Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Registration Fee
The fee for registration as exporter/importer is Ks 5,000 for one year and Ks 10,000 for
three years. The same fees are payable on renewal.
Goods which may be Exported
Myanmar products can be exported with the exception of some selected items like teak,
rice, etc. under the export licence issued by Ministry of Trade.
Export Licence Fee
Generally there is no export licence fee. However, if hardwoods are to be exported in log
form. the following service fees are payable to the Ministry of Trade.
Sr. No. FOB value of the Licence Service Fee
(Kyat) (Kyat)
1. 1 to 50,000 25,000
2. 50,001 to 100,000 50,000
3. 100,001 to 150,000 75,000
4. 150,001 and Above 100,000
Import Procedure
Customs duty is payable according to the tariff schedule. Import duty is levied on the tax
base, assessable value, which is the sum of C.l.F. value and landing charges of 0.5 per
cent of C.I.F. value. Together with customs duty, Commercial tax is levied on the
imported goods basing on the landed cost which is the sum of assessable value and
import duty. These taxes are collected at the point of entry and the time of clearance.
Export
On the shipment of export commodities an Export Declaration Form (CUSDEC - 2) must
be submitted to the Customs Department together with the following documents:
Customs duty is levied on exported goods according to the tariff schedule and export duty
is levied on the tax base F.O.B value.
Customs Declaration Form for Transit Trade
All commodities, not for domestic consumption and imported for transit trade, are
required to furnish the prescribed form, ie. CUSDEC - 3, attached with the following
documents:
Transit duty is based on the C.l.F. value of the imported goods and will be levied at 2.5%
ad valorum rate.
Clearance under Special Order
A special order may be granted for rapid clearance of the following types of goods
imported by sea or air:
1. Perishable goods
2. Goods immediately required by government projects and enterprises
3. Live animals, human remains.
Temporary Importation
Commodities, imported temporarily for inward processing. such as industrial raw
materials, packing materials are exempted from customs duty for a period of two years
under bond to re-export within a time limit.
Claims for Drawback
Seventh-eighth of the customs duty paid on goods that could be easily identified will be
refunded when such goods are withdrawn from the country again under the drawback
facility in accordance with the following conditions :-
1. The re-export goods must be identical with those imported on payment of duty.
2. Two years must not have elapsed since their importation in cases where the port
of re-export is the same as that of import. The time may be extended up to three
years on application.
3. The re-export goods must not be included among the articles declared to be
incapable of being identified.
4. The goods must not be re-exported to a port to which shipment under claim for
drawback is prohibited.
5. The goods exported must not be of less value than the amount of drawback
claimed.
6. The claim for drawback should not ordinarily be less than 5 kyats in respect of
any single shipment.
7. The goods must not be included among the articles declared to be prohibited or
restricted.
EXPORT PROCEDURES
OBJECT
Procedure for Export under EDI system
Departmental clarifications
Exports where LC has expired
Procedure for project exports
Movement of empty containers for stuffing purposes
Stuffing of containers outside the docks
Stuffing of exports at factory under drawback, bond, free and
duty
Procedure for manufacturer-exporters
Procedure for merchant -exporters
Movement to gateway ports/Air ports by road
Movement by coastal vessels
Short shipment notice
Percentage of goods to be examined
Self-certification and minimal physical examination
Return of export goods from docks
Export of Handloom products
Export of handicrafts
Export of narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
Silk-pre-shipment inspection
IMPORTANT CASE LAWS
OTHER REFERENCES
LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES
OBJECT:
Section 40: As per this section, the person in charge of the conveyance shall not
permit loading any export goods unless duly passed by the proper officer of
Customs.
Section 50 of the Customs Act, 1962 is a statutory provision for entry of goods for
exportation. This section describes that the exporter has to file the shipping bill in case of
export by air or sea or a bill of export in respect of export by land.
Shipping Bill(Manual):
In order to effect exports under the manual system the exporters are required to file
shipping bills in the format prescribed on the Shipping Bill and Bill of Exports (Forms)
Regulations, 1992. Separate shipping bills are prescribed for:
If a shipping bill or bill of export is filed, the rate of duty in force on the date on
which the order of clearance and permission of loading is granted under Section 51,
2ill apply.
In all other cases the rate in force on the date of payment of duty will apply.
As per section 14 of the Customs Act the value of the export goods shall be
calculated with reference to rate of exchange as in force on the date on which a
shipping bill or a bill of export as the case may be is presented under section 50. The
rate of exchange means the rate determined by the Central Government or
ascertained in such a manner as the Central Government may direct. The Central
Government normally issues notification to this effect periodically.
