Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reservoir Fluid Properties
Reservoir Fluid Properties
Composition is critical
Formation fluid samples help to
establish the physical and chemical
properties of formation fluids, such as
the hydrocarbon type and the
pressurevolumetemperature (PVT)
behavior of the reserves in place.
Hydrocarbon composition can vary
significantly within an oil field and must
be adequately described. Typical
measurements performed on a fluid
sample from an oil reservoir include PVT
relationships, viscosity, composition,
gasoil ratio (GOR), differential
Number 2, 2001
12
Surface sampling
Surface sampling involves the
recombination of oil and gas taken
from the separator, along with accurate
measurement of their respective rates.
This method is often chosen when
large volumes of oil and gas are
required for analysis, as is the case for
condensate fluids. Surface sampling is
also selected in cases where the fluid
at the bottom of the well is not
representative of the reservoir fluid,
such as gas condensate reservoirs and
oil reservoirs producing large
quantities of water.
The main difficulties in surface
sampling arise because fluid in the
separator is at its bubblepoint and gas at
its dewpoint. Any slight fall in pressure
or increase in temperature can result in
the fluid becoming diphasic during the
Downhole sampling
The main challenges in downhole sampling
operations are finding the best zones for
sampling, connecting to the formation,
obtaining acceptably low filtrate
contamination, and transporting unaltered
fluid samples back to the surface.
Conventional downhole sampling
techniques, such as DSTs, require the
well to be conditioned before sampling
to remove the nonrepresentative
reservoir fluid around the wellbore with
the original fluid. In this process, the well
is produced at successively lower rates
until further reductions have no effect on
the stabilized gasoil ratio.
100
10
Reservoir fluid
100 % oil-base mud filtrate
1 wt % oil-base mud filtrate
10 wt % oil-base mud filtrate
40 wt % oil-base mud filtrate
0.10
0.01
Component
Number 2, 2001
C1
C2
C3
iC4
nC4
iC5
nC5
C6
Benzene
C7
Toluene
C8
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
C21
C22
C23
C24
C25
C26
C27
C28
C29
C30
C31
C32
C33
C34
C35
C36
13
Number 2, 2001
14
Light-emitting
diode
Gas detector
Lamp
Water
Gas
Fluid flow
Oil
Liquid detector
Optical density
Color
channels
Comments
Water,
oil
channels
Inflate packer
Packer
pretest
Start
pumpout
Pumping
filtrate
Pumping oil
Stop
pumping
Start sample
Throttling
Change
throttle
Seal sample
Accurate in-situ
measurement by
optical fluid analysis
The OFA module provides the flowline
fluid measurements needed to
distinguish sample contamination in a
wide range of complex environments
(Figure 2.3). It uses a combination of
visible and near-infrared absorption
spectrometry to record the intensity of
light transmitted through the MDT tool
flowline fluid at various wavelengths.
Optical properties of
wellbore fluids
Crude A
Crude B
Optical density
Water
Oil-base
mud filtrate
Condensate
Diesel
0
0 1
2
Channel number
500
1000
1500
2000
Wavelength, nm
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Number 2, 2001
15
Energy per
photon, eV
Wavelength, m
Cosmic
rays
Objects of size
comparable to
wavelength
10 13
10 7
10 12
10 6
10 11
10 5
10 10
10 4
10 9
10 3
10 8
10 2
10 7
10
10 6
10 5
10 1
10 4
10 2
Sands
10 3
10 3
Gravel
10 2
10 4
10 1
10 5
rays
Water and hydrocarbon
molecules
X-rays
Ultraviolet
Visible
light
Silts
Infrared
Radar bands
Boulders
UHF
Television
Television
FM TV
10 6
VHF
10
10 7
HF
10 2
10 8
10 3
10 9
Clays
MF
LF
R
a
d
i
o
Rigs
Short
wave
Standard
broadcast
radio
Wells
Number 2, 2001
16
In practice
Limestone vol 1
v/v
Total flow 1
1 Depth, ft
Zone 1
Zone 2A
6600
Zone 2B
6650
6700
Zone 3A
6750
Zone 3B
6800
Zone 4
10,000
GOR, scf/STB
35
30
25
1000
1
HOP index
10
COP index
10
100
Number 2, 2001
17
NPHI
0
(ft3/ft) 0.5
1 : 400
(ft)
Formation pressure
(psi)
4050
4200
WC: 48%
Sal: 100 kppm
(60 kppm)
2A
6950
WC: 0%
Sal: 70 kppm
(60 kppm)
2B
7000
WC: 0%
Sal: 130 kppm
(60 kppm)
7050
WC: 92-96%
Sal: 170 kppm
(60 kppm)
3A
7100
3B
WC: 50%
0%
Sal: 300 kppm
(200 kppm)
7150
4
NPHI
(ft3/ft) 0.5
1 : 400
(ft)
2A
6950
2B
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
7000
7050
3A
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
7100
1.0
3B
7150
Number 2, 2001
18
WC: 48%
600
1200 1800 2400
Elapsed pump-out time, sec
WC: 100%
600
1200
1800
Elapsed pump-out time, sec
WC: 50% (filtrate)
Actual WC: 0%
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
600
1200 1800 2400
Elapsed pump-out time, sec
Advanced reservoir
monitoring technology
in the Ghawar field
The main objectives of obtaining MDT*
Modular Dynamics Formation Tester
data in the Ghawar field are:
to establish the vertical pressure
profile
to obtain fluid samples in partly swept
zones, and establish water salinity and
movable oil fraction
to measure the in-situ permeability for
use in reservoir simulation models.
