Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) is an economic and
geopolitical organization of eight countries that are primarily located in South Asia or Indian
subcontinent. The SAARC Secretariat is based in Kathmandu, Nepal. The combined economy of
SAARC is the 3rd largest in the world in the terms of GDP (PPP) after the United States and
China and 5th largest in the terms of nominal GDP. SAARC nations comprise 3% of the world's
area and contain 21% (around 1.7 billion) of the world's total population and around 9.12% of
Global economy as of 2015. India makes up over 70% of the area and population among these
eight nations. All non-Indian member states except Afghanistan share borders with India but only
two other members, Pakistan and Afghanistan, have a border with each other. During 2005-10,
the average GDP growth rate of SAARC stood at an impressive 8.8% p.a., but it slowed to 6.5%
in 2011 largely because of economic slowdown in India, which accounts for nearly 80% of
SAARC's economy. But driven by a strong expansion in India, coupled with favorable oil prices,
from the last quarter of 2014 South Asia once again become the fastest-growing region in the
world.
The idea of regional political and economical cooperation in South Asia was first raised in 2 May
1980 by Bangladesh President Ziaur Rahman and the first summit was held in Dhaka on 8
December 1985, when the organization was established by the governments of Bangladesh,
Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Since then the organization has
expanded by accepting one new full member, Afghanistan, and several observer members.
The SAARC policies aim to promote welfare economics, collective self-reliance among the
countries of South Asia, and to accelerate socio-cultural development in the region. The SAARC
has developed external relations by establishing permanent diplomatic relations with the EU, the
UN (as an observer), and other multilateral entities. The official meetings of the leaders of each
nation are held annually whilst the foreign ministers meet twice annually.
2. History
The idea of co-operation in South Asia was discussed in at least three conferences: the Asian
Relations Conference held in New Delhi on April 1947; the Baguio Conference in
the Philippines on May 1950; and the Colombo Powers Conference held in Sri Lanka in April
1954.
In the ending years of the 1970s, the seven inner South Asian nations that included Bangladesh,
Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka agreed upon the creation of a trade bloc
and to provide a platform for the people of South Asia to work together in a spirit of friendship,
trust and understanding. President Ziaur Rahman later addressed official letters to the leaders
of the countries of the South Asia, presenting his vision for the future of the region and the
compelling arguments for region. During his visit to India in December 1977, President Ziaur
Rahman discussed the issue of regional cooperation with the Indian Prime Minister Morarji
Desai. In the inaugural speech to the Colombo Plan Consultative Committee which met in
Kathmandu also in 1977, King Birendra of Nepal gave a call for close regional cooperation
among
South
Asian
countries
in
sharing
river
waters. After
the USSR's intervention in Afghanistan, the efforts to established the union was accelerated in
1979 and the resulting rapid deterioration of South Asian security situation. [19] Responding to
the President Ziaur Rahman and King Birendra's convention, the officials of the foreign
ministries of the seven countries met for the first time in Colombo in April 1981. The
Bangladesh's
proposal
was
promptly
endorsed
by Nepal, Sri
Lanka,
Bhutan and
the Maldives but India and Pakistan were skeptical initially. The Indian concern was the
proposals reference to the security matters in South Asia and feared that President Ziaur
Rahman's proposal for a regional organization might provide an opportunity for new smaller
neighbors to renationalize all bilateral issues and to join with each other to gang up against India.
Pakistan assumed that it might be an Indian strategy to organize the other South Asian countries
against Pakistan and ensure a regional market for Indian products, thereby consolidating and
further strengthening Indias economic dominance in the region.
However, after a series of quiet diplomatic consultations between South Asian foreign ministers
at the UN headquarters in New York from August to September 1980, it was agreed that
Bangladesh would prepare the draft of a working paper for discussion among the foreign
secretaries of South Asian countries. The foreign secretaries of the inner seven countries again
delegated a Committee of the Whole in Colombo on September 1981 which identified five broad
areas for regional cooperation. New areas of co-operation were added in the following years.
In 1983, the international conference held by Indian Minister of External Affairs P.V. Narasimha
Rao in New Delhi, the foreign ministers of the inner seven countries adopted the Declaration on
South Asian Association Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and formally launched the
Integrated Program of Action (IPA) initially in five agreed areas of cooperation namely,
Agriculture; Rural Development; Telecommunications; Meteorology; and Health and Population
Activities.
Officially, the union was established in Dhaka with Kathmandu being union's secretariatgeneral. The first SAARC summit was held in Dhaka on 78 December 1985 and hosted by
the President of Bangladesh Hussain Muhammad Ershad. The declaration signed by King of
Bhutan Jigme Singye, President of Pakistan Zia-ul-Haq, Prime Minister of India Rajiv
Gandhi, King of Nepal Birendra Shah, President of Sri Lanka JR Jayewardene, and President
of Maldives Maumoon Gayoom.
Deeper economic cooperation among the South Asian countries can avoid high costs to
consumers.
To integrate the SAARC countries and to get benefit from economic interdependence.
3
Increases the intra-regional trade as well as promotion of trade with other part of the
world.
4. Objectives of SAARC
The objectives of the Association as defined in the Charter are:
i) To promote the welfare of the peoples of South Asia and to improve their quality of life;
ii) To accelerate economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region and
to provide all individuals the opportunity to live in dignity and to realize their full potential;
iii) To promote and strengthen collective self-reliance among the countries of South Asia;
iv) To contribute to mutual trust, understanding and appreciation of one anothers problems;
v) To promote active collaboration and mutual assistance in the economic, social, cultural,
technical and scientific fields;
vi) To strengthen co-operation with other developing countries;
vii) To strengthen co-operation among themselves in international forums on matters of
common interest; and
viii) To cooperate with international and regional organizations with similar aims and
purposes.
