Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I have been reading again and again "THE 1 BILLIONHUNGRY PROJECT" introduction:
* Will this petition really change something at the decisions already taken by those leaders?
* When will something really change in a sustainable way?
* Why don't the "1 million people feeling frustration, anger and indignation" come up with suggestions
about the best practices to combat hunger?
* Which are the efficient solutions, different from the actual ones leaving the daily situation of 1 billion
people hungry almost unchanged during the last decades (notwithstanding a recent reduction to 925
million)?
------------
1 million signatures should not be a final objective of this project, it should be the start of an efficient
program based upon success stories, if not by the political leaders and their national and international
organizations, then by the hundreds of organizations of the 1 million people who have signed this
petition ("Most people, if they believed it was within their power to change things, would take action."
And I signed it too! So, let us create the power to change things, let us take action, following all those
who already take action to produce their own food, e.g. the ever-growing group of the so-called city
farmers.
A new dawn? Absolutely not, for already in World Wars I and II the political leaders decided to offer
allotments to the poor, a sustainable strategy to alleviate poverty and hunger, still well alive and
kicking (see the thousands of allotment gardens all over the world).
Well, well, isn't that MDG 1 all over?