Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In October 2011, there were 200 new HIV Ab Table 1. Quick Facts
Demographic Data October Jan-Oct Cumulative Data:
sero-positive individuals confirmed by the STD/AIDS 2011 2011 1984—2011
Cooperative Central Laboratory (SACCL) and re-
Total Reported Cases 200 1,869 7,884
ported to the HIV and AIDS Registry (Table 1). This
Philippine HIV and AIDS Registry
AIDS Cases 0
Jan Feb M ar A pr M ay Jun Jul A ug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 65 47 59 66 85 40 70 61 56 80 80 126
Of the 200 HIV positive cases, only one was reported 2010 143 130 120 154 153 109 131 108 153 104 112 174
was acquired through bisexual contact. No AIDS- Figure 2. Comparison of the Proportion of Types of Sexual
related death was reported for this month. Transmission in 2011, 2010 & Cumulative Data (1984-2011)
100% Heterosexual
Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW) 28 24 Bisexual
80% 2,812 Homosexual
Proportion of Cases
Figure 3. Number of HIV/AIDS Cases Reported in the Philippines by Year, Jan 1984 to October 2011 (N=7,884)
1950
1800
1650
1500
1350
1200
1050
900
750
600
450
300
150
0
'84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11
T OT A L 2 10 29 38 32 39 66 85 72 102 118 116 154 117 189 158 123 174 184 193 199 210 309 342 528 835 1591 1869
A sympt omat i c 0 6 18 25 21 29 48 68 51 64 61 65 104 94 144 80 83 118 140 139 161 171 273 312 506 806 1571 1797
A I DS 2 4 11 13 11 10 18 17 21 38 57 51 50 23 45 78 40 56 44 54 38 39 36 30 22 29 20 72
Deat h 2 4 10 12 9 8 15 13 13 11 19 24 27 10 16 17 9 20 11 11 8 16 18 10 7 1 2 *15
*Nine initially asymptomatic cases reported in 2011, died due to AIDS that same year.
1
Philippine HIV/AIDS Registry October 2011
AIDS Cases (1984-2011)
Of the 1,869 HIV positive cases in 2011, seventy-two were Fig 4. Proportion of Modes of Transmission of AIDS Cases by Year,
reported as AIDS cases. Eighty-eight percent were males. Jan 1984—October 2011
Ages ranged from 1-59 years (median 31 years). 96% (69) 100%
Proportion of Cases
sion and (2) needle sharing among injecting drug users.
50%
I DU 3 1 0 0 2
(10), injecting drug use (6), and needle prick injuries (2) Homosexual Cont act 234 10 15 17 30
[Figure 4]. Three percent (28) of the AIDS cases did not Het er osexual Cont act 434 7 6 3 18
1-67 years old (median 27 years). The 20-29 year old age
group (60%) had the most number of cases for 2011. For the 75%
among the 20-24 years old (27%), 25-29 years old (33%) 50%
male and female cases reported. Eighty-two percent (6,440) 35-49yo 37 0 290 33
15-24yo 62 3 530 30
The age groups with the most number of cases were: 20-24 1-14yo 0 0 1 2
years (20%), 25-29 (27%) and 30-34 years (19%) [Figure 6].
