reat AEG Congest Cars teatonale GI 188 Saker, Retr, N80 5109604
Excavating in weak rocks with the Norwegian Method of Tunnelling (NMT)
PChyssanthakis, N.Barton & FLoset
‘Norwegian Geotechnical Instinte, Oslo, Narweay
A.Dallas
C1 Saramopoulos SA, General Contactors Athens, Greece
K Mitsotakis
‘Avon Lid, Consulting Group, Athens, Greece
ABSTRACT: The updated Q-sysiem for rock mass classification and suppor seletion and the use of modem
iatrials such as wet process fiber reinforced shotcrete, S(,anticoressive bolts, and reinforced ibs of
shoterete, RRS, are essential elements of the Norwegian Method of Tunnelling (NMT). Te Norwegian
Geotechnical Institute of Oslo has been involved i aint venture with Contractor CJ Sarantopoulos S.A and
Consulting Group Axon Lid forthe study and construction ofthe fist tunnel project in Patras, Greece, using
principles from the Norwegian Method of Tunneling (NMT). This project comprises the construction of @
bypass highoay, with twin tunnels, scheduled to open by year 200), in weak mail formation with sandy
‘interbeddings. The twin tunnels wit an approximate length of 650 m have a designed pila thickness of 16
im. The Q- system was used fr the classification ofthe rock mass which could be characterised a extremely
oor lo very poor with Q - values angng between 0.01 and 0.3.
RESUME: Le systdme Q de classification des masses racheuss et de sélection de la méthode de suttnement,
sinsi que Futlisation de matriaux modemes tes que le béton projeléraforeéavee des bres facie, Sif) le
boulonnage anticorosion, le cintes en gunite renforés, RRS, sont des éléments essentiels de la méthode
norvégienne de construction des tunnels (NMT). Llnsitit de Géotechnique Norvégien Oslo a été implique
dans un projet multlral avec le mate douvrage C2. Sarantopoulos 8. et le bureau décades Axo Lid
pour Ixade et la construction d'un premier projet de tunnels & Patras, Grée, basésut les principes de [a
méthode NMT. Le projet compread la constriction dune voie dautoroute avec deux tuaels jumelés, dont
ouverture est prévue pour 2001, dans des formations marneuses pe résstantes avec des bancs sablonneu.
{Les deux tunnels, une longueu?approximative de 6S0 mates, ont une paisseur de plier de 16 metres, Le
systme Qua éié utlisé pour la classification de la masse mameuse, qui peut re caractérsé comme
‘extrémement file ts faible, les valeurs Q variant entre 0.01 et 0.3.
1 INTRODUCTION Several exiensometers were installed in three
Gifferet locations in the test tunnel. The roof
Due to uncertainties in connection with the ground
conditions revealed in core logs, a pilot tunnel 40 m
in length, in @ nearby location of the twin tunnels
with nearly quadratic cross section with dimensions
2x 2 m, was frst excavated. Several in sit tests
‘such as plat loading test fr determination of the E
‘modulus, deformation measurements forthe elastic
response of the rock mass and bot pullout tests for
the determination of shear strength of the material
were performed. All these in situ tess provided
‘valuable information fr the overall evaluation ofthe
support requirements. Two plate loading tests vere
conducted secordng to the suggested international
standards (SRM, 1981). Stress levels abowe 2.5
MPa resulted in plastic behaviour of the rock.
fextensometers of Section C at 35.0 m from the
fenrance reached values of about 13 and 11 ram at
1.5m and 2.5m from the arch crown respectively,
before they were stabilised. Surprisingly good results
were derived from the belt pull-out tests on site
‘The five tested fully grouted bolts of effective
grouting length of only 125m were able 10 take
Toads ranging between 7.9 and 17.2 tal, Failre on
the pll-out tests occurred between grouting and
rock. The maximum shear stess dung the bolt pll-
‘ut tests can then be caleulated by using the simple
relation:
®DxL‘where:F = maximum pull-out toed, D
iameter, 38 mm, L= grouted length, 1.25 m,
“The maximum obtained shear strength values
‘ou yatid between 0.610 I.1 MPa. If we consider
these bolt pull-out tests o be equivalent to undrained
traxial texts with the eventual failure envelope
horizontal, then we can indirectly estimate the
uniaxial compressive strength Gof the marl which
fs twice as much as Tay. From the 1981 ISRM
Ihandbook (Suggested methods for the quantitative