Departmental clarifications
When the export goods are examined at source and sealed by the Central Excise
officers, in respect of whom duty drawback is proposed to be claimed, it should be
certified in the following manner:
"Certified that the description and value of the goods covered by this invoice and
the particulars amplified in the packing list with a view to ascertaining drawback
amount at the port of export, have been checked by me and that the goods have
been packed and sealed with Central Excise lead seal or signet seal under my
supervision
Countersigned Signed
Superintendent of C.Excise Inspector
If the date of LC validity has expired, but the date of negotiation is valid, exports
may be allowed, as the documents will be negotiated. If both the dates have expired,
exports should be allowed on "Documents against Payment" basis.
Procedure for project exports
Application for registration of Project Export should be made in the form vide
Annexure ‘A’ in the export Deptt. along with the enclosures.
1. Shipping Bills covering project export should also be prepared like all other
shipping Bills keeping in view the requirements for the declaration of
separate quantity, net weight and other particulars item wise/product wise so
as to enable the A.Os, to assess each item in the Shipping Bill accurately from
various aspects like valuation, export inspection code ETC.
2. Each S/Bill, invoice and G.R. Forms under this scheme should also bear
following declaration in red ink in large scripts on the top margin:-
"PROJECT EXPORT" and also the registration number given by this department
or suitable stamp as made by the Export Depts. may be used.
3. Each S/Bill, invoice and G.R. Forms should bear an endorsement stating therein
letter number or approval number assigned to the Project Export by the Reserve
Bank of India ior by the authorised bank.
4. As provided under the scheme, the exporters may make shipments from ports
other than the major port with which the contract has been registered. For availing
of this facility, release orders for allowing shipment from other ports will have to be
obtained from Export Deptt. of this Customs House.
5. The request for release order for making shipments from other ports will he
scrutinized on the basis of proforma invoice produced along with written
request for this purpose. The said invoice will be scrutinized and assessed in
the same way other S/Bills are processed in the Export Dept As per Rules
and practice and in the light of this Public Notice but to the extent relevant
for issuing the release order. They would be entitled to receive the drawback
for such part shipments through the other ports from Custom House.
6. The exporter should see that they comply with various stipulations in terms
of the undertaking given by them vide application form in Annexure’A.
Failure to comply with the same will lead to action being taken against them
in accordance with the rules applicable in this regard.
In the interest of export promotion, it has been directed that no separate permission
is required from Customs for movement of empty container from the ICD/CFS/ for
the purpose of stuffing in the factory. It is necessary that the exporter must have
obtained general permission for stuffing the export goods in the factory. The
movement is however subject to usual checks at exit gate of the ICD/CFS.
The exporter desirous of taking the containers outside the port premises for the
purpose of stuffing has to make a requisition to the concerned steamer agent, who
will in turn make an application to the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner (Docks).
Details of goods to be exported, number of containers required along with container
numbers should be given by the steamer agent. These particulars are entered in a
register maintained for this purpose. A preventive officer/Inspector attached to
Container cell will inspect the container for making sure that it is empty and seal it
with Customs seal.
Upon receipt of stuffed container, the steamer agent will again intimate the Docks to
enable it to close the entry in its register. If the examination report of the Central
Excise offices is inadequate, the Customs officers will subject the goods to re-
examination at docks. If the load is less than one container load, facility for stuffing
at factory will not be extended. In all such cases, the goods will be examined at
docks.
Permission for stuffing at factory will be granted for three months at a time for
following category of goods:
In case of drawback shipping bill, factory stuffing will be allowed only in the factory
of manufacture. In other cases, it will be considered on case by case basis.
Procedure for manufacturer-exporters
Board circular has authorised movement of containers carrying export goods from
small coastal ports by coastal vessel to the gateway ports. This export will be
allowed at the gateway port subject to the condition that a bond has been executed
as per regulation 4 of the Goods Imported (Conditions of transshipment)
Regulations, 1995 and export goods are manifested through the gateway port (port
of transshipment or hub port), such as for instance, "To Amsterdam, through
Chennai".
Alternatively, he may present the shipping bill or bill of export for cancellation or
amendment.
Rule 3 seeks to impose a penalty of Rs.100 maximum for failure to comply with this
condition.
The assessing officer’s name seal affixed on the assessed shipping bill usually also
indicates the percentage of goods checked. An option exists to indicate whether 5%
or 10% of goods are examined. In many cases, the Ministry has noticed that the
percentage of checking done is not indicted by striking out the in applicable
percentage. The assessing officers are directed to indicate the specific percentage of
export goods examined by them.
