Resistance to sanity is MAD When minds are lost best lose

Resistence to MAD is sad yours before going MAD

If it makes you mad it probably is

Enforcing the Law A novel idea

Common Sense Evolution

Red Coats Mad Plan 2008

The Law is a book to go by...not a book to go buy Charter rights are not for sale or rent

Yet the members of the Society sell and rent them over and over again

The members of the Law Society of Upper Canada believe they are the law and are if we believe them

Law Society proclaims their members do not give a dam about the Canadians Charter Rights

The Law Society demonstrate they do not give a damn with every effort to prove it

Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant demonstrates he doesn’t give a damn

and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” explains why
Politicians debate what’s good for the Society
and the Attorney General assures and enacts it

Lawyer’s debate them on the immoral’s behalf and sure enough their cut behalf

The moral majority finance it but victims don’t have a chance making us all victims perchance it

How MAD are we?

So glad you asked

1
 Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Where’s Zack….. We want Zack

Too bad Zack didn’t realize the government was the organized crime

He might have been here today to help. Right?

Well you are here and realize the government is organized crime. Right?

Of course you do. First hand experience and now you’re a real honest to goodness RCMP

You knew before you received the evidence but what do you do? … is the problem at hand eh? Bill

Do you mind if I call you Bill, Bill………I’ll take that as a yes and you can call me Frank because I
obviously am frank. Eh Bill?

Here you have the conspirators counting on you and you know you can count on them, but what if the people
find out.

Hell, what’s the odds?

Are you sure?

I presume you can count on the Commission for Public Complaints.

Makes this individual want to cry.

You can be who ever you want to be and what you are, so are the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and so
ensures the individual’s lowly place in life in this great country of ours under the supremacy of God who is
just a figment of imagination as is our guaranteed Charter rights.

Why? You know why

You did answer the WHY’s in the November 12 2007 document didn’t you?

Mad Glad mostly sad Why?

Perhaps some of the guys can give you some insight.

2
November 13, 2007
info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org;
edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; cba-
mba@mts.net; admin@cbanb.com; cba-
nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca;
cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-
pei@isn.net; info@abcqc.qc.ca;
cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick,On
L4P 2P8

3
Dear Canadian Bar Association Reprsentatives

I am just an ordinary citizen of Canada, perhaps a little less passive and a little more
conviction towards the acquisition of justice as I have been on the trail 24/7 since June 30
2005 with it nowhere in site here in Ontario.

I have looked under every rock and found nothing but snakes, venomous for sure and I
was just wondering if they are spread throughout Canada.

My main concern is to whether or not the Canadian individual is actually guaranteed

Charter Rights as provided in The Constitution Act, 1982 or perhaps they are something
you can rent when needed and can afford them or is there perhaps a way of purchasing
them out right or can you only rent them if you have an excellent credit rating.

If a crook cleans you out is your acquisition to justice negated for being so stupid or is it
the governments fault for not getting the message to me that there are bad people running
around the country?

Well let me get to the point

I have accomplished nothing in the line of justice here in Ontario and in fact the evidence
I have collected along the way proves irrefutably it is impossible to achieve the justice as
stated and implied in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms for quite obvious
reason which the Law Society of Upper Canada related to me in a completely different
matter than the one I an providing you today.

They are quite adamant their members do not give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter Rights which makes it quite difficult for me to discern how it would
be possible for the individual to achieve justice consistent with the supreme law of
Canada, with their members having infested the legal system.

I am requesting you review the attachments and study the referenced evidence responding
FFF.
Should you find anything that seems not particularly right in your understanding of The
Law take appropriate action to address the issues.

You will read that I do not have confidence in the government personnel due their
indifference to the issues I have addressed them where my analysis of the evidence
proves irrefutably government personnel are engaged in a conspiracy against the
Canadian people whereby the individual who is guaranteed Charter rights hasn’t a hope
in hell accessing them alone and hasn’t a hope in hell organizing the people to stand
together to assert their rights.

Of course if I was gay I would have a membership to contend with.

4
In any case I would like you to review the actions taken by the Law Society of Upper
Canada against the particular lawyer referenced within the said file and take action where
it is due in your professional opinions.

I am sending this to Canadian Bar Association Representatives across the country and I
presume the significance of the serious nature of the issues will be readily apparent to
you.

