Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Understanding The Auditor
Understanding The Auditor
If all the facts concerning financial transactions were properly and accurately recorded and if
the owners and managers of business enterprises were entirely honest and sufficiently skilled
in matters of accounting and recording, there would be little need for independent auditing.
However, human nature being as it is, there probably will always be a need for the auditor.
Many businesses, depending on size and nature, employ internal auditors. Their
responsibilities and functions, while similar to those of an independent auditor, are vitally
different in a major respect having to do with impartiality and independence. For the purpose
of this discussion the terms accountant, auditor and certified public accountant (CPA) are
used interchangeably and only refer to the "outside" independent auditor.
Good accounting and financial reporting aid society in allocating its resources in the most
efficient manner. The goal is to allocate our limited capital resources to the production of
those goods and services for which demand is greatest. Economic resources are attracted to
the industries and organizational entities that are shown by accounting measurements to be
capable of using the resources to the best advantage. Inadequate accounting and inaccurate
reporting, on the other hand, conceal waste and inefficiency and thereby prevent our
economic resources from being allocated in a rational manner.
A decision by a credit professional to grant credit is usually based on careful study of the
company's financial statements along with other information. The credit manager's purpose in
granting credit is to facilitate the sale of product and collect payment when it is due. But what
if the financial statements submitted by the company along with its credit application are not
dependable? Assume, for example, that the financial statements overstate current assets and
annual earnings, and omit major liabilities. Assume also that the credit manager, acting on the
basis of such misleading information, grants trade credit. The end result is likely to be that the
credit manager does not receive payment and may have to write the transaction off as a loss.
Audited financial statements are now the accepted means by which business corporations
report their operating results and financial position. The word audit when applied to financial
statements means that the balance sheet, statements of income and retained earnings, and
statement of cash flows are accompanied by an audit report prepared by independent public
accounts, expressing their professional opinion as to the fairness of the company's financial
statements.
The goal is to determine whether these statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Financial statement audits are normally
performed by firms of certified public accountants; users of auditors' reports include trade
creditors, management, investors, bankers, financial analysts and government agencies.
The term registration statement is an important one in any discussion of the impact of the
SEC on accounting practice. To register securities means to qualify them for sale to the
public by filing with the SEC financial statements and other data in a form acceptable to the
Commission. A registration statement contains audited financial statements, including
balance sheets for a two-year period and income statements and statements of cash flow for a
three year period. The legislation creating the SEC made the Commission responsible for
determining whether the financial statements presented to it reflect proper application of
accounting principles.
The primary purpose of an audit is to provide assurance to the users of the financial
statements that these statements are reliable. Auditors do not express an opinion on the
client's accounting records. The auditors' investigation of financial statement items includes
reference to the client's accounting records, but is not limited to these records. The auditors'
examination includes observation of tangible assets, inspection of such documents as
purchase orders and contracts, and the gathering of evidence from outsiders including banks,
customers, and suppliers, as well as analysis of the client's accounting records.
A principal means of establishing the validity of a balance sheet and income statement is to
trace the statement figures to the accounting records and back through the records to the
original evidence of transactions. However, the auditors' use of the accounting records is only
a means to an end ñ and merely a part of the audit. It is, therefore, appropriate for the auditors
to state in their report that they have made an audit of the financial statements rather than to
say that they have made an audit of the accounting records.
Expressing an independent and expert opinion on the fairness of financial statements is the
most important and valuable service rendered by the public accounting profession. The
auditors' standard report states that the examination was performed in conformity with
generally accepted auditing standards and by expressing an opinion that the client's financial
statements are presented fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
However, if there are deficiencies in the client's financial statements or limitations in the
auditors' examination, or if there are other unusual conditions about which the readers of the
financial statements should be informed, auditors' cannot issue the standard report. Instead,
they must carefully modify their report to make these problems or conditions known to users
of the audited financial statements.
The auditors' product is their report. It is a separate document from the client's financial
statements, although the two are closely related and transmitted together to stockholders and
to creditors.
Adequate disclosure in the notes to financial statements is necessary for the auditors to issue
an unqualified opinion on the financial statements. Disclosure requirements that have become
a part of the basic financial statements include the disclosure of significant accounting
policies, accounting changes, loss contingencies, and lease and pension information.
Detecting Misstatements
Generally accepted accounting principles require that the financial statements be free from
material misstatements. The auditors have a responsibility to detect various types of material
misstatements, including errors, irregularities and those caused by illegal acts.