The Declaration on South Asian Regional Cooperation was adopted by the Foreign Ministers in
1983 in New Delhi. During the meeting, the Ministers also launched the Integrated Program of
Action
(IPA)
in
nine
agreed
areas,
namely,
Agriculture;
Rural
Development;
5. Secretariat
The SAARC Secretariat was established in Kathmandu on 16 January 1987 and was inaugurated
by Late King Birendra Bir Bikram Shah of Nepal.
It is headed by a Secretary General appointed by the Council of Ministers from Member
Countries in alphabetical order for a three-year term. He is assisted by the Professional and the
General Services Staff and also an appropriate number of functional units called Divisions
assigned to Directors on deputation from Member States.
The Secretariat coordinates and monitors implementation of activities, prepares for and services
meetings and serves as a channel of communication between the Association and its Member
States as well as other regional organizations.
The Memorandum of Understanding on the establishment of the Secretariat which was signed by
Foreign Ministers of member countries on 17 November 1986 at Bangalore, India contains
5
various clauses concerning the role, structure and administration of the SAARC Secretariat as
well as the powers of the Secretary-General.
In several recent meetings the heads of state or government of member states of SAARC have
taken some important decisions and bold initiatives to strengthen the organization and to widen
and deepen regional co-operation.
The SAARC Secretariat and Member States observe 8 December as the SAARC Charter Day.
6. Regional Centers
The SAARC Secretariat is supported by following Regional Centers established in Member
States to promote regional co-operation. These Centers are managed by Governing Boards
comprising representatives from all the Member States, SAARC Secretary-General and the
Ministry of Foreign/External Affairs of the Host Government. The Director of the Centre acts as
Member Secretary to the Governing Board which reports to the Programming Committee.
Figure-01: Exports and Imports share of Major Trade Groups (in percentage)
10
11
SAFTA was envisaged primarily as the first step towards the transition to a South Asian Free
Trade Area (SAFTA) leading subsequently towards a Customs Union, Common Market and
Economic Union. In 1995, the Sixteenth session of the Council of Ministers (New Delhi, 1819
December 1995) agreed on the need to strive for the realization of SAFTA and to this end an
Inter-Governmental Expert Group (IGEG) was set up in 1996 to identify the necessary steps for
progressing to a free trade area. The Tenth SAARC Summit (Colombo, 2931 July 1998)
decided to set up a Committee of Experts (COE) to draft a comprehensive treaty framework for
creating a free trade area within the region, taking into consideration the asymmetries in
development within the region and bearing in mind the need to fix realistic and achievable
targets. The SAFTA Agreement was signed on 6 January 2004 during Twelfth SAARC Summit
held in Islamabad, Pakistan. The Agreement entered into force on 1 January 2006, and the Trade
Liberalization Program commenced from 1 July 2006. Under this agreement, SAARC members
will bring their duties down to 20 per cent by 2009. Following the Agreement coming into force
the SAFTA Ministerial Council (SMC) has been established comprising the Commerce Ministers
of the Member States. In 2012 the SAARC exports increased substantially to US$354.6 billion
from US$206.7 billion in 2009. Imports too increased from US$330 billion to US$602 billion
over the same period. But the intra-SAARC trade amounts to just a little over 1% of SAARC's
GDP. In contrast, in ASEAN (which is actually smaller than SAARC in terms of size of
economy) the intra-bloc trade stands at 10% of its GDP.
12
11. Awards
11.1 SAARC Award
The Twelfth Summit approved the SAARC Award to support individuals and organizations
within the region. The main ends of the SAARC Award are:
13
To honor any other contributions and achievement not covered above of individuals and
organizations in the region.
The SAARC Award comprises of a gold medal, a letter of citation, and cash prize of US $25,000.
Since the institution of the SAARC Award in 2004, it has been awarded only once and the Award
was posthumously conferred upon the late President Ziaur Rahman of Bangladesh.
14
2006: Promotion of Tourism in South Asia Syed Zafar Abbas Naqvi (Pakistan)
2008: Protecting the Environment in South Asia Uswatta Liyanage Deepani Jayantha
(Sri Lanka)
12. Anthem
SAARC does not have an official anthem like some other regional organizations (e.g. ASEAN).
A poem by poet-diplomat Abhay Kumar spurred a search for a better SAARC Anthem. Nepal's
foreign minister has expressed the need for a SAARC anthem to connect SAARC nations. Nepal
at the 18th summit in Kathmandu in November 2014 planned to introduce proposal for a
SAARC Anthem in the agenda of summit when heads of all member states meet here.
