You are on page 1of 1

FOOTNOTE GUIDE

1. G.R. No. 125706 CHINA CHANG JIANG ENERGY


CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES) versus ROSAL
INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDERS, represented by its General
Manager, ALBERTO S. SURLA, CONSTRUCTION
INDUSTRY ARBITRATION COMMISSION, PRUDENCIO
F. BARANDA, and the COURT OF APPEALS
2. Reference to the case of China Chang Jiang
3. G.R. No. 207264 REGINA ONGSIAKO REYES, vs.
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS and JOSEPH SOCORRO B.
TAN,
4. Moses, M. L., The Principles and Practice of International
Commercial Arbitration (2012),2nd Ed., p. 6
5. Supra Note 4-5
6. Greenberg, et al. International Commercial Arbitration An
Asia-Pacific Perspective (2010). First Ed. Par. 4.36, p. 155.
7. Id at Par. 4.47, p. 158.
8. GR NO. 161957- Jorge Gonzales and Panel of Arbitrators vs
Austria-Martinez January 22, 2007
9. Supra note 19 at Par. 4.50, p. 159.
10. Supra note 22 at Par. 4.50, pp. 159-160
11. Belohlavek, Importance of the Seat of Arbitration in
International Arbitration: Delocalization and Denationalization
of Arbitration as an Outdated Myth, 31 ASA BULLETIN
2/2013 (JUNE), at p. 263.
12. Definition of kompetenz-kompetenz p13
13. Greenberg, et al. International Commercial Arbitration An
Asia-Pacific Perspective (2010). First Ed. Par. 5.46, p. 214.
Supra note at p. 91.

REFER TO
See Annex A

See Annex A
See Annex B
See Annex C
See Annex C
See Annex D
See Annex D
See Annex E
See Annex D
See Annex D
See Annex F

See Annex G
See Annex D

You might also like