Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Flexural Strength Design of Concrete Beams
Flexural Strength Design of Concrete Beams
TECHNICAL PAPER
INTRODUCTION
Recently, high-strength steel reinforcement conforming to
ASTM A1035-071 has been developed. The stress-strain
characteristics of the reinforcement are quite different from
conventional Grade 60 (400 MPa) steel reinforcement. The
new steel is considerably stronger than conventional
reinforcing steel and lacks a well-defined yield point. There
are several practical advantages to using this new highstrength material, including reduction of congestion in
heavily reinforced members, improved concrete placement,
savings in the cost of labor, reduction of construction time
and, in some cases, enhanced resistance to corrosion.
Research on the use of high-strength steel as reinforcement
for reinforced concrete members has been ongoing for some
time. The flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced
with high-strength reinforcing bars has been investigated
experimentally by a number of researchers.2-4 The available
research indicates that, when properly designed, beams
reinforced with high-strength reinforcing bars will achieve
similar strength characteristics to beams reinforced with
conventional steel reinforcements.
Other research has indicated that high-strength reinforcing
bars can be effectively used as a replacement for conventional
steel reinforcing bars for typical reinforced concrete bridge
decks.5 The research indicates that, due to the use of highstrength steel reinforcing bars, the required steel area can be
reduced by up to 33% while maintaining comparable
behavior to bridge decks reinforced with conventional Grade 60
(400 MPa) steel. Detailing requirements, including the
strength of bent bars and bond characteristics, have also
been investigated5 and additional research is ongoing at
several universities.
In addition to the ongoing research in this field, the recent
publication of ASTM A1035-071 that outlines structural
specifications for low-carbon and chromium steel bars
further facilitates the use of high-strength steel as reinforcing
for concrete structures. The standard specifies two grades of
570
high-strength steel: Grade 100 and 120 (690 and 830 MPa).
It cautions designers, however, that current design requirements
limit the allowable design strength of reinforcements to 80 ksi
(550 MPa). This limitation prevents engineers from fully
using the enhanced strength characteristics of these materials
and therefore represents a practical obstacle to the transfer of
the technology to the engineering community.
To lift the 80 ksi (550 MPa) yield strength limitation of the
current ACI 318 Code, a design methodology is proposed
based on accepted engineering principles and analysis
techniques. The proposed design methodology demonstrates
that the flexural strength of members reinforced with highstrength steel will be comparable with the flexural strength of
members designed according to the current design provisions.
RESEARCH SIGNIFICANCE
This paper presents a design methodology, in similar
format to the current ACI 318 provisions, for the flexural
strength design of concrete beams reinforced with ASTM
A1035-071 Grade 100 (690 MPa) steel bars. The discussion
is limited to reinforcing bars having stress-strain characteristics
that are similar to the high-strength steel commercially
known as MMFX; however, the proposed design concept is
valid for any high-strength steel that does not exhibit a distinct
yield plateau. The proposed tension-controlled strain limits
ensure that the strain, curvature, and deflection deformability
ratios of beams designed according to the proposed methodology are comparable to the ratios for beams designed
according to current and previous ACI 318 provisions. The
proposed method will enable the designers to take full
advantage of high-strength steel bars as reinforcement for
concrete structures.
CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH-STRENGTH
REINFORCING STEELS
A number of high-strength reinforcing steels are currently
available for the design and construction of reinforced
concrete flexural members. The typical stress-strain relationships
of several different high-strength reinforcing steels are
presented in Fig. 1(a), along with the stress-strain relationship of
conventional Grade 60 (400 MPa) steel for comparison. As seen
in the figure, the stress-strain curve of typical high-strength
steel is characterized by an initial linear portion followed by
a nonlinear section. The absence of a distinct yield plateau is
characteristic of most high-strength steel. Despite the lack of
a well-defined yield point, most high-strength reinforcing
ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 4, September-October 2008.
MS No. M-2006-491.R2 received November 14, 2007, and reviewed under Institute
publication policies. Copyright 2008, American Concrete Institute. All rights reserved,
including the making of copies unless permission is obtained from the copyright proprietors.
Pertinent discussion including authors closure, if any, will be published in the JulyAugust 2009 ACI Structural Journal if the discussion is received by March 1, 2009.
ACI Honorary Member Robert F. Mast is a Past President and Past Chairman of
BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc., Seattle, WA, where he continues to serve as a
Senior Principal. He is a Past President of ACI and a member of ACI Committees
314, Simplified Design of Concrete Buildings; 318, Structural Concrete Building
Code; 376, Concrete Structures for Refrigerated Liquified Gas Containment; TAC
Technology Transfer Committee; and the Concrete Research Council. He authored the
Unified Design Provisions, which were incorporated in the 2002 and later editions of
the ACI 318 Code.
ACI member Mina Dawood is a PhD Candidate at North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC. He received his BSc from the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB,
Canada, in 2003 and his MS from North Carolina State University in 2005.
