Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evolving Design
Of Chiller Plants
By Thomas H. Durkin, P.E., Member ASHRAE
and valves, the equipment has become more efcient, and more
attention is paid to intricacies of connections. The quest is for solutions that are less expensive to build, less expensive to operate and
easier to maintain than traditional (or previous) arrangements. This
article covers the improvements in chiller plant design, the reasons
why each variation was made, the challenges and opportunities that
were presented, and the results achieved.
The evolution is driven by a continuous search for improvement, and
the only way that can happen is if the
performance of projects is tracked
and all the results and implications are
understood. The standard should never
be that systems work. That must be a
prerequisite. The standard should be
40
ASHRAE Journal
November 2005
56F) T.
T. The design T
T
T has a direct impact on pumping energy
and pump/pipe sizing.
1988: Primary/Secondary Constant Speed Pumping
Of Both Chiller Circuits
This may not sound like much of a change, but the results
were pretty interesting. While designing the nal phase of a
multiyear project that began in 1990, the last addition ended
up being larger than had been conceived three years earlier.
Faced with modifying a recently installed chiller plant to solve
a critical issue of pump capacity, 10% more ow was needed.
By removing the pressure drop (ow limiters) from the piping loop, the system curve shifted to the right far enough to
November 2005
give the capacity needed ((Figure 3). The same pump was now
delivering more ow.
This raised some interesting questions:
What do ow limiters really do?
Answer: They make system balancing easy and control
valve selection less important. If a control valve were to
fail open, the ow limiter would limit the impact on the
rest of the system, maybe even to the point of masking the
failed control valve.
What happens when the ow limiters are removed?
Answer: On the building side, nothing happens as long as
the control valves are working correctly. In the mechanical
room, additional pump capacity was found, and 3 psi (7 ft)
of head was taken off the pumps, equaling a drop in pump
energy for the life of that building.
Anything else?
Answer: In many control schemes, the winter fail-safe
freeze-protection operation for heating systems is to open
the control valves and count on the ow limiters to balance
the ow. This means that the hot water pumps are running
at 100% speed. This also means that the hot water pumps
werent sized for the building peak load, but were sized
for the larger sum of the individual spaces. And, it means
that the speed drives arent being allowed to save money
since most of the operating hours are unoccupied when the
pumps are at full speed. A much better scheme is to limit
the freeze protection valve position to some small percent
calculated to prevent freeze-ups. This will allow for pump
energy savings, and eliminate the need for ow limiters.
Installed Cost: 0.890 of baseline.
Operating Cost: 0.943 of baseline.
Payback: Immediate.
Advantages: Saves pump energy; and saves operating cost.
Disadvantage: Balancing more time consuming; control
valve and actuator selection more critical.
1996: Variable Primary Flow
This was the next logical step in the evolution of variablespeed pump systems. The constant-speed chiller primary pumps
design purpose is to provide constant ow through the chiller to
ensure safe operation. However, with modern chiller controls,
the need for constant ow through the chiller is not as critical
as a generation ago. Minimum ow will always be required.
The variable primary-ow design did away with the constantspeed chiller pumps and added chiller isolation valves. A ow
meter in the chiller inlet line monitored ow, with a setpoint
minimum corresponding to the number of chillers needed. The
ow meter would open a chiller minimum ow valve to ensure
safe operation ((Figure 4).
From a rst-cost standpoint, replacing two large pumps with
two isolation valves, adding some additional controls, and
increasing the size of the remaining pumps resulted in a net
savings. That savings is compounded by reducing the required
size of the mechanical room.
ASHRAE Journal
41
Secondary Pumps
Primary
Pumps
Secondary Pumps
Primary
Pumps Potential
Mixing
Point
Supply
Potential
Mixing
Point
Flow Limiter
Constant
Speed
Chiller
Three-Port
Control Valve
Chiller
Coil
Chiller
Constant
Speed
Supply
Variable
Speed
Flow
Limiter
DPT
Coil
Chiller
Chiller Bypass
Constant
Speed
Return
Chiller Bypass
Return
140
11 in. D
65% 70%
75%
10 in.
78%
80%
New Selection
680 gpm at 83 ft
80.5%
10 in.
100
80%
78%
9 in.
80
75%
70%
65%
25
60
hp
Original Selection
600 gpm at 90 ft
hp
15
40
20
9 in.
NPSH in Feet
120
hp
30
20
20
NSPH REQ.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Capacity in U.S. gpm
ASHRAE Journal
10
900
1000
1100
1200
0
1300
ashrae.org
November 2005
Chiller
Isolation
Valve
Flow Meter
Chiller
Chiller
Supply
Chiller Min.