15
Naeem U. Hasan
Nihal Rodrigo
Q. A. M. A. Rahim
Chenkyab Dorji
Ahmed Saleem
16
Date
1st
78 December 1985
2nd
Country
Host
Host leader
Bangladesh
Dhaka
India
Bengaluru
Rajiv Gandhi
3rd
24 November 1987
Nepal
Kathmandu
4th
Pakistan
Islamabad
Benazir Bhutto
5th
Maldives
Mal
6th
21 December 1991
Sri Lanka
Colombo
Ranasinghe Premadasa
7th
Bangladesh
Dhaka
Khaleda Zia
8th
24 May 1995
India
New Delhi
P V Narasimha Rao
9th
Maldives
Mal
Sri Lanka
Colombo
Chandrika Kumaratunga
Nepal
Kathmandu
Pakistan
Islamabad
Bangladesh
Dhaka
Khaleda Zia
17
India
New Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Sri Lanka
Colombo
Mahinda Rajapaksa
Bhutan
Thimphu
Jigme Thinley
Maldives
Addu
Mohammed Nasheed
Nepal
Kathmandu
Sushil Koirala
Pakistan
Islamabad
17th
1011
November
2011[62]
18
In 1993, SAARC countries signed an agreement to gradually lower tariffs within the region, in
Dhaka. Eleven years later, at the 12th SAARC Summit at Islamabad, SAARC countries devised
the South Asia Free Trade Agreement which created a framework for the establishment of a free
trade area covering 1.4 billion people. This agreement went into force on January 1, 2006. Under
this agreement, SAARC members will bring their duties down to 20 per cent by 2007.
in various fields. The details of work Program under each agreed areas of cooperation can be
viewed by clicking the respective links.
20
A Memorandum of Understanding was signed with the United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development (UNCTAD) in February 1993 on UNCTAD Database on Trade Control Measures
and Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS).
A Memorandum of Understanding on cooperation between SAARC and the European
Commission was signed in July 1996 under which projects for cooperation have been identified
out of which some have already been implemented.
A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has also been signed with the German Metrology
Institute with regard to capacity building for the harmonization of Standards among the SAARC
countries.
21
Despite the sincere attempts of the Association, there are several factors that stand in the way of
economic integrity among the SAARC nations. The clashes between India and the neighboring
countries have prevented the SAARC members to make the most of the economic benefits
derived from the Association.
This has prompted the South Asian countries to go for bilateral trading activities instead of
getting involved in multilateral trade agreements. However, the Association is expected to take
more proactive steps to improve the economic relationship among its members.
Besides devising policies for economic integration, SAARC is supposed to function as a medium
to facilitate discussions among the South Asian nations. Seminars and conferences are going to
be helpful measures for promoting cross border trade and investment.
As an aftermath of globalization, Indian government has resorted to open trade policy. The
economic reforms of early 1990s have opened an array of challenges for the Indian
entrepreneurs. The growth rate of the Indian economy was around 7% during the period from
1994-1997. The inflow of foreign fund also recorded substantial increase.
All these resulted from the flexible economic policies adopted by the Indian government. The
economic prosperity of India prompted the other SAARC members to seek resort to international
trade as a platform for economic growth.
Both Sri Lanka and Nepal have shown their interests to enhance intra-regional trade. Bangladesh
is also following the same trend. With the increased intra-regional trading activities, the
economic relationship among the SAARC nations is bound to be stronger in future.
1997
0.08
19.69
0.15
1998
0.04
14.82
0.16
1999
0.03
12.37
0.07
2000
0.03
6.66
0.01
2001
0.03
10.88
0.00
22
2002
0.02
13.40
0.02
2003
0.01
14.16
0.00
2004
0.01
11.34
0.00
2005
0.00
10.86
0.00
2006
0.00
10.36
0.00
2007
0.00
11.71
0.00
PAKISTAN
SRI LANKA
0.96
0.20
21.08
1.11
0.12
16.24
1.24
0.12
13.83
1.40
0.13
8.22
1.28
0.12
12.31
1.24
0.01
14.70
1.22
0.09
15.51
1.25
0.08
12.59
1.24
0.09
12.20
1.70
0.10
12.16
SOUTH
ASIA
TOTAL
REST OF 78.92 83.76 86.17 91.73 87.69 85.30 84.49 87.41 87.80 87.84
THE
WORLD
Figure-10: Share of Bangladeshs import from SAARC Countries in its total Imports
1.58
0.09
13.39
86.61
***Source: UN COMTRADL
Countries
BHUTAN
INDIA
NEPAL
PAKISTAN
SRI LANKA
SOUTH ASIA
TOTAL
REST OF
THE WORLD
1997
0.00
0.59
0.13
0.85
0.12
1.69
1998
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.65
0.03
0.88
1999
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.79
0.07
1.17
2000
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.91
0.10
1.36
2001
0.00
0.43
0.02
0.56
0.06
1.07
2002
0.00
0.47
0.01
0.57
0.04
1.09
2003
0.03
0.64
0.01
0.56
0.09
1.33
2004
0.05
1.27
0.01
0.57
0.12
2.02
2005
0.02
1.90
0.01
0.87
0.13
2.93
2006
0.00
1.95
0.01
0.48
0.11
2.55
2007
0.00
1.78
0.01
0.47
0.13
2.39
98.31
99.12
98.83
98.64
98.93
98.91
98.67
97.98
97.07
97.45
97.61
In recent years, there has been an increased interest in regional economic integration in South
Asia. Regional integration in South Asia got the momentum in 1995 when the South Asian
Preferential Trading Arrangements (SAPTA) came into force. In early 2004, SAARC member
countries agreed to form a South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA), which came into force from
July 1, 2006. Bangladesh is negotiating with India, Pakistan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka for regional
FTAs.
In order to achieve rapid economic development through intensifying trade relation by gradually
removing tariff, non-tariff and para-tariff barriers amongst the member countries. An FTA among
economies such as Bangladesh-SAARC would likely maximize the gains from trade.
