| 1—We Need Help/Clarification... | 2-We Understand and are Ready to Move Forward | LUCS- Keewagin Behavior Standards Policy — Site Self-Assessment ——————— ASSESSMENT SCALE: 1-5 3-We Are On Our Way 4 We Could Share Our Work With Other Sites... ‘Comments Expectations 1. Designat St core Fan 2. Develop a positive school focuses on proacti includes a re: necessary igagement plan that ive practices and ive re-entry plan when removal was 2 pssife Sclad- yee epyga then Hah (5% place. 3. Create a plan for teaching the expectations to all staff members and students on an annual basis and as needed during the school year ot gir 229 of Bon T's. 4. Identify a system to identify students who would benefit, from additional support from school and community | resources and a tiered system of additional instruction and supports * Establish a system to review the effectiveness of current proactive and responsive interventions ($EL CO Foam puehags 2@TL schedule for implementation and oversight of school-wide engagement plan Wed Mire WAR A OVOSIPT: 6. Record three to five positively stated expectations that serve as the foundation of the schoolwide plan. <6 Sfatepanys of cypecvaNnns. shefratiny 75 enpeefel af Fhe Zepxvng f pions att ule brcats. 1b fotahBehavior Standards Policy — Site Self-Assessment 7. Conduct quarterly data reviews for any evidence of bias for staff and students © Report behavior data quarterly to school oF discriminatory behavior to identify additional training | “SEL PD Gurtely ta ABcwss dda aul bebatiar> 8. Identify any additional based on the quarter -FEL PD 9. Identify and communicate the proactive and equitable a (din th pecfapaS ‘ 0D |. weed eee Aedile \emeed A renew Scbedafe_ itside of the classroom. Md cle%eS fave 2 clase) ggstrent plan. 12, Identify and communicate the tier and equitable approaches and interventions to be used when, ‘e not met. For each of the tiers identify practices G._Restorative re-entry plan (when removal is used) + Levels of belavin~ (7)Implementation Analysis: Positive School-wide Engagement Plan Use the following reflective questions to guide the implementation anal 1. What strategies and/or practices are being implemented? Specify if 2. What impact has the implementation had on staff? 3. What impact has the implementation had on students? 4. What evidence of implementation could you share? 5. What data are you documenting to inform the impact of your implementation? LALES— Kecwtyain luals, teams, andjor the site are implementing the strategies. Strategies That Have Been Implemented Impact on StaffjSchool Culture Impact on Students] Student Engagement. C\eeeroo LANE eSemus Skee K[(weet © Eye? raining | eee fA wine, Guo \eesous ne dt ot Gees “pax o Legging ice SOLUS OM PO (elo bigs | Dammann, \oitdiuy dakiow wy O’W wepaiwing Wn «Me + SOK . PADS P qovg TY elem | LBelwnice demh a cleemr apa. Wovd4 aw fan Powe - Ube GRMN wiad cek ews, Shudrfs Pag» CUES a | rorlered + Gudloufy use “9 vectwakwe langvaze- Community Luildiag LAG, pod Setting Lovreed Wier “ye oes Onn ™Synthesis of Implementation Analysis Strategies Implemented Impact on Practice Impact on Student Engagement October Analysis -Respmsive clegriine |e Leas piniFut, pre |i Aadliifs Geto: ee aaily a “posite. ze rec farapue- logins Pepi Cirels : Spek Seg s \, ese ome af tess] : fa: = oe, Less relevalé + Sprdlurls «sie South, baat”. January. Analysis Rebuuarg April Analysis Synthesis of implementation