Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Capm
The Capm
The CAPM
Learning outcomes
By the end of this lecture you should:
Be able to interpret and apply the CAPM, both for
individual assets and portfolios
Know what the assumptions of the CAPM is why
they are relevant
Know how to partition the risk of an asset into a
systematic and an unsystematic part, and why it is
important
Quick recap
Last lecture we saw how the separation
theorem implies all investors hold the same
optimal risky portfolio, P*
In equilibrium, the demand for risky assets
must equal the supply of risky assets
Therefore the optimal risky portfolio must
equal the market portfolio, M
The properties of a risky asset in that portfolio
will determine how attractive it is
3
Quick recap
The relevant properties of our combined
portfolio is its risk and expected return
If we combine several assets, some risk may
be diversified away
How much of an assets risk can be diversified
away and how much cannot depends on its
covariance with the other assets in the
portfolio
4
Quick recap
Last lecture, we derived an expression for the
relation between the covariance of an assets
returns with the market and the required
return of the asset:
E (ri ) = rf +
Cov(ri , rM )
2
M
[E (r ) r ]
M
Cov(ri , rM )
2
M
[E (r ) r ]
M
M2
[E (r ) r ]
M
M2
E (rM ) = r f + 2 [E (rM ) r f ] = r f + E (rM ) rf
M
E (rM ) = E (rM )
Cov (r f , rM )
M2
0
M2
[E (r ) r ]
M
[E (r ) r ]
M
Cov(ri , rM )
M2
[E (r ) r ]
M
SML
rf
i =
Cov(ri , rM )
M2
10
An assets measures how much risk the
assets contributes in the market portfolio,
relative to the average contribution
i > 1 means that Cov(ri, rM) > Var(rM), or that
the asset contributes more risk than the
average asset
i < 1 means that Cov(ri, rM) < Var(rM), or that
the asset contributes less risk than the
average asset
11
Since nobody likes risk, investors will demand higher returns of assets that
contribute more risk in the portfolio
We can interpret the SML much like we interpreted the CAL:
An asset with = 0.5 contributes half the risk of the average asset and gets half the
reward in terms of excess returns
An asset with = 2 contributes twice the risk of the average asset and gets twice the
reward in terms of excess returns
E (ri )
SML
rf
i =
Cov(ri , rM )
M2
12
A regression formulation
Although the CAPM tells us the expected return of
an asset, we know that realized returns may be
higher or lower than that
It is useful to phrase the CAPM as a regression
model, in which we relate realized returns to each
other and allow for some random error, :
ri = rf + i (rM rf ) +
A regression formulation
Recall from statistics, the univariate OLS regression model:
Y = + X +
The value of is
Cov( X , Y )
Var ( X )
Cov (ri , rM rf )
Var (rM rf )
ri =rf +
Cov(ri , rM )
Var (rM )
Cov ( ri , rM )
rM rf +
Var ( rM )
14
A regression formulation
We see that by taking expectations on both sides we can return to
our previous formula: r = r + [r r ]+
E (r ) = E (r + [r r ]+ )
E (r ) = E (r ) + [E (r ) E (r )]+ E ( )
i
E (ri ) = rf + i E (rM ) rf + 0
ri = rf + i rM rf +
]
Var (r ) = Var ( [r r ] + )
Var (r ) = Var (r r ) + Var ( ) + 2 Cov (r
Var (ri ) = Var (rf + i rM rf + )
i
i
2
i
rf , )
15
A regression formulation
Since rf is still a constant, we can simplify the
expression further:
Var (ri ) = i2Var (rM rf ) + Var ( ) + 2 Cov (rM rf , )
Var (ri ) = i2Var (rM ) + Var ( ) + 2 Cov(rM , )
i2 = i2 M2 + 2
Systematic risk
i2 = i2 M2 + 2
Example
Suppose we run some industrial firm. Many
things could affect our returns.
For instance, there could be an oil embargo or
an earth quake
These events would affect all firms, so we say
that these risks are systematic
Since all firms are affected, their returns
would move together in this situation
Therefore we cannot diversify the risk away
18
Unsystematic risk
i2 = i2 M2 + 2
Example
Suppose that we step on a nail and cannot work
or that an accidental fire burns our plant down
This would be bad for our returns, but other firms
would not be affected
We call these risks unsystematic
Since other firms are unaffected, we could
diversify such risks away by combining many
stocks in a portfolio
It is unlikely that everyone steps on a nail the
same day
20
CAL
P*
A
rf
Unsystematic risk
23
Mathematically:
M
2
M
2
M
2
M
25
Portfolio
The of a portfolio is the weighted average of
the of the assets in that portfolio
Consider the portfolio P: r = w r + w r
We manipulate both sides to get the :
P
Cov(rP , rM )
2
M
1 1
2 2
Cov(w1r1 + w2 r2 , rM )
M2
Cov(w1r1,rM)
w2r2
Cov(w2r2,rM)
26
Portfolio
We see that
Cov(w1r1 + w2 r2 , rM ) = Cov(w1r1 , rM ) + Cov(w2 r2 , rM ) = w1Cov(r1 , rM ) + w2Cov(r1 , rM )
Substituting:
P =
Cov (rP , rM )
2
M
w1Cov (r1 , rM )
2
M
w2Cov(r1 , rM )
2
M
= w11 + w2 2
Assumptions of CAPM
Investors are price takers
No investor is large enough relative to the market to
influence equilibrium prices by her trades
Assumptions of CAPM
Investors are rational mean-variance
optimizers
All investors maximize a utility function somewhat
like ours and do so correctly