FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami’ public research university ADULT CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY ON TEACHING PERSONALITIES PURPOSE OF THE STUDY You are being asked to be in a research study. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how effectively a teacher communicates information to their students. NUMBER OF STUDY PARTICIPANTS If you decide to be in this study, you will be one of 46 people in this research study. DURATION OF THE STUDY Your participation will require approximately one hour or part thereof. PROCEDURES If you agree to be in the study, we will ask you to do the following things: 1. Sign this consent document 2. Attend an APA Workshop 3. Answer questions about that APA Workshop RISKS AND/OR DISCOMFORTS The following risks may be associated with your participation in this study: First, you may feel uncomfortable giving out demographic and personal information; or second, feel undue stress giving your honest opinion. BENEFITS The following benefits may be associated with your participation in this study: allow you to eam the basics of APA formatting and writing, become better exposed to different teaching styles and personalities. This study may benefit society by contributing to the understanding of people’s social influences and learned cultural norms. ALTERNATIVES There are no known alternatives available to you other than not taking part in this study. However, any significant new findings developed during the course of the research which may relate to your willingness to continue participation will be provided to you. CONFIDENTIALITY The records of this study will be kept private and will be protected to the fullest extent provided by law. In any sort of report we might publish, we will not include any information that willFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Center For Academic Success Instructor Performance Rating Survey and Teaching Personality Effectiveness In order to improve our productivity and effectiveness, please circle the best choice below: 1. How would you rate the value of this workshop? Not at all Moderately Somewhat Neither Somewhat Moderate Extremely Valuable Invaluable Invaluable Valuable Valuable Valuable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. How would you rate the length of the presentation? Not Long Moderately Somewhat Neither Somewhat Moderately Extremely Enough Short Short Long Long Too Long 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 3. How would you rate the content of the presentation? Notatall Moderately Somewhat Neither ‘Somewhat Moderately Extremely Informative Uninformative _ Uninformative Informative Informative Informative 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 4. How would you rate the appearance of the instructor? Not at all Moderately Somewhat Neither Somewhat Moderately Extremely Appealing Unappealing_Unappealing Appealing Appealing Appealing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. How would you rate the attractiveness of the instructor? Not atall Moderately Somewhat Neither Somewhat Moderately Extremely Atiactive Unattractive Unattractive Attractive Attractive Attractive 1 a 3 4 5 6 7 6. How would you rate the intelligence of the instructor? Not at all Moderately Somewhat Neither Somewhat Moderately Extremely Intelligent Unintelligent _Unintelligent Intelligent Intelligent Intelligent 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 7. How would you rate the knowledgeability of the instructor? Not at all Moderately Somewhat Neither Somewhat Moderately Extremely Knowledgeable Unknowledgeable | Unknowledgeable Knowledgeable Knowlegeable Knowledgeable H 2 3 4 3 6 7 8. How would you rate the eloquence of the instructor? Not atall Moderately Somewhat Neither Somewhat Moderately Extremely Eloguent Not Well-spoken Not Wellspoken Wellspoken Wellspoken _Wellspoken 1 2 3 4 3 6 Zl 9. How would you rate the preparedness of the instructor? Not at all Moderately Somewhat Neither Somewhat Moderately Extremely Prepared Unprepared ——_Unprepared Prepared Prepared ~—_-Prepared 1 2 3 4 5 6 a 10. How would you rate the likeability of the instructor? Notat all Moderaiely Somewhat Neither» Somewhat ~—- Moderately Extremely Likeable Unlikable—_Unlikable Likeable —Likeable-——_Likeable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Masculine Consent Form ‘Agnes Narikkatin Aury Moquete Boby Ukken Denfs Nunez Sanchez Elizabeth Gomez Eugenio Oliveros, Gloria Lopez Inemesit Ekanem Isleda Ponas Sanchez Karina Hasing Landry Francos Larisa Perez Isasi |. Marino Porniel Michael Guiedo Nayeema Sultana Olidaysi Alvarez . Petit Louis Augustin Rafael Rojas Roger C.D. Jaques Rolanda Desir Rosbel Mirabel Yudlith Ruiz Arias Yur Ehrlich Yusvell Mori GonzalezFLORIDA F INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Center For Academic Success APA Workshop DATE: Federico Lastra SIGN-IN SHEET PANTHER I.D. 0 es euris AAW GB BIO356 BY Sealy sa ase LosbI! whi Feb s301s KOL An aA De a1 5215394 ) 2G? Vso Sucrob Ds 2. SI 00E 4 PPRESENMe 2) Lew a Bry of Sim, Rewer 3522385 | kart, I fartin | apbq¢30- ie Ly Sse S3/8S esas “te By ERYNames ‘Agnes Nerikkatio Boby Ulken 18 ol Lot le cabrora Eugenio Olveras Gloris Lopes Hepew Preseniau sale Valder Jorge os Karina Hsing Katleen Thermeey Etienne Kenia Carbone! Keron Martin Landry Francos asa Pere ia cReyos ussome Mari Perle ‘Maya Marcero Michel Guiedo Nayeema Suara Olga Atvarez Olga seve lest Aharex Pat Loui Augustin Rafe! Roe Raul optste Robert Siew Roger C.. Jaques Roland Des Rosbel Mabel Sam Bendon Sandra isso "Yesra Santenden Yovanit Faarco shop value Feminine Feminine Feminine Feminine Feminine Feminine Feminine Feminine Feminine Masculine Masculine Masculine Masculine Maseuline lena appearance atractveness ence knowedgonl sioquance preparedness Meablty endinesso © € € € € € z . © € € ° we wr oz or wt wor wt we 6c et oF z we BSSSSeSseeERS ot et et we oz et oe : i 5 i i aeseeea Th {ETAT