I would appreciate very much if you each addressed the issues in an independent manner
and studied the evidence as if you each were the individual looking for justice.

In other words put yourself in my shoes using your intelligent heads to determine if you
would be getting a fair shake under the law and if not set out a course of action as to how
you would address it.

I do not expect you to respond to me nor do I expect you to act on my behalf.

I was hoping perchance once you have all completed addressing your analysis of the
evidence and identified the or any inadequacies as per your individual departments
perception of The Law, the Constitution, you would accumulate them to one department
and distribute the whole 15 to each department simultaneously for analysis for the
purpose of restructuring a Legal System conducive to and consistent with the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights, which believe it or not is a significant concern to them even if
they are not aware.

Surely there can be no doubt it is time for significant change to the Legal System and
perhaps it will be more apparent if you should take on this endeavor independently and
then together as suggested or in some manner more suitable to your intelligence
obviously having a broader oversight than I could possibly have although I do have a
particular view perchance you have not yet chanced upon and I highly suspect no more
desire to do than I.

However having done so why not take advantage of putting your minds together to
compare apples against apples or oranges against oranges as you prefer.

Just a thought as they persistently pop up without a thought as to what to do with them.

I would appreciate it if someone would forward this information on to Mr. Gary H. Pon
up there in Nunavut because it just has become too costly to fax for me.

It has also occurred to me he may be lonely up there and glad to here from us in the
south.
Perhaps he may suggest if we just all went ice fishing we would all keep out of trouble.

Thank you

5
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher

PS
I would appreciate however knowing if you see the necessity to address the issues in
some manner.

6
 November 13, 2007

Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On
L4P 2P8
Canada

Constitution Act, 1982

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Canada is founded upon the supremacy of God and the rule of law
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set
out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably
justified in a free and democratic society.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience

and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including
freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of
peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.

Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms

http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

The Conspiracy
Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Office of the Attorney General of Ontario

http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
Law Society of Lower Tier Canada

PUBLIC INQUIRY
On September 1 2006 the preliminary findings of an investigation undertaken by myself, a former
Provincial Government and City of Toronto employee, suggesting a provincial government
conspiracy against the people of Ontario were presented to the Premier of Ontario Dalton McGuinty
and several other top government officials including Peter Van Loan of the Federal Government to
provide them the opportunity to commence or cause to commence proceedings to expose the
government personnel involved so as to bring them before the justice system of Canada where the
evidence identified as the BLACK BOOK clearly showed there were serious inconsistencies of the
Ontario laws with the Constitution Act, 1982 the supreme law of Canada. Allegations of obstruction
of justice under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the criminal code of the Constitution Act, 1982
7
When the Premier and others failed to respond to the BLACK BOOK given the apparent serious nature
of the issues I began to circulate the evidence to various government departments and levels of
government and upon receiving no positive response began to realize the whole legal system was corrupt
and in on a conspiracy against the people which presented some what of an impediment to my original
quest to have a fraud brought to justice, which expanded to include obstruction of justice by certain
government personnel and then to government conspiracy against the people.

In the early stages of my investigation I was running on plain old common sense and a whole lot of
experience in investigative practice having retired from a forty year career in land surveying having
spent 10 years with the province of Ontario, 16 years in the private sector where I was managing a small
survey office before wrapping up my 40 year career with 14 years at the City of Toronto.

Obviously the challenge was insurmountable to take on the whole damn government, one person against
Goliath without slingshot nor any faith in God.

What I did have was faith in me being particularly adept to the challenge, unorthodox in my ways
having always looked for better and faster ways than the conventional which had been well established
long before my presence on the scene.

So having recently retired having availability of time, confidence in my experience with fortitude and
conviction, confidence in the incompetence of government personnel and their persistence to resist
change and their general attitude of killing a day in their quest to retirement, their general ineptitude to
learn any more than what they have been told and adherence to routine and their general confidence in a
thing dependent on sticking together to a belief of ignorant persuasion unfounded of common sense and
having often taken on such challenges before to change the ideology of well established principles this
was an opportunity and challenge of a lifetime I had lucked upon. Attitude towards purpose is
everything.

As in any challenge it serves well to know your opponent and in this case they didn’t know me and in
fact they are so bloody ignorant they don’t even know themselves.

