Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Solimine v. United States, 64 F.3d 654, 1st Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    This document is a court ruling that summarizes and affirms the dismissal of a case brought by Anthony Solimine against the United States. The court found that this case and previous appeals brought by Solimine were essentially identical and frivolous, based on meritless legal theories. The court denied Solimine's motion for oral argument and summarily affirmed the district court's dismissal of the case for the reasons stated in that court's September 21, 1994 memorandum and order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-08-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 64 F.3d 654 Docket: 94-2250

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling that summarizes and affirms the dismissal of a case brought by Anthony Solimine against the United States. The court found that this case and previous appeals brought by Solimine were essentially identical and frivolous, based on meritless legal theories. The court denied Solimine's motion for oral argument and summarily affirmed the district court's dismissal of the case for the reasons stated in that court's September 21, 1994 memorandum and order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    Solimine v. United States, 64 F.3d 654, 1st Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling that summarizes and affirms the dismissal of a case brought by Anthony Solimine against the United States. The court found that this case and previous appeals brought by Solimine were essentially identical and frivolous, based on meritless legal theories. The court denied Solimine's motion for oral argument and summarily affirmed the district court's dismissal of the case for the reasons stated in that court's September 21, 1994 memorandum and order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    64 F.

    3d 654

    NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished


    opinions may be cited only in related cases.
    Anthony SOLIMINE, Plaintiff, Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants, Appellees.
    No. 94-2250.

    United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.


    Aug. 29, 1995.

    Anthony Solimine on brief pro se.


    Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and David S. Mackey, Assistant
    United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.
    Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, and SELYA and LYNCH, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    The underlying district court action and this appeal are essentially identical to
    appellant's other district court complaints and previous appeals in Solimine v.
    F.B.I., Nos. 94-1873; 94-1995 (1st Cir. Mar. 24, 1995). As we noted therein,
    the underlying action is frivolous as it is based on "an indisputably meritless
    legal theory." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989).

    Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied.

    We summarily affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum
    and order of dismissal dated September 21, 1994. Loc. R. 27.1.

    You might also like