Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • COMPARISON

    Uploaded by

    pragya kushwaha
    10 views1 page
    This table compares the performance of a conventional 5T SRAM cell and a conventional 6T SRAM cell. It shows that the 5T cell has faster write 0 time but slower write 1 time than the 6T cell, and the 6T cell consumes more power than the 5T cell.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This table compares the performance of a conventional 5T SRAM cell and a conventional 6T SRAM cell. It shows that the 5T cell has faster write 0 time but slower write 1 time than the 6T cell, and the 6T cell consumes more power than the 5T cell.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views1 page

    COMPARISON

    Uploaded by

    pragya kushwaha
    This table compares the performance of a conventional 5T SRAM cell and a conventional 6T SRAM cell. It shows that the 5T cell has faster write 0 time but slower write 1 time than the 6T cell, and the 6T cell consumes more power than the 5T cell.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Conventional 5T Conventional 6T

    Write 0(ns) 14.95 .0026


    Write 1(ns) 0.84 45
    Power consumed (uW) 2.33 6.54

    You might also like