The Board has directed that at the Gateway port, for containers brought
under self-sealing procedure, routine examination should be dispensed with.
For such containers, only one out of five containers should be opened for visual
inspection of the content. Thereafter, from each opened container a minimum of two
packages and maximum of 5% packages may be examined.
1. In case of manufacturer exporters who have in-house testing facility, their test
reports may be relied on for the purpose of logging of DEEC book as well as for
verification under Pass Book Scheme, if the following conditions are satisfied:
1. Test results obtained from Central Excise test laboratories will be valid for six
months, provided the test reports bring out the technical characteristics of inputs, as
required under various schemes (DEEC, pass book scheme etc.). A certified copy of
this test report along with examination report may be produced.
Handloom Export Promotion Council (HEPC) will endorse all the shipping bills
containing cotton handloom products whether they belong to merchant exporters or
manufacturer exporters to the effect that the goods covered by shipping bills are
handloom products and with regard to all shipping bills so endorsed by HRPC,
certificate of non-availment of modvat credit need not be insisted.
Export of handicrafts
In case of handicraft exports, routine references for obtaining NOC from the
Archaeological Survey of India, should be avoided. In order to equip the Customs
officers to understand and decide what kind of cases have to be referred to ASI or
Wild Life department, in the NACEN training program, it has been proposed to
incorporate in the curriculum, subjects such as Antiquities Act and law regarding
export of wild life.
For duty drawback purposes, in terms of General Note No.11 of Drawback Table,
the exporters of handicrafts of Brass or Iron have to produce a certificate from the
Development Commissioner that the said goods are handicrafts. The Export
Promotion Council for handicrafts may also issue this certificate. However, no
certificate of non-availment of modvat is required as handicrafts are
unconditionally exempt from payment of Central Excise Duty.
In terms of NDPS Act, 1985, export or import of items falling under Schedule-I is
prohibited. Other Psychotropic substances may be exported with the export
authorization issued by the Central Narcotic Bureau. Besides, Ministry of
Commerce Public Notice No.79/EXP(PN)/96-97, dated 2.1.1996 allows export of
Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine and Acetic Anhydride against NOC issued by the
Narcotic Control Bureau. Export of these goods will be permitted only upon
compliance of these conditions.
Silk-pre-shipment inspection
Exporters will bring the consignments of silk to the customs point. For each
consignment, an application for pre-shipment inspection in prescribed forms of
Central Silk Board (CSB) will be made accompanied by two copies of export
invoices, two packing lists and a sample swatch of 6" square dimension.
After the inspectors check the correctness of HS code and authenticate the invoices, the
customs will randomly select consignments for check by the CSB Inspector. The parcels
will be checked for purity, yarn constituents, construction particulars with sample
attached to the application and description contained therein. If parcels conform to
samples the CSB inspector will issue an endorsement to that effect to customs on the
invoice. If there is a mismatch, the inspector will inform customs in writing for
appropriate action by customs. CSB will conduct examination and submit report on the
same day. Thereafter, sample swatch will be analyzed in the lab for fibre composition.
This will also be reported to customs. This procedure seeks to avoid dual inspection, one
by CSB and the other by
Payment instruments
Types
The most frequently used cashless payment instruments in Europe are: credit transfers,
direct debits, cards and cheques. Electronic money (e-money) is little used at the moment
but has the potential to grow and may become a major payment instrument in the future.
Credit transfers are instructions from the payer to his/her bank to debit his/her bank
account and to credit the beneficiary’s bank account. Credit transfers are the most widely
used payment instrument in Europe. They account for around one-third of all non-cash
payments.
Direct debits are pre-authorised debits on the payer’s bank account that are initiated by
the beneficiary. They are often used for recurring payments. Around one-quarter of all
non-cash payments are effected as direct debits.
Payment cards (debit or credit cards) are cards issued by a credit institution or card
company. They indicate that the holder of the card may charge his/her account at the
bank (debit card) or draw on a line of credit (credit card) up to an authorised limit. Cards
are used slightly less than one-third of non-cash payments.
A cheque is a written order from one party (the drawer) to another (the drawee, normally
a bank), requiring the drawee to pay the indicated sum on demand to the drawer or to a
third party specified by the drawer. Usage of cheques is still high in some countries
(especially in France, Ireland, Portugal) but diminishing. In most euro area countries
cheques are practically non-existent.
