SNS

35

SNS
*
**

.
.

.
IV.

ICTs
SNS , SNS , SNS

.
.
SNS SNS
. , , SNS ,
, , ,
. , SNS
,
. ,
. ,

.
: (SNS), , ,

* 2010 10 29 (SNS),
.
** skjsky@gmail.com

36

I.
1969 (information revolution)
2010, .
(participatory architecture) (social
network services; SNS) . SNS
,
.
(A network of networks)
(web) .
SNS ,
. SNS
,
. SNS (boyd and
Ellison 2007)
(public or semi-public) ,

( 2010, 130-131; 2009).1)
SNS .
SNS 1995
(Classmates.com) (SixDegree.com)
(boyd and Ellison 2007; 2010).

.
, , ,
, SNS .
1) (danah boyd) (Shirky 2008, 242).
.

 SNS

37

SNS .
(http://www.eMarketer.com) , 2006
SNS 39% 2009 59%
. SNS (Facebook.com) 3,767.9
, 1,733.3 .
(Facebakers.com) 2010 11 30,
5 7,440 , 211
. , 2010 11
18.13% .
SNS
(Prescott 2010)
(Information and Communication Technologies
; ICTs)
. , SNS
, , , .
, ICTs , ,
.

ICTs (social
contexts) (RAND 2002; Chadwick 2006, 18-19).

,
. ICTs
(smart phone)

. SNS
.
SNS . SNS

38

. SNS

.
. SNS
.
SNS
.
( 2010).
,
,
. SNS

. SNS
.
.
SNS (networking) .

(Solove 2008; 2010). ,
,
,
(dilemma) ( 2007, 2).
ICTs SNS
3 . , SNS
SNS . , SNS
. , SNS

.

 SNS

39

.
, ,
, . ,
400
.
2010 10 21 25 .
SPSS ver. 12.0 , ,
t-test .
.

. , SNS
,
.

.

. ICTs

.2) (Bell 1973) (Toffler 1980)
ICTs
.
2) .
' '
.
.
. ,
. OECD
( 2009, 158 ).

40

. (van Dijk 1999),
(Castells 2000; 2001)

(networked public sphere) (Benkler 2006,
10-12). ICTs .
(Twitter.com) SNS 1989
, 1991
.
SNS ,
(cyber activism)
(Kalathi and Boas 2003).
SNS
.
ICTs
(weak
ties) (face to face)
.
SNS 2.0
(Lyon 2003, 5).
(surveillance society)
(social care) (social control)
.
. ,

(big brother) , (invasion of
privacy) ( 2008; Castells 2001;
2006, 129-137; Gandy 1989, 65).3)

 SNS

41

ICTs
ID , ,
. SNS

.
. (2009, 174-175)

.
.

.

.
ICTs
.

(Chadwick, 2006: 257-258)

. ,

. (Mathiesen 1997)
, . SNS

(synopticon)
( 2006, 134-135).

3) ICTs ,
. ICTs

,
(Castells 2001, 166).

42

SNS ,
. (2006)
SNS
.
. SNS
( 2010; 2009).
(2010)
. SNS

.

.
ICTs .
,
.
ICTs
.
.

.
.
2.0 SNS
.

 SNS

43

.
1.
.
SNS SNS
. SNS , ,
(microblog) , , ,
.
< 1 >

(frequency)

400

100.0

200
200

50.0
50.0

1929
3039
4049
50

110
120
100
70

27.5
30.0
25.0
17.5

5
60
56
279

1.3
15.0
14.0
69.8

///

//
//
/

58
128
43
32
22
1
10
54
39
13

14.5
32.0
10.8
8.0
5.5
0.3
2.5
13.5
9.8
3.3

200
201400
401600
601800
801

48
148
120
43
41

12.0
37.0
30.0
10.8
10.3

44

200(50.0%), 200(50.0%). 19
. 1929
110(27.5%), 30 120(30.0%), 40 100(25.0%), 50 70
(17.5%) . 5(1.3%), 60(15.0%),
56(14.0%) 279(69.8%).
83.8% . SNS
.
. 128(32.0%)
/// 58(14.5%), 54
(13.5%) .
SNS . 200
48(12.0%) , 201400 148(37.0%), 401600
120(30%) 67% . 600
SNS . SNS
< 1> .
2. SNS
SNS .
) SNS ,
) .
, t-test . SNS