Their persistence to ignorance and continuity to incompetence enforced by habit and routine and their
confidence dependent on the support of others akin leave them extraordinarily vulnerable devoid of
common sense intent to original purpose of hire and that which is intended and necessary to accomplish.

I have taken on such challenges successfully many times before in single offices and departments before
but the whole damn government?

Ha ha ha, this indeed was going to be a decent challenge with no likely help in sight.

As I set myself to the task gathering and studying what ever I could get my hands on pertinent to the
endeavor being abundantly aware of the value of documentation and it’s authority upon circumstance
and the significance of priority of legitimate evidence and the difference between what is relative
evidence to the purpose and what is evidence as to what has been done whereas a continuity of evidence
coincidental to an erroneous presumption makes the whole string of evidence irrelative to the purpose
required to be achieved even though the evidence is abundantly weighted given an apparent advantage to
the erroneous conclusion over limited evidence of legitimate support credence must be given in support
of that which was originally intended even to the extent of taking many steps back before continuance of
the original legitimate course to purpose.

Once achieved with significance to fact, due consideration must be to the resolve from the point of
deception and resulting detriments in efficient effective manner consistent with and conducive to
original purpose with due regard to continuity of sanity.

Tradition is a preponderance of consistencies perhaps supported by a proliferation of truths but when

continuity of tradition is extrapolated inconsistent to sane and legitimate purpose it is null and void from
. 8
the point of diversion and all once considered truths from said point of deviation remain
evident true to the deviation however of no value relative to the integrity of legitimate purpose.
That is to state for all intent and purpose they are mythical and habitual in nature inane to
purpose.

As is the nature of habit and the government personnel’s persistence to it being the basis their
intelligence is traditionally founded on they can be depended on to be consistent with each other
as assuredly as their confident is dependent on support from each other but break one link in
that chain and that which the chain supports collapses.

Within each department are a few competent people of unique perception amongst many
followers who are devoid of consistent sane reason persistently reasoning aloud aggravating
clear and precise path to intended purpose which assuredly must be reasoned but left to those
capable.

These inane people who learn by rote inundated with truths of superfluity gathered on diversion
obscure and befuddle the clear path providing obstacles to one, intent on taking it, where
tendency is to take the path of least resistance creating a long arduous journey of apparent
insanity to purpose but the only sane way to get there due the insanity.

Upon reaching the intended destination due regard must be given to straightening the course
from the point of commencement having proof of success in hand removing one by one the
obstructions that originally stood in path elongating the original trek to exorbitant financial and
time loss.

Failure to remove, these obstructions will persist to obstruct again and again to the humongous
detriment to successful achievement of effective efficient legitimate sane purpose they are inept
and detrimental to.

Digressions are the catalysts to eradicate the superfluities of diversions where associated truths
are relative to the diversions only as authentic as the diversion itself relative to the true bearing
from beginning to end of legitimate sane purpose where a traverse of trial and error was
originally traveled from beginning as a means to the success.

A straight line from beginning to end can then be drawn and any point along the diversion can
be computed as to its offset from the truth though indeed all and any evidence of the diversion
remains steadfast as truth of the diversion alone, not the truth of the true line of legitimate
purpose.

These truths of the diversion serve a purpose of their own consistent with the diversion whereas
it may be beneficial to the true purpose to determine why the diversion was so far off course
and who was responsible and why for the purpose of deterrence of reoccurrence of the
superfluity.

With some incite as to where I am coming from and definite knowledge of intent to expose the
government conspiracy I have staged a mocked Public Trial where the evidence is real and the
public is not being all there is the “threshold” so to speak between the Reality and the Fiction.

Quite an accomplishment for just one individual but I have to admit I couldn’t have done it
without the cooperation of the government personnel who persistently remained true as to that
which I knew to be true about them. How true their incompetence and consistence to it. Eh?

9
 Public Trial
Fiction or Reality?

The Fiction of the Attorney General

Fiction or Reality?

Belief

Yes, it is all in the belief

Nothing to do with what I believe for the evidence is real

What’s it matter what I believe now that I accomplished my belief?

I have proved it irrefutably to no one but me because no one has seen it, though available on the web for
the public to see no one has seen it I believe

Do you see what I mean? Oh, then you must have seen it.
So you are either no one or just no one of useful purpose to me or the issues I addressed. Right?

