2014

The P3 Mobile
Benchmark UK
EE emerged the clear winner and took the best in test accolade
for 2014. Three ranked second overall and had the best voice
performance. O2 and Vodafone followed almost level-pegging
with a slightly better score for O2.
The first ever P3 Mobile
Benchmark UK ended in a
clear ranking of the countrys
operators. The best in
test seal was awarded to
EE, thanks to the best data
performance and a good
voice service.
Three ranked second with
the best voice performance
in the test, while O2 and
Vodafone followed almost
head-to-head.
The P3 Mobile Benchmark
used high-tech measurement equipment to test all
four UK mobile networks in
big cities, smaller cities and
on connecting routes. The
test cases were designed to
push the networks as hard as
possible, and were all based
on proven P3 measurement
methodologies.
The results show, the UK
networks provide much
better services in larger
metropolitan areas than
in smaller cities and
on
connecting
routes.
Compared
with
other

leading operators in Europe

and worldwide, all UK
networks have significant
potential to further improve
their service quality and
performance.
The newest mobile network
technology has just begun
to show what customers can
expect in the future.

Mobile

11/201

Benchm

ark UK

Introduction
The UK is one of the largest and most interesting mobile communications
markets in Europe since it is moving very quickly at the forefront of trialling
and deploying some of the newest LTE technologies.
Thus, the UK is a natural area of
focus for P3 communications, the
international leader in mobile
benchmarking. The P3 Mobile
Benchmark UK is designed to
provide an independent overview of
the current network situation in the
UK; it highlights the leading-edge
innovations in the countrys mobile
networks, but also reveals potential
weak spots in mobile service quality
as perceived by customers.

Background
The network operators are in the
process of deploying 4G technology,
also known as LTE, across large
portions of their networks; LTE-

P3 has been running similar annual public benchmarks in

Germany since 2002 and in Austria and Switzerland since
2009. This year, it also launched an Australian benchmark.
In
Germany,
Austria
and
Switzerland, the benchmark is now
widely accepted as an objective
and thorough test of network
performance, drawing on hundreds
of thousands of voice and data
measurements. It has become
a way both to improve market
transparency and for the mobile
operators themselves to measure
and compare network quality.
Today, the P3 benchmark provides
an important incentive for the
operators to continue investing
in improving their infrastructure,
services and performance. It also
gives them a perfect platform to
show how revenue from customers
is used to deliver and improve
service and quality.

capable smartphones are available

everywhere and are dominating
handset sales. For these reasons,
the P3 benchmark was conducted
using modern 4G/ LTE devices.
As
technically-minded
people
know, voice is currently a particular
challenge
when
smartphones
use LTE. At this point neither
the networks nor the end user
devices allow telephony over LTE;
for each phone call devices must
therefore switch to legacy voice
network standards like UMTS or
GSM. Mobile experts refer to this
as Circuit Switched Fallback (CSFB).
In order to use CSFB, the device
first needs to detect a UMTS or
GSM network and then switch to
it. Due to this procedure, call setup
takes longer and the possibility of
failure increases. The selected test
methodology focused specifically on
this issue.
The benchmark results were based
on several weeks of intensive
testing. Two specially equipped
measurement cars took tens of

thousands of test samples while

travelling up and down the country,
covering major metropolitan areas,
smaller cities and connecting routes
to provide the most representative
data possible. The selected areas for
the tests accounted for roughly 13
million people or 20 per cent of the
UK population.
To ensure fair competition between
the operators, each was informed
several months in advance about test
methodologies, the main focuses of
the test cases and the target areas.
It was up to each operator to decide
how best to prepare for the test.
At the same time, the P3 benchmark
was designed to be strictly
independent and impartial. The final
say for the test design, the routes
and the score weighting was ours.
And, needless to say, the operators
had absolutely no influence over the
final results. The scoring for the P3
Mobile Benchmark UK was based on
the proven scoring systems used in
other P3 benchmarks worldwide.
P3 communications has well over
a decade of experience in network
testing of this type. In 2013
alone, P3 compiled about 40,000
measurement hours in 42 countries
across five continents, with our
test vehicles covering more than
500,000 miles. P3 works with clients
around the world including network
operators, device manufacturers
and regulatory authorities.
3

Timeline 2014

Jun

Start of scoping
and planning
work.