The auditors are required to assess the risk that errors and irregularities have occurred
affecting the client's financial records. The audit is designed to provide reasonable assurance
of detecting errors and irregularities that are material to the financial statements.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of ABC Company as of December 31, 2001, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
A special type of significant uncertainty, that is important to the credit professional, concerns
the ability of a company to continue as a going concern. Under generally accepted accounting
principles, both assets and liabilities are recorded and classified on the assumption that the
company will continue to operate. Assets, for example, may be presented at amounts that are
significantly greater than their liquidation values.
Conditions that may cause the auditors to question the going-concern assumption include
negative cash flows from operations, defaults on loan agreements, adverse financial ratios,
work stoppages, and legal proceedings. If a substantial doubt exists about the company's
ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the balance sheet date, the
auditors modify their report by adding a final paragraph such as the following:
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that ABC
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial
statements, ABC Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a
net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue
as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described
in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Qualified Opinions
Qualifications with respect to an auditor's opinion may be broadly classified into two
categories; those qualifications which relate to the scope of the examination, and those
qualifications with respect to the fairness of presentation in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles consistently applied. A qualified opinion restricts the auditors'
responsibility for fair presentation in some areas of the financial statements. The opinion
states that except for the effects of some deficiency in the financial statements, or some
limitation in the scope of the auditors' examination, the financial statements are presented
fairly. All qualified reports include a separate explanatory paragraph before the opinion
paragraph disclosing the reasons for the qualification.
Adverse Opinions
An adverse opinion is the opposite of an unqualified opinion; it is an opinion that the
financial statements do not present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash
flows of the company, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The auditors should express an adverse opinion if the statements are so lacking in fairness
that a qualified opinion would not be warning enough. Whenever the auditors issue an
adverse opinion, they should disclose in a separate paragraph of the report the reasons for the
adverse opinion and the principal effects on the financial statements of the matters causing
the adverse opinion.
Disclaimer of Opinion
A disclaimer of opinion is no opinion. In an audit engagement, a disclaimer is required when
substantial scope restricts or other conditions preclude the auditors' compliance with
generally accepted auditing standards.
Specialization by Auditors
Nearly every trade and industry has a group of auditors who concentrate their practice and
become authorities in that field. Often this specialization is along functional lines. A business
is best served by an auditing firm who understands the industry's business cycle, practices,
products, market conditions and characteristics.
Frequency of Audit
Two types of services performed by auditors - continuity of engagement and continuous audit
- do not provide the same types of services. Continuity of engagement indicates an
independent auditor is regularly employed to prepare annual and other statements, and does
so for successive years. A continuous audit means the auditor makes periodic inspections of
the books and records between annual statement periods, but not necessarily an audit, and
may supervise or prepare monthly trial balances and quarterly or semi-annual statements. A
continuous audit enables the auditor to follow the client's affairs more closely then is possible
during a single annual visit. Therefore, creditors can place greater credence on financial
figures prepared under this arrangement.
Change in Auditor
When the regular auditor quits an engagement, it is important to discover the underlying
reason. A desire to lower auditing costs is often given as the motive, but the move may also
have credit implications. A substantial cut in auditing fees may lead to lower quality auditing
work and less verification effort. The change in auditors may have been prompted by a
difference of opinion between auditor and management regarding the treatment and
certification of material items in the statement.
Some auditors announce they are no longer "on the books" of a former client, but,
understandably do not give the reason. As a creditor, you should carefully compare the
certification of the new auditor with that of the former one.
Conclusion
Auditors prepare financial statements and supporting schedules for clients, and not to meet
the special needs of creditors. Their intensive training, strict regulation of auditing procedures
and conventions, and their accountability to professional societies govern their work. They
do, however, have a responsibility to clarify items in their audits when questions are raised,
and should give such explanations willingly.
A conscientious credit professional should have the customer's permission before asking the
auditor for additional schedules, exhibits, or other information ordinarily withheld from
publication. Auditors differ as to the degree of their cooperation with small- or medium-sized
clients. Some believe their audit report meets the terms of their engagement; others give
additional information, which may benefit the clients. In some cases, auditors accompany
their clients during interviews with credit executives and will supply additional information
to creditors. As a prudent credit professional, you should welcome an opportunity to become
acquainted with an auditor on whom you expect to rely.