SAPTA was signed with a view to promoting and sustaining mutual trade and economic
cooperation within the SAARC region through exchange of tariff concession. Since 1995, four
rounds of negotiations have been concluded and tariff concessions on around 5,500 products
23
were exchanged. Products coverage and extent of concessions granted by the member countries
under SAPTA to LDCs were not significant, except those by India.
Moreover, for SAARC countries, India had removed in 1998 all quantitative restrictions that it
maintained till 2003 for others. The preferential tariff concession offered by India for
Bangladeshi export products was mainly for fertilizers, sugar confectionery, biscuits, leather
products, footwear, jute products, cosmetics, soaps, ceramic products, textiles, artificial flowers,
electrical goods, clocks and watch, furniture, plastic products, textiles etc.
Until 1951, total intra-regional trade in South Asia as a percentage of the region's total trade was
double. However, as South Asia became progressively more closed to the world market, and as
political rivalry between India and Pakistan intensified over time, intra-regional trade came down
to just 2% of the region's total trade by 1967. The share began to grow during the 1990's
following multilateral trade liberalization in these countries, and by 2002 it rose to 4.4% (Baysan
et al. 2006). Bangladesh is the second largest importer in South Asia. In 2007, Bangladesh
accounted for 26% of total intra-regional import.
In contrast, in 2007, Bangladesh's exports to the region accounted for only 6% of the total
regional exports, implying that it has a large deficit in its trade with the region. Bangladesh's
trade with other SAARC countries is also highly unequally distributed. Bangladesh trades very
little with Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka.
In South Asia, India is the major trading partner of Bangladesh with Pakistan a distant second.
But trade with India is one-sided, as the volume of imports from India to Bangladesh is much
larger than the volume of exports from Bangladesh to India. Therefore, Bangladesh has a large
bilateral trade deficit with India which has increased over time.
Bangladesh exports constitute a miniscule (1%) share of India's imports, a negligible share (1%)
of its own exports and cover only a small range of products (fertilizer and jute goods made up
two-thirds of exports), though ready-made garment (RMG ) is the major export item for
Bangladesh, very little is exported to India.
24
South Asia has not been a significant export destination of Bangladeshi export products. In facts,
over the last 10 years, there has not been any major change in this pattern. In 1997, Bangladesh's
exports to the South Asian region accounted for only 1.69% of her total exports, which, by 2007,
rose to only 2.39%.
Figure 11 also suggests that over time, Bangladesh's dependence on South Asia as a source of her
imports declined. In 1997, Bangladesh's imports from South Asian region accounted for 21.08%
of her total imports, which by 2007 declined to 13.39%. In other words despite all the trade
agreements to promote Bangladesh within the region, it did not show much improvement
between 1997 and 2007.
The existing trade relation of Bangladesh with SAARC countries implies that during the past
decade trading in both directions -- export and import -- has increased markedly. However,
having explored the implications of negotiating FTAs with SAARC member countries, it appears
that the possibility of an FTA with India should be examined for all possible implications. At
present the trade gap with India compared to other SAARC countries is very high. In this case,
Bangladesh will have to look for broadening her category of non-traditional items to increase
export to SAARC member countries.
A recurrent theme for all trade negotiations is the need for skillful negotiators. Unfortunately,
Bangladesh has not built up this capacity; our resources are few and far between. Most countries
we negotiate with have trained and experienced negotiators.
***Source: The Daily Star (Wednesday, October 19, 2011)
26
however possesses significant amount of natural resources which can be utilized for the growth
of the seven sister states, for India and for the region as a whole. The main reason for the
backwardness and weak links of these states with mainland India is the high transport cost
involved in moving goods from mainland India to these states and the poor infrastructure of the
region. However, if a transport network is set out through Bangladesh the transport cost of
transportation will come down significantly. Although the seven sister states possess natural
resources investment in the area is low by the Indian government. The goods produced in
mainland India also seldom reaches these places since the price becomes too high since
transport cost is very high.
The political tension between Pakistan and India has also retarded the progress of SAARC.
India often assumes that the smaller nations of SAARC will join hands with Pakistan and
become stronger than India. On the other hand Pakistan seems to fear that the SAARC is an
Indian strategy to organize the other South Asian nations against it.
27
effective transaction among countries is only possible if they are contiguous. The SAARC
countries can establish a multi-modal system of transportation within the region to facilitate
exchange of goods since they are geographically in close proximity to each other. The
proximity factor and a better transport system within the region will lead to increased
interaction among the people of the nations which would in turn lead to a more intense
cooperation. The SAARC nations must integrate their road and rail networks for improved
transportation within the zone. Smooth movement of different modes of transport including the
waterways and airways will facilitate exchanges of all kinds. An improved transportation
system will ensure lower transaction cost. The countries within the region should also have
regional power and energy grids since the countries have natural supply of energy and mineral
resources. Similar integration in other major infrastructure depending on the differences in
factor endowments would also enhance the growth of the economies and ensure a harmonious
relation between the nations.
The potential of growth also exists in exploiting the huge untapped resources of the region
including energy and mineral resources. Establishment of common power and energy grids are
possible which would ensure the optimal use of the huge natural and mineral resources of the
region. Another important potential of the region is the huge reserve of natural gas and coal in
the West Bengal, Bangladesh region. The free movement of labour and integration of
infrastructure would facilitate external trade and investment into the zone. Technologies could
be exploitable economically since cooperation would bring in opportunities for economies of
scale.
