QUICK AND EASY DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS

WORKBOOK

Leo Jonker
Queens University Fall 2007-2008

Foreword
Most of the students entering in rst year engineering at Queens University have taken dierential Calculus in High School. This applies to students who have graduated from Ontario high schools, those who have had some CEGEP education in Quebec, all Alberta Students (assuming they took mathematics 31 in their nal high school year), and some British Columbia and Saskatchewan students, . Most of the students coming from outside Canada have also had some Calculus before they get here. A smaller number, including most of those who come from schools in the Maritime provinces, and those coming from Manitoba have not had any signicant amount of calculus. This should not worry you. You are probably better prepared in other ways, but it does meant that you will need some extra help at the beginning of rst year. We would like our rst year calculus course to make use of the more advanced preparation of some students, without creating a situation that is impossible for those students for whom Calculus is a completely new experience. These notes are intended to prepare all students for APSC 171, Calculus I. In them we will introduce students to dierential calculus in a highly intuitive fashion, one that will, we think, t well with the tenor of the rest of the course. We will introduce the idea of the derivative, discover formulas for the derivatives of polynomial functions, the exponential functions, and logarithmic functions, and we will discuss basic rules for calculating derivatives of combinations of functions (the Product Rule, Quotient Rule and Chain Rule). This is a set of (deliberately) incomplete notes prepared for your use. The notes reect the way in which the material should be learned. The intro-

ii duction to each topic is concise, but complete. You should be able to read and understand it. At certain points the ow of thought in interrupted by a question for which the answer is not provided. If the notes are used in a class, this is where the instructor will ask you to become involved in the completion of the argument. If the notes are used as self-study, then this is where you try to make sense of the question. When you get stuck you can consult James Stewart, Calculus: Early Transcendentals, the text for the course, or any Calculus book that may be available to you. At other times, the gaps in the notes follow problems in which the theory you have learned can be applied. These, too, are for you to ll in. Some of these problems are indicated as Concept Questions. These are multiple-choice questions that signal points at which key concepts are often misunderstood or misapplied. They have short answers, but do require some thought. Computer assisted learning There are also some computer-based learning objects designed specically for the course, and written a few years ago by Thomas Norman, a former student in Mathematics and Engineering. These are small interactive computer programmes to help you learn the concepts behind a topic. Whenever a topic has one of these learning objects associated with it, this is indicated in the interactive notes as follows: Computer help for this topic is available on the course website To nd these learning objects, go to the course website and click on Computer assistance in the column on the left.

Contents
What is a derivative really? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rates of Change (Sections 2.7 and 2.9 in Stewart) 1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Derivatives of Exponential Functions (Section 3.1 in Stewart) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Derivatives of Combinations of Functions (Sections 3.1 and 3.2 in Stewart) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 The Chain Rule (Section 3.4 in Stewart) Inverse Functions (Section 1.6 in Stewart) Logarithmic Functions (Section 1.6 in Stewart) Derivatives of Log Functions (Section 3.6 in Stewart) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

iii

iv

CONTENTS

WHAT IS A DERIVATIVE REALLY?

What is a derivative really?

There is just one big secret at the heart of Calculus: If you consider a function over a very small interval of input values it always looks like a linear function.

This means that if you try successive input values, equally spaced and very close to each other, the output values seem to go up at a constant rate. Here are two examples: Consider the function f (x) = x2 . We know this function is not linear (its graph is not a straight line), and yet, look at the following table of (a few) values of this function: x 3.000 3.001 3.002 3.003 x2 9.000 9.006 9.012 9.018

It sure looks linear on this small scale! So does the following table of some values of the function f (x) = ex : x 1.000 1.001 1.002 1.003 ex 2.71828 2.72100 2.72372 2.72644

In each case the output goes up by 0.00272 when the input goes up by 0.001; so once again, this function looks linear when you get close. This property of looking linear when you zoom in to a point becomes visual when you apply it to the graph of a function. Here are three pictures, produced by Maple, of the graph of the exponential function ex at smaller and smaller scales around the point x = 1:

CONTENTS

8 3.6

3.2 3.1

6 3.2

3 2.9

y4

y 2.8

2.8 2.7

2 2.4

2.6 2.5

0 0 0.5 1 x 1.5 2 0.8 0.9 1 x 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.95 1 x 1.05 1.1

This property that makes graphs look linear when observed on a small scale, is closely related to the fact that when we look around us, the earth looks more or less at. We can, perhaps, forgive our distant ancestors for thinking that it really was at. Of course, as with all simplications, there is a caveat. The secret is not quite true of all functions. If the graph of your function has a corner at some point, as in the case of f (x) = |x|, no amount of zooming in is going to make that corner go away. A function that looks linear when you zoom in to a point on its graph is called a dierentiable function. Fortunately most of the functions we deal with are dierentiable, or else are dierentiable at most points. Eventually we should turn our observation about the local linearity of functions into something we can do mathematics with. In particular, the insight should help us do certain kinds of calculations. Before we get to that, however, there is a second secret at the heart of Calculus, which has a lot to do with the one we revealed at the start of this chapter, even though it may seem quite unlike it: If a quantity is very small, then its square 2 is negligible by comparison.

When we say something is negligible relative to something else, we mean that its size is a small fraction of the something else. For example, consider = 0.001 then 2 = 0.000001. If we were to subtract 0.000001 (or add it) to 0.001, it would make a negligible dierence to the total. It would add only one-thousandth of its value to the total. The dierence becomes

WHAT IS A DERIVATIVE REALLY?

even more pronounced if = 0.000001; for then 2 = 0.000000000001 and subtracting or adding this to would change it by only one-millionth of its initial magnitude. Concept Question 1. If is very small (say around 1/1000), which of the following is a reasonable approximation? ( means is approximately equal to)

5 5+ 3 3 2 + 2. 2 3. 5 + 5 1. 7 7 2 + 13 5. 13 4.

A. Equation 3. B. Equation 5. C. Equations 1 and 3. D. Equations 1, 3, and 4. E. All of the equations.

Click here for help

The connection between the two secrets So how is the secret on page 2 connected to the secret on page 1? Suppose we have a simple function, say f (x) = x2 . We want to use the second secret to

CONTENTS

explain why this function will seem linear if we stay very close to any given initial point. Say we start at x = a, and examine what happens to f (x) when x is replaced by a + x, where x represents a very small number. That is, we want to see how the value of this function changes as x changes, but is kept very small. Then f (a + x) = (a + x)2 = a2 + 2ax + (x)2 . By the secret on page 2, we can ignore (x)2 for all practical purposes, as long as x stays very small. Thus f (a + x) a2 + 2ax . Notice that if we think of x as a variable (and keep a constant), the right side is a linear function g(a + x) = a2 + 2ax. Notice that we do not want to say f (a + x) a2 + 2ax a2 , which is also true, though with a rougher approximation. The reason is, we want to see what linear function f (a + x) resembles, so if there is a term of rst degree in x we do not want to remove it, for it indicates the manner in which the value of f (a + x) changes. If we go back to writing x for a + x we get g(x) = a2 + 2a(x a) , where, as we said already, f (x) and g(x) are extremely close to each other, as long as x is very close to a. Notice that if we let x = a the two function are precisely equal to each other. Example 1. If we write down the equation of the graph of g we get y = a2 + 2a(x a). Since a is kept constant, this is clearly the equation of a line. Zooming in to the graph of f around the point (a, f (a)) is the same as restricting x to values close to a. What do we call the line given by the graph of g? Click here for help

WHAT IS A DERIVATIVE REALLY?

Notice, from the equation of the graph of g, that the tangent line to the graph of f at (a, f (a)) has slope 2a. This slope is dened as the derivative of f (x) = x2 at a. The derivative of a function f at an input value a is the slope of the tangent line to the graph of the function at the corresponding point (a, f (a)) on the graph.