Flow Valve
Chiller
Isolation Valve
DPT
DPT
Chiller
Coil
Supply
Chiller Min.
Flow Valve
DPT
Chiller
Variable Speed
Coil
DPT
Return
Variable Speed
Primary Pumps
Primary Pumps
Return
What Is Low T?
T
T?
44
ASHRAE Journal
ashrae.org
November 2005
ASHRAE Journal
ashrae.org
November 2005
Chiller Min.
Flow Valve
Chiller
Isolation
Valve
118 gpm
Chiller
Isolation
Valve
57.3F
Chiller Min.
Flow Valve
Chiller
DPT
Coil
277 Ton
Chiller
DPT
DPT
DPT
Coil
Chiller
DPT
64.4F
Variable Speed
Primary Pumps
Variable Speed
Primary Pumps
Evap.
Cond.
Dedicated Heat
Recovery Chiller
Hot Water Return
Heat recovery chillers are not intended to replace the main cooling plant, only to replace summertime boiler operation. They are an
environmentally conscious way of controlling humidity, decreasing
greenhouse gases, and providing domestic water heat.
The ideal location is where it will see the warmest entering
evaporator temperature, which is before the chiller minimum
ow bypass ((Figure
Figure 77).
). Typical sizing for a 100,000 ft2 (9290
m2) school might be a 200-ton (703 kW) main cooling plant
and a 30-ton (106 kW) DHRC.
Even though it is called a chiller, its summertime function is
to make hot water, and cooling is a by-product. That reverses in
the winter when it makes chilled water with the rejected heat
as a by-product. This is distinctly different than a heat pump,
which has reversing valves on the refrigerant side. In a DHRC,
the evaporator is always the evaporator; the condenser is always
the condenser. The control parameters differ from summer
(condenser control) to winter (evaporator control).
ASHRAE Journal
ashrae.org
November 2005
$0.07/kWh.
Cooling = $0.70.
Boiler = Off.
Heating = $0.00.
Total Option 3 = $0.70 for 100 MBTU of cooling and
125 MBTU of heating.
At these utility rates, a couple of interesting conclusions can
be drawn from this.
1. Recovered heat will always be cheaper than any boiler or
water heater arrangement.
2. It is cheaper to run the heat recovery chiller than to run the
economizers if you have a need for the rejected heat.
The potential economic benets of heat recovery have been
known for several generations, but a reliable control arrangement and a way to use the low-grade heat recovered from condensers were never easy (see Condensing Boilers sidebar).
The operating cost justication comes from eliminating
summertime reheat and minimizing the amount of economizer operation. As illogical as it sounds, the cooling control
sequences should be rewritten to make DHRC the rst call
for cooling instead of economizers for VAV and multizone
systems.
If the facility has an indoor swimming pool, the payback is
immediate, since a pool dehumidier (arguably the most expensive and complicated refrigeration device in any building)
Ghost Energy
Ghost energy refers to unintended and unnecessary energy
usage such as reheating or overcooling for no psychrometric
or comfort benet. At least three kinds of ghost energy exist:
ghost cooling, ghost heating, and ghost pumping. The term
originated with the observation that, if low T
T occurs (which
it does), and if the fundamentals of heat transfer say that it
shouldnt (which they do), then the Btus must be going somewhere (which they are). A leaky preheat valve, for example,
can create signicant ghost heating and cooling demand.
Excess ventilation, which comes with a need to dehumidify
or preheat, is also a kind of ghost energy.
Ghost cooling can be caused by authority distortion of
pressure dependent valves, which appears to be a prime
cause of low T. The actuators, especially on quarter turn
valves, are not nite enough to react quickly to variations in
system differential. The result is that VAV leaving air setpoint,
nominally at 55F (13C), is now running at 54F or 53F (12C
or 11C) (ghost cooling). No one in the space will notice the
difference, but there would then be an implied reheat load
(ghost heating).
There is ghost pumping for the additional chilled water and
heating water ows along with ghost heating and cooling.
is no longer required. The same function and same economy
can be had with conventional air-handling devices.
Installed Cost: 0.999 of baseline (no pool) or 0.830 (with
pool).
Operating Cost: 0.800 of baseline.
Payback: 4.6 years (no pool) or 0.5 years (with pool).
Advantages: Lower operating cost; some cooling redundancy, some chillers available in winter.
Disadvantages: Potentially higher rst cost; control complexity.
2005
ASHRAE Journal
ashrae.org
November 2005