You are on page 1of 8

EXPOSURE Compensation

Dim/no light

1.7

1.What changes can you see?


I can see that in dim light, high exposure compensation will make the picture really bright and the pic
2. Which do you think is the best image and why?
I think exposure compensation of 1.3 is the best because it made the picture brighter and more attrac

Un-natural light

1.7

1.What changes can you see?


I can see that in un-natural light, high exposure compensation will make the picture bright and as you
2. Which do you think is the best image and why?
I think exposure compensation of 1.7 is the best because it made the picture brighter and more attrac

Natural light

Natural light

1.7

1.What changes can you see?


In natural light, I can see that the exposure compensation is useless, because you can see slight differ
2. Which do you think is the best image and why?
If I had to choose 1 picture then I would choose 0 which is neutral.

OVERALL - Which image do you think is the best and why do you think that?
Overall, I think I would choose the 1.7 image in the dim light because I think this was the most effectiv

1.7

1.3

re really bright and the picture keeps getting bright until it reaches 0, as you go down after the 0, the picture be

e brighter and more attractive.

1.7

1.3

e picture bright and as you increase the exposure compensation, the pictures keep getting brighter, and as you

e brighter and more attractive. It also has the perfect colors, and as you move down, the color kinda fades awa

1.7

1.3

se you can see slight difference between the 2 and the -2.

k this was the most effective exposure compensation.

-1.3

-1.7

-1.3

-1.7

fter the 0, the picture becomes darker.

ting brighter, and as you go down after the 0, the picture becomes darker.

he color kinda fades away, and if I chose 2 then it would be really bright that I wont we able to see the sign.

-1.3

-1.7

-1.7

-2

-1.7

-2

able to see the sign.

-1.7

-2

You might also like