Jul
EE, O2, Three
and Vodafone
were notified
of the planned
benchmark by
P3, including
preliminary
information
around scope,
and were invited
to provide feedback.

Sep
P3 finally defined all test
parameters.
The decision was
made to publish
the benchmark
results in
November 2014.

Oct
Testing began.
All operators
were notified
and, in turn,
were asked to
provide notice
of any outages
which might
impact results.

Nov
Testing concluded. P3 began
post-processing
on the results.
The P3 Mobile
Benchmark UK
was published.

About P3 communications

P3 communications is a leading international consulting, engineering

and testing services company. P3 communications is part of the
P3 group, which has over 2,500 employees worldwide and posted a
turnover of more than 270 million in 2013. The company provides a
broad portfolio of independent technical and management consulting
services including network planning, engineering, end-to-end
optimisation, security, QoS and QoE testing, international benchmarking,
device testing and acceptance services. P3 communications clients
include network operators, equipment vendors, device manufacturers,
public safety organisations and regulatory authorities around the world;
the companys own experts combine strong technical know-how with
many years of management experience.
4

Methodology
The basis for the benchmark was
the proven P3 measurement
methodology, used by the company
for similar testing around the
world. The methodology ensures
fair comparability of results between all operators under tests, and
yields reliable outcomes.

Smartphones

Every year P3 reviews and decides

which measurement device will be
used for the upcoming tests.
The selected smartphone must fulfil
a detailed set of requirements. It
is very important that it is widely
used in the target markets, to
ensure the benchmark results
are representative of typical enduser experience; for this reason,
P3 only considers market-leading
devices. The test smartphones must
also allow the installation of all
necessary measurement software,
making an Android operating
system mandatory. Special local
requirements are reflected by
using local versions of the devices
and, if available, operator specific
firmware.
The selected smartphone for the
2014 UK measurements was the
Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE Cat 4. This
device supports download speeds
up to 150Mbit/s.

EE, O2, Three and Vodafone

themselves provided the SIM cards
for testing and ensured that any fair
use policies which are sometimes
used to control data download
speeds for customers with very high
data usage would not interfere with
the test results. However, the P3 test
staff also anonymously purchased
SIM cards from normal retail outlets
for a control comparison, ensuring
that the SIM cards used for the test
exactly matched those commercially
available to consumers.

Measurement System

Each measurement car was

equipped with P3s custom-built
proprietary high end measurement
systems; one voice and one data
test smartphone per operator; and
a set of external antennas, mounted
in a roof top box, to ensure proper
test conditions. All smartphones
were set up with 12dB attenuation
in the antenna feeders to reflect a
balance of real-world conditions,
such as users sometimes moving
into buildings.

Roof top box

Voice Measurements

All voice test calls were mobile

to mobile, and were set up from
each car to the other. Voice
measurements were taken while
the cars were moving in cities,
waiting at hot spots, or transferring
between cities.

Speech quality was evaluated using

the Perceptual Objective Listening
Quality Analysis wideband algorithm
(POLQA). POLQA-Wideband has
become an important measurement
standard
for
next-generation
networks, as operators deploy highdefinition voice services and offer
compatible handsets. It delivers an
advanced level of benchmarking
accuracy and adds significant new
capabilities for wideband and superwideband (HD) voice signals, along
with support for the most recent
voice coding and VoIP transmission
technologies.
All test cases were executed in LTE
preferred mode, which forced the
networks to employ CSFB while the
devices were in 4G areas. Voice calls
in 3G- or 2G-only coverage areas
were operated as usual. To simulate
typical user behaviour, voice
measurements were conducted
while the test devices were handling
data traffic at the same time in this
case, by receiving emails.
Key performance metrics included
call setup times, speech quality,
call success ratios and sustainable
connections.
The difference between the last
two metrics is worth explaining.
Call success ratio looks only at
the proportion of calls that are
successfully set up and do not cut
off. The sustainable connection
measurement, on the other hand,
looks at the proportion of calls
where speech quality does not drop
below a certain minimum level more
than once or are even silent. In user
5

terms, unsustainable calls happen

when there is so much noise on the
line, or you have so many problems
hearing the other person that you
decide to give up and try again.