We will give a more important characterization of the derivative in a moment, but for now let us note what we have learned about the derivatives of the function f (x) = x2 at various points: The derivative of f (x) = x2 at input value x is equal to 2x.

Thus its derivative at x = 2 is equal to 4. At x = 0 it comes to 0. At x = it comes to 2. The process that associates the derivative at x to the input x can be thought of as a new function constructed from the original function f . It is called the derivative function, or simply the derivative, and is denoted f . Thus we have learned that if f (x) = x2 then f (x) = 2x. It has suddenly become a simple matter to calculate the slope of the parabola y = x2 ! This process of calculating the derivative function from the original is called dierentiation. Notice that since f (a) is the slope of the tangent line from which the graph of f becomes indistinguishable when we zoom in to a, we are saying, in eect, that near a, f (a + x) f (a) + f (a)x . In other words, the derivative at a is the coecient of the linear term in the linear function that best approximates f near a. As we said on page 2, all reasonable functions are dierentiable with the exception of isolated points at which the graph of the function has corners. Even when you do not have a formula for a function, but are given its graph, you can say something about its derivative:

CONTENTS

Concept Question 2. Given the graph of f , which of the graphs below it is the graph of f ? Is it the solid graph A, the dashed graph B or the dotted graph C?

A B

Click here for help

WHAT IS A DERIVATIVE REALLY?

We would like to be able to calculate a formula for the derivative of any polynomial. Lets begin with other power functions. Theorem If f (x) = xn , where n is a positive integer, then f (x) = nxn1 .

Example 2. Prove that this theorem is true, by expanding f (a + x) and then applying the secret revealed on page 2 to the resulting expression . Click here for help

CONTENTS

A polynomial function is just a sum of constant multiples of power functions. Suppose we have a polynomial f (x) = c0 + c1 x + c2 x2 + + cn xn . Then to nd the derivative f we could apply the same idea to all of the terms at once: replace x by a + x. Then f (a + x) = c0 + c1 (a + x) + c2 (a + x)2 + + cn (a + x)n c0 + c1 (a + x) + c2 (a2 + 2ax + ) + + cn (an + nan1 x + ) , where the dots indicate terms that involve x to power 2 or higher, and which can therefore be ignored relative to the lower order terms. Thus f (a + x) c0 + c1 (a + x) + c2 (a2 + 2ax) + + cn (an + nan1 x) = f (a) + (c1 + 2c2 a + 3c3 a2 ncn an1 )x . If we extract the coecient in front of x, and then replace a by x we get the derivative (the slope):

Theorem: The derivative of a polynomial f (x) = c0 + c1 x + c2 x2 + cn xn is f (x) = c1 + 2c2 x + 3c3 x2 + + ncn xn1 .

Notice that this says that to calculate the derivative of a polynomial you should calculate the derivatives of the power functions in the terms, and then combine the results in the way they were combined in the original polynomial. Notice also that the derivative of a constant function is always 0 (see what you get if all the coecients except c0 are equal to zero). The reason is that the graph of a constant function is a horizontal line, and therefore the slope is 0 at each point.

WHAT IS A DERIVATIVE REALLY? Example 3. What is the slope of the graph y = 3x2 5x + 7 at (1, 5)? Click here for help

Example 4. For what values of x does the graph of f (x) = x4 8x3 + 22x2 24x + 3 have positive slope and for which values does it have negative slope? Click here for help

10

CONTENTS

Rates of Change (Sections 2.7 and 2.9 in Stewart)

