand and for a particular
pack size. Based on the statements, indents are being issued to the suppliers on a
daily basis. If a particular brand and pack size is in exceptional demand in the
current month and there is a likelihood of stock out situation, then additional
order for that particular item is placed and indents issued thereafter.
No preferential treatment is given to any supplier and the systems mentioned
above (which has been computerized) is strictly followed since 1998. After
take-over of retail vending by TASMAC also the same procedure is being
followed
without
any
change.
After the indents are issued the daily despatches from the suppliers is also being
monitored
by
31
TASMAC.
Source: ksbc.kerala.gov.in
Sales are effected from the Warehouses and FL-1 Shops. Licencees viz
Consumerfed and Bars authorized to Purchase approach the Corporations
Warehouses for purchases. The amount payable is first remitted into the
respective bank accounts of the Corporation and only after receipt of the
remitted challans for the value thereof the goods are released to the purchasers.
For the requirements of the Corporations FL-1 Shops goods are just transferred.
32
From the FL-1 shops, goods are sold in bottles to consumers direct on cash
basis.Details
of
sales
made
till
date
is
given
below.
Source: ksbc.kerala.gov.in
CONTRIBUTION
TO
STATE
EXCHEQUER
The following were the amounts contributed to the State Exchequer during
previous seventeen completed years by way of Sales Tax, Excise Duty, Vending
Fee, and License Fee etc.
YEAR
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
CONTRIBUTION
EXCHEQUER
25.63
30.86
40.06
40.74
57.35
78.33
33
TO
STATE
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Source: ksbc.kerala.gov.in
92.07
112.59
133.00
179.72
215.58
315.51
611.19
753.48
847.56
903.56
1025.93
1310.17
1468.16
1622.30
1824.04
2055.71
2424.49
2914.10
3621.15
4259.80
FINANCIAL
RESULTS
The profit made before and after payment of Vending Fee till date is indicated
below. Figures in Crores
34
YEAR
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Vending
Profit
2.51
3.15
3.66
4.78
10.35
8.70
11.46
13.95
12.99
15.77
7.01
10.21
11.38
17.52
15.40
8.43
9.83
19.96
11.10
19.09
51.85
122.82
173.68
179.72
285.91
Fee
2.09
3.04
4.09
4.01
0.04
8.42
10.28
12.15
12.26
14.88
5.45
9.08
7.98
9.81
10.60
4.86
5.44
10.02
4.20
9.40
40.15
71.24
106.44
120.48
140.86
Vending Fee
0.48
0.11
0.43
0.78
1.31
0.28
1.18
1.80
0.73
0.89
1.56
1.13
3.00
7.71
3.80
3.57
4.39
9.94
6.90
9.69
11.70
51.58
67.24
59.24
145.05 ( pre-
164.61
audited)
234.78(
399.39
audited)
Source: ksbc.kerala.gov.in
DIVIDEND PARTICULARS
The dividend paid to the government from 1990-91 is indicated below.
35
After
pre-
YEAR
DIVIDEND (%)
1990-91
20%
1991-92
20%
1992-93
20%
1993-94
0%
1994-95
30%
1995-96
40%
1996-97
100%
1997-98
100%
1998-99
100%
1999-00
100%
2000-01
200%
2001-02
300%
2002-03
400%
2003-04
400%
2004-05
400%
2005-06
400%
2006-07
400%
2007-08
400%
2008-09
Declaration awaited
2009-10
Declaration awaited
Source: ksbc.kerala.gov.in
DIVIDEND AMOUNT
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.31
0.31
0.41
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.03
2.06
3.09
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
Declaration awaited
Declaration awaited
belowRs.400
Rs.400 and 16% of purchase cost / case / PL subject to minimum of Rs.66 /
above
belowRs.500
Rs.500 and 16% of purchase cost / case / PL subject to minimum of Rs.80 /
above
belowRs.1000
Rs.1000 and 16% of purchase cost / case / PL subject to minimum of
above
Excise
on Beer
23.40
per
case)
2
advance by KSBC
IMFL Import Rs. 5 per proof Paid in advance by KSBC
Fee
case)
Beer Import Rs. 2
Fee
per
litre
Paid by KSBC
Paid by KSBC
Paid by KSBC
Paid by KSBC
Tax
Surcharge on 5%
Paid by KSBC
Sales Tax
TOT
on 5%
Paid by KSBC
Gross Sales
Cess on TOT 1%
Source: ksbc.kerala.gov.in
Paid by KSBC
37
BUSINESS
The following were the amounts contributed to the State Exchequer during
previous four completed years by way of Sales Tax, Excise Duty, Vending Fee,
and License Fee etc. Figures in Crores
AMOUNT
YEAR
CONTRIBUTED
1313.64
1455.66
1622.09
1824.44
2055.71
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Source: ksbc.kerala.gov.in
Internal
Audit
and
Vigilance
Department
The Internal Audit of the Corporation is based at Head Office and has a staff
strength of 82 comprising of a Head Office Audit Team and 18 Warehouse Audit
teams. In addition to frequent inspections, the Audit team and Vigilance teams
also conducts enquires into customer and the complaints. The Audit teams
annually conduct about 3000 inspections.
TASMAC
Before take over of Retail Vending by TASMAC, the sale volume of IMFS was
148.99 lakh cases. The sale volume has increased to 229.22 lakhs during the
year 2005-06. The additional sale volume was 80.23 lakh cases. The growth rate
was
53.85%.
Before take over of Retail Vending by TASMAC, the turnover of TASMAC was
Rs.3499.75 Crores. The turnover has increased to Rs.7335 Crores during the
38
year 2005-06. The additional turnover was Rs.3835.25 Crores and the growth
rate
was
109.59%.
REVENUE TO GOVERNMENT:
Before take of Retail Vending by TASMAC, the Government Revenue through
TASMAC was Rs.2828.09 Crores. It has increased to Rs.6086.95 Crores during
the year 2005-06. The additional Government Revenue during 2005-06 was
Rs.3258.86 Crores and the growth rate was 115.23%.
DIVIDEND DECLARED :
Apart from remitting various Taxes and Duties to the Government, TASMAC is
declaring dividend every year and remits the amount to the Exchequer. The
details regarding rate and the amount of dividend declared are given below:
YEAR
AMOUNT
(Rupees in lakhs)
1999-2000
5
35.00
2000-2001
5
35.00
2001-2002
5
35.00
2002-2003
5
35.00
2003-2004
5
35.00
Source: tasmac.tn.gov.in
RATE
UNIT
Rs.93.24
& Rs.113.24
PREMIUM
SCOTCH WHISKY
Rs.113.24
BEER
Rs.4.36
DRAUGHT BEER
Rs.13.10
Source: tasmac.tn.gov.in
-55%
-70%
CLASSIFICATION
OF
IMFS
PRODUCTS:
IMFS products are classified as (1) Ordinary Brands, (2) Medium Brands and
40
(3)
Premium
Brands.
ORDINARY
BRANDS:
price
not
exceeding
Rs.429/-
per
MEDIUM
case.
BRANDS:
price
between
Rs.430/-
and
PREMIUM
Rs.504/-
per
case.
BRANDS:
Revenue in Crores
2002 03
2,828.09
2003 04
3,639
28.67%
2004 05
4,872
33.88%
2005 06
6,086.95
24.94%
2006 07
7,300
19.93%
2007 08
8,822
20.85%
2008 09
10,601.5
20.17%
41
% Change
2009 10
12,491
17.82%
2010 11
14,965
19.80%
PRICING
42
THE
PRICING
OF
INDIAN
MADE
FOREIGN
LIQUOR
43