Data Measurements

For data measurements, a variety

of different data-specific test cases
were used. Tests included HTTP
downloads and uploads as well
as live web browsing, static web
browsing using a defined standard
web page, and YouTube video
streaming both in standard and high
resolution (2.7MB video at 360p SD,
11.9MB video at 720p HD).
The webpages were selected from
amongst the most popular sites
in the UK. For this years test, the
following pages were selected:
Google
YouTube
BBC
Ebay
Amazon

Logistics and routes

The testing was conducted in major

metropolitan areas, smaller cities
and on connecting routes. The test
vehicles drove the same overall
route around the country in parallel,
but avoided staying in the same
exact areas at the same time in
order to prevent the risk of one car
distorting the measurements of the
other. They also took different routes
within cities to maximize the area
covered. Both vehicles conducted
not just mobile drive tests but also
stationary measurements at areas
of interest such as railway stations,
airports, recreational areas and
densely populated residential areas.
These types of high-traffic and

Wikipedia
LinkedIn
Wordpress
The Telegraph
Gumtree

frequently crowded areas present

a challenge for mobile network
operators, which have to provision
and allocate sufficient capacity for
all local users.

In total, the test vehicles

covered more than 3,500

miles. Across all services

combined on all networks,
they collected more
than 160,000

data

samples and conducted

roughly 16,000 voice
calls with more than
125,000 speech
samples. In total
more than 380
Gigabytes
of data was
transferred.

A public video was used for YouTube

streaming in both resolutions.
Finally, as a stress test, as much data
as possible was pushed over the
networks within a 10 second time
window.
The key metrics for data
measurements were success ratios
and session times, as well as up- and
download speeds. One particularly

Srling

Glasgow
Paisley
East Kilbride

Edinburgh

Big Cities
Smaller Cities

Penrith

Preston Burnley

Leeds

Oldham

Manchester
Waypoints on Testing Route

important metric from a customer

point of view was the basic data
rate: the minimum speed for the top
90% of all samples.
For YouTube, the video start-up delay
and the percentage of playback
samples without interruption were
important parts of the evaluation.

London
Marlow
Witney
Cirencester
Stroud
Worcester
Droitwich Spa
Bromsgrove
Birmingham
Redditch
Evesham
Stratford-upon-Avon
Royal Leamington Spa
Nuneaton
Tamworth
Stafford
Congleton
Macclesfield
Wilmslow

Manchester
Chorley
Preston
Burnley
Bury
Oldham
Leeds
Harrogate
Penrith
Edinburgh
Dunfemline
Stirling
Falkirk
Livingston
Glasgow
Paisley
East Kilbride

Stafford

Birmingham
Evesham

Stroud
Marlow

London

Results
The results of the P3 Mobile
Benchmark UK are represented by
means of a scoring, that is used
to map the technical performance
metrics to a common scale and to
aggregate the achievements in the
different test categories to one final
count.

of mobile radio networks. Years

ago, data had almost no importance
at all, while voice and SMS texting
was key to end user perceptions.
Today, data dominates, while voice
is perceived as something of a
commodity. This might change
again once Voice over LTE (VoLTE)

The score reflects the degree of fulfilment regarding the

maximum achievable performance, while the best possible
total score is 500.
As technology moves forward and
customer demands change over
time the scoring criteria are carefully
adapted each year founding on P3
communications worldwide and
long term experience in the rating

technology is implemented, with

new challenges and opportunities
for voice services.
This way, P3 makes sure that the
score always reflects the technical
performance of the networks

compared to what is possible

with state-of-the-art technology
worldwide.
The different performance aspects
of the various test disciplines
contribute with different weights to
the final score.
The weighting was designed to
reflect the basic needs of mobile
customers and, in general, put more
emphasis on reliability and stability
than on the peak performance
of the networks. In other words,
establishing a successful call in the
first place was more important
than a minor advantage in speech
quality; by the same token, reliable
data sessions with adequate speeds
were weighted more highly than
high peak data rates.

Results: Voice Telephony

The voice score was separated
into two major sections. The first
section contained the results of the
metropolitan areas (big cities). The
other section included smaller cities
and connecting routes (Small Cities

and Transfers). The percentages

in the table indicate how much of
the maximum score in each section
were achieved by each operator.
Looking at the combined voice
results achieved in cities and on

transfer routes, Three came out

with the best voice score in the
test. EE ranked in second place
not far behind; third place went to
Vodafone, closely followed by O2.

Operator
Voice Total

max.