Given the evidence is real, you are real, I am real and it’s all on my web in the public domain which is real
and you have all been provided the evidence and televisions and radios are real, the Toronto Sun and Star
being real and yet I have heard nothing about the issues which are real being addressed I realistically find
you all guilty as I had set out to prove .

All that remains is the hanging, so to speak.

I have heard it said.

Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves.

Mission accomplished I believe.

Well that was good for me, was it good for you?

The thing with fiction and reality is they are both real with fiction being a deviation of reality.

Now we just draw a straight line from 1982 to 2007 with the individual’ guaranteed Charter Rights the
purpose.

My individual guaranteed Charter rights were seriously violated on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental
Housing Tribunal by my former tenant in front of the judicator Nancy Fahlgren being well aware , in a
public building financed by the people of Ontario to administer justice to and for the people where justice
has not yet been served on this Wednesday the 14th day of November 2007 which you all are aware and in
fact have been found guilty as per which the evidence irrefutably proves by your refusal to commence or
cause to commence proceedings consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights

You being the prominent government personnel whose e-mail addresses are listed on page 37 of the
document dated November 12 2007 “Mad Glad mostly Sad WHY?.doc” to be found on my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

10
 Court of Appeal

With due consideration to your rights to appeal even though you have not contested the findings of the
Public Trial which the evidence irrefutably proved and by your continued persistence not to deal with the
issues which are of a most serious nature regarding your willful refusal to demonstrate a modus operandi is
in place consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and having been
provided the irrefutable evidence my Charter rights have been violated and remain steadfast not to
administer and enforce justice in respect of my Charter rights I have taken the responsibility to assure you
all will receive the justice you are entitled to under the Constitution Act, 1982 with due consideration to
your guaranteed individual Charter rights.

Having said that and after a preliminary investigation into the Federal Governments ability to perform their
duties consistent with and conducive to your individual guaranteed Charter rights I have initiated
proceedings in the form of a Public Inquiry to clear the way and safe guard your rights to a fair trial before
the Federal courts

The following is my initiatives to this endeavor.

On my web site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

towards the bottom of the page you will see the following link to a document which is a cover document
addressed to the RCMP which I took to the Newmarket detachment accompanied by my mother on
October 18 2007 along with the documents listed on page 9 therein which Sgt. Steinebech declined to take
possession of
Request RCMP investigation of Government Conspiracy.doc (3)
Immediately below that are links to the evidence listed on page 9 aforesaid and below that is a link to
RCMP Meeting Recap October 18 2007.doc which is a recap of that said meeting with Sgt.
Steinebech RCMP

From there if you would care to join me on my web site Guardians of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms near
the top of the page you will see a link to my letter to Stockwell Day Minister of Public Safety dated
November 3 2007 which makes reference to previous efforts to get Federal Government personnel to
address the issues regarding the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights.
Below that are links to other documents demonstrating my efforts to the endeavor and to this date
November 14 2007 I have not received any indication they are responsive to my concerns leaving the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights unprotected by the Federal Government the issuers of the
guarantee, which implicates them to the conspiracy and most certainly are responsible to back the
guarantee as is fundamental to common law having accepted financial benefit to provide a service
consistent with and conducive to the guarantee as per the provisions of the Charter to each individual.

With all the evidence in and having been provided the opportunity to respond to the evidence and failing to
do so and furthermore having not commenced or caused to commence proceedings consistent with and
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights they too of the Federal Government referred within
the documents referred to herein are guilty of conspiracy against the Canadian people.

It may be Fiction to you people until the Public Read it when it will become real.

The Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have advised in
accordance with the RCMP Act, my complaint was forwarded to the Commissioner for appropriate action.
What do you suppose that means?
11
Toronto Star and Toronto Sun

I’m sure you know better than I how all this will work out.
Will I live long enough to see a real investigation?
How long should an investigation take when it is already done?
You have the evidence.

You people could jump in anytime or do you expect it to be covered up and you’re just
doing your part?

Perhaps you don’t give a damn about the people.

The evidence appears that way wouldn’t you think?

12
You people operate under your rights guaranteed under the Charter and I am sure you
have had some interesting challenges.

How convenient that you just happened to have the media to support your cause.
It works because the people support you.

Why wouldn’t you support the people?

Just one of those things in reality Eh

Me, me, me.

