Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q: An Agreement Was Made Betw. A & B. Was A © Created?: Bern - Carrasco
Q: An Agreement Was Made Betw. A & B. Was A © Created?: Bern - Carrasco
Q: An Agreement Was Made Betw. A & B. Was A © Created?: Bern - Carrasco
CONTRACTS
(Read Arts. 1305-1422)
A. General Provisions
1.
Definition
Article 1305. A contract is a meeting of minds
between two persons whereby one binds
himself, with respect to the other, to give
something or to render some service.
AUTO-CONTRACT:
1.
bern.carrasco
a)
b)
c)
ESSENTIAL
NATURAL
ACCIDENTAL
1.)
2.)
3.)
extraordinary (especialissimos)
are
those which are peculiar to a specific contract (i.e.
price in sales).
(b) NATURAL ELEMENTS
1370
intention
of
parties;
contemporaneous & subseq. Acts
based
on
(1)
(2)
Consensuality;
Autonomy;
bern.carrasco
Obligatory Force
Relativity
C.
CHARACTERISTICS
CONTRACTS:
Mutuality;
ii.
iii.
iv.
(3)
(4)
(5)
PRINCIPLES
OF
8.
contract
CONSTI
Non-impairment Clause,
legisture nor Courts may not prescribe the terms of a
legal , \freedom to w/o prior restraint;
RATIO:
STIPULATION WHEREBY STUDENT
CANNOT TRANSFER TO ANOTHER SCHOOL W/O
REFUNDING SCHOLARSHIP CASH, NULL AND
VOID.
Scholarships are awarded in recognition of
merit & NOT to keep students in school to bolster
prestige. As for the Def., scholarship award is a business
scheme designed to increase the business potential of an
educational institution.
5.
6.
7.
bern.carrasco
dissent.
Escalator clause
Valid if not potestative solely on the will of one of the
parties (violates mutuality)
EX:
of Loan/ of WORK/service/projectindependent ing
Q: w/o de-escalation clause, will still be valid?
A: yes; only the escalation clause will not be
given effect
BANCO FILIPINO SAVINGS VS NAVARRO, 152 SC
346 (87)
RATIO:
A contract which embodies an
Escalation Clause authorizing automatic increase in
interest rates in the event a law increasing the
lawful rates of interest that may be charged, does
not incl. a CB Circular, whc, although having the
face & effect of law, is not strictly a statute or a law.
An Escalation Clause to be valid must include
a de-escalation clause. There can be an inc. in int.
if incd. by law or by the Monet.Board; in order for
such stip. To be valid, it must incl. a provision for the
reduction of the stipd. interest in the event that the
applicable maximum rate of int. is reduced by law or
by the MB.
bern.carrasco
(2)
(3)
Tol:
Reqs. of axn under this article:
existence of a valid
knowledge by 3P of s existence
the
vendor-aretro against the transferee of the vendee (Art. 1608).
FLORENTINO V. ENCARNACION
RATIO:
A stipulation pour autrui is a stipulation in favor of a
third person conferring a clear and deliberate favor
upon him, and which stipulation is merely a part of a
contract entered into by the parties, neither of whom
acted as agent of the third person, and such third
person and demand its fulfillment provoked that he
communicates his to the obligor before it is revoked
BAL:
EXCEPTION: 3 parties are affected by the contract in
the following instances and can take appropriate
action:
A direct (not
subrogatory) action by the creditor against his debtors
debtor, a remedy which gives the creditor the prerogative
to act in his own name, such as the actions of the lessor
against the sublessee (Art. 1652);
the laborer of an
independent contractor against the owner/principal ER
(Art. 1729);
bern.carrasco
principal
the
RATIO:
Contract between foreign bank &
local bank asking the latter to pay an amount to a
beneficiary, is a SPA.
MARIMPERIO vs. CA
RATIO: A party who has not taken part in the
cannot sue or be sued for the performance or
cancellation thereof, unless he has a real interest
affected thereby.
In a of sublease, the personality of the
lessee does not disappear & the sublease generally
does not have any direct action against the owner of
the premises as lessor.
bern.carrasco
a. bilateral
7) According to Risk
a. commutative
A commutative contract is one in which
each of the parties acquires an equivalent of his
prestation and such equivalent is pecuniarily
appreciable and already determined from the
moment of the celebration of the contract (i.e.
lease).
b. aleatory
bern.carrasco
Baviera:
In an equitable mortgage, the property must still
first be foreclosed before ownership passes to the seller.
Distinguished fr. a pacto de retro sale, where ownership already
passes to the buyer upon perfection of the contract, but if the
right to redeem is exercised, then ownership reverts to the seller.