Electronic money (e-money) is a monetary value (claim on the issuer) which is stored in
an electronic device and accepted as means of payment by undertakings other than the
issuer. E-money can take the form of pre-paid cards, or it can be stored on a personal
computer. back to top
Payment Instruments in India
The growth of cheque volumes could be attributed partly to the rapid expansion of bank
branches
through the seventies and the consequent spread of banking as also partly to the
increasing
tendency of the people to invest in financial assets like shares and debentures. There has
also
been a significant growth in such corporate instruments as fixed deposits. This is
reflected in the
substantial increase in the use of payable 'At Par' instruments for dividends, interests and
refund
orders.
3.15. The substantial increase in the volumes of cheques indicates the need for upgrading
the
existing infrastructure for exchange and settlement from manual clearing arrangement to
more
efficient and electronically driven systems. Manual sorting and listing of instruments
result in
long delays as well as errors in computation of the total claims. The settlement process
itself
would get delayed and result in the problem of unreconciled entries between the banks.
3.16. Another important payment instrument which is widely popular is the Money Order
service offered by the Department of Posts, Government of India. The Money Order
enables an
individual to send remittances to a third party under the aegis of the Post Office. It is a
point-topoint
delivery of funds. The originating Post Office collects the full amount of remittance as
also
a commission (service charge) from the individual remitting the funds and sends the
advice to
the destination Post Office. At the destination Post Office, the funds are paid to the
beneficiary. The money order can be sent as an ordinary paper based payment advice or
as a Telegraphic Money Order. The Telegraphic Money Order is faster as the payment
advices are sent through
Telex or Telegraph. The customer, of course, has to pay higher service charges for this
facility.
3.17. The Postal Order is another payment instrument of the Department of Posts. The
Postal
Order is issued denomination-wise, which can be encashed by the beneficiary after due
identification at the Post Office on which it is drawn. Postal Orders like the Money
Orders are
independent of the banking system. Both these instruments are GIRO payments and are
credit
transactions as opposed to a cheque which is a debit payment mechanism.
Chapter 5
Open Account
An open account transaction is a sale where the goods are shipped and delivered
before payment is due, which is usually in 30 to 90 days. Obviously, this option
is the most advantageous to the importer in terms of cash flow and cost, but it is
consequently the highest-risk option for an exporter. Because of intense competition in
export markets, foreign buyers often press exporters for open account terms. In addition,
the extension of credit by the seller to the buyer is more
common abroad. Therefore, exporters who are reluctant
to extend credit may lose a sale to their competitors.
However, though open account terms will definitely
enhance export competitiveness, exporters should thoroughly
examine the political, economic, and commercial
risks as well as cultural influences to ensure that payment
will be received in full and on time. It is possible to
substantially mitigate the risk of non-payment associated
with open account trade by using such trade finance
techniques as export credit insurance and factoring.
Exporters may also seek export working capital financing
to ensure that they have access to financing for production
and for credit while waiting for payment.
Key Points
chArActeristics of An
open Account
Applicability
Recommended for use (a) in low-risk trading
relationships or markets and (b) in competitive
markets to win customers with the use of one or
more appropriate trade finance techniques.
Risk
Significant risk to exporter because the buyer could
default on payment obligation after shipment of
the goods.
Pros
• Boosts competitiveness in the global market
• Helps establish and maintain a successful trade
relationship
Cons
• Significant exposure to the risk of non-payment
• Additional costs associated with risk mitigation
measures
Open account terms may be offered in competitive markets with the use of one or more
of
the following trade finance techniques: (a) export working capital financing, (b) govern-
ment-guaranteed export working capital programs, (c) export credit insurance, and (d)
export factoring. More detailed information on each trade finance technique is provided
in
Chapters 6 through 9 of this guide.
A negotiable instrument can serve to convey value constituting at least part of the
performance of a contract, albeit perhaps not obvious in contract formation, in terms
inherent in and arising from the requisite offer and acceptance and conveyance of
consideration. The underlying contract contemplates the right to hold the instrument as,
and to negotiate the instrument to, a holder in due course, the payment on which is at
least part of the performance of the contract to which the negotiable instrument is linked.
The instrument, memorializing (1) the power to demand payment; and, (2) the right to be
paid, can move, for example, in the instance of a 'bearer instrument', wherein the
possession of the document itself attributes and ascribes the right to payment. Certain
exceptions exist, such as instances of loss or theft of the instrument, wherein the
possessor of the note may be a holder, but not necessarily a holder in due course.
Negotiation requires a valid endorsement of the negotiable instrument. The consideration
constituted by a negotiable instrument is cognizable as the value given up to acquire it
(benefit) and the consequent loss of value (detriment) to the prior holder; thus, no
separate consideration is required to support an accompanying contract assignment. The
instrument itself is understood as memorializing the right for, and power to demand,
payment, and an obligation for payment evidenced by the instrument itself with
possession as a holder in due course being the touchstone for the right to, and power to
demand, payment. In some instances, the negotiable instrument can serve as the writing
memorializing a contract, thus satisfying any applicable Statute of Frauds as to that
contract.