Sami H. Rizkalla, FACI, is a Distinguished Professor of Civil and Construction
Engineering in the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering,
North Carolina State University. He is the Director of the Constructed Facilities
Laboratory and NSF I/UCRC in Repair of Structures and Bridges at North Carolina
State University. He is a member of ACI Committees 118, Use of Computers;
440, Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement; Joint ACI-ASCE Committees 423,
Prestressed Concrete, and 550, Precast Concrete Structures; and E803, Faculty
Network Coordinating Committee.
ACI Honorary Member Paul Zia is a Distinguished University Professor Emeritus at
North Carolina State University. He is an ACI Past President and is Chair of
ITG-6, High-Strength Steel Bars. He is a member of ACI Committees 363, HighStrength Concrete; 440, Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement; Joint ACIASCE Committees 423, Prestressed Concrete, and 445, Shear and Torsion; and the
Concrete Research Council.
(1)
fs =
0.345
170 ------------------------------ ( ksi ) 0.00241 < s < 0.060
s + 0.00104
fs =
2.379
1172 ------------------------------ ( MPa ) 0.00241 < s < 0.060
+
0.00104
s
(2)
Moment capacity,
Increase
Reserved capacity,
kip-ft (kN-m) of capacity, % kip-ft (kN-m)
Grade 60
(400 MPa) steel
327 (443)
Actual behavior
639 (867)
95
0 (0)
524 (711)
60
115 (156)
427 (579)
31
212 (288)
Steel type
Area of steel,
in.2 (mm2)
ratio
ratio
ratio
= 0.75 b
8.45 (5450)
34 (234)
5 (34)
2.87
3.03
1.95
t = 0.005
7.14 (4610)
39 (269)
5 (34)
3.71
3.44
1.81
t = 0.005
5.71 (3680)
48 (331)
5 (34)
2.98
2.92
1.74
Proposed
t = 0.0066
High-strength
2.43 (1570)
67 (462)
4 (28)
2.85
2.96
2.47
Proposed
t = 0.0066
High-strength
2.86 (1850)
67 (462)
5 (34)
2.92
3.01
2.51
Proposed
t = 0.0066
High-strength
3.21 (2070)
67 (462)
6 (41)
3.10
3.09
2.57
Proposed
t = 0.0066
High-strength
3.71 (2390)
67 (462)
8 (55)
3.44
3.34
2.75
Proposed
t = 0.0066
High-strength
4.64 (2920)
67 (462)
10 (69)
3.33
3.19
2.66
10
to 1999
15
2002
12
and 2005
575
(3)
576
Actual behavior
Simplified method
0.0066
0.009
0.3125d
0.25d
0.31251d
0.251d
Compressive force C
0.85fc ab
0.85fc ab
0.002125fc 1
0.002125fc 1
REFERENCES
Value
Strain, s /n
6.18
Curvature, s /n
5.37
Deflection, s /n
2.94
t 0.009
1. ASTM A1035, Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain, LowCarbon, Chromium, Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, ASTM
International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2007, 5 pp.
2. Ansley, M. H., Investigation into the Structural Performance of
MMFX Reinforcing, 2002, http://www.mmfxsteel.com/technical_resources/
Default.asp.
3. Malhas, F. A., Preliminary Experimental Investigation of the Flexural
Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using MMFX Steel, University
of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, 2002, http://www.mmfxsteel.com/
technical_resources/Default.asp.
4. Yotakhong, P., Flexural Performance of MMFX Reinforcing Rebars
in Concrete Structures, masters thesis, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 2003.
5. Seliem, H. M. A., Behavior of Concrete Bridges Reinforced with
High-Performance Steel Reinforcing Bars, doctoral dissertation, North
Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2007, http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/
theses/available/etd-05042007-174633/unrestricted/etd.pdf.
6. Vijay, V. S.; GangaRao, H. V. S.; and Prachasaree, W., Bending
Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced with MMFX Steel Bars, WVU
College of Engineering, Morgantown, WV, 2002, http://www.mmfxsteel.com/
technical_resources/Default.asp.
7. Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D., Prestressed Concrete Structures,
Response Publications, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1997, 766 pp.
8. Martin, L. D., and Perry, C. J., eds., PCI Design Handbook, sixth
edition, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 2004, 728 pp.
9. Mast, R. F., Memorandum: Simplified Strength Design of Flexural
Members Using MMFX Steel, Jan. 2007, 8 pp.
10. ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced
Concrete (ACI 318-63), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills,
MI, 1963, 144 pp.
11. Vijay, P. V., and GangaRao, H. V. S., Bending Behavior and
Deformability of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete
Members, ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2001, pp. 834-842.
12. ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural
Concrete (ACI 318-95) and Commentary (318R-95), American Concrete
Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1995, 391 pp.
13. ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural
Concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (318R-02), American Concrete
Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2002, 443 pp.
14. Mast, R. F., Unified Design Provisions for Reinforced and
Prestressed Concrete Flexural and Compression Members, ACI Structural
Journal, V. 89, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1992, pp. 185-199.
15. ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural
Concrete (ACI 318-99) and Commentary (318R-99), American Concrete
Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1999, 369 pp.
577