. SNS
(
2009). SNS SNS
) SNS , , )
, ) , ) ,

45

SNS

) , ) , )
7 .
, SNS
. SNS , ,
, ,
. ,
2.5(4= )
.
3.035, 3.14 .
SNS
.
< 2 > SNS ( )

SNS

SNS
SNS
SNS ,

SNS

* p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001

1.1050

.30732

1.1050

.30732

1.5850

.78476

1.7000

.83876

2.6200

.89980

2.7050

.86703

3.0350

.70445

3.1400

.77030

2.8100

.70454

2.8600

.71622

3.2300

.63965

3.1500

.57371

3.0850

.66331

3.0800

.59613

2.9400

.67727

2.9350

.65798

2.9850

.71928

2.9000

.77654

t-
t

.000

-1.416

-.962

-1.423

-.704

1.317

.079

.075

-1.136

46

< 1 > SNS ( )

4

3.035
3
2.62

2.705

3.23

3.14
2.81

2.86

3.15

3.085

3.08

2.94

2.935

2.985

2.9

3. SNS
SNS
. (van Dijk 2002)

.
SNS .
(Rafaeli 1988) (Jones 2006)
. , (two level)
(consumption)
. (reaction)
.
. (layered)
.
,

( 2009).

47

SNS

SNS
t-tes < 3>.
< 3 > SNS

SNS

SNS
SNS ,

SNS

1.6089

.79433

1.9286

.92110

2.6369

.88053

2.8810

.88902

3.1061

.71785

2.9286

.89423

2.8184

.69249

2.9762

.84068

3.1704

.60020

3.3571

.65598

3.0698

.61552

3.1905

.74041

2.9190

.66663

3.0952

.65554

2.9246

.75028

3.0952

.72165

t-
t

-2.424

-1.698

1.475

-1.364

-1.889

-1.175

-1.624

-1.399

# p<.1, * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001

, SNS
. SNS

. SNS
95%(p<.05) ,
. SNS
.
, SNS
.

48

.
SNS
.
2.6369 , 2.8810
(p<.1).
, SNS
(p<.1). SNS
.
SNS

. SNS SNS
SNS
.
4. SNS ,
SNS
. SNS 3
.
< 4 > SNS

2 (0.9%)

49 (21.4%)

118 (51.5%)

60 (26.2%)

229

612

2 (2.4%)

7 (8.2%)

44 (51.8%)

32 (37.6%)

85

4 (4.7%)

13 (15.1%)

41 (47.7%)

28 (32.6%)

86

8 (2.0%)

69 (17.3%)

203 (50.8%)

120 (30.0%)

400

Pearson 2 = 14.195 p=.028

 SNS

49

< 5 > SNS

,

3 (1.3%)

77 (33.6%)

123 (53.7%)

26 (11.4%)

229

612

1 (1.2%)

14 (16.5%)

52 (61.5%)

18 (21.2%)

85

5 (5.8%)

21 (24.4%)

40 (46.9%)

20 (23.3%)

86

9 (2.3%)

112 (28.0%)

215 (53.8%)

64 (16.0%)

400

Pearson 2 = 22.260 p=.001

, SNS
.4) (Pearson 2 = 14.195 p=.028),
612 SNS .
51.8%, 37.6%
89.4%. 90%
. 6
. 22.3% 6
.
, SNS .5)
(Pearson 2 = 22.260 p=.001), 6
. , SNS

.
SNS 6
.

4) SNS .
4 .
5) SNS ,
. 4 .

50

5. SNS
, SNS
. SNS
.
.
,
.
332(85.3%) .
400 308(77.0%). SNS

. , SNS
.
< 6 > SNS

(%)

(%)

12 (3.0%)

47 (11.8%)

210 (52.5%)

131 (32.8%)

400

78 (19.5%)

230 (57.5%)

75 (18.8%)

17 (4.3%)

400

< 7 > SNS

(%)

117 (29.3%)

223 (70.7%)

400

. SNS

( 29.3% <

 SNS

51

70.7%). SNS

.
, SNS SNS
,
, , , ,
.

.
,
, ID
.
, ,
.

.
ICTs
.
(informed citizen) ,
ICTs
.
.