Aren’t you guys first to claim the public have the right to know what’s going on?

Oh, I see. They have no rights unless you decide to support them.

It’s supposed to work two ways I am sure you know.

Just forgot for a moment. eh?

There is a huge story here of Historic Epic unless of course you like things fine how they
are with the people taking the shaft.

We’ll soon know

Why not interview some of the people. Start with Lawyer Files # 1-3. Find out where
Attorney General Michael Bryant first came into the picture. At the beginning, Right?
You know it all
Does the Commission do what they advertise to do?

Not bloody likely.

No government department or agency is going to be provided the authority to expose and

eliminate the government conspirators for obvious reason they are the ones who hand out
the authority. Right?

Well pretty soon I will have exposed the whole damn system from every direction.

Oh, I get it. Since I was doing so well gathering the irrefutable evidence in natural course
of pursuance of justice they would expose themselves rather than cover things up as they
would when reporters come snooping around.

Brilliant, I do all the work, and when you are ready to cash in when circulation slows
presto, you’re in business again.

Perhaps for Christmas you will give the people what they have long been waiting for.
Nail the government conspirators to the cross.

13
When they cite their traditional values and- the rule of law-which has long been the
well established legal principle of that elusive concept, hard to easily define which
protects the individual and society as a whole which the Attorney General is responsible
to guard as his Office has traditionally done you will be prepared to stomp on them.

Good plan. Don’t forget to give them enough rope and make sure they all get a chance to
speak to that proving that is indeed their present day ideology and mode of operandi.

Then perhaps cite the words of Confucius to support their traditionalism stretching far
back at least 2500 years ago.

“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page
were the words Benevolence, Righteousness and Morality….finally I began to make out
what was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase:
EAT PEOPLE”

Then present the letter from the York Regional Police Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge
dated January 10 2006 where he makes reference to issues being connected to the
legislative framework which has long been established in this country. (See page 18)

Once they have all proved their consistency to helping the Attorney General guard –the
rule of law- that most elusive concept, hard to easily define, that well established legal
principle which the Office of the Attorney General has traditionally guarded to
incompetently protect the individual and society as a whole proving all the government
personnel are consistent and persistent to the endeavor proving irrefutably the established
modus operandi of the government today is consistent with the tradition and the Attorney
General who has guarded it well you can table the Constitution Act, 1982 (document)
which contains the guarantee to each individual and society as a whole which demands
competent responsible government personnel irreproachable to the support of the
guarantee.

Then when they do their Jackie Gleason “humma humma humma” we’ll laugh and laugh
and laugh savoring every moment before we nail them to the cross.

Ha ha ha, I get it, Brilliant Toronto Star and Toronto Sun as the darkness of night
representative by the Star slips into the bright sunny day representative by the Sun.

Sure it’s all documented but they are creatures of habit and will continue to argue as they
are wont to do and perhaps entitled to do before 1982 but once the Constitution was
enacted in 1982 their traditional ways were precluded as were all laws and precedence set
which were inconsistent with the spirit of the Law under the supremacy of God where as
to their inconsistencies were of no force or effect.

The ramifications are extraordinarily stupefying where the whole damn government
personnel of mandated authority have caused incalculable deprivations upon the
Canadian individual’s and has allowed to persist due the unusual coincidence of

14
circumstance where the ineptness of the people naïve to The Law being attentive to
private sector endeavors and their undying trust and faith in the legal system that the
personnel will watch each other consistent with The Law while the mandated authorities
of the establishment took advantage of their faithful trust as they carried on business as
usual as they have traditionally, defined in the words of Confucius so long ago.

Quite a formidable length of time indicative of the depth of experience to the traditional
endeavors to “EAT PEOPLE” as they ransacked, used and consumed them to sate their
avarice habits.
“Men’s natures are alike; it’s their habits that carry them far apart”
They have had 25 years to break their old habits while the people and society suffered as
they do from all of immoral persuasion, whereas the evidence shows their resistant to
change having been caught cold turkey must be stopped cold turkey and I have charged
the Commissioner of the RCMP with that responsibility.

Commissioner William Elliot alias “Bill” is just the man to do it being experienced in
their traditional habits of slippery ways appearing headed east towards the rise of a new
day but bent west intent of continuous darkness of their traditional good old days.

