Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment and
evaluation:
Observations, work
samples, feedback and
checklist
Page
3
Page
Page
Session 1
of explanations to others
Frontloading Activity:
Read and briefly investigate three different text-types so that children can
distinguish between explanatory texts, reports and recounts. Capture ideas through
talk and reading and use of different examples of the text-type- on screen, oral,
written and visual.
Group brainstorm of what students already know about explanation texts.
Brainstorm will be presented as graffiti wall.
Scaffolding Activities:
Explore and practice concepts
Move children from where they are at to where you want them to be
Leading to culminating project that allows children to visually show their
procedural and conceptual knowledge in creative way
Tim Teaching Plan and Key
Link to learning
Assessments:
e
Questions:
outcomes
State and share learning
Children will
intentions.
understand the
Mini-Lesson: Introduction to the
purpose of an
purpose of explanation texts
explanation text.
Explicitly explain to students
Observations
Observations
Page
circle formation.
.Children will
understand the
purpose of an
explanation text.
Children will
understand the
purpose of
explanation texts.
Children will be able
to communicate
their understanding
of explanations to
others.
Page
Observations and
feedback
Page
Page
Session 2
Learning Outcomes:
Explicit Text Type Knowledge
(Conceptual)
Procedural (organisation)
knowledge:
Children will be able to
communicate their
understanding of explanations
to others.
Frontloading Activity:
Have a guest (local farmer) in at the beginning of the lesson with an old and
simple milk separator.
Let the farmer use the mechanism, and the students try to explain how it works.
The teacher explains to the guest that the students have been previously focusing
on the purpose of an explanation text. The teacher then states that the students
will now be focusing on the language features of an explanation. What technical
language do we use for this mechanism? E.g. names for parts, etc.
Scaffolding Activities:
Explore and practice concepts
Move children from where they are at to where you want them to be
Leading to culminating project that allows children to visually show their
procedural and conceptual knowledge in creative way
Learning
Experiences and Key
Link to learning
Assessments:
Ti
outcomes
me Questions:
Children will
State and share learning
comprehend and
intentions.
use appropriate
Mini-Lesson: Introduction to
language features
language features of an explanation
of explanation
text
texts.
Observations
Explicitly inform students of
Observations
Children will
comprehend and
use appropriate
language features
of explanation
texts.
Page
Children will
comprehend and
use appropriate
language features
of explanation
texts.
Observations
Observations and
work samples
Children will
comprehend and
use appropriate
language features
of explanation
texts.
Observations and
feedback
Page
10
11
Session 3
Page
Page
12
Children will
understand the
structure of an
explanation text.
Children will be able
to communicate
their understanding
of explanations to
others.
Observations and
work samples.
Observations and
work samples
13
Page
Observations and
feedback
Extension activity:
Students should not need an
extension activity. If groups finish
earlier than others, they can identify
and label a more complex
explanation text.
Share Time
In the last few minutes of the
session, the teacher asks students
(in circle formation) to share
something they learnt during the
session and/or something they
would like to learn more about.
Materials/ Resources:
Larger butcher paper and textas, smart board, My Place episode 14, variety of
explanation text type examples, list of language features from previous lesson, structure
strips (A3 and A4).
14
Session 4
Page
structure of explanation
texts.
Together the highlight these
features that were evident in
the teachers oral
presentation.
Background knowledge:
The students in their history
unit have been learning
about how food and
technology has changed
since Henrys era. The unit
requires students to create a
technological invention used
for food processing or
manufacturing. The students
have the choice of creating
an already existing invention,
adapting an invention to
improve it or create their
Children will
understand the
structure of an
explanation text.
Children will
comprehend and
use appropriate
language features
of explanation
texts.
15
Page
Observations
Work samples
Observations
16
Page
Share Time:
In the last few minutes of the
session, the teacher asks students
(in circle formation) to share
something they learnt during the
session and/or something they
would like to learn more about.
Materials/ Resources:
Students research information, students invention models, appendix, computers,
inventors coat.
17
Session 5
Page
Scaffolding Activities:
Explore and practice concepts
Move children from where they are at to where you want them to be
Leading to culminating project that allows children to visually show their
procedural and conceptual knowledge in creative way
Learning Experiences and Key
Link to session
Assessments:
Ti
Questions:
learning
me
outcomes
Children will know
and understand the
writing process.