Lack of political will was a major hindrance to the success of the planned free trade area. A
major change in the mindset of the political leadership of the countries is required in order to
ensure successful economic integration. An important pre-requisite for establishing close
cooperation is to have a shared perception of common benefits. There has to be a feeling
amongst the governments as well as the people of the participating countries that they are
benefiting equitably, if not equally, from cooperation. The distribution of the benefits has to be
fair among the member states. Lack of political will mainly generated from lack of mutual trust
at both government and non-government levels. The strained relationship that exists between
some of the SAARC nations needs to be overcome in order for the SAARC to exist and provide
28
positive result for the region. Many view the normalization of the bilateral relation between
India and Pakistan as an important prerequisite for successful regional integration among the
SAARC nations. Strong political will and commitment on the part of the governments of
constituent countries is a vital factor for the success of a regional economic cooperation. All
this can only be done if the political tension between the SAARC nations can be overcome with
the vision of better life for the people of the region and acceleration in the regions economies.
At the present time it is a challenge for the economic and business people to bring in
integration into the region. India has to realize that if the SAARC platform cannot be
strengthened they will lose out. Excluding India, the countries within the SAARC region have
about 50% of the population of the region. This huge population could prove to be a potentially
profitable market for India. If India wishes to tap this market they have to share in the light of
trade theory and economic integration. The Seven Sister States is an expensive area for India,
since transport to that region is expensive. In order to bring forward this region India needs to
integrate with Bangladesh in terms of transportation through Bangladesh and this would
improve relation with India. Seven Sisters have a lot of untapped resource. Improvement of
relations between India and Bangladesh will help accelerate the efficient use of these resources.
Bangladesh can bring energy from Nepal and Bhutan, price of energy would fall and it would
benefit Bangladesh. Nepal and Bhutan would also benefit since their resources would be used
more efficiently. Such integration and cooperation has to be set out between all countries so
that the benefit is reaped by each nation.
In recent years China has entered into the South Asian market with its export of cheap goods
especially electronic. China has become competent in the production of all types of goods at a
very cheap rate and an acceptable quality. India on the other hand is a vast country with a
varied supply of natural resources. India can easily produce products similar to China at almost
equivalent prices and good quality. However, in order to do that it may need to integrate with
some of its neighboring countries. If India does not do this they will lose out the market in the
SAARC regions who are currently importing a lot of products from China. However, if India
moves ahead and integrates to produce the Chinese products and sets up a free trade area with
its partners China will lose the market and India can tap a huge market in the region. The
SAARC nations would also be more eager to trade and cooperate with India rather than with
29
China. The nations are all developing economies and they can only receive from China but
have little to offer. For most nations it is a one way track with China which is leading to
widening of the trade gap. But if similar products can be obtained from neighboring countries
and resources can be shared the nations can give and take and be more competitive. This can
lead to the formation of and development of an economic hub in the region. The region can
grow to be a strong economic power which can compete with other regional blocs. Sharing and
exchange will be done and political issues can be resolved. However, the above are proposed
and potential achievement that can be made. The edge line and risk is whether SAARC will
survive or not.
advantage in limestone, graphite, mineral sands, gems, phosphates, clay, pearls and hydro
power. They have acquired advantage in aqua fish, aqua culture and sea food, coconut and
coconut products, handicrafts, gems and jewelries, rubber and rubber products, tea, toys etc.
Nepal has natural advantage and acquired advantage in tourism and hydroelectric power.
Bhutan on the other hand has natural and acquired advantages in coal, dolomite, ferrosilicon,
gypsum and limestone. Maldives, being a very small country has natural and acquired
advantage in fisheries, tourism and cottage industries.
Automobile industry
Computer software
Solving border issues with Pakistan will help India to capture the markets of Pakistan
Leather goods
Jute products
RMG
31
Cement
Pharmaceuticals
Natural gas
India and Bangladesh can come to an agreement so that Bangladesh can enter the market
of seven sisters with the products like:
Natural Gas
Cement
Pharmaceuticals
Marble
Sulfur
Carpets
Leather goods.
India can give Pakistan advantage in the product like carpets and leather goods. On the
contrary Pakistan can open up for Indian heavy industries.
Gems, pearls
Jewelries
32
Tea
Rubber and TEA extensively to Indian market by allowing India to utilize its
automobile and heavy industries in the Sri Lankan market
Tourism
Hydroelectricity
Among the SAARC countries Nepal has the unique advantage for hydroelectric project
because of its geography. Nepal can allow India:
India needs to help Nepal by giving free transit of its product using Indian land. Also, Nepal
can sell its energy to Bangladesh and hence the cost of production of industrial goods will fall
significantly in Bangladesh, which in turn will be a contributing factor in supplying the
neighboring countries with good quality products at a more competitive price. But before that,
India must be economically motivated to let Nepal establish the supply pass through it to
Bangladesh.
F. Maldives has a good market in the SAARC countries for:
Fisheries
India can establish joint venture in Maldives to capitalize the natural opportunity.