190

140

153

84

94

Big Cities

125

73%

75%

32%

42%

Small Cities/Transfers

65

76%

91%

68%

65%

Voice in big cities

In cities EE and Three were on par in terms of voice scoring. While EE provided a slightly better call success ratio,
Three impressed with very short call set up times and the best speech quality.
The Vodafone network delivered good speech quality but could improve on call success ratio and call set up
time. The challenges for O2 were call stability and call set up times as well as speech quality, which suffered from
missing HD voice features. All networks performed well in terms of call sustainability.
Operator

EE

Three

O2

Vodafone

97.1

96.8

91.1

92.4

Call Setup Time (s)

7.9

8.1

8.2

Speech Quality (MOS-LQO)

3.3

5.5
3.6

2.6

3.0

99.0

98.1

99.0

98.6

Voice (Big Cities)

Call Success Ratio (%)

Call Sustainability (%)

Voice in smaller cities and on transfer routes

Three provided the best voice service in the tested smaller cities and on the transfer routes, leading in all Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs). Test winner EE provided a stable voice network, followed by O2 and Vodafone.
Call success ratio on transfer routes was an area of interest for almost all operators but Three, while call sustainability was managed well.
Operator

EE

Three

O2

Vodafone

97.4
4.5
3.6
99.5

93.5

90.9

8.0

7.3

2.5

3.0

98.5

99.0

Voice (Small Cities and Transfers)

Call Success Ratio (%)

94.3

Call Setup Time (s)

7.0

Speech Quality (MOS-LQO)

3.3

Call Sustainability (%)

98.7

Results: Data
The data score was separated into
three major sections. The first
section contained the results of
the metropolitan areas (big cities),
while the other sections included
separately smaller cities (Small
Cities) and connecting routes
(Transfers). The percentages in the

table indicate how many of the

maximum points in each section
were achieved by each operator.
Overall EE achieved the highest
data score. O2 ranked second, with
Vodafone not far behind. Three
could not show comparable results

to those for its voice performance

and consequently ended up in
fourth place.
LTE has already begun to show its
potential, with top data rates of
more than 40Mbit/s measured in
metropolitan areas.

Operator

226

163

199

186

200

81%

50%

74%

72%

Web Browsing

70.0

79%

75%

90%

88%

File Download

40.0

71%

32%

58%

60%

File Upload

40.0

83%

47%

64%

66%

YouTube

50.0

90%

31%

72%

63%

Small Cities

40

45%

45%

45%

32%

Web Browsing

14.0

47%

67%

67%

47%

File Download

8.0

39%

33%

30%

23%

File Upload

8.0

49%

37%

39%

20%

YouTube

10.0

43%

29%

30%

28%

Transfers

70

66%

65%

47%

41%

Web Browsing

24.5

70%

78%

65%

54%

File Download

14.0

70%

62%

27%

28%

File Upload

14.0

82%

68%

56%

50%

YouTube

17.5

45%

45%

29%

28%

Data Total
Big Cities

max.

310

Data in metropolitan areas

All networks showed good data stability in most of the tested services, with different strengths and weaknesses.
Vodafone and O2 delivered the best browsing results, while EE showed the best YouTube performance with
impressive success ratios.
EE achieved the highest data speeds in upload and download, followed by Vodafone, O2 and Three.
Operator

EE

Three

O2

Vodafone

Success Ratio (% / %)

97.0 / 99.0

97.5 / 98.8

99.0 / 99.3

Avg. Session Time (s / s)

4.1 / 1.1

4.5 / 2.7

99.0 / 99.7
3.5 / 1.2

99.7 / 2.9
5271

98.8 / 9.9

99.4 / 3.9

99.3 / 3.4

1160

3640

4478

99.9 / 1.6
3134

99.2 / 5.2

99.7 / 2.2

99.7 / 2.6

686

2228

2225

17361
6131

6355

13232

13973

1095

3662

3925

21032
3088

6577

10343

11257

625

1316

1826

99.9 / 1.6
99.6

95.7 / 2.2

98.8 / 1.3

99.5 / 1.7

93.9

97.6

99.3

98.8 / 1.4
98.0

79.0 / 3.7

96.7 / 2.0

93.5 / 2.0

68.1

92.7

90.7

DATA SERVICES (Big Cities)

Webpage download (Live/Static)

3.8 / 1.4

File download (3MB)