Pacto de retro, or conventional redemption, is
favored by creditors, bec. it does away w/ the necessity of a
foreclosure, in case the debtor fails to pay the loan. All that the
creditor has to do is to execute an affidavit consolidating
ownership in himself & register the same in the Register of
Deeds. The price in a pacto de retro sale is naturally lesser than
that in an absolute sale, bec. the sale is subject to a resolutory
condition, & also to facilitate redemption. Thus, the mere fact
that the price is not the true value of the property does not justify
the conclusion that the contract is one of mortgage.
bern.carrasco
EXCEPTION:
Real contracts, such as
deposit, pledge, and commodatum are not perfected
until the delivery of the object of the obligation (Art.
1316)
3. PERFORMANCE
4. CONSUMMATION
2.
complete
The offer must be complete, indicating with sufficient
clearness the kind of contract intended and definitely
stating the essential conditions of the proposed
contract as well as the non-essential ones desired by
the offeror.
3.
intentional
An offer without seriousness, made in such manner
that the other party would not fail to notice such lack
of seriousness, is absolutely without juridical effects
and cannot give rise to a contract (i.e. must not be
made in jest, or a prank).
Acceptance must be affirmatively and clearly made & must be
evidenced by some acts or conduct communicated to offeror,
either in formal or informal manner, & may be shown by
conduct, acts, words, by accepting party that clearly manifest
the intention to buy or sell. (Art. 1319; Adelfa Properties v. CA)
Requisites of Acceptance:
1. unequivocal
2. unconditional
o
If the acceptance is qualified, then that is a
counter-offer.
o
An amplified acceptance may or may not be
an acceptance of the original offer. It depends on the
circumstances.
o
For example, A is selling 1000 kgs. of
cement. B says he wants to buy 2000 kgs of cement.
There is no acceptance of the offer if B will only buy
2000 kgs and nothing less.
Manifestation of Acceptance:
o
An acceptance may be express or implied
(Art. 1320).
o
Silence is ambiguous. One must look at the
circumstances to determine if the silence is a form of
acceptance.
o
A
and B are own stalls which sell rice. C delivers 1000
kgs of rice to A every Sunday. If A is not there, C just
leaves it to As assistant. C tries to do business with B.
B is not there though. C leaves rice with Bs assistant.
B does not call C. Both A and B are silent. A
acceptance the rice because of the arrangement. If A
did not want to accept the rice, then A should have
called. Bs silence is not acceptance.
Q: Could there be a perfected contract in a unilateral promise
to sell?
A: Yes, a perfected contract of option is an accepted
unilateral promise whc specifies the thing to be sold and the
price to be paid, when coupled with a valuable
consideration distinct and separate from the price.
(Art. 1324)
OPTION is a contract granting a privilege to buy or sell at a
determined price w/in an agreed time (Ang Yiu Asuncion v.
CA, Dec. 2, 1994)
COGNITION Theory
Acceptance made by letter of telegram does not bind the offer
except from the time it came to his knowledge (Art. 1319, 2nd
par).
bern.carrasco
SANCHEZ V. RIGOS
It should be noted that:
1. Art. 1324 applies to s in general, whereas the 2nd par
of Art. 1479 refers to "sales" in particular, &, more specifically,
to an "accepted unilateral promise to buy or to sell." Art.
1479 is controlling in the case at bar.
2. In order that said unilateral promise may be binding upon
the promisor, Art. 1479 requires the concurrence of a
condition, namely, that the promise be "supported by a
consideration distinct fr. the price. In other words, the
promise, even if accepted, may be w/drawn if there is no
consideration distinct fr. the price. (SW Sugar case)
bern.carrasco
The law will apply the rules of the true contract and
not the ostensible contract.
Article 37. Juridical capacity, which is the fitness to be the
subject of legal relations, is inherent in every natural person
and is lost only through death.
Capacity to act, which is the power to do acts with legal
effect, is acquired and may be lost.
Article 38. Minority, insanity or imbecility, the state of
being a deaf-mute, prodigality and civil interdiction
are mere restrictions on capacity to act, and do not exempt the
incapacitated person from certain obligations, as when the
latter arise from his acts or from property relations, such as
easements.
Article 39. The following circumstances, among others,
modify or limit capacity to act: age, insanity, imbecility,
the state of being a deaf-mute, penalty, prodigality,
family relations, alienage, absence, insolvency and
trusteeship. The consequences of these circumstances are
governed in this Code, other codes, the Rules of Court, and in
special laws. Capacity to act is not limited on account of
religious belief or political opinion.
Article 739. The following donations shall be void:
(1) Those made between persons who were guilty of
adultery or concubinage at the time of the donation;
(2) Those made between persons found guilty of the
same criminal offense, in consideration thereof;
(3) Those made to a public officer or his wife,
descendants and ascendants, by reason of his office.
In the case referred to in No. 1, the action for declaration of
nullity may be brought by the spouse of the donor or donee;
and the guilt of the donor and donee may be proved by
preponderance of evidence in the same action.