• The rights to payment are not subject to set-off, and do not rely on the validity of
the underlying contract giving rise to the debt (for example if a cheque was drawn
for payment for goods delivered but defective, the drawer is still liable on the
cheque)
• No notice need be given to any party liable on the instrument for transfer of the
rights under the instrument by negotiation. However, payment by the party liable
to the person previously entitled to enforce the instrument "counts" as payment on
the note until adequate notice has been received by the liable party that a different
party is to receive payments from then on. [U.C.C. §3-602(b)]
• Transfer free of equities—the holder in due course can hold better title than the
party he obtains it from (as in the instance of negotiation of the instrument from a
mere holder to a holder in due course)
Negotiation often enables the transferee to become the party to the contract through a
contract assignment (provided for explicitly or by operation of law) and to enforce the
contract in the transferee-assignee’s own name. Negotiation can be effected by
indorsement and delivery (order instruments), or by delivery alone (bearer instruments).
In addition, the rights and obligations accruing to the transferee can be affected by the
rule of derivative title, which does not allow a property owner to transfer rights in a piece
of property greater than his own.
[edit] History
[edit] Classes
Promissory notes and bills of exchange are two primary types of negotiable instruments.
A bill of exchange or "draft" is a written order by the drawer to the drawee to pay money
to the payee. A common type of bill of exchange is the cheque (check in American
English), defined as a bill of exchange drawn on a banker and payable on demand. Bills
of exchange are used primarily in international trade, and are written orders by one
person to his bank to pay the bearer a specific sum on a specific date. Prior to the advent
of paper currency, bills of exchange were a common means of exchange. They are not
used as often today.
It is essentially an order made by one person to another to pay money to a third person.
A bill of exchange requires in its inception three parties—the drawer, the drawee, and the
payee.
The person who draws the bill is called the drawer. He gives the order to pay money to
the third party. The party upon whom the bill is drawn is called the drawee. He is the
person to whom the bill is addressed and who is ordered to pay. He becomes an acceptor
when he indicates his willingness to pay the bill. (Sec.62) The party in whose favor the
bill is drawn or is payable is called the payee.
The parties need not all be distinct persons. Thus, the drawer may draw on himself
payable to his own order. (see Sec. 8)
A bill of exchange may be endorsed by the payee in favour of a third party, who may in
turn endorse it to a fourth, and so on indefinitely. The "holder in due course" may claim
the amount of the bill against the drawee and all previous endorsers, regardless of any
counterclaims that may have disabled the previous payee or endorser from doing so. This
is what is meant by saying that a bill is negotiable.
In some cases a bill is marked "not negotiable" – see crossing of cheques. In that case it
can still be transferred to a third party, but the third party can have no better right than the
transferor.
In the commonwealth almost all jurisdictions have codified the law relating to negotiable
instruments in a Bills of Exchange Act, e.g. Bills of Exchange Act 1882 in the UK, Bills
of Exchange Act 1908 in New Zealand, The Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 in India and
The Bills of Exchange Act 1914 in Mauritius. The Bills of Exchange Act:
1. defines a bill of exchange as: 'an unconditional order in writing, addressed by one
person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it
is addressed to pay on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum
certain in money to or to the order of a specified person, or to bearer.
2. defines a cheque as: 'a bill of exchange drawn on a banker payable on demand'
3. defines a promissory note as: 'an unconditional promise in writing made by one
person to another, signed by the maker, engaging to pay on demand, or at a fixed
or determinable future time, a sum certain in money to or to the order of a
specified person or to bearer.'
Additionally most commonwealth jurisdictions have separate Cheques Acts providing for
additional protections for bankers collecting unendorsed or irregularly endorsed cheques,
providing that cheques that are crossed and marked 'not negotiable' or similar are not
transferable, and providing for electronic presentation of cheques in inter-bank cheque
clearing systems.
The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition has a comprehensive article on the
Bill of Exchange, detailing its history and operation, as understood at the time of its
publication.
In the United States, Article 3 and Article 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code govern the
issuance and transfer of negotiable instruments. The various State law enactments of
Uniform Commercial Code §§3-104(a) through (d) set forth the legal definition of what
is and what is not a negotiable instrument:
(3) does not state any other undertaking or instruction by the person
promising or ordering payment to do any act in addition to the payment
of money, but the promise or order may contain
(iii) a waiver of the benefit of any law intended for the advantage or
protection of an obligor.
