Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1306448174
Teknik Metalurgi dan Material
Metfis-02
----1-----
----2-----
----3-----
----4-----
----5-----
-----6-----
42,2
33,1
24.2
15
8,9
15,18
17,90
21.56
26.89
38.01
40.67
d1
46.5
21.5
14.1
9.8
8.7
d2
45.4
21.2
12.3
10.5
9.6
8.5
Sample Number
d3
47.4
21.3
12.4
11.2
9.3
d4
46.7
19.5
12.8
10.9
9.7
8.1
d5
46.9
21.1
13.4
10.8
9.4
46.58
20.92
13
10.64
9.4
8.26
d1/2 / m1/2
0.15
0.22
0.28
0.31
0.33
0.35
HV1
36.4
38.1
42.2
51.2
51.6
53.9
HV2
36.9
38.9
45.6
51.6
52.4
54.3
HV3
32.4
45.6
42.6
50.5
52.4
56.2
HV4
37.8
42.1
47.2
48.2
53.6
45.5
HV5
39.1
41.9
41
47.3
45.2
55.7
Mean HV
36.52
41.32
43.72
49.76
51.04
53.12
123.96
131.16
149.28
153.12
159.36
From the result, if we want to check the correctness of this formula, we just need to
pick some data from mean grain size measurement (d) and see the result of the
yield stress. If it just fit to yield stress that we get from experiment or not.
For example
Using d = 20.92 m (sample 2)
1/2
y=69+255(20.92)
y=69+55.75
y=124.75
y=123.96
1/2
y=69+255(9.4)
y=69+83.17
y=152.17
While from the experiment we got that
y=153.12
That is because we use linier regression methods that still have some amount of
margin of error. But it still means that this formula is still suitable for this calculating
because its relative error still less than 1%.
And from that experiment, we can conclude that the more narrow the diameter of
grain size will affect to more hardness of that material (as we can see, HV value will
be increase if the diameter of grain is decrease).
y=3HV
So, we can say that the more narrow the diameter of grain size will affect to more
yield stress that can be applied to the material