Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 2
organizational change
Lewin’s view on organization: Kurt Lewin- two
opposite forces- equilibrium- seeking promotion
change: driving force, maintaining status quo:
restraining force.
Model 1: Kurt Lewin’s & Friends 3 step model:
2 ideas about change:
First idea: status quo resultant of 2 opposing
forces. Eg: production level of manufacturing
company- some forces- higher level- some forces
lower level
Idea 2: model of the change process
itself. 3 stage process
Unfreezing- the old behavior (or
situation), moving to a new level of
behavior & refreezing the behavior
refreeze at
the new level. Eg: confidence-
implementing- freeze
permanent in built
nature
3unfreeze
stage model:
Stage 1: unfreeze creates pain &
discomfort- causes guilt & anxiety
Stage 2: driving force- stronger/
weaker/ both. Change occurs increasing
the driving force alone- counter parting
restraining force
Stage 3: refreezing primary task- no
lasting change
Model 2: Kurt Lewin’s
Force Field Analysis
Force field Diagram
Change Issue
Driving force Restraining Force
weak
weak
moderate
Strong force
No
change
change
equilibrium
2 forces driving & restraining
Forces include: people, habits, customs &
attitudes
FFD- any level: personal, project,
organizational- visualize in favor or against
Top- planned change issue. Driving force-
push- organization- new state of affairs, ext
environment (globalization, IT, changing
workforce)
Restraining forces- status quo- resistance to
change- employee changing behavior
Uses of FFD:
1.Investigate balance of power involved in the
issue
2.Identify opponents & allies
3.Identify how you can influence each target
group
Steps in FFD:
1.Describe the current situation
2.Describe the desired situation
3.Identify where the current situation will go- if
action is implemented
4. List all forces driving change towards desired
situation
5. List all forces resisting change towards desired
situation
6. Discuss & interrogate all forces: are they valid? Can
they be changed? Which are the critical ones?
7. Allocate scores to each of the scores. Eg: extremely
weak: 1,extremely strong 10
8. Chart the forces, left DF & right RF
9. Discuss how change can reduce restraining forces
10. Increasing DF & reducing RF may also result in
some other forces/ create new ones
System approach
Org decision- affects internal & external groups
significant ways- management must understand &
anticipate- DM
System theory- solves problem- diagnosing- i/p,
Xmn, o/p & f/b
Attempts- view org – single unified, purposeful
entity, composed of interrelated parts
Gives manager a way of looking at an
organization- as a whole & as apart of an activity.
Eg: production department- marketing
department- no anticipation about CB- hampered
This theory highlights underlying relationships
Facilitates thinking b4 acting, evaluates the
impact of their actions- maintains good balance-
org
Limitations:
Broad philosophical perspectives-
bridges academia & practical problems
Objective- not influenced by “one best
way” ,”manager decide things for others”
Over emphasis on oneness, coordinative
& harmony of the organizations- org
inbuilt org conflicts
7 stage model:
Modification of Lewin’s model. 3 stage model
expanded to 7 stage model
Phase 1:developing a need for change- unfreezing
phase
Phase 2: establishing a change relationship. Eg:
client system- needs help- change agent-
establishing a working relationship
Phase 3: clarifying/ diagnosing client's system
problem
Phase 4:examining alternative routes & goals,
establishing goals & intentions of action
Phase 5 :transforming intentions- actual change
efforts. Phase 3,4,5- Lewin’s “moving phase”
Phase 6: generalizing & stabilizing change-
refreezing phase
Phase 7: achieving terminal relationship-
terminating customer client relationship
To ensure complacency & righteousness
Kotter’s 3 part framework:
1.Defrost the status quo
2.Take actions bring about change
3.Anchor the changes in corporate culture
ADKAR Model
Model describes 5 required
building blocks for change-
realized successfully on
individual level
Awareness: of why change is needed
Desire: to support & participate in the change
Knowledge: of how to change
Ability: to implement new skills & behavior
Reinforcement: to sustain the change
Goal oriented change management model-
allows mgmnt- focus on their activities on
specific business results
Imparting communication & training
activities- result of org change- useful in
imparting planning & execution of work
ADKAR model can be used to:
diagnose employee dimension to change
(resistance to change, transition through process,
creates successful action plan, develop change
management)
Business dimension to change (need or
opportunity is defined, scope & obj is defined,
solutions for business, new process system are
developed, solution is implemented in the org)
People dimension to change (top level ,manager
& employee as a whole- ADKAR model)
Power of ADKAR for
managing change
Focus on the first element- root cause of
failure
Where process is breaking down & elements
are being overlooked
Focuses on maximum probability for success
Plans effectively for a new change/ diagnose y
current change is failing
Corrective action taken- action implemented
successfully
Managerial approaches for
implementing change
Managing change is more than reactive &
doing damage control.