(Great

Firewall)

(Goldsmith & Wu 2006).

52

. SNS


.
.
SNS
SNS . ,
, SNS , , ,
, .
SNS

.
, SNS

,
. SNS ,

.
223(70.7%) .
,
77.9% . SNS

.
SNS
. ,
.

 SNS

53

( 2004).
.

(Pateman) .

.
.
, OECD
ICTs
.

. SNS

.

.
,
. SNS
.
.
(accountability)
. (McQuail 2006)
.
2 (liability)
(answerability) (PD 2010 11 10).

.

54

.

. ,
, .

. .

.
SNS
.
SNS
,
.
, .
ICTs ,
(Chadwick 2006,
258).

( 2000).

.
(node)
.
, BBC SNS
SNS .

,
.

 SNS

55

.
.


.

(Gurak 2002, 176), ,
.

(social consensus)
.

56

. 2006. ,
. . : .
, J. 2002. . : .
. 2010. Privacy on the Facebook," IT 2010 9
.
. 2004. . : .
. 2007. , .
. . 2006.
. : .
. 2008. UCC , UCC &
.
, . . 2008. .
: .
. 2010. (SNS)
, 26 3. 129-157.
______. 2009. ?:
, .
. 2009. , 21
19 1.
. 2000. ..
, 6 2.
, . . 2006. .
: .
. 2009. :
.

 SNS

57

. 2010. SNS .
.
. 2009. . : .
KINDS. http://www.kinds.or.kr/
PD 2010 11 10.
Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in

Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

Benkler, Yochai 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production

Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.

boyd, danah and Ellison, Nicole. 2007, Social Network Sites: Definition,
History,

and

Communication

Journal

Scholarship,

13

(1).

of

Computer-Mediated

http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/

boyd. ellison.html. (2010/05/12).

Castells, Manuel. 2001. The Internet Galaxy : Reflections on the

Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press.

________________. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell
Publishers.

Chadwick, Andrew. 2006. Internet Politics: States, Citizens, And New

Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press.

Gandy,

Oscar.

H.

technology

1989.
&

The

bureaucratic

surveillance
social

society:
control,

Information

Journal

of

Communication, 39(3). 61-76.

Goldsmith, J & Wu, Tim 2006. Who Controls the Internet?: Illusion of

a Borderless World. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kalathi, Shanthi and Boas, Tayler. 2003. Open Networks Closed

Regimes. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press.

Lyon, D. 2003. Surveillance after September 11th Polity, Cambridge.

58

Mathiesen, Thomas. 1997. The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault's

Panopticon Revisited, Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 1, No. 2.
Prescott, LeeAnn. 2010, 54% of US Internet users on Facebook, 27%
on MySpace, http://social.venturebeat.com/2010/02/10/54-of-usinternet-users-on-facebook-27-on-myspace/ (2010/05/14).
Rafaeli, S. 1988. Interactivity: From new media to communication," In
R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann & S. Pingree(Eds.), Advancing

communication

science:

Merging

mass

and

interpersonal

processes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

RAND. 2002. Poor Connection: Trouble on the Internet Frontiers. Santa
Monica, CA: RAND.
Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody:

The Power of Organizing

Without Organizations. USA: Penguin Books, . 2008.

. : .
Toffler, E. 1980. The third wave. New York: Bantam Books.
van Dijk, Jan. 1999. The Network Society: Social Aspects of New

Media. London: Sage.

 SNS

59

Abstract

A Study on the Characteristics and

Understanding of Information Human
Rights of Korean Social Network Services
(SNS) Users
Kyong-Jae Song

Today, social network services (SNS) users are increasing rapidly. And recently, SNS
such as Facebook.com, Myspace.com, and Twitter.com, have created new political,
economic and social relations in the cyberspace and the real world. Surprisingly,
Facebook.com users exceeded 500 million people worldwide. This study aims to analyze
the actual conditions and information rights of SNS users, through survey analysis of
Korean SNS users. Through data from an internet survey, this study analyses social and
demographic characteristics and understanding of information human rights. This study has
used quantitative methodology. This argument provides the important key in understanding
the characteristics and information human rights of SNS users.
Key Words : social network services(SNS), information human rights, accountability,
self-control of information.

: 2010.10.30
: 2010.12.01
: 2010.12.17