(c) An order that meets all of the requirements of subsection (a), except
paragraph (1), and otherwise falls within the definition of "check" in
subsection (f) is a negotiable instrument and a check.
(d) A promise or order other than a check is not an instrument if, at the
time it is issued or first comes into possession of a holder, it contains a
conspicuous statement, however expressed, to the effect that the promise
or order is not negotiable or is not an instrument governed by this
Article.
Thus, for a writing to be a negotiable instrument under Article 3,[1] the following
requirements must be met:
The latter requirement is referred to as the "words of negotiability": a writing which does
not contain the words "to the order of" (within the four corners of the instrument or in
endorsement on the note or in allonge) or indicate that it is payable to the individual
holding the contract document (analogous to the holder in due course) is not a negotiable
instrument and is not governed by Article 3, even if it appears to have all of the other
features of negotiability. The only exception is that if an instrument meets the definition
of a cheque (a bill of exchange payable on demand and drawn on a bank) and is not
payable to order (i.e. if it just reads "pay John Doe") then it is treated as a negotiable
instrument.
Persons other than the original obligor and obligee can become parties to a negotiable
instrument. The most common manner in which this is done is by placing one's signature
on the instrument (“endorsement”): if the person who signs does so with the intention of
obtaining payment of the instrument or acquiring or transferring rights to the instrument,
the signature is called an endorsement. There are five types of endorsements
contemplated by the Code, covered in UCC Article 3, Sections 204–206:
1. in good faith;
2. for value;
3. without notice of any defenses to payment,
the transferee is a holder in due course and can enforce the instrument without being
subject to defenses which the maker of the instrument would be able to assert against the
original payee, except for certain real defenses. These real defenses include (1) forgery of
the instrument; (2) fraud as to the nature of the instrument being signed; (3) alteration of
the instrument; (4) incapacity of the signer to contract; (5) infancy of the signer; (6)
duress; (7) discharge in bankruptcy; and, (8) the running of a statute of limitations as to
the validity of the instrument.
The holder-in-due-course rule is a rebuttable presumption that makes the free transfer of
negotiable instruments feasible in the modern economy. A person or entity purchasing an
instrument in the ordinary course of business can reasonably expect that it will be paid
when presented to, and not subject to dishonor by, the maker, without involving itself in a
dispute between the maker and the person to whom the instrument was first issued (this
can be contrasted to the lesser rights and obligations accruing to mere holders). Article 3
of the Uniform Commercial Code as enacted in a particular State's law contemplate real
defenses available to purported holders in due course.
The foregoing is the theory and application presuming compliance with the relevant law.
Practically, the obligor-payor on an instrument who feels he has been defrauded or
otherwise unfairly dealt with by the payee may nonetheless refuse to pay even a holder in
due course, requiring the latter to resort to litigation to recover on the instrument.
[edit] Usage
While bearer instruments are rarely created as such, a holder of commercial paper with
the holder designated as payee can change the instrument to a bearer instrument by an
endorsement. The proper holder simply signs the back of the instrument and the
instrument becomes bearer paper, although in recent years, third party checks are not
being honored by most banks unless the original payee has signed a notarized document
stating such.
Exporters who lack sufficient funds to extend open accounts in the global market needs
export working capital financing that covers the entire cash cycle, the from purchase of
raw materials through the ultimate collection of the sales proceeds. Export working
capital
facilities, which are generally secured by personal guarantees, assets, or receivables, can
be structured to support export sales in the form of a loan or a revolving line of credit.
The U.S. Small Business Administration and the Export–Import Bank of the United
States
offer programs that guarantee export working capital facilities granted by participating
lenders to U.S. exporters. With those programs, U.S. exporters can obtain needed
facilities
from commercial lenders when financing is otherwise not available or when borrowing
capacity needs to be increased.
Export credit insurance provides protection against commercial losses (such as default,
insolvency, and bankruptcy) and political losses (such as war, nationalization, and
currency
inconvertibility). It allows exporters to increase sales by offering liberal open account
terms to new and existing customers. Insurance also provides security for banks that are
providing working capital and are financing exports.
Export Factoring
Forfaiting is a method of trade financing that allows the exporter to sell medium-term
receivables (180 days to 7 years) to the forfaiter at a discount, in exchange for cash. The
forfaiter assumes all the risks, thereby enabling the exporter to offer extended credit
terms
and to incorporate the discount into the selling price. Forfaiters usually work with exports
of capital goods, commodities, and large projects. Forfaiting was developed in
Switzerland
in the 1950s to fill the gap between the exporter of capital goods, who would not or could
not deal on open account, and the importer, who desired to defer payment until the capital
equipment could begin to pay for itself. More detailed information about forfaiting is
provided
in Chapter 10 of this guide.
