You are on page 1of 10

Question 1

X F FX FX²
2.5 8 20 50
7.5 11 82.5 618.75
12.5 14 175 2187.5
17.5 10 175 3062.5
3543.7
22.5 7 157.5 5
50 610 9462.5

i. Mean = ∑fx = 610 = 12.2


∑f 50

∑ fx
ii. Standard Deviation =
√ ∑f
– ( X́)2
9462.5
=
√ 50
– (12.2)2

= √ 189.25−148.76
= √ 40.41

= 6.36

S
iii. Coefficient of Variation = x 100

6.36
= x 100
12.2

= 52.13
P−π
iv. Using, Z = π (1−π )
√ n

P = 14 + 10 + 7 = 31 = 0.62
50 50

π = 0.57 ; 1 - π = 0.43

1 – p = 1 – 0.62 = 0.38

Step 1:
Null Hypothesis : The mean amounts are the same
Alternative Hypothesis : The mean amounts are not the same

Step 2:
1 – tail ; z = 1.64
At 5%

Step 3:
P−π
Z = π (1−π )
√ n

0.62−0.57
= 0.57( 0.43)
√ 50

= 0.0500
0.0700

= 0.714
Step 4:

Step 5:
The the mean is the same.
Question 2
OBSERVER RESULT
    Region    
Distance traveled South Middle North Total
Less than 5 miles 50 80 70 200
Between 5 and 10 miles 80 60 20 160
More than 10 miles 70 60 10 140
  200 200 100 500

EXPECTER RESULT
    Region    
Distance traveled South Middle North Total
200×200 = 80 200×200 = 80 100×200 = 40
Less than 5 miles 500 500 500 200
Between 5 and 10 200×160 = 64 200×160 = 64 100×160 = 32
miles 500 500 500 160
200×140 = 56 200×140 = 56 100×140 = 28
More than 10 miles 500 500 500 140
  200 200 100 500

(O-E)²
O E (O-E)² E
50 80 900 11.25
80 80 0 0
70 40 900 22.5
80 64 256 4
60 64 16 0.25
20 32 144 4.5
70 56 196 3.5
60 56 16 0.29
10 28 324 11.57
  57.86
Step 1:
Null Hypothesis : There is no association between response and interest in the
position place
Alternative Hypothesis : There is a association between response and interest in the
position place

Step 2:
5
α = 5% = = 0.05
100
V = (r-1) (c-1)
= (3-1) (3-1)
= 2x2
= 4
X² = 9.49 from table

Step 3:
X² = 57.86 from calculation

Step 4:
Step 5:
There is association between response and interest in the position place

Question 3

Advertising Predicted Actual


Cost   Sales   Sales   Total
X X² X X² X X²
2 4 70 4900 70 4900
6 36 90 8100 90 8100
8 64 100 10000 100 10000
8 64 100 10000 100 10000
12 144 120 14400 120 14400
16 256 140 19600 140 19600
20 400 160 25600 160 25600
20 400 160 25600 160 25600
22 484 170 28900 170 28900
26 676 190 36100 190 36100
TC 140 1300 1300 2740
nc 10   10 10 30
X² 2528   183200   183200 368928

(∑ X )²
SS Total = ∑ X² -
n

(2740)²
= 368 928 –
30

= 368 928 – 250 253.33

= 118 674.67
(Tc) ² (∑ X )²
SST = ∑ -
nc n

(140) ² (1300) ² (1300) ² (2740) ²


= + + -
10 10 10 10

= 1960 + 169 000 + 169 000 – 250 253.33

= 339 960 – 250 253.33

= 89 706.67

SSE = SS Total – SST

= 118 674.67 – 89 706.67

= 28 968

Source of Sum of Degree of


Variation Sources Freedom Mean Square F
Treatment 89706.67 2 44853.34
Error 28968 27 1072.89 41.81
Total 118674.67 29 45926.23

Step 1:
Null Hypothesis : There is no evidence of daily variation
Alternative Hypothesis : There is a evidence of daily variation

Step 2:
V = k-1 ; n-k = 29-2
= 3-1 = 27
=2
At 5% , α = 0.05
F = 3.39 from table
Step 3:
F = 41.81 from calculation

Step 4:

Step 5:
There is evidence of daily variation
Question 4

a. At 95%
Z = 1.96
s
μ = X́ ± Z x ( )
√n
219.13
= 392.31 ± 1.96 x
√65
219.13
= 392.31 ± 1.96 x
8.06
= 392.31 ± 53.27

= 339.04 to 445.58

b. At 99%
Z = 2.58
s
μ = X́ ± Z ( )
√n
219.13
= 392.31 ± 2.58 x
√65
219.13
= 392.31 ± 2.58 x
8.06
= 392.31 ± 70.14
= 322.17 to 462.45

You might also like