Mister Bill has chanced upon a most difficult challenge with no precedence to guide him
and the dire necessity unprecedented where cold turkey he must about face or end up on
our hot plates Christmas Day.
Somewhat of a befuddlement but the people are fed up with paying the bills, the
Michaels, Armands and Bruces and the Randys of The Law enforcerment who are
incompetent due their incoherence to it as they have been caught up and addicted to the
habitual ways of their predecessors as did they before them on and on in descent of chain
of ancestry being in dissent of present law namely the Constitution Act, 1982 which is the
supreme law of Canada which recognizes the principle of the supremacy of God affirmed
in the verbiage and particularly defined as
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set
out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably
justified in a free and democratic society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be
deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or
punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or
mental or physical disability.

15
Attentiveness to The Law is mandatory to all Canadians but none should be more
informed than the government personnel financed to administer and enforce it whereas
they must be competent, responsible and irreproachable to it so as to support the
guarantee of the Charter in a manner consistent with and conducive to it as per any
guarantee of common law and tradition with due regard to common sense and the sanity
attributed to it.

It is the presumption that the Constitution (Document) and the Constitution

(Establishment) are one and the same but it is the presumption they must be the same that
provides the direction to where a conclusion lies but presumed evidence of the
presumption remains a state of mind until valid evidence is presented in it’s support and
every rock turned to assure no rebut exists to challenge.

Obvious neglect to precise coherence of The Law in administering and enforcing

provides clear and present danger to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where an
inconsistency in administering or enforcing The Law is an immediate deprivation to the
individual’s Charter rights not only directly of the victim of particular circumstance but
every individual who finances the system as a taxpayer and indirectly every person
dependent on them for their personal well being.

Where an inconsistency with The Law is identified it is incumbent upon the government
personnel mandated to administer and enforce it to immediately address the inconsistency
to eradicate any possibility of reoccurrence and when it is found that it is a human
deliberation for personal benefit due regard to deterrence must be applied with deliberate
due regard.

For the purpose of due regard to the necessity of coherence all verbiage of law must be
presumed to have been written in the spirit of God who is supreme in matters of the
supreme law of Canada and consistent due regard must adhere to its interpretation.

Credence must be given to that which can be least mistaken by humankind whereas the
following words of Jesus who was closest to God and knew well of his aspirations was
heard and well known to say.

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

As common sense attests and commonly known, no law will be consistently obeyed
unless consistently enforced and where adherence to justice is demanded of law and
consistency to punishment must be attentive to an eye for an eye with due regard to
deliberate intent where priority is to diligence to the predictable and deterrence to the
prevention.

Whereas the present modus operandi of the present authorities has been irrefutably
evidenced and proven incompetent to the endeavor and by the government personnel’s
consistence to it having demonstrated their continuance in persistence having been
provided the irrefutable evidence of their unscrupulous disregard in respect of The Law

16
which they have permitted to run rampant and provided asylum to their associate
accomplices leaves the presumption of their authority unsupported with no rock left
unturned leaving absolutely nothing to be debated finds them without authority leaving
them to be duly informed by a mandated authority who acts within the confines and
purpose of The Law.

That responsibly is Mister Bill’s, RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and under the
authority of the Constitution Act, 1982 (Document) which he has been charged, financed
and sworn to uphold must do so consistent with the spirit of The Law in the spirit of God
who is supreme as recognized by the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982
whereas the evidence presented to him is irrefutable to the fact the Government mandated
personnel referenced within the documents presented do not recognize the principles of
The Law namely the supremacy of God and the aspirations attributed to him which have
been clearly written into The Law and excerpts presented on page 15 thereby null and
voiding their authority wherever their inconsistency which the evidence is quite clear
they are consistent and persistent to inconsistency with the Constitution leaving them
without authority and vulnerable to any mandated authority who acts consistent with and
conducive to the spirit of The Law and God and it is Bill’s responsibility to bring them
before the courts to face the justice of the people and where any government personnel
mandated under the authority of the Constitution acts in a manner inconsistent with their
obligation to administer and enforce justice pursuant to The Law shall be immediately
removed of their authority and dealt with in consistent manner as the government
personnel brought before them.

Quite simple eh Bill? (aside…I know Bill’s watching)

Good, let the festivities begin.

