Mike and Jack conducted an observation study to count and determine the operational status of all silos in Dallas Township. They classified the silos as either Harvestore or cement and whether they were operational. By dividing the township into sections and counting the silos in each section using Google Maps, they identified 12 Harvestore silos and 37 cement silos, with none currently operational. They drove around the township to verify the counts and ensure no silos were missed to improve accuracy. In total, they found 49 silos in the township, all non-operational.
Mike and Jack conducted an observation study to count and determine the operational status of all silos in Dallas Township. They classified the silos as either Harvestore or cement and whether they were operational. By dividing the township into sections and counting the silos in each section using Google Maps, they identified 12 Harvestore silos and 37 cement silos, with none currently operational. They drove around the township to verify the counts and ensure no silos were missed to improve accuracy. In total, they found 49 silos in the township, all non-operational.
Mike and Jack conducted an observation study to count and determine the operational status of all silos in Dallas Township. They classified the silos as either Harvestore or cement and whether they were operational. By dividing the township into sections and counting the silos in each section using Google Maps, they identified 12 Harvestore silos and 37 cement silos, with none currently operational. They drove around the township to verify the counts and ensure no silos were missed to improve accuracy. In total, they found 49 silos in the township, all non-operational.
For the observation study Mike and Jack conducted, as a group we choose to observes, count, and determine operational status of the entire population of silos in Dallas Township. In our study, our variable was to determine the silos was either a Harvestore or a cement silo, and operational status, making our variables qualitative, and a cluster sample. In order to fully county all of the silos in Dallas Township, we counted and surveyed the brand and operational status. In our simple random sample, we used google maps to count all of the silos in the township. After, pulling up google maps Mike and Jack divided up all of the sections and determined who was counting the sections in that section. After counting all of the silos in all 36 sections we determined there were thirty-seven cement silos and twelve Harvestore silos, none of which were in operation. By dividing up all of the sections between Mike and Jack this helped us avoid error because, we knew which sections we had to count, thus no silos in any sections were counted twice. However, the Google Maps imagery data we used dated back to September of 2013, and silos may have been torn down, thus making us count a silo that didn't exist. However to avoid this problem and undercoverage, Mike and Jack drove around the township to make sure no silo was counted that didnt exist today, and to further ensure that every silo was counted. In our study, Mike and I determined that our study was at the nominal level of measurement. Because Mike and Jack were not doing a experimental study, we did not need to worry about a control, placebo, or double blind effect. We also did not have to worry about privacy concerns because, silos are no secret, and most people know what a paint they are. After the study was concluded, Mike and Jack determined that in total there are 49 silos in Dallas Township, and none of them are in operation, because they are a pain, and did I mention a pain.