Success Ratio / Avg. Session Time (% / s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
File upload (1MB)
Success Ratio / Avg. Session Time (% / s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
File download (10 Seconds)
Avg. throughput (kbit/s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
File upload (10 Seconds)
Avg. throughput (kbit/s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
Youtube SD
Success Ratio / Start Time (% / s)
Video playouts without interruptions (%)
Youtube HD
Success Ratio / Start Time (% / s)
Video playouts without interruptions (%)

10

Data in small cities

The results in the tested small cities showed where all operators could find a lot of potential to improve their data
services. Smaller cities suffered from lower success ratios, longer session times and slower data speeds.
In small cities EE, Three and O2 performed on-par, followed by Vodafone.

Operator

EE

Three

O2

Vodafone

Success Ratio (% / %)

92.3 / 97.1

96.9 / 98.5

96.6 / 97.7

94.7 / 88.5

Avg. Session Time (s / s)

5.5 / 3.3

5.3 / 3.8

5.1 / 3.4

5.5 / 4.3

98.5 / 9.0

99.3 / 10.2

98.0 / 13.5

95.5 / 14.3

1206

1142

965

682

99.3 / 7.5

99.3 / 8.6

98.9 / 7.2

94.8 / 11.8

497

563

576

290

Avg. throughput (kbit/s)

12158

6823

8355

8730

90% faster than (kbit/s)

1226

1326

924

577

Avg. throughput (kbit/s)

7585

2492

4530

4658

90% faster than (kbit/s)

486

511

349

141

97.8 / 2.4
95.5

96.6 / 2.4

97.0 / 2.2

97.1 / 2.6

94.1

92.7

94.7

90.8 / 2.6
85.1

85.6 / 4.1

78.4 / 4.1

78.0 / 4.4

77.0

70.0

71.5

DATA SERVICES (Small Cities)

Webpage download (Live/Static)

File download (3MB)

Success Ratio / Avg. Session Time (% / s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
File upload (1MB)
Success Ratio / Avg. Session Time (%/s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
File download (10 Seconds)

File upload (10 Seconds)

Youtube SD
Success Ratio / Start Time (% / s)
Video playouts without interruptions (%)
Youtube HD
Success Ratio / Start Time (% / s)
Video playouts without interruptions (%)

11

Data on transfer routes

The results on transfer routes showed even more improvement potential than those in smaller cities. Biggest
challenges were the success ratios und the very slow throughputs. All services were suffering from those
performances.
EE and Three achieved the best scores followed by O2 and Vodafone.
Operator

EE

Three

O2

Vodafone

Success Ratio (% / %)

90.9 / 95.2

94.9 / 97.9

90.8 / 85.8

87.8 / 81.4

Avg. Session Time (s / s)

5.7 / 3.0

5.5 / 4.1

5.1 / 3.6

5.5 / 4.3

99.3 / 8.1

97.9 / 9.6

84.6 / 17.9

83.3 / 16.0

1250

1299

147

138

98.8 / 7.6
471

98.7 / 9.1

89.5 / 11.2

89.0 / 16.5

450

292

179

10379
1397

7560

7059

8046

1260

69

36

Avg. throughput (kbit/s)

8699

2103

4622

4615

90% faster than (kbit/s)

370

489

45

20

97.7 / 2.5

94.3 / 2.2

94.6 / 3.2

95.9

98.2 / 2.3
97.5

91.8

91.1

83.8 / 3.3

84.8 / 3.8

69.5 / 4.7

76.5 / 4.3

78.2

77.5

60.6

67.8

DATA SERVICES (Transfers)

Webpage download (Live/Static)

File download (3MB)

Success Ratio / Avg. Session Time (% / s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
File upload (1MB)
Success Ratio / Avg. Session Time (% / s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
File download (10 Seconds)
Avg. throughput (kbit/s)
90% faster than (kbit/s)
File upload (10 Seconds)

Youtube SD
Success Ratio / Start Time (% / s)
Video playouts without interruptions (%)
Youtube HD
Success Ratio / Start Time (% / s)
Video playouts without interruptions (%)

12

Results London
The major metropolitan area of the UK is worth having a detailed view at in terms of network performances.
If the London area were to be scored separately, with the same voice and data scoring used for big cities, the
results would be as follows:

Operator

TOTAL

max.

325

255

187

185

200

Telephony

max.