33
BANGLADESH
BHUTAN
INDIA
MALDIVES
NEPAL
PAKISTAN
SRI LANKA
1981
N/A
2.5
5.3
0.3
N/A
1.0
0.5
2.6
N/A
1.4
0.7
2.3
0.4
N/A
1.2
N/A
0.3
0.8
0.4
0.02
1.1
N/A
0.1
0.6
0.2
1987
1991
1995
1999
Figure-12: Intra-Country Exports in the SAARC Region (As a percentage of total exports)
***Source: IMF, Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbooks, IMF, 1988, 1992, 2002.
34
Software Business
This business was once in the hands of the USA, EU and Japan. The SAARC countries having
a large demand for these products can be good market for India. Already India has entered the
Bangladesh market with this business.
the countries in these regions through an increase in inter-regional trade and investment,
regional cooperation in South Asia remains weak. An opportunity for accelerated growth and
further energizing the economies of South Asia does exist by increasing investment through
regional cooperation. Therefore, enhancing investment cooperation and facilitating investment
among the countries in the region will be crucial for the development of the economies in the
region.
A recent study shows that there is considerable convergence between South Asian economies.
Both theory and evidence suggest that regional integration arrangements may provide an
important stimulus to foreign investment. Besides attracting more foreign investment, there are
many areas, particularly the energy and transportation sectors, in which South Asia can benefit
through increased regional investment cooperation given the existing complementarities.
Regional investment cooperation can also help lower transport costs, generate more
complementarities by expanding and diversifying the production base and trade structure,
diversify comparative advantage, introduce appropriate technologies and encourage
competition.
Countries
1980-85
1990
1995
1998
-0.1
0.1
0.1
9.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bangladesh
Bhutan
36
India
34.7
35.4
71.3
65.8
-0.2
N/A
0.2
0.2
0.1
1.3
0.2
0.3
42.0
53.3
26.2
14.5
23.5
9.4
1.9
10.0
Maldives
Nepal
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
37
Bangladesh
0.9
0.0
3.6
India
0.8
0.6
0.0
3.0
Nepal
3.5
0.6
0.0
4.8
Pakistan
4.2
0.0
0.6
2.5
Sri Lanka
13.1
0.5
0.5
7.6
1.1
Figure-14: Private Capital Flow and Foreign Direct Investment in South Asia
***Source: World Bank (2002) World Development Indicators Table 6.1
FDI to the region is predominantly from outside the region. The sectors that have attracted most
foreign investment vary between countries. In the case of Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, the textile
and garment sectors account for 28 per cent and 16 per cent respectively of FDI, whereas 56
per cent of FDI has gone into infrastructure projects in India. In the case of Pakistan, 40 per
cent of all FDI has gone into the power sector. While FDI from outside the region has been far
greater than intra-regional investments, there are signs that intra-regional investments are
increasing. The major outward FDI flows are from Indian firms, which have started to expand
FDI both within South Asia and beyond. Firms from other South Asian countries are also
38
increasingly undertaking FDI within the region and investing in a wide range of sectors and
activities.
There are two SAARC countries, Nepal and Bhutan, where FDI from India is the predominant
source of FDI. On the other hand, none of the SAARC countries are significant investors in
Pakistan though there is a very limited FDI flow from the other countries in the region. India is
the largest investor among the SAARC countries in Sri Lanka, while Pakistan and Maldives are
respectively second and third to India as investors. In the case of Bangladesh, firms from India,
Pakistan and Sri Lanka have in recent years invested US$418 million in 133 ventures covering
a wide range of sectors. In spite of Indias huge internal market, investments from other
SAARC countries have been quite insignificant, both in relative and absolute terms, accounting
for less than one per cent of total foreign investment in India. Bangladesh is the largest investor
in India from the region, followed by Sri Lanka, Nepal and Maldives.
The Lafarge Surma Cement plant in Bangladesh is the single largest cross-border investment in
the region involving a major multinational firm. Lafarge, a French multinational, is one of the
largest cement manufacturers in the world. The plant is expected to go into production very
shortly. The raw materials, mainly limestone and shale, for this 2 10 million dollar joint venture
cement plant in the district of Sylhet, located in North-eastern Bangladesh close to the Indian
border will be supplied from a quarry in the bordering state of Meghalaya. The plant, one of the
largest in the region, and the quarry are connected by a 17 kilometer (11 mile) cross-border
conveyor belt to transport the limestone. The plant will have an initial capacity of 1.2 million
tons of cement per annum although this capacity is expected to be doubled in due course.
Another example of a successful joint venture is in the rubber sector in Sri Lanka. The vertical
joint venture was initially between an Indian motor vehicle company, Associated Motorways
Private Ltd and the Sri Lankan subsidiary of CEAT for the manufacture of tyres. Sri Lanka,
which did not have a developed rubber-based industry, gained greater access to the protected
and growing Indian market, while India obtained easy access to the supply of good quality
natural rubber. At the end of the day both countries benefited through this joint venture.
39
40
inland waterways and the GBM rivers and tributaries and telecom (3) promotion of intra and
inter-regional trade and (4) promotion of cooperation in other areas such as environment
protection, tourism, and establishment of export processing zones.
Cooperation between India and Bangladesh can commence with small-scale transfer of
electricity (150-200 MW) from East Zone of India to West Zone of Bangladesh, at the same
time Bangladesh may consider exporting 50 MW to Tripura from the eastern grid of
Bangladesh. A pre-feasibility study in September 2000 for Bangladesh with USAID support
established the viability of a 750 MW power project in the western region of Bangladesh. It
was envisaged that 50 per cent of the power generated could be exported to India.
At sub-regional level, there are efforts to tap hydropower potential. At a meeting sponsored by
the ADB held in New Delhi in March 2002, an Inter-Governmental Task Force of Energy and
Water Resources Secretaries of Nepal, India, Bhutan and Bangladesh agreed to develop the
hydropower resources of Arun Valley in Nepal.
