Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Procter & Gamble Case Study: Strategy Formulation
Procter & Gamble Case Study: Strategy Formulation
CASE STUDY
Strategy Formulation
THE COMPANY
• Established in 1837, P&G - manufactured, distributed and
marketed consumer goods products.
Non-
Durable
Durable
Goods
Goods
Beauty/Fe
Pharmaceut
Petroleum Beverages Apparel Tobacco minine
icals
Care
Key Brands: Herbal Essences, Key Brands: Noxzema, Gillete Key Brands: Tampax and
Infusium 23, Physique, and Olay. Always.
Pantene, Aussie & Head and
Shoulders.
Product Basket
FINE FRAGNANCES COSMETICS PERSONAL CLEANSING
- Was a major distributor of - Offered products like - Offered products like bar
various fine fragrance foundation, eye shadow, soaps, body wash, etc.
brands. mascara, lip gloss etc for - Targeted everybody for
- Targeted both men & lips, face, nails, eyes. such products.
women. - Targeted women of all age
groups.
Key Brands: Giorgio Beverly Key Brands: Cover Girl and Key Brands: Zest, Camay and
Hills, Hugo Boss and Lacoste. Max Factor. Noxzema.
CGI Market Segmentation
• Better purchase decisions possible with product
awareness but impulse purchase and ignorantly
following trends were common mistakes
committed by consumers.
– Gender
– Age
– Ethnicity
– Marital Status
– Low income consumers
CGI Market Segmentation
Gender:
Beauty care for female expanded to male consumers (early 2005).
Segment specific success factor: Gender specific promotion
Age:
For all ages. From infants for senior citizens. Addressing each age group
differently. Huge Market potential with adoption of beauty/personal care
products across each age group
eg: baby boomers expected growth 11.9 m in 1999 to 17.39 m in 2010
Segment specific success factor: Brand recognition
Ethnicity:
Products developed catering /considering the extend of ethnicity for
multicultural market or single ethnicity market.
Segment specific success factor: Tailored to the need of each ethnic
CGI Market Segmentation
Marital Status:
Products offering based on married or single to ascertain the percentage of
disposable income for self or family.
Segment specific success factor: Tailored to the need of each population
Common Success Factors: Competitive price & affordability, wide selection, good
distribution channel, availability, good quality, attractive packaging, strong brand image and
maintain brand loyalty.
Distribution
The CGI companies relied on various distribution channels
apart from their sales force to make the goods available at
POP
Distributions companies
Success factor: Good relation with store managers for shelf space &
display
Individual Stores
Success factor: Location and Good relation with consumers
Chain store Outlets
Success factor: variety of service and good customer service. Eg:
Costo, Walgreens, Target, Sears and Wal-Mart
Advertising
America
Sourcing- choice of sourcing partner, limit of sourcing , price
negotiations etc
Technology: Manufacturing units flexibility to adapt to
changing needs with less cost
Competition: Based on price and product line and dept, brand
reputation and market presence
Competitors
Unilever
Founded in 1930 in England
Presence in 150 countries
products
Strength: Brand reputation and price competition, age &
gender, All media advertising
Weakness: Brand recognition, Mass market presence,
Marital status, age, distribution & store manager
relations etc
Competitors
Avon
Started in 1886 in United states
World’s largest direct seller with 5 million reps
$55,000.00
$50,000.00
$45,000.00
$40,000.00
$35,000.00
Dollars in million
$30,000.00
$25,000.00
$20,000.00
$15,000.00
$10,000.00
$5,000.00
$-
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Financial Data
$4.50
$4.00
$3.50
$3.00
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$-
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Financial Analysis
The company was a global leader with sales growth of more than
40%, increasing to $57 billion in 2005.
Profit was also doubled and generated $30 billion free cash flow.
40% increase in sales per employee was observed.
Although the R&D investment had increased but as a percentage
of sales it had declined from 4.8% in 2000 to 3.4% in 2005.
More than 80% of initiatives succeeded in creating shareholder
value, an improvement of 25% over the past three years.
Reduced capital spending as a percentage of sales since 2000
from nearly 8% to less than 4%, without forgoing any strategic
investment in growth.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses
Opportunities Threats