Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Doug Buehl's-Question Dissection
Doug Buehl's-Question Dissection
Teacher:HeatherLamers
School:CSUB
ContentAreaStandard:
Comprehension
LiteracyStandard:
Comprehension,inventionstrategies,criticalreading
InstructionalObjectives
Definitionofwhatis
tobetaughtand
learned
Understandingessayprompts;overcomingtest/timedexamanxiety
Curriculum
LessonContent
SeeBuehlsQuestionDissection
InstructionalDelivery
Procedures
Strategies
SeeBuehlsQuestionDissection(below)
Distributeindexcards
Distributedifferentessayprompts
Evidence/Assessment
Collectwordwebsalongwithfinishedessay(indexcards)
Accommodations
Readingdifficulties
Advancedlearners
Englishlearners
Text
InstructionalMaterials
Levelisbasedupondifficultyofessayquestion
ThesampleessayquestionderivesfromWritingandReadingAcrossthe
Curriculum
DougBuehlsQuestionDissection
QuestionDissection(10911)
1. Brainstormdifficultiesinvolvedwhenansweringessayquestionsingeneral.
2. IntroducetheprotocolforQD(QuestionDissection);lookforcluesinthesecategories:
a.testverbs
b.topic
c.list
d.number
e.order
f.firstsentence
Buehlrecommendsplacingtheseprotocolsinaboxwithenoughavailableroomforstudents
toexplorethesecategoriesbeforetacklingatoughessayexamontheirown.
3. Usesampleessayquestionsaspractice.
4. Buehlrecommendspracticingessayplanningandorganizationbyusingawordweb.
5. Iftheessayisforatest,Buehlrecommendsthatinstructorsallowstudentstobringtheirword
webson4x6indexcardstoencouragecriticalthinking/planningskills.
SAMPLEESSAYQUESTION:
1. Theemailrevolutionappearstohavechangedsomeoftherulesofcommunication,oftenforthe
worse.Oneofthemoreunpleasantdevelopmentsofthemediumisflaming:thesendingofabusive,
insulting,andsometimesviciousmessages,oreventhreats,toanotherwithwhomonemayhavea
minordisagreement.Considerablylessserious,butstillannoyingtomanyemailrecipients,isthe
tendencyofsomewritersnottousepunctuationorcapitalletters,indeednottobotherproofreading
(orevensigning)theirmessagesatall.Whilesomebelievethatemailmessagesdonotrequirestrict
adherencetostylisticconventions,otherstakeissue.InTheElementsofEmailStyle,authorsDavid
AngellandBrentHeslopassert,Usingalllowercaselettersisannoyingfortherecipientandcan
resultinyourmessagebeingmisunderstoodornotreadatall.Doyouregardsuchcasualdisregard
forconventionsasbreachesofcommunicationetiquetteoraretheysimplypartofthedistinctive
natureofemailculture?Attempttoexplaintheseandperhapsothernegativefeaturesofemail
communication,drawinguponsomeoftheselectionsthatyouhavereadinthischapter,particularly
Leonard,Schwartz,andDyson.