Besides reacting- mgr-consciously initiate
&implement changes- to meet new demands-
crated by changed circumstances
3 broad approaches- creates change-
assumptions differ from people, systems
change, specific strategies & kind of
response
Top down approach
Most common way- implement change- pushing
down the hierarchy. Solutions/ decisions- top-
passed on through the formal channels-
“Unilateral decision” . 2 assumptions
1st assumption: reason for changes existing in
the organization (eg: low performance, high
absenteeism, low productivity rate)- can be
traced through single tangible factor-changes in
structure, reporting system & procedures
Resource dependence
perspective
Survive in the industry-
organizations- resource- strategies to
control environment-reduce
dependency on organizations- internal
& external strategies.
Eg: procuring raw materials from
other company
Internal strategies
External strategies
Population ecology
perspective
Population- organization plays in a
particular sector- occupies ecological
niche. Organization to survive in the
industry- multiple niches. 3 associated
concepts - leads to change
Institutional
perspective
Special relevance to social norms, values &
culture of the organization. Constitutes
institutional environment of organizations- given
more importance than market competitors under
this perspective- also called as symbolic elements
Instuitionalization- process- organization adopt-
specific structures- external legitimacy- due
course-org resemble each other-
“isomorphism”- org resembling each other-
complying laws & regulations. 3 classifications:
Understanding the
change process
OC- succeeds- individual understands
about the change- individual change
tends to happen over a period of time
Steps to understand change:
8 step model for OC
process
1. Really understand & clarify mutual expectations
about the level of detail & cost that project requires
2. Consultant or a project manager, agree
expectations on a pragmatic basis
3. Assume that situations can be improved- look at
ideal situations
4. New overview analysis- suggests new better ways
& techniques
5. Detailed job analysis
6. Involve people- less job secure
Facilitating change
Resistance to change
Defined as resistance as an inevitable response to
any major change. Individuals naturally rush to
defend the status quo if they feel their security or
status are threatened
Nature of resistance:
Active resistance: finding fault, ridiculing,
appealing to fear & manipulating
Passive resistance: agreeing verbally but
not following through, feigning ignorance &
withholding info.
3 levels of resistance
Individual resistance
Organizational resistance
Group resistance
Individual resistance: sources of
resistance: perceptions, personalities
& needs
Group resistance
Intervention strategies for
organizational change
Understanding organizational Development
(OD)
Concerned with helping managers plan change
in organizing & managing people- develop
coordination, commitment & competence
Purpose is to enhance both the effectiveness
&well being of their members- planned
interventions- through structure & systems
using behavioral science
Developing learning
organization
LO- places, mechanisms & processes- enhance
their capabilities- work for it- achieve
sustainable objectives- themselves &
communities they participate
Not simply- open to creative thought-tap
knowledge- “ability to think critically &
creatively, ability to communicate the ideas &
concepts, cooperate with human beings”
Learning is an ongoing, creative process for its
members
LO- single loop & double loop
Single loop: learning- organizational productivity &
capacity to achieve set objectives- routine behavioral
learning. learning without significant change
Double loop: reevaluates the nature of org
objectives, values & beliefs- change in the
organizational culture
Adaptive learning: adopt to environmental
changes- difficulty- assumptions of cultural values &
org structure
Generative learning: creativity & innovation-
beyongd adopting to change & anticipating change
Theoretical foundation- characteristics
of LO is:
1. Presence of tension: tension- catalyst or
motivational need to learn- stems gap b/w
org vision & reality
2. The systems thinking: LO recognizes-
shared values- of employees- openness to
new idea & external environment
3. Organizational culture conducive to
learning: OC- high value of learning-
empathies- genuine concern for & in
employee suggestions & innovations-
operationalized through reward system
Y LO?
Cope up with changing environment &
uncertainty
To be more flexible & take advantage of the
opportunities
To be more innovative
To make the most of the skills & talents of staff