This document discusses using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. It notes that feedback is essential to the multiple draft writing process as it pushes students through revisions to create a final product. However, providing feedback involves teachers taking on different roles like audience, assistant, and consultant. The document recommends that teacher feedback focus more on content and organization rather than surface errors, and that teachers encourage learner autonomy rather than dependence. It suggests an alternative technique where students write summaries after receiving feedback on compositions to help them improve future writing.
This document discusses using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. It notes that feedback is essential to the multiple draft writing process as it pushes students through revisions to create a final product. However, providing feedback involves teachers taking on different roles like audience, assistant, and consultant. The document recommends that teacher feedback focus more on content and organization rather than surface errors, and that teachers encourage learner autonomy rather than dependence. It suggests an alternative technique where students write summaries after receiving feedback on compositions to help them improve future writing.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document discusses using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. It notes that feedback is essential to the multiple draft writing process as it pushes students through revisions to create a final product. However, providing feedback involves teachers taking on different roles like audience, assistant, and consultant. The document recommends that teacher feedback focus more on content and organization rather than surface errors, and that teachers encourage learner autonomy rather than dependence. It suggests an alternative technique where students write summaries after receiving feedback on compositions to help them improve future writing.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
4 Problems with Multiple Teacher-Roles 4 Alternatives to Mid-Draft Teacher Feedback 4 Using Teacher Feedback j
4 Feedback is seen as essential to the
multiple-draft process 4 It is what pushes the wr thru the var drafts and on to the eventual end-product 4 Many types of feedback« 4 Providing feedback during wr process involves tcr assuming diff roles-such as audience, assistant, consultant, reader
|
4 Teacher feedback should be more on
content and organization, instead of surface- level errors. 4 Teacher ought to encourage learner autonomy, not teacher dependence 4 So, teacher should provide mid-draft feedback
!| j" #
| j
4 Author suggested a techniques where getting stds to
produce, on the day that the compositions are returned to them-a new cycle begins-a summary entitled- µHow can I improve future compositions.¶ 4 This is useful in 3 ways ± Learners need time to process the evaluation received, using mental effort ± The summary belongs to the indiv stds, constructed based on tcr and peers¶ comments ± Bridges the gap betwn learners¶ text, allowing fdbk on one compo to be used in future ones.