You are on page 1of 26

Media effects

Laswell’s Model of Mass


Communication

Who

Says What

In Which Channel

To Whom

With What Effect
Effects Theories

Walter Lippmann: Public Opinion
(1922)

We see the world as "pictures in
our heads"

Media shape perception of things
we have not experienced personally
Powerful Effects Theory

Media have immediate, direct
influence

Assumes people are passive and
absorb media content uncritically &
unconditionally

“Hypodermic Needle” model

“Magic Bullet” model
Minimalist Effects

Paul Lazarsfeld Erie County study
(1940)

Mass media had hardly any direct
effect

Personal contact more important
than media contact

Media effects mostly indirect
Two-step Flow model

Media affect individuals through
opinion leaders


Opinion leaders are those who
influence others
 Clergy, teachers, neighborhood
leaders, etc.
Status Conferral

Media coverage can create
prominence for issues & people

Agenda Setting

Maxwell McCombs & Don Shaw

Media tell people what to think about
– but not what to think
Media can:

Create awareness


Establish priorities


Perpetuate issues


Intramedia effect as well
Narcoticizing dysfunction

Media do not energize people into
taking action

Media lull people into passivity by
overwhelming them with
information

People deceive selves into
believing they’re involved when
they’re actually only informed
Cumulative Effects Theory

Media influence is gradual over time

Effect is often powerful

Spiral of Silence (Noelle-Neumann)



Vocal majority intimidates others
into silence
Focus on the audience

1940s challenge to audience
passivity
Uses & Gratifications

People choose media that meet
their needs & interests

Needs such as:



Surveillance

Diversion

Socialization
Surveillance

Media provide info about what’s
going on

Both news & entertainment
Diversion
Media as entertainment

Stimulate

Relax

Release
Socialization

Mass media can help initiate
people into society

And help them fit in

Demonstrate dominant behaviors
and norms

“Observational learning”
Role modeling


Imitative behavior

Impact can be negative or
positive ("prosocial”)
Socialization via
eavesdropping

Children learn about adult topics
by seeing them depicted in
media
Parasocial interaction

False sense of participating in
dialogue

Communication is actually one-
way
Consistency theory

Individuals exercise control over
media’s effects on them

People choose media & messages
consistent with their existing views
& values

Selective:

Exposure

Perception

Retention & Recall
Selective Exposure

People choose some media messages
over others

People ignore messages that
contradict their beliefs
Selective Perception

People tend to hear what they want or
expect to hear
Selective retention & recall

People retain & recollect some media
messages and not others
Bottom line:

Individuals have a large degree of
control over how the mass media
affect them
War of the Worlds
Revisited
Why did the Orson Welles
broadcast have such a powerful
effect on its audience?

EarthStation1.com's
Radio Sounds Showcase: The 193
8 "War of the Worlds" Radio Broad
cast
Wavs

“Reverence” for radio as a reliable
medium

Predisposition to expect bad news

Selective perception

Gullibility fueled by awe of science

WWI memories – gas warfare

Failure of common sense
Determining Causality

Correlation means that 2 or more
variables coexist


Causality means that one variable
causes another


Beware of bad science (studies
purporting causality)

You might also like