This document outlines the structure and content of a 3rd semester L.L.B. degree examination in Company Law given in January 2011. The exam has 3 parts: Part A consists of short answer questions worth 24 marks total; Part B consists of 2 essay questions worth 18 marks each for a total of 36 marks; Part C consists of 2 case comment questions worth 20 marks each for a total of 40 marks. The document provides sample questions for Parts A, B, and C that examine various topics in Company Law, including doctrines, types of companies, directors' duties, modes of winding up companies, and legal issues related to shares, debentures, and financial statements.
This document outlines the structure and content of a 3rd semester L.L.B. degree examination in Company Law given in January 2011. The exam has 3 parts: Part A consists of short answer questions worth 24 marks total; Part B consists of 2 essay questions worth 18 marks each for a total of 36 marks; Part C consists of 2 case comment questions worth 20 marks each for a total of 40 marks. The document provides sample questions for Parts A, B, and C that examine various topics in Company Law, including doctrines, types of companies, directors' duties, modes of winding up companies, and legal issues related to shares, debentures, and financial statements.
This document outlines the structure and content of a 3rd semester L.L.B. degree examination in Company Law given in January 2011. The exam has 3 parts: Part A consists of short answer questions worth 24 marks total; Part B consists of 2 essay questions worth 18 marks each for a total of 36 marks; Part C consists of 2 case comment questions worth 20 marks each for a total of 40 marks. The document provides sample questions for Parts A, B, and C that examine various topics in Company Law, including doctrines, types of companies, directors' duties, modes of winding up companies, and legal issues related to shares, debentures, and financial statements.
THIRDSEMESTER Paper III COMPANY LAW (Revised Regulations w.e.f. 2009-2010) Time: 3 Hours Max Marks: 100 Part-A (Short Answer Questions) Write short notes on any six questions of the following Each question carries 4 Marks (Marks: 6x4=24) 1. Doctrine of ultra virus 2. Promoters. 3. Difference between private company and public company. 4. Debentures. 5. Advantages of incorporation of a public limited company. 6. Quorum for the Board meeting. 7. Official liquidator. 8. Prospectus. 9. Statutory Meeting. Part-B (ESSAY TYPE QUESTIONS) Answer any Two of the following Each question carries 18 marks (Marks: 2x18=36) 10. Describe the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil.
11. What is the procedure for transfer for shares and
restrictions on transfer? 12. What is the position of directors in a public limited company? 13. What are the various modes of winding-up of public limited? Part-c (Case Comment Type questions) Answer any two questions Each question carries 20 marks (Marks: 2x20=40) 14. The Tata Nano Company got power by its articles of association to issue debentures by passing an ordinary resolution in the Board of Directors. The Managing Director issued bonds to a without the requisite resolution. After two years. A sued the company for the recovery of money under the bonds. 15. A buys 100 shares of a public limited company from B through a stock broker He receives the share certificate and blank transfer deed signed by B but not lodge the transfer deed for registration.
Examine the legal effect of the
unregistered transfer between the Transferor and
transferee.
16. The Board of Directors of Satyam Co. Ltd.
Appointed Raju as the Managing Director and gave him all powers of management of the companys affairs. Raju had manipulated the accounts of the company to show that the company is running on very sound lines.
But he stated after two years
that he manipulated the accounts. How far he is
responsible for the loss of the shareholders? 17. The executive Director of a company purchased some stationery for the company but took it to his house for private use.
The company refused to
pay the supplier of the stationery on the plea that