Obtaining the vertical pressure
distribution is a primary focus because
this information clarifies the
communication between the superpermeability, thin beds and the
surrounding high-porosity zones, as well
as the communication between highand low-porosity zones towards the
base of the reservoir.
Quantitative measurement of water
saturation is essential in understanding
water movement in the reservoir,
evaluating flood sweep efficiency, and
choosing future well locations.
The injection water in the Ghawar
field is very low salinity compared with
the connate water. The openhole,
electric wireline logs drilled behind the
flood front are impossible to interpret
quantitatively without a knowledge of
the Rw. Figure 2.10 shows a vertical
pressure profile and the salinities
determined from MDT samples.
The MDT is able to pump fluids from the
formation until uncontaminated formation
fluid is observed (Figure 2.11). The Rw
determined from the sample can be used
in quantitative evaluation of wireline logs
to determine true water saturation.
The graph for the lowest zone in
Figure 2.11 also indicates that the truer
measured water cut from the MDT
sample, which is uncontaminated by
mud filtrate, shows unswept movable oil
that is not indicated by conventional
sampling methods.
Formation
fluid
Resistivity
CQG
Strain gauge
P
P
Pressure
test chamber
Contamination
OFA bubbles
Pump up/down
module
Sample fluid
Sample
chamber
Wellbore fluid
at hydrostatic
pressure
Open valve
Closed valve
Number 2, 2001
19
Induction
ohm-m
Density porosity
Clean core
permeability, md
Five-level averaging
on CMR data
CMR Timur/Coates
Density porosity
permeability, md
0.1
in. 16
1000 CMR 3-ms porosity, p.u.
GR
Neutron porosity
TCMR
T2 log mean
porosity, p.u.
ms
0 0.3
p.u.
-15 0.1
0 API 150 45
1000 40
T2 distribution
Borehole
T2 cutoff
ms
3000
Depth, m
X100
Tar
zones
X125
X150
Number 2, 2001
20
Integrated answers
maximize sampling
efficiency
Wellsite efficiency is substantially
increased when MDT sampling depths
are guided by CMR results. The
in-situ dynamic MDT measurements
complement the CMR continuous
permeability log, and help confirm the
presence of producible hydrocarbons.
Number 2, 2001
Reading rainbows
in the mud
21
C. Single-phase sample
SPMC
100%
uid
fra
ct
io
Liq
Pressure
Liquid
%
n,
Critical point
250-cm3
monophasic
sample
'Floating'
piston
Nitrogen pressure
transmitted to
the sample
through the
buffer fluid
'Floating'
piston
Pressurecharged
nitrogen
Multiphase zone
D. Multiphase sample
75%
Liquid % 50%
25%
0%
Gas
Temperature
Reservoir temperature
Ambient temperature
Number 2, 2001
22
Reservoir fluid
Buffer fluid
Nitrogen
Flow-stream analysis
The optical density and coloration
sampling method described previously is
used for most wells. However, in a well
drilled with synthetic, oil-base mud, the
OFA measurements show that base-oil
filtrate and other contaminants decrease
rapidly as they are pumped through the
MDT tool. In the field example in Figure
2.17, the MDT flow stream was
monitored with the OFA spectrometer.
The responses in channels 3 to 7 evolve,
indicating crude oil as the flow cleans up.
The OFA log suggests that after about
30 min of pumping, little filtrate
contamination is present and the
coloration channels indicate that a
medium-gravity hydrocarbon sample is
flowing through the tool. In this well, the
optical density readings in all channels
have stabilized after 40 min, indicating
that additional pumping would not
significantly reduce contamination
further. A formation sample was
0.8
Channel 3
Optical density
0.6
0.4
Channel 4
0.2
Channel 5
Channel 7
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Number 2, 2001
Middle East Reservoir Review
23