Work samples
Checklist
Children will
understand the
structure of an
explanation text.
Children will
comprehend and
use appropriate
language features
Work samples
of explanation
texts.
18
Page
Drafting:
Students who are competent
and ready for begin to draft
their explanation text are
asked to begin. Students can
choose between writing and
typing their draft.
Students are asked (as part
of the drafting and reworking
phase) to get three peers to
give feedback on their work
before they ask the teacher
to look at it.
Students, who do not feel
comfortable yet, are welcome
to stay on the floor for an
interactive writing experience
with the teacher on creating
an explanation text together
before they begin writing
their draft.
There is no deadline for the
completion (published copy)
of students explanation text,
as all students will work at
their own rate.
Extension activity:
Move through the phases of
the writing process to
completion- publish copy.
Share Time:
Authors circle (Wing Jan, 2009,
p.118):
In the last few minutes of the
session, the teacher asks students
(in circle formation) to share what
phase they are at in the writing
process and share their own
attempts and provide/be given
valuable feedback.
Materials/ Resources:
Students model invention, graphic organiser
of the writing process.
Children will
understand the
purpose of an
explanation text.
Feedback
Children will
comprehend and
use appropriate
language features
of explanation
texts.
19
Page
20
Page
21
Page
appropriate education for all (Huebner, 2010). Differentiation can be achieved in many
ways, such as through explicit instruction and Blooms taxonomy. Blooms taxonomy uses
a hierarchy of questions to support differentiation in the classroom so all students have
the opportunity to engage in and answer stimulating questions for all levels of
understanding (Taylor & Oakely, 2007). Blooms taxonomy is used across the literacy
programme, but can be specifically identified in lesson one, after the students watch the
My Place episode 14.
Explicit instruction also occurs regularly throughout the entire program. As writing
is a complex process and learning of and about text types does not happen
automatically, students need to be explicitly taught the writing demands of an
explanation text type, such as its purpose and audience, structure and language features
(Wing Jan, 2009; Pinnell & Fountas, 2007). At the beginning of each of the five lessons, is
a mini-lesson where the focus, such as lesson two has a focus on language features of an
explanation text, is explicitly stated to the students. Explicit approaches have been found
to be effective in teaching academic content, such as text types, to at-risk children, such
as ESL learners, but is beneficial for all learners, including the talented (McNamara, 2007;
Vacca, Vacca & Mraz, 2011). What also needs to be and was made explicit to all students
in any literacy program, is learning intentions. Learning is assisted if learning
intentionsare shared with, committed to, and understood by the learner (Hattie, 2009,
p.23). Learning intentions for the program are shared at the beginning of each lesson and
are the same for all students, as the aim of AusVELS English is the same for all students
(AusVELS, 2013; Pinnell & Fountas, 2007). Teachers therefore must have high
expectations for all.
Teachers need to effectively communicate to all students that they expect that
they will learn and achieve the learning intentions, and to a high standard (Wing Jan,
2009). High expectations are vitally important as consistent evidence suggests that all
students, especially ESL learners, achieve higher educational outcomes when teachers
expectations are high (Hammond, 2012). The literacy program teaching of and about
explanation texts is a high challenge program. What is more vitally important, though,
teachers setting the same high expectations for all students in a mixed-ability classroom,
is for those teachers to provide differentiated levels of support to ensure that all
students have a fair chance to achieve those expectations (Hammond, 2012, p.230).
ESL learners will require a greater level of support than perhaps other students, through
scaffolding.
22
Page
ESL learners engage in the writing process through the expert assistance of the
teacher and the support of their classroom peers through scaffolding methodology
(Pinnell & Fountas, 2007). Scaffolding is the most effective strategy for the language and
literacy development of all ESL learners, according to Hammond (2001). Scaffolding can
be defined as helping learners to do what they cannot do at first through providing
various levels of support leading to independence (Vacca et al., 2011, p.127). The
program includes various opportunities, through instruction and activities, that involve
the use of different levels of scaffolding, from intense support by the teacher, to students
independence is: modelled, shared, guided and independent writing (Hill, 2012). A
perfect example of providing various levels of support leading to independence is in
lesson three. The lesson begins with explicitly informing students about the specific
structure of an explanation text through modelling. The teacher and students then
reconstruct an explanation text focusing on the structure (shared/guided writing) and this
activity is followed with students in pair or individually deconstructing a text to identify
its structure (independence).
