You are on page 1of 1

Application #5

Paper Topic #1- Why we should require pre-school?


The effects of students who go to preschool vs. the effects of children that dont
attend preschool and how is affects:
School- the students cognitive development whether they learn the four
stages in the classroom vs at home
How the child interacts with there peers
Journal Article
1. Effects of an Animated Book Reading Intervention on Emergent Literacy
Skill Development: An Early Pilot Study:
Effects of an Animated Book Reading Intervention on Emergent Literacy
Skill Development: An Early Pilot Study. (2015). Journal of Early
Intervention, 37(2), 155-171 17p. doi:10.1177/1053815115598842
2. The differential effects of preschool: Evidence from Virginia:
Huang, F. L., Invernizzi, M. A., & Drake, E. A. (2012). The differential
effects of preschool: Evidence from Virginia. Early Childhood
Research Quarterly, 2733-45. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.03.006
3. Coolahan, K., Fantuzzo, J., Mendez, J., & McDermott, P. (2000). Preschool peer
interactions and readiness to learn: Relationships between classroom peer play
and learning behaviors and conduct. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 92(3),
458-465. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.458
Paper Topic #2- Why people should or shouldnt parents spank children
How spanking affects childrens school and how it affects how they act towards
other children and authority
Journal Article
1. Child-spanking at age 5 may have a detrimental effect on child externalising
behaviour and cognitive development at age 9:
Boutwell, B. B. (2014). Child-spanking at age 5 may have a detrimental effect on
child externalising behaviour and cognitive development at age 9. Evidence
Based Nursing, 17(4), 114-114 1p. doi:10.1136/eb-2013-101698
2. Finding dynamic treatment effects under anticipation: the effects of spanking on
behavior:
Lee, M., & Huang, F. (2012). Finding dynamic treatment effects under
anticipation: the effects of spanking on behaviour. Journal Of The Royal
Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics In Society), 175(2), 535-567.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.01001.x

You might also like