A number of gas pipeline projects have also been recommended ranging from the Iranian and
Turkmanistan pipelines to pipelines from Myanmar, Tripura and Bangladesh. Each of these
proposals has their advocates and also critics. The politics of energy cooperation cannot be
divorced from the other considerations. The key to moving forward is to devise a win-win
approach which will be acceptable to all the countries in the region. As in the case of a
seamless electricity grid covering the entire region, consideration can also be given to a similar
gas grid. However, implementing such a complex project will require time, money and
expertise. The World Bank and the multilateral agencies as well as the private sector can play a
key role in making such an ambitious project possible.
Non-Commercial energy sources like solar, wind, small hydro, bio gas and biomass
technologies could play an important role in increasing access to electricity in rural areas.
Regional cooperation can provide the framework for such exchanges.
More recently, there is a proposal from the Tata group to invest two billion dollars in
Bangladesh in three projects: a steel mill, a fertilizer plant and a power plant. A substantial part
of the production from all the three projects will be exported back to India. Both the
41
governments of India and Bangladesh have welcomed this investment at the highest level.
However, much will depend on an agreement being reached between the Tatas and the
government of Bangladesh regarding the terms and conditions for the supply of gas for the
three projects. Should these projects be implemented they will provide an enormous impetus to
both bilateral and regional cooperation.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Integrating South Asias road and railway network with that of the ASEAN countries
and China
7.
8.
9.
Considering the enormous potential in the field of information technology (IT), particularly ecommerce, promoting regional cooperation for the development of IT infrastructure through
sharing knowledge, experiences and expertise needs to be emphasized. Information technology
(IT) plays an important role by increasing connectivity, communication and transparency in the
business process. It is also instrumental in attracting FDI. Creating a South Asia wide
information network will buttress cooperation among member countries. For example, the lead
taken by India in attracting US outsourcing in the IT sector may spill over to other SAARC
countries through a common IT infrastructure, technology transfer and knowledge sharing.
26.1 Railways
Before the partition of India in 1947, the intra-sub-continental movements were mainly carried
out by railway with inland water transport carrying part of the traffic, particularly between the
states of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Bengal and Assam. Until the 1965 war between India and
Pakistan, Indian rail wagons used to come well inside the then East Pakistan using rail lines
which crossed national boundaries (See Map 1). Although these physical links are still there,
very little cross-border movement by rail is taking place today between India and Bangladesh.
In this connection, lack of coordination between gauge conversion in Indian Railway (IR) and
dualization in Bangladesh Railways (BR) could kill prospects of uninterrupted flow in the
future. Indian and Bangladesh wagons have different coupling and breaking systems. BR
wagons do not cross the border because these cannot be connected to Indian rolling stock
without reducing the efficiency of Indian trains. Possibilities of having unit trains of BR
wagons could be looked into as a solution. Currently, Indian rail wagons are pulled by
Bangladesh locomotives only over short distances inside Bangladesh. Similarly, movement of
Pakistani passenger train across the Indo-Pakistan land frontier can move only up to in India.
43
44
27.1 Movement between North East India, Bhutan, Nepal and Bangladesh
During British India, the transport networks were all radiating outwards from the international
sea ports of Karachi, Bombay, Madras, Kolkata and Chittagong. Subsequently, several new
ports have been developed in the sub-region which includes sea ports near Karachi and
Bombay, Haldia near Kolkata, and Mongla in the south-west of Bangladesh. In the context of
North-East India, Bhutan and Nepal due to congestion at Kolkata port, Bangladesh ports
(Chittagong and Mongla) could have provided a very easy access to the sea. The shipment of
Assam tea to Europe on its traditional route through Chittagong is not possible since it is not
45
covered by the current bilateral agreement. As a result, the transportation cost includes a
trucking route of more than 1400 kilometers to KolkataPort through the land corridor termed
the chicken neck between Bangladesh and Nepal (See Map 4). The traditional route for
Assamese tea via Chittagong port would have cut the journey for export shipments by almost
60 per cent. Third-country trade for both Nepal and Bhutan is also routed through Kolkata port,
with associated delays and cost. But their export/import cargo could have moved more cost
effectively through Bangladesh ports.
Agartala, the capital of Tripura state, is also constrained by its weak transport links with the
outside world as well as with the mainland India. The southern border of Tripura state is only
75 km from Chittagong port. But since access to Chittagong port is not allowed under any
agreement between Bangladesh and India, goods from Agartala are required to travel a distance
of 1645 km to reach Kolkata, against a direct distance of 350 km across Bangladesh.
If Bangladesh would have allowed Indian cargo access to the sea through ChittagongPort, it
could have earned considerable foreign exchange for the services it would render in terms of
say railway charges, the port charge and transit fee.
46
47
connects all the major cities in that nation. India will help Afghanistan build the road link from
the border with Iran to its internal road system.
The Chabahar corridor will give India the much needed access to Afghanistan and Central Asia,
although through a much longer and more expensive route. Had there been a more positive
understanding between India and Pakistan, it could have opened up much wider avenues for
economic cooperation involving other countries of South Asia as well.
48
49
50
51
52
member countries and travel freely throughout the Schengen zone. Internal border controls
have almost disappeared.