To evaluate the level of support students need, students are assessed regularly
during the program. Assessment can provide information that offers insights about what
should be taught, retaught, and extended as students move towards independence as
learners (Lapp, Fisher & DeVere Wolsey, 200, 31). The forms of assessment used in the
program are informal, authentic assessments such as observations, work samples and a
checklist for the final published writing product (explanation text about students
invention). These forms of assessment are important in mixed-ability classrooms with a
high number of ESL learners because more traditional assessment methods, such as
standardised tests, are often primarily language-based and prove difficult for ESL
learners to use in demonstrating their growing skills and abilities (Herrell & Jordan, 2004;
Winch, Johnston, March, Ljungdahl & Holliday, 2010). Furthermore, other ways to support
ESL learners learning through and in mainstream curriculum is to make ESL learners feel
more comfortable and safe by including aspects of their native culture in the classroom
(provided books about/from their culture), speak slowly and clearly, using gestures and
visual cues (many diagrams and images provided throughout instruction/activities), and
as the ESL learners are learning English through full English immersion strategy it is
important they interact with the teacher and their peers as this method relies on the
social aspect of learning (Hill 2012; Herrell & Jordan, 2004). Learning is a collaborative
process and requires dialogue (Hattie, 2010, p.39). Students have many opportunities
for group work within the program.
23
The program not only caters for ESL learners, but also caters for the needs of
Page
gifted students. Collaborative learning and peer tutoring can assist gifted students
literacy learning by demonstrating their developing literacy skills to their less
experienced literacy peers, such as ESL learners. This is known as role reversal (Wing Jan,
2009; Taylor & Okaely, 2007). Talented students also thrive in learning environments that
allow choice. Choice builds responsibility for, and independence of learning. Talented
students may choose more complex inventions to create during the program, promoting
engagement and motivation (Taylor & Oakely, 2007). All students are provided with the
choice of their topic (invention) and choices to work independently or in groups, or the
level of support they require. For example, students in lesson five are left with the
responsibility of deciding whether they begin writing their draft or require more support
before the drafting process. The best learning environments offer a large variety of
choices to satisfy individual abilities and talents (Blaz, 2006, p.5).
References:
AusVELS. (2013). AusVels. Retrieved from
http://ausvels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/English/Overview/Diversity-of-learners
24
Page
Blaz, D. (2006). Differentiated Instruction : A Guide for Foreign Language Teachers. Larchmont,
NY, USA: Eye On Education. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.com
Hattie, J. (2009/2012). Visible Learning for Teachers. London and New York: Routledge.
Hammond, J. (2001). Scaffolding: teaching and learning language and literary education.
Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
Hammond, J. (2012). Hope and challenge in The Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL
students and their teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(2), 223
240.
Herrell, A., & Jordan, M. (2004). Fifty Strategies for Teaching English Language Learners (2nd ed.).
New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Hill, S. (2012). Teaching English Language Learners in Developing Early Literacy: Assessment
and Teaching (2nd ed.). South Yarra, VIC: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.
Lapp, D., Fisher, D. & DeVere Wolsey, T. (2009). Literary Growth for Every Child: Differentiated
small-group instruction K-6. New York: The Guilford Press.
Pinnell, G.S., & Fountas, C. (2007). The continuum of literacy learning, Grades K-8: Behaviors
and understandings to notice, teach, and support. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.
Page
25
Taylor, T. & Oakely, G. (2007). Catering for gifted students in the literacy classroom. Practically
Primary, 12(1), 21 26.
Vacca, R.T., Vacca, J.A.L., & Mraz, M. (2011). Content Area Reading: Literacy and learning across
the curriculum (10th ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson Education Inc.
Winch, G., Johnston, R., March, P., Ljungdahl, L., Holliday, M. (2010). Literacy (4th ed.). Melb, VIC:
Oxford University Press.
Wing Jan, L. (2009). Write Ways: Modelling writing forms (3rd ed.). Australia, South Melbourne:
Oxford University Press.