Ethos and pathos appeals are evident throughout the first part of the speech. Diction in the speech was intentionally focused on connecting with the audience through emotion. He uses words such as "tormented", "jeopardy", and "endangered" to really try and make them feel more apt to speak out against wrongfulness.
Ethos and pathos appeals are evident throughout the first part of the speech. Diction in the speech was intentionally focused on connecting with the audience through emotion. He uses words such as "tormented", "jeopardy", and "endangered" to really try and make them feel more apt to speak out against wrongfulness.
Ethos and pathos appeals are evident throughout the first part of the speech. Diction in the speech was intentionally focused on connecting with the audience through emotion. He uses words such as "tormented", "jeopardy", and "endangered" to really try and make them feel more apt to speak out against wrongfulness.
One of the most honorable, if not the most honorable award, is the Nobel Peace Prize. Being awarded only 96 times, it is a prestigious honor to be given. One of those few people to ever receive this was Elie Wiesel, a survivor of the holocaust. His acceptance speech focused on the central idea that Inhumane acts should be spoken against He did this by using the appeals ethos and pathos and by also using devices such as anaphoras and diction. The ethos appeal is evident throughout the first part of the speech. One such example is I remember: it happened yesterday, or eternities ago. (paragraph 4). By using the first person view while talking about the discrimination and suffering that took place during the holocaust, Wiesel is saying that he was there during the events. He is credible to talking about the events because of the fact that he was actually there and endured the torturous affairs that occurred. Next, Wiesel uses the pathos appeal towards the end of his speech. An example of this is when he says, And the I explain to him how naive we were, that the world did know and remained silent. (paragraph 7). He said this when a little boy asked him about the holocaust wondering how people could remain muted when they had knowledge of the terrible things happening to the jewish people. By including this sentence, Wiesel evokes emotion from the audience to get his message, people need to interfere with wrongdoings and the suffering of people, across. The anaphora is best used in paragraph 4 where Wiesel continuously uses the phrase, I remember at the start of his sentences. This usage allows Wiesel to further show that the holocaust events are forever a part of him which connects to ethos and pathos. His diction in the speech was intentionally focused on connecting with the audience through emotion to persuade them to take action in situations where people are persecuted for race, gender, religion, or political views. He uses words such as tormented, jeopardy, and endangered to really try and make them feel more apt to speak out against wrongfulness. This also further supplements the pathos appeal in the speech. Not a lot of people get the opportunity to receive the Nobel Peace Prize and Elie Wiesel promised to himself that he would never be silent in immoral circumstances because of what he went through in the holocaust. With the use of ethos, pathos, anaphora, and diction, Wiesel spoke to the people while he was accepting his peace prize, about how they should speak and act against unjust actions and how staying
silent doesnt help. He endured a lot but managed to stay positive, win the Nobel Prize, and pass his word of speaking out on to countless people.