Email From Chia Boon Teck to Belle 3rd November 2009

From: Chia Boon Teck <chiaboonteck@chiawongllp.com>

Date: Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: letter from unilegal
To: Belle Lin Nai <belle.linnai@lvmhgroups.com>, bellelinnai@gmail.com
Cc: winniephua@chiawongllp.com, caristawee@chiawongllp.com

Hi belle

Pls let me have your approval and comments, if any, on my following proposed
reply to unilegal:-

We refer to your letter dated 2.11.09.

Much had been exchanged between you and our client's previous solicitors as well
as our client directly on the issue of her stolen gold bars. Our client had already
made a police report. Our client had not "remained silent".

Arbitration requires both parties to pay the arbitrator as well as for arbitration
facilities; whereas they need not incur any costs for the judicial officers and the
courts if parties litigate instead.

Unlike shipping and construction cases which might benefit from having an
arbitrator who is familiar with these industry practices, there is little, if any, benefit
from referring a tenancy matter to arbitration.

Out of respect for the President of the Law Society, our clients shall refrain from
filing their Writ of Summons in the Subordinate Courts pending his reply to your
letter to him dated 2.11.09.

As regards our letter to the President of the Law Society dated 26.10.09, the
undersigned was alerted to your not having been copied the same only now. We
apologize for our secretarial oversight and enclose herewith a copy of our aforesaid
letter for your record.

Cc President of Law Society

clients

Thx & regards

Chia Boon Teck