Chi-Square

Chi-Square difference test

Chi-Square ddl p
Model 0 36.6 33 30.52%
Model 1 43.14 35 16.24%
Chi-Square 6.54 2 3.80%

You just need to fill in B4, C4, B5, & C5 (ie, the cells on a white background)
Model 1 should be more constrained than model 0

Page 1
 Chi-Square

Test 3.80%
model 0 is better. Risk: 5%
Model 0 is better. Risk: 10%

lls on a white background)

If Model 0 is better, the fit of Model 1 is significantly lowered by the additional constraints
If no model is better (test > 5% or 10%), you should usually use model 1

Page 2
 Chi-Square

the additional constraints

Page 3
 Rel & Val

lambda 1-lambda2
LV--> item 1 0.75 0.438
LV--> item 2 0.889 0.210
LV--> item 3 0.817 0.333
LV--> item 4 0.868 0.247
LV--> item 5 0.735 0.460
LV--> item 6 0.657 0.568
LV--> item 7
LV--> item 8
LV--> item 9
LV--> item 10
3.746 sum (lambda2)
2.254 sum (1-lambda)2
Just fill in this column 0.624 Rho vc
22.241 Sum lambda2
0.908 Joreskog rho

Page 4
 Rel & Val

=AVE: average variance extracted (=d5/k): convergent validity if >0,5

(Check also that Lambda's c.r. are significative & that smc>0,5

Construct reliability

Ref. : Fornell, C. & D. F. Larcker (1981), Evaluating Structural Equations Models with
Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research , 18, 39-
50.

Page 5
 GammaHat & RMSEA

Chi-deux df n p
329 76 494 44

Enter your values here

Page 6
 GammaHat & RMSEA

Fhat GammaHat Adjusted GammaHat

0.513 0.977 0.703
Steiger's 1980 GammaHat

RMSEA Lo 0.072
RMSEA 0.082
RMSEA Hi 0.091

Moschopoulos' (1984) approximation is used to compute the RMSEA confidence interval. Se

Moschopoulos, Panagis G. (1984), "On a New Transformation to Normality," Communications in Stati
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9505&L=semnet&P=R6799&I=1

Page 7
 LV with 1 item

indicator standard-deviation lambda must be fixed at

0.980 0.931

You just need to fill in B3

Ref.: Anderson, J. C. & D. W. Gerbing (1988), Structural Equation Modeling in Practice : A Review and Recommended Tw

Page 8
 LV with 1 item

uniqueness fixed at
0.096

ce : A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3, 411-423.

Page 9
 Cronbach's alpha
number of items 5 0.833
average correlation between items 0.500

What if I remove 2 items with the "same" correlation with the others?
Alpha becomes ,,, 0.750
number of items becomes ,,, 3

What if I remove 1 item with the "same" correlation with the others?
Alpha becomes ,,, 0.800
number of items becomes ,,, 4

What if I add 1 item with the "same" correlation with the others?
Alpha becomes ,,, 0.857
number of items becomes ,,, 6

What if I add 2 items with the "same" correlation with the others?
Alpha becomes ,,, 0.875
number of items becomes ,,, 7
You just need to fill in B2 & B3
By Michaël Korchia, marketing professor at BEM Bordeaux Management School

www.watoowatoo.net/mk
Thanks to all SEMnet contributors
(comments welcome)
Version 1.3.A, 25/03/10