Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anova Final

    Uploaded by

    Ron Pascual
    10 views16 pages
    This document presents the results of a one-way ANOVA test comparing the mean paper waste produced across three types of offices (Administrative, Services, Academic). The ANOVA found no statistically significant difference in paper waste between the three office types (p=0.7750961165). A Tukey-Kramer procedure also found no significant differences between any of the office type pairs (Administrative vs Services, Administrative vs Academic, Services vs Academic). Therefore, it was concluded that the mean paper waste does not differ significantly across the three office types.

    Original Description:

    fdsdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document presents the results of a one-way ANOVA test comparing the mean paper waste produced across three types of offices (Administrative, Services, Academic). The ANOVA found no statistically significant difference in paper waste between the three office types (p=0.7750961165). A Tukey-Kramer procedure also found no significant differences between any of the office type pairs (Administrative vs Services, Administrative vs Academic, Services vs Academic). Therefore, it was concluded that the mean paper waste does not differ significantly across the three office types.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views16 pages

    Anova Final

    Uploaded by

    Ron Pascual
    This document presents the results of a one-way ANOVA test comparing the mean paper waste produced across three types of offices (Administrative, Services, Academic). The ANOVA found no statistically significant difference in paper waste between the three office types (p=0.7750961165). A Tukey-Kramer procedure also found no significant differences between any of the office type pairs (Administrative vs Services, Administrative vs Academic, Services vs Academic). Therefore, it was concluded that the mean paper waste does not differ significantly across the three office types.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 16

    ONE WAY ANOVA FINAL

    Administrative Offices
    50
    50
    50
    50
    299.5
    749.5

    count
    mean

    6
    208.1666666667

    Services Offices
    50
    50
    50
    50
    50
    50
    50
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5
    749.5
    749.5
    3000

    13
    442.1153846154

    Factor Levels
    n

    3
    44

    NAL
    Academic Offices
    50
    50
    50
    50
    50
    50
    50
    50
    50
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5
    299.5

    749.5

    749.5

    749.5
    749.5
    749.5
    7550
    25
    589.7

    Anova: Single Factor


    SUMMARY
    Groups
    Administrative Offices
    Services Offices
    Academic Offices

    ANOVA
    Source of Variation
    Between Groups
    Within Groups
    Total

    Since p-value obtained is 0.7141 which is greater than 0.05,


    Tukey-Kramer Procedure

    Admin vs Service

    Admin vs Acads

    Service vs Acads

    Count

    Sum
    6
    13
    25

    1249
    5747.5
    14742.5

    SS
    754162.385198131
    60307594.9102564

    df
    2
    41

    61061757.2954545

    43

    er than 0.05, it can be concluded that the means of the three offic
    Mean Difference

    Critical q

    -233.9487179487

    3.439

    -381.5333333333

    3.439

    -147.5846153846

    3.439

    Average
    Variance
    208.1666666667 80290.0666666667
    442.1153846154 655753.58974359
    589.7
    2168212.5625

    MS
    377081.192599066
    1470916.94903064

    F
    0.2563579085

    P-value
    0.7750961165

    that the means of the three offices are statistically the same. We s
    Standardized Error

    q times s.error

    95% Conf interval

    423.2613155346

    1455.5956641235 -1689.5443820723

    389.8650425466

    1340.7458813176

    293.2440413538

    1008.4662582156 -1156.0508736002

    -1722.279214651

    F crit
    3.2256838423

    cally the same. We shall not procede to Tukey-Kramer Procedure


    95% Conf interval

    95% sure interpretation of the results

    Admin Offices produces between


    1689.54g less and 1221.65g more
    of paperwaste than Services
    offices
    1221.6469461748

    959.2125479843

    Admin offices produces between


    1722.28g less and 959.21g more
    of paperwaste than Academic
    Offices

    Services offices produces between


    1156.05g less and 860.88g more
    of paperwaste than Academic
    waste
    860.881642831

    Kramer Procedure

    ation of the results

    No significant difference

    No significant difference

    No significant difference

    Note: We are not entirely sure that these


    means are equal. We should stay on neutral
    language to avoid misconception. "No
    significant difference" does not exactly
    mean that means between two pairs are
    congruent. It may be but it may be not.

    You might also like