This document is a court opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit regarding an appeal from a bankruptcy case. The court affirmed the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, finding that the appeal had no merit for three reasons: 1) the appellant waived any claims about the form of the bankruptcy court proceedings and there was no abuse of discretion; 2) the appellant had no standing to pursue claims that were previously assigned to the corporation's bankruptcy trustee; and 3) the bankruptcy court properly dismissed the appellant's remaining claims under Massachusetts law.
This document is a court opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit regarding an appeal from a bankruptcy case. The court affirmed the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, finding that the appeal had no merit for three reasons: 1) the appellant waived any claims about the form of the bankruptcy court proceedings and there was no abuse of discretion; 2) the appellant had no standing to pursue claims that were previously assigned to the corporation's bankruptcy trustee; and 3) the bankruptcy court properly dismissed the appellant's remaining claims under Massachusetts law.
This document is a court opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit regarding an appeal from a bankruptcy case. The court affirmed the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, finding that the appeal had no merit for three reasons: 1) the appellant waived any claims about the form of the bankruptcy court proceedings and there was no abuse of discretion; 2) the appellant had no standing to pursue claims that were previously assigned to the corporation's bankruptcy trustee; and 3) the bankruptcy court properly dismissed the appellant's remaining claims under Massachusetts law.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
Misc. No. 98-9001
IN RE: EDWARD J. CHOINSKI AND MILDRED B. CHOINSKI,
Debtors.
RICHARD J. BIRCH,
Appellant,
v.
EDWARD J. CHOINSKI, ET AL.,
Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL
OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge,
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
Richard J. Birch on brief pro se.
Richard S. Hackel on brief for debtors/appellees Edward J. Choinski and Mildred B. Choinski.
July 6, 1998
Per Curiam.
Upon careful review of th
record, we conclude that this appeal has no merit.
We reach
this conclusion essentially for the reasons stated by the
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its memorandum of decision dated November 18, 1997:
appellant waived any appellate claim about
the form of the bankruptcy court proceedings, and in any event
we perceive no abuse of the bankruptcy court's discretion in that regard; appellant has no standing to pursue the substance of the claim that he previously assigned to the corporation's bankruptcy trustee; and the bankruptcy court properly dismissed appellant's remaining claims under Massachusetts law. Affirmed.