Letter of credit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
After a contract is concluded between buyer and seller, buyer's bank supplies a
letter of credit to seller.
Seller p bill of lading for payment from buyer's bank. Buyer's bank exchanges bill of
lading for payment from the buyer.
The letter of credit can also be source of payment for a transaction, meaning that
redeeming the letter of credit will pay an exporter. Letters of credit are used primarily in
international trade transactions of significant value, for deals between a supplier in one
country and a customer in another. In such cases the International Chamber of Commerce
Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits applies (UCP 600 being the
latest version).[2] They are also used in the land development process to ensure that
approved public facilities (streets, sidewalks, storm water ponds, etc.) will be built. The
parties to a letter of credit are usually a beneficiary who is to receive the money, the
issuing bank of whom the applicant is a client, and the advising bank of whom the
beneficiary is a client. Almost all letters of credit are irrevocable, i.e., cannot be amended
or canceled without prior agreement of the beneficiary, the issuing bank and the
confirming bank, if any. In executing a transaction, letters of credit incorporate functions
common to giros and Traveler's cheques. Typically, the documents a beneficiary has to
present in order to receive payment include a commercial invoice, bill of lading, and
documents proving the shipment was insured against loss or damage in transit.
Contents
[hide]
• 1 Terminology
o 1.1 Origin of the term
o 1.2 Types and related terms
• 2 Documents that can be presented for payment
• 3 Legal principles governing documentary credits
• 4 The price of letters of credit
• 5 Legal basis
• 6 International Trade Payment methods
• 7 Risk situations in letter-of-credit transactions
• 8 See also
• 9 References
• 10 External links
[edit] Terminology
The English name “letter of credit” derives from the French word “accreditation”, a
power to do something, which in turn is derivative of the Latin word “accreditivus”,
meaning trust. This applies to any defense relating to the underlying contract of sale. This
is as long as the seller performs their duties to an extent that meets the requirements
contained in the letter of credit.[citation needed]
Letters of credit (LC) deal in documents, not goods. The LC could be irrevocable or
revocable. An irrevocable LC cannot be changed unless both the buyer and seller agree.
Whereas in a revocable LC changes to the LC can be made without the consent of the
beneficiary. A sight LC means that payment is made immediately to the
beneficiary/seller/exporter upon presentation of the correct documents in the required
time frame. A time or date LC will specify when payment will be made at a future date
and upon presentation of the required documents.[citation needed]
Negotiation means the giving of value for draft(s) and/or document(s) by the bank
authorized to negotiate, viz the nominated bank. Mere examination of the documents and
forwarding the same to the letter of credit issuing bank for reimbursement, without giving
of value / agreed to give, does not constitute a negotiation.[clarification needed][citation needed]
To receive payment, an exporter or shipper must present the documents required by the
letter of credit. Typically instead of presenting goods themselves, a document proving the
goods were sent is presented instead. However, the list and form of documents is open to
imagination and negotiation and might contain requirements to present documents issued
by a neutral third party evidencing the quality of the goods shipped, or their place of
origin or place. Typical types of documents in such contracts might include:[citation needed]
• Financial Documents
• Commercial Documents
• Shipping Documents
• Official Documents
• Transport Documents
• Insurance documents
One of the primary peculiarities of the documentary credit is that the payment obligation
is abstract and independent from the underlying contract of sale or any other contract in
the transaction. Thus the bank’s obligation is defined by the terms of the credit alone, and
the sale contract is irrelevant. The defences of the buyer arising out of the sale contract do
not concern the bank and in no way affect its liability.[3] Article 4(a) UCP states this
principle clearly. Article 5 the UCP further states that banks deal with documents only,
they are not concerned with the goods (facts). Accordingly, if the documents tendered by
the beneficiary, or his or her agent, appear to be in order, then in general the bank is
obliged to pay without further qualifications.
The policies behind adopting the abstraction principle are purely commercial and reflect a
party’s expectations: firstly, if the responsibility for the validity of documents was thrown
onto banks, they would be burdened with investigating the underlying facts of each
transaction and would thus be less inclined to issue documentary credits as the
transaction would involve great risk and inconvenience. Secondly, documents required
under the credit could in certain circumstances be different from those required under the
sale transaction; banks would then be placed in a dilemma in deciding which terms to
follow if required to look behind the credit agreement. Thirdly, the fact that the basic
function of the credit is to provide the seller with the certainty of receiving payment, as
long as he performs his documentary duties, suggests that banks should honour their
obligation notwithstanding allegations of misfeasance by the buyer.[4] Finally, courts have
emphasised that buyers always have a remedy for an action upon the contract of sale, and
that it would be a calamity for the business world if, for every breach of contract between
the seller and buyer, a bank were required to investigate said breach.