125

88

88

42

57

71%

70%

33%

46%

167

99

143

143

83%

50%

71%

72%

London ONLY

Data Services
London ONLY

125

max.

200

200

It is very interesting to see Vodafone, which performed in London much better in voice. EE achieved a better data
score, while O2 and Three delivered voice and data scores in London at the same level as in the total Big City
category.

13

366
316

280

VOICE

VOICE

VOICE

DATA

DATA

DATA

DATA

The overall scores combined results

from all of the categories previously
detailed, and resulted in a clear
winner for the first P3 Mobile
Benchmark UK.
EE achieved the highest overall score
with a significant lead over secondranked Three. O2 and Vodafone
followed almost on par with each
other, with O2 having a very slight
edge.

283

VOICE

Overall
Scores

MAX.
500

11/2014
Mobile Benchmark UK

Operator

TOTAL

max.

500

366

316

283

280

Telephony

max.

190

140

153

84

94

Big Cities

125

73%

75%

32%

42%

Small Cities/Transfers

65

76%

91%

68%

65%

226

163

199

186

Data Services

max.

310

Big Cities

200

81%

50%

74%

72%

Small Cities

40

45%

45%

45%

32%

Transfers

70

66%

65%

47%

41%

14

Conclusions .
& Highlights
The P3 Mobile Benchmark was specifically designed to push the limits of the most advanced mobile network
technology currently in service.
It revealed some very well performing services and some very
well served areas, but also plenty of
potential for improvement in all UK
networks.

Comparing the UK results with

other P3 mobile benchmarks in
Europe and Australia makes it clear
that much better performances are
achievable. But the good news for

all UK customers is that the newest

technology potentially provides
for much more capability than is
currently implemented; i.e. there is
a lot more to expect.

EE achieved the best in test seal thanks to a dominant data performance

combined with a reliable and well managed voice network. But there is
potential for improvement in web browsing and data performance outside
urban areas. For EE to defend its number 1 position, some extra attention to
voice services could give it a valuable score boost for next year.

11/2014
Mobile Benchmark UK

Three finished in second place, with the best voice performance in the test. Had it not trailed
the field in data, though, it could have put a lot more pressure on EE. Once its data challenges are solved, we can expect much more from Three.

O2 delivered well in data with the second best result, but has a lot of scope to improve its
scores in voice. It was not far behind EE on data, however, with some improvements to success rates and throughput, the data story next year could be different. Higher voice success
rates and better speech quality could further strengthen O2s position.

Vodafone ended up in third place for both voice and data. But O2 only pulled ahead in the
total scoring via a slight advantage in data performance; it is a small gap to close for Vodafone to draw level with O2, and a little more ground to cover to threaten Three. With good
data results and an increased stability in voice, Vodafone could catch up in next years P3
Mobile Benchmark UK.

15

International
Benchmark
While the best UK operator achieved
a score of 366, the top performers
in Germany, Austria and Switzerland
scored in a range above 440; and
even a score above 470 was achie-

ved in the last years. The lowest values in those countries were above
325, which would still be enough for
the second place in UK.
In other words, compared with

other leading operators in Europe

and worldwide, all UK networks
have significant potential to further
improve their service quality and
performance.

The Future
The P3 Mobile Benchmark 2014 is intended to be the first in a regular
series of such reports.
The mobile industry in the UK moves very quickly and is at the forefront
of trialling and deploying some of the newest LTE technologies, such as VoLTE and LTEAdvanced. Right now, each of the operators has a number of major cutting-edge initiatives
under development to boost their networks in different ways.
We expect to see significant improvements by the time the next testing cycle begins.

P3 communications GmbH, Postfach 37 01 83, 52035 Aachen/Germany

phone +49 241 9437 400, info.communications@p3-group.com

Headquarters:
Aachen (GER), Belgrade (SRB), Morristown (NJ, USA), Sydney (AUS)

All rights reserved. The information and statements provided in this document are for informational purposes only. Any measurements, recommendations, opinions or findings
provided are only true and accurate for the conditions encountered at the time of any survey and P3 communications accepts no liability for any errors or omissions. In no event will
P3 communications be liable for any consequential, indirect or incidental damages whatsoever, including lost profits, business, contracts, revenue or anticipated savings arising out of
the use of any P3 communications products or documentation (or from errors or deficiencies therein), reliance on the data or measurements produced or information contained within.

16