Professional Documents
Culture Documents
153 700
reported to the HIV and AIDS Registry (Table 1).
Asymptomatic Cases 153 692 4,283
This was a 80% increase compared to the same
AIDS Cases 0 8 841
period last year (n=85 in 2009) [Figure 1]. Of the
Males 144 637 3,869*
153 individuals reported, 30 were detected from
Females 7 61 1,242*
voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) as part of
Youth 15-24yo 55 217 941
ongoing community outreach activities. Most of the
Children <15yo 0 1 53
cases (95%) were males. The median age was 28
years (age range: 17-56 years). The 20-29 year Reported Deaths due to AIDS 0 1 322
(58%) age-group had the most number cases. * No data available on sex for eleven (11) cases.
2009 65 47 59 66 85 40 70 61 56 80 80 126
There were no reported AIDS cases and deaths for 2010 143 130 120 154 153
70%
50
[Figure 9, page 3]. Sixteen (80%) were males. The
60% 25
50%
median age was 32 years (age range: 22-49 years). 40% 787
All cases acquired the HIV infection through sexual 30%
0%
May 2010 May 2009 Cumulative
Figure 3. Number of HIV/AIDS Cases Reported in the Philippines by Year, Jan 1984 to May 2010 (N=5,124)
1000
800
Number of New Cases
600
400
200
0
'84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10
TOTAL 2 10 29 38 32 39 66 85 72 102 118 116 154 117 189 158 123 174 184 193 199 210 309 342 528 835 700
Asymptomatic 0 6 18 25 21 29 48 68 51 64 61 65 104 94 144 80 83 118 140 140 162 171 273 314 508 806 692
AIDS 2 4 11 13 11 10 18 17 21 38 57 51 50 23 45 78 40 56 44 53 37 39 36 28 20 29 8
Death 2 4 10 12 9 8 15 13 13 11 19 24 27 10 16 17 9 20 11 10 5 16 18 8 9* 1 1
* Five initially asymptomatic cases reported in 2008, died due to AIDS that same year.
1
Philippine HIV/AIDS Registry May 2010
From 1984 to 2010, there were 841 AIDS cases reported, 50%
than half (445) of sexual transmission was through hetero- Needle Prick 2 0 0 0
sion (10), injecting drug use (4), and needle prick injuries Bisexual Contact 60 4 8 1
age group (29%) had the most number of cases for 2010.
For the male age group, the most number of cases were 75%
Number of New Cases
found among the 20-24 years old (27%) and 25-34 years
old (31%) [Figure 5]. 50%
in Figure 6, there is a significant difference in the number May 2010 (M) May 2010 (F) 2010 (Male) 2010 (Female)
35-49yo 33 3 110 14
(3,869) were males. The age groups with the most number 25-34yo 56 2 314 24
of cases were: 20-24 years (16%), 25-29 (24%) and 30-34 15-24yo 52 2 195 21
* Two cases in May 2010 did not have data on age and sex
Figure 6. Comparison of the Distribution of Male and Female HIV Cases by Age-Group and Certain Highlighted Years
50 & older 1984-2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
45-49yo
40-44yo
35-39yo
30-34yo
25-29yo
20-24yo
<15yo 15-19yo 20-24yo 25-29yo 30-34yo 35-39yo 40-44yo 45-49yo 50 & older <15yo 15-19yo 20-24yo 25-29yo 30-34yo 35-39yo 40-44yo 45-49yo 50 & older
2007 6 1 36 74 54 43 30 15 19 2007 3 0 4 16 12 14 6 5 3
2006 1 2 26 48 40 38 20 21 23 2006 3 3 13 13 22 16 8 4 8
1984-2005 20 12 95 252 320 283 229 149 134 1984-2005 15 30 174 196 168 124 76 26 33
2
Philippine HIV/AIDS Registry May 2010
sion (Table 2). There were 517 males and 41 females 300
Number of Cases
250
from 18-71 years old. There were 105 males and 15 200
7]. 100
mother-to-child transmission and 3% (128) through <6yo 7-14yo 15-17yo 18-24yo 25-34yo 35-49yo 50&older
needle sharing among injecting drug users. Other modes Maternal to Child 1 - - - - - -
for 7% (370) of the cases. Cumulative data shows 51% Heterosexual Contact - Female - - - 12 17 10 2
(2,319) were infected through heterosexual contact, 32% Heterosexual Contact - Male - - - 11 31 14 8
70%
Mother-to-Child 0 1 50 Heterosexual 1 7 24 24 16 19 35 30 41 47 58 56 81 82 138 114 93 128 129 129 123 131 193 139 160 54 105
Table 3. Reported Mode of HIV Transmission Among OFWs Figure 9. Number of OFWs Compared to Non-OFWs by Year (1984-2010*)
700
Mode of Transmission May 2010 Jan-May 2010 Cumulative
n= 20 n= 61 N=1,410 600
Non-OFW 1 8 29 35 23 34 56 78 58 73 87 92 119 90 138 91 63 95 88 99 112 116 179 232 405 671 639
No Data Available 0 0 48 % of OFW 50% 20% 0% 8% 28% 13% 15% 8% 19% 28% 26% 21% 23% 23% 27% 42% 49% 45% 52% 49% 44% 45% 42% 31% 23% 20% 9%
From January to May 2010, 60 blood units were confirmed to be posi- Table 4. Results of Blood Units Referred for HIV Confirmation
tive by the RITM.
Monthly Report 2010
For May 2010, out of the 43 blood units referred for HIV confirmation, Blood units* Positive Indeterminate
9 units were positive for HIV, and 34 units were negative for HIV referred
February 89 12 3
Figure 10. HIV Positive Blood Units by Month & Year (2008-2010) March 72 15 1
April 79 15 5
20
May 43 9 0
June - - -
Number of Positive Blood Units
15
July - - -
August - - -
10 September - - -
October - - -
5
November - - -
December - - -
Total for the year
335 60 10
0 (Jan –May only)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
2008 10 7 4 8 8 2 9 6 7 7 4 2 74 * One blood donor can donate more than one blood unit.
2009 5 5 10 10 7 5 7 7 9 12 3 9 89 ** These are HIV positive blood units, not donors. Donors of HIV positive blood units
2010 9 12 15 15 9 66 may or may not be in the HIV & AIDS Registry.
The Registry is a passive surveillance system. Except for HIV confirmation by the
NRL, all other data submitted to the Registry are secondary and cannot be veri-
fied. An example would be an individual’s reported place of residence. The
Registry is unable to determine if this reported address is where the person got
infected, or where the person lived after being infected, or where the person is
presently living, or whether the address is valid. This limitation has major implica-
tions to data interpretation. Thus, readers are cautioned to carefully weigh the
data and consider other sources of information prior to arriving at conclusions.