The “principle of strict compliance” also aims to make the bank’s duty of effecting
payment against documents easy, efficient and quick. Hence, if the documents tendered
under the credit deviate from the language of the credit the bank is entitled to withhold
payment even if the deviation is purely terminological.[5] The general legal maxim de
minimis non curat lex has no place in the field of documentary credits.
Legal writers have failed to satisfactorily reconcile the bank’s undertaking with any
contractual analysis. The theories include: the implied promise, assignment theory, the
novation theory, reliance theory, agency theories, estoppels and trust theories,
anticipatory theory, and the guarantee theory.[6] Davis, Treitel, Goode, Finkelstein and
Ellinger have all accepted the view that documentary credits should be analyzed outside
the legal framework of contractual principles, which require the presence of
consideration. Accordingly, whether the documentary credit is referred to as a promise,
an undertaking, a chose in action, an engagement or a contract, it is acceptable in English
jurisprudence to treat it as contractual in nature, despite the fact that it possesses
distinctive features, which make it sui generis.
A few countries including the United States (see Article 5 of the Uniform Commercial
Code) have created statutes in relation to the operation of letters of credit. These statutes
are designed to work with the rules of practice including the UCP and the ISP98. These
rules of practice are incorporated into the transaction by agreement of the parties. The
latest version of the UCP is the UCP600 effective July 1, 2007.[7] The previous revision
was the UCP500 and became effective on 1 January 1994. Since the UCP are not laws,
parties have to include them into their arrangements as normal contractual provisions. For
more information on legal issues surrounding letters of credit, the Journal of International
Commercial Law at George Mason University's School of Law published Volume 1,
Issue 1 exclusively on the topic.
Where the buyer parts with money first and waits for the seller to forward the goods
Subject to ICC's UCP 600, where the bank gives an undertaking (on behalf of buyer and
at the request of applicant) to pay the shipper (beneficiary) the value of the goods shipped
if certain documents are submitted and if the stipulated terms and conditions are strictly
complied with.
Here the buyer can be confident that the goods he is expecting only will be received since
it will be evidenced in the form of certain documents called for meeting the specified
terms and conditions while the supplier can be confident that if he meets the stipulations
his payment for the shipment is guaranteed by bank, who is independent of the parties to
the contract.
• Documentary collection (more secure for buyer and to a certain extent to seller)
Also called "Cash Against Documents". Subject to ICC's URC 525, sight and usance, for
delivery of shipping documents against payment or acceptances of draft, where shipment
happens first, then the title documents are sent to the [collecting bank] buyer's bank by
seller's bank [remitting bank], for delivering documents against collection of
payment/acceptance
Where the supplier ships the goods and waits for the buyer to remit the bill proceeds, on
open account terms.
Fraud Risks
Legal Risks
• Nominated Bank has made a payment to the Beneficiary against documents that
comply with the terms and conditions of the Credit and is unable to obtain
reimbursement from the Issuing Bank
• If Confirming Bank’s main risk is that, once having paid the Beneficiary, it may
not be able to obtain reimbursement from the Issuing Bank because of insolvency
of the Issuing Bank or refusal of the Issuing Bank to reimburse because of a
dispute as to whether or not payment should have been made under the Credit
•
International T
Profit is not a so
the company’s s
Providers
Understand ofthe
the
i
Flow”
Exporters
Exporter
always
payment
Open account
Collection
Importers
Consignment alway
Importer
Letter
Advance of Credit
payment
Red Clause L/C
i
Bank
International T
Profit is not a so
the company’s s
Understand the i
Flow”
High cost of ex
Exporters always
Exporter
payment is force
terms to its
Importers alwaycust
30, 60, 90 days
Letter of Credit i
days
Factoring VS Ac
Receivable Fina
With Account R
you receive a loa
invoices are pled
This is money w
Factoring : Clas
repaid at some p
With Factoring,
Non-recourse
asset
Recourse
There is nothing
Modified recours
Forfaiting
A purchase of
instruments su
under time lett
exchange, promi
It has been don
Exporter’s
basis pers
Operated
Advantageson a d
Available up flow
Improve cash to
Non-recourse
value
Importer’s pers
Advantages
Simple documents
Obtain fixed rate
extended credit
Improve credit lines
Forfaiter’s pers
Advantages
Simple documents
Assets purchases is
easily transferable
Financing avail
importer
Letter of Credit
Trust receipt (T/R
Shipping Guaran