17
18
19
20
21
22
 The following e-mail addresses have been sent this document “Commissioner RCMP November
16, 2007” which is available for all to see on my web site “Guardians of the Canadians
Charter of Rights and Freedoms” http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-
charter-of-rights-and-freedoms I know Bill Commissioner RCMP William Elliot will study
this
The documente-mail
following as he addresses
reviews all thebeen
have evidence in competent
sent this document manner which will
“Commissioner RCMPlead him to it
November 16, 2007 which is available will
As per usual I request you all to study it well as if your way of life is dependent on it as each
individual’s way of life guaranteed by the Charter is dependent on your fortitude and conviction to it
FFF. You had best think for yourselves or others will do it for you.
23
“A man who has committed a mistake and doesn’t correct it, is committing another mistake”
I believe it is reasonable to presume that this applies to the ladies. Right Ladies?

Consistency of belief guaranties consistency of consequence

What can be said of truth without evidence or willingness to back

He who traditionally argues in defense in support of a tradition after its preclusion by Law, either stated or implied
confirms the tradition and his ineptness to kick the habit attesting to the incompetence of his immediate superior
and ultimately those under his authority.

Being the author I can assert this applies to the ladies equally.

I request you all take responsibility to assure everyone referenced herein has been made aware of the issues and
the importance to their well being so they may take advantage of this final opportunity to address them in a
manner consistent with The Law by which granted them their authority and to collect financial benefit for their
efforts in service of our Country and the Canadian people.

Perchance the RCMP forget to advise you of your rights upon arrest I take this opportunity to advise that you have
the right to remain silent and highly suggest you do so for persistent to traditional habit will betray you and will be
used against you as will the evidence I have documented irrefutably to your part in the conspiracy.

There are no words you can state in your defense that you haven’t already stated or implied by your silence when
immediate action was and is demanded addressing the issues and to restructure the system adept to the protection
and benefit of each individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Under the clear and present circumstance you have only one favorable option beneficial to you and we the other
individual’s referenced in the Charter guarantee.

In the spirit of the season I wish you all a Merry Christmas hoping you experience the true spirit devoid of
commercialism which will take care of itself.

You have been charged and privileged to act in the service of the Lord under the authority of the Constitution
which recognizes His supremacy and by the power vested to you must restructure the legal system adept to your
responsibility to support the guarantee of the Charter consistent with the provisions granted equally to every
individual of Canada which is not an option of debate.

I wish you all a Merry, Merry Christmas and pray you will experience the true spirit of Christmas and retain it in
habitual bliss as you carry out your duties through the years to come in that spirit prerequisite to your power of
authority.

In that spirit of accepted habit you will attend to the issues addressed in my writings experiencing the joy
privileged with it as each individual finds God not as a fictional belief but a belief that is real as law and order
under His guidance consistent and conducive to His spirit in the spirit of The Law, the Constitution of Canada
prevails.

The web of persistent deceit woven by the members of the Law Society for their members benefit will benefit
them no longer as priority is to the guaranteed individual’s Charter rights which are attached to them as an arm or
leg, not to be debated.
Those government personnel who do not act in good faith of The Law will experience the wrath of The Law and
God at their own expense.
24
Merry Christmas and goodbye
Frank Gallagher

Day.S@parl.gc.ca; MCU@JUSTICE.GC.CA
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca;
communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-
csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;citytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@tor.sunp
ub.com;city@thestar.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca;dinovoc-
qp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.hardeman@p
c.ola.org;fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca;fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;g
autht@sen.parl.gc.ca;gcarlino@ombudsman.on.ca;hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.parl.gc.
ca;jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;

lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;communications@ps.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.p
arl.gc.ca;munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;nimhinfo@nih.gov;
mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca;
sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0@parl.g
c.ca;vanlop1@parl.gc.ca;web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@justice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca;
zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca; info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca

rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca;
Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca;
Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;

MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca;

Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca;
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca;
Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca;
Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca; ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org;
terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca
sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; potterl@scc-
csc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca;
mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca;
plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca; info@police.york.on.ca; info@cba.org;
mail@cba-alberta.org; edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; cba-mba@mts.net; admin@cbanb.com; cba-nl@nl.rogers.com;
cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-pei@isn.net; info@abcqc.qc.ca; cba.sk@sasktel.net;
cbayukon@internorth.com

25