Article 1476. In the case of a sale by auction:
xxx
(4) Where notice has not been given that a sale by
auction is subject to a right to bid on behalf of the
seller, it shall not be lawful for the seller to bid himself
or to employ or induce any person to bid at such sale
10
Article 1490. The husband and the wife cannot sell property
to each other, except:
bern.carrasco
1.
11
Requisites of Cause:
1. it must exist
2. it must be true
3. it must be licit
3.
4.
It
5.
bern.carrasco
2.
12
RATIO:
Only an absolute or unqualified acceptance
of a definite offer manifests the consent necessary
to perfect a contract (Article 1319, New Civil Code).
Once a contract is shown to have been
consummated or fully performed by the parties
thereto, its existence and binding effect can no
longer be disputed.
TANG v CA
RATIO:
Art. 1332. When one of the parties is unable to read,
or if the contract is in a language not understood
by him, and mistake or fraud is alleged, the person
enforcing the contract must show that the terms
thereof have been fully explained to the former.
The obligation to show that the terms of the
contract had been fully explained to the party who
is unable to read or understand the language of the
contract, when fraud or mistake is alleged,
devolves on the party seeking to enforce it.
CARIO v CA
RATIO:
Contracts whc are absolutely simulated or
fictitious are inexistent and null & void ab initio.
LAGUNZAD v GONZALES
RATIO:
Duties must comply w/s entered into
where provisions thereof are not contrary to
L/M/GC/PO/PP.
WELDON v CA
bern.carrasco
13
4.
2. SPECIAL FORM
a) for validity
If it not written, the same is void.
Examples are donations (Arts. 748, 749),
antichresis (Art. 2134),
Tolentino
Art. 1356 provides for TWO CASES where form is absolute &
indispensable, namely:
1)
the
2)
2.
If
donation
is made orally, there must be
simultaneous delivery.
Title to immov prop. does not pass fr. the donor to the
donee until & unless:
1.
The donor was duly notified thereof--Necessary that formal notice is given to the donor & the
fact that due notice has been given must be noted in the
instruments containing the offer to donate & that
showing the acceptance. Then & only then is the
donation perfected
3.
bern.carrasco
14
contract
Tolentino:
This has been defined as an undertaking by a
person, not before liable, for the purpose of securing or
performing the same duty for w/c the original debtor continues
to be liable.
The test as to whether a promise is w/in the
statute has been said to lie in the answer to the
question whether the promise is an original or a
collateral one:
bern.carrasco
15
[Tolentino]
Rationale of the SOF: Oral contracts lead to fraud in the
fulfillment of obligations, or to false testimony.
bern.carrasco
1.
2.
3.
4.
16
bern.carrasco
17
1.
Rescissible Contracts
bern.carrasco
The
refore, Art. 1381 (2) is limited to contracts which constitute
mere acts of administration (i.e. the purchase of
equipment for the cultivation of lands, purchase of
materials for repair of buildings, etc.).
iii. those undertaken in fraud of creditors when the
creditors cannot in any other manner collect the
claims due them (Art. 1381 (3))
18
for the same purpose, save those which are inherent in his
person; they may also impugn the acts which the debtor
may have done to defraud them (Art. 1177).
(1)
(2)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
bern.carrasco
19
(3) Non-perf. is the only grd. For Rsn under 1191, while there
are various reasons of equity as grds. under 1191 applies only to
recip. ds. where one party has not performed, while under
1380(+) ob. May be unilateral or reciprocal & even when K has
been fulfilled.
2. VOIDABLE Contracts
A voidable contract is a contract in which all of the
essential elements for validity are present, but the
element of consent is vitiated either by lack f legal
capacity of 1 of the contracting parties or by mistake,
violence, intimidation, undue influence, or fraud.
Voidable contracts are binding unless they are annulled
by a proper action court. They are susceptible to
confirmation.
There is a difference between confirmation and ratification:
bern.carrasco
20
bern.carrasco
1.
1344)
2.
3.
4.
a)
aside.
b)
21
Requisites of Confirmation:
i.
ii.
iii.
bern.carrasco
22
This does not fall squarely under the presumption of fraud bec.
there was a sale before judgment in 1974. If sale was after,
presumed to be fraudulent.
bern.carrasco
23
TOLENTINO:
Purpose of the Statute of Frauds: To prevent fraud &
perjury in the enforcement of obligations depending for their
evidence upon the unassisted memory of witnesses by requiring
certain enumerated contracts & transactions to be evidenced by
a writing signed by the party to be charged.
Statute Of Frauds
simply provides for the manner in w/c contracts
under it shall be proved
bern.carrasco
24
4. Void Contracts
A void contract is an absolute nullity and produces no
effect, as if it had never been executed or entered into.
The following contracts are inexistent and void from
the beginning (Art. 1409):
(a)
(b)
(c)
of
nullity
would
be
merely
bern.carrasco
2)
a judgment
declaratory
25
bern.carrasco
26