Figure 6. Comparison of the Distribution of Male and Female HIV Cases by Age-Group and Certain Highlighted Years
40-44yo
35-39yo
30-34yo
25-29yo
20-24yo
15-19yo
Number of Male Cases Number of Female Cases
<15yo
2000 1750 1500 1250 1000 750 500 250 0 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750
<15y o 15-19y o 20-24y o 25-29y o 30-34y o 35-39y o 40-44y o 45-49y o 50 & ol der <15y o 15-19y o 20-24y o 25-29y o 30-34y o 35-39y o 40-44y o 45-49y o 50 & ol der
2007 6 1 36 74 54 43 30 15 19 2007 3 0 4 16 12 14 6 5 3
1984-2006 21 14 121 300 360 321 249 170 157 1984-2006 18 33 187 209 190 140 84 30 41
*Note: 74 did not report age, 11 did not report sex, 10 did not repot age and sex
2
Philippine HIV/AIDS Registry October 2011
Number of Cases
reported data on mode of transmission (Table 2). There 700
300
100
were infected through sexual contact, 3% (235) through <7yo 7-14yo 15-17yo 18-24yo 25-34yo 35-49yo 50&older
the cases. Cumulative data shows 39% (2,812) were Het erosexual Cont act - Female - - 1 27 53 31 8
infected through heterosexual contact, 37% (2,665) Het erosexual Cont act - Male - - 1 27 100 53 23
through homosexual contact, and 24% (1,719) through Bisexual Cont act - - 2 193 351 92 5
bisexual contact. From 2007 there has been a shift in the Homosexual Cont act - - 4 275 406 115 13
90%
30%
Homosexual contact 80(44%) 813(46%) 2,665(37%)
20%
Blood/Blood Products 0 1 20 0%
Injecting Drug Use 17 80 235 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11
Needle Prick Injury 0 0 3 Het er osexual 1 7 24 24 16 19 35 30 41 47 58 56 81 82 138 114 93 128 129 129 123 131 193 139 160 216 271 324
Table 3. Reported Mode of HIV Transmission Among OFWs Figure 9. Number of OFWs Compared to Non-OFWs by Year (1984-2011*)
1800
Mode of Transmission Oct 2011 Jan– Oct 2011 Cumulative
n= 21 n= 227 N=1,750 1600
Number of Cases
1400
Sexual Transmission 21 227 1,688
1200
Heterosexual contact 9(43%) 94(41%) 1,096(65%) 1000
No Data Available 0 0 48 Non-OFW 1 8 29 35 23 34 56 78 58 73 87 92 119 90 138 91 63 95 88 99 111 116 179 236 406 671 14161642
% of OFW 50% 20% 0% 8% 28% 13% 15% 8% 19% 28% 26% 21% 23% 23% 27% 42% 49% 45% 52% 49% 44% 45% 42% 31% 23% 20% 11% 12%
From January to October 2011, 793 blood units were screened reactive Table 4. Results of screened HIV reactive Blood Units
for HIV and referred to RITM for confirmation. All these HIV reactive Monthly Report 2011
blood units were immediately sent to RITM and not transfused to anyone.
Blood units* Confirmed Indetermi-
referred for Positive nate
For October 2011, out of 119 screened HIV reactive blood units referred confirmation
for confirmation, 22 units were confirmed positive for HIV by RITM, 87
January 85 11 0
were negative for HIV, and 10 were indeterminate results [Table 4].
February 67 15 2
Figure 10. Blood Units Screened Reactive for HIV by Year (2008-2011) March 76 14 1
April 74 20 1
150
May 48 10 0
June 118 32 4
July 78 22 1
100
August 80 18 2
September 48 10 0
50
October 119 22 10
November
December
Total for the year
0 793 174 21
Jan Feb M ar ch A pr i l M ay June Jul y A ug Sep Oct Nov Dec T ot al
(Jan –Oct only)
73 65 48 47 54 23 52 49 47 58 38 41 595
2008 * One blood donor can donate more than one blood unit.
2009 51 32 72 70 44 72 56 59 60 68 50 33 667
** These are HIV positive blood units, not donors. Donors of HIV positive blood
52 89 72 79 43 80 62 46 88 88 52 69 772
units may or may not be in the HIV & AIDS Registry.
2010
The Registry is a passive surveillance system. Except for HIV confirmation by the
NRL, all other data submitted to the Registry are secondary and cannot be veri-
fied. An example would be an individual’s reported place of residence. The
Registry is unable to determine if this reported address is where the person got
infected, or where the person lived after being infected, or where the person is
presently living, or whether the address is valid. This limitation has major implica-
tions to data interpretation. Thus, readers are cautioned to carefully weigh the
data and consider other sources of information prior to arriving at conclusions.