The present state of transport integration among SAARC countries is totally out of step with
the global trend towards regionalization. The South Asian countries need to make a decisive
departure from the present situation in order to be fully integrated into the ongoing
globalization process. The economic pay off from such integration would be correspondingly
high. As regards the political impediments to such integration, the SAARC countries should
take some lessons from other sub-regions where mutually beneficial economic exchange are
taking place in spite of political differences.
In this context a process of awareness creation about the mutual benefit of transport integration,
or cost of non -cooperation, based on a comprehensive study referred to earlier, could go a long
way in persuading the political leadership about the importance of transport integration. Unless
rapid progress is make in this direction, the South Asian sub-region will become the missing
link in an otherwise integrated regional and world transport network. National transport
systems are within the exclusive jurisdiction of sovereign governments and their integration
can be achieved only when the national governments show a strong political commitment to the
goal of a more integrated South Asian community in general and an integrated South Asian
transport system in particular.
29. Conclusion
South Asian countries continue to be characterized by low per capita consumption of energy,
poor quality of energy infrastructure, skewed distribution and inaccessible and costly energy
availability. These countries have largely remained energy importers and increasingly face a
serious energy shortfall. All these have adversely affected their productive activities, social
development and investment climate. There has been a realization that availability and
accessibility to energy can transform the quality of life and work substantially, help raise health
and educational standards and slow down rural-urban and cross-border migration by enhancing
the level and pace of income and employment generation.
53
Creation of a South Asian energy market and cooperative development of the available diverse
energy sources in the region can help increase the level of energy security in the region and
thus can subsequently contribute to achieving a sustained higher economic growth. There are
distinct advantages for South Asian countries to cooperate in the energy sector. There have been
negotiations going on among the South Asian countries on the possibility of power trading and
gas pipelines. Given the demand and supply situations in the sub-continent, it is rational to
believe that the trade in power and gas will be mutually beneficial in terms of both economic
and political gains. The studies conducted to date reveal some important regional projects that
merit serious consideration. They also provide a range of options.
However, there are several challenges ranging from trust and confidence building to investment
and technology transfer, demand centers locations, to really integrating the energy market and
sustaining the effort to match the regional aspirations with such efforts. The 12th SAARC
Summit held in Islamabad in 2004 clearly indicated the need to consolidate energy cooperation
by creating an energy ring. What is required is a breakthrough project that can be set as an
example for other regional energy and other ventures. In all these efforts and stratification, the
key element should be understanding the neighbors, strengthening both the traditional and
freshly emerging ties with them and making a much more concerted regional effort in
consolidating a regional identity. The projects need to be depoliticized through sensitizing the
general mass about the gains that accrue and providing options and alternatives to the
policymakers. An equally critical task is to build the capacities of the policymakers in the
energy sector across the region by re-skilling and reorienting them to the advantages of energy
cooperation.
At the same time the South Asian countries should realize that cooperation is a goal-oriented
action wherein not only the goal but also certain resources are shared together by the
participants. This implies sharing of national control over these resources which is taken as a
loss of national sovereignty. Whenever these countries have felt like this, they have tended to
withdraw from the regional cooperation process. States are reluctant to cooperate on merely
economic goals. Therefore, tackling of this perception of national sovereignty itself is a major
question as it demands extending a new form of cooperation, sacrifice and contribution which
the countries in this region invariably lack. That is why initiatives like beneficial bilateralism
and unilateral gestures have really worked in case of the region.
54
55
Free trade area: All barriers to the trade of goods and services among member countries
are removed. In the theoretically ideal free trade area, no discriminatory tariffs, quotas,
subsidies, or administrative impediments are allowed to distort trade between members.
Each country, however, is allowed to determine its own trade policies with regard to
nonmembers. Thus, for example, the tariffs placed on the products of nonmember
countries may vary from member to member.
European Free Trade Association (EFTA): EFTA has been on free trade in industrial
goods. Agriculture was left out of the arrangement, each member being allowed to
determine its own level of support. Members are also free to determine the level of
protection applied to goods coming from outside the EFTA.
A Customs Union: Eliminates trade barriers between member countries and adopts a
common external trade policy. Establishment of common external trade policy necessities
significant administrative machinery to oversee trade relations with nonmembers. Most
countries that enter into a customs union desire even greater economic integration down
the road. The EU began as a customs union, but it has now moved beyond this stage.
Economic union: Involves the free flow of products and factors of production among
member countries and the adoption of a common external trade policy, but it also requires
a common currency, harmonization of members tax rates, and a common monetary and
fiscal policy. Such a high degree of integration demands a coordinating bureaucracy and
the sacrifice of significant amounts of nationals sovereignty to that bureaucracy. The EU
is an economic union, although an imperfect one because not all members of the EU have
adopted the euro, the currency of the EU, differences in tax rates and regulations across
56
countries still remains, and some markets, such as the market for energy, are still not fully
deregulated.
Political union: In which a central political apparatus coordinates the economic, social
and foreign policy of the member status. The EU is on the road toward at least partial
political union. The European Parliament, which is playing an ever more important role
in the EU, has been directly elected by citizens of the EU countries since the late 1970s.
The United States provides an example of even closer political union, in the United
States, independence states are effectively combined into a single nation. Ultimately, the
EU may move toward a similar federal structure.
Bibliography
UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics-2011
UN COMTRADL
IMF, Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbooks, IMF, 1988, 1992, 2002.
World Bank (2002) World Development Indicators
The Daily Star
Website:
www.saarc-sec.org
www.sdfsec.org
www.saarcstat.org
www.wikipedis.com
www.academia.edu
www.study.com
57
58