NOTE: James Stewart: Calculus, Early Transcendentals 6e, is the textbook we will be using in the rst year Applied Science calculus courses. However, you should be able to read these notes without any reference text so there is no need to buy the book before you arrive at Queens. The most important characterization of a derivative is its ability to measure instantaneous rate of change. Most of you have discussed rates of change in high school, especially in cases when the function expresses distance (its output) in terms of time (its input). If f is the function whose rate of change we want to discuss, say at an input value a, then we might begin by taking a value not too far from a, say a + x, and comparing the function values at these inputs by subtracting f (a + x) f (a). This expresses a change in the function value, but not yet a rate of change. To get that, you have to compare this change in the output value of the function to the corresponding change in the input. This comparison is achieved by division: The average rate of change of the function f between inputs a and a + x is f (a + x) f (a) Average rate of change = . x Sometimes it is convenient to give a name to the output of the function, say y = f (x). Then the numerator in the above expression represents a change in the y-value and can be denoted as y. That is, the average rate of change is the ratio y . x f y x

a + x

RATES OF CHANGE

11

In the diagram, this average rate is equal to the slope of the line segment joining the points (a, f (a)) and (a + x, f (a + x)). The line extending this segment is sometimes referred to as a secant line. Now suppose we let x get smaller and smaller. Then the point (a + x, f (a + x)) will gradually slide (along the graph) towards (a, f (a)), and in the process the secant line will turn (a little) and gradually converge to the tangent line, as in the next picture:

a On the one hand, the slope of this tangent line is what we mean by the derivative f (a). On the other hand, this slope is what the slopes of the secant lines get closer and closer to as we let x get smaller and smaller. This idea is expressed as a limit: f (a) = lim f (a + x) f (a) . x0 x

This means that if, in the fractional expression on the right, you let x get closer and closer to 0, then the value of that expression gets closer and closer to f (a). In general, whenever we have any kind of expression E(u) that depends on a variable u, then by the limit of E(u) as u c we mean the quantity L that E(u) gets closer and closer to when u is allowed to get closer and closer to c. The notation for this is L = lim E(u) .
uc

Returning to the discussion of the derivative, and writing x in place of a+x, we get

12 f (x) f (a) . xa xa

CONTENTS

f (a) = lim

This is the denition of the derivative you will usually see in a textbook . Because of this characterization of the derivative as the limit of a ratio of change in output to change in input, several alternative notations for a derivative reect this understanding. If the variable name y is used for the output of a function f , as in y = f (x), then we also write any of the following: f (x) = dy d = f (x) . dx dx

Let us see how this limit approach might work for the function f (x) = x2 : The slope of the secant between (a, a2 ) and (a + x, (a + x)2 ) is (a + x)2 a2 a2 + 2ax + (x)2 a2 2ax + (x)2 = = . x x x At this point we can either notice that we can disregard (x)2 because it is so small in comparison to the other terms in the numerator, in which case we conclude 2ax + (x)2 = 2a , f (a) = x or we can say, slightly more formally, that f (a) = lim 2ax + (x)2 = lim (2a + x) = 2a . x0 x0 x

Either way, we have conrmed the derivative calculation we did much earlier. We saw earlier that the derivative of xn is nxn1 , for any positive integer n. In fact this formula is valid even when n is not a positive integer, but any xed real number. We do not have time to do all the proofs necessary to show this, but we do have time to show it for two instances.

RATES OF CHANGE

13

Concept Question 3. To nd a formula for the derivative of the function f (x) = x1 = 1/x, at a point a, we have to nd the limit f (a) = lim
x0

f (a + x) f (a) . x

What does the expression on the right look like for this function? A. B. C. lim
1 a

x0

+ x x x
1 a

1 a

x0

lim

1 a+x

x0

lim

x (a + x) a Click here for help

Example 5. Calculate this limit and thus nd the derivative of x1 . Click here for help

14 For a second example, we will nd the derivative of

CONTENTS x = x1/2 .

Concept Question 4. If we want to calculate the derivative of x, say at a point a, we should begin with the expression for the average rate of change between a and a + x. Which of the following is the correct expression for that? A. B. a + x x a

(a + x) a x ( a + x) a C. x Click here for help

RATES OF CHANGE

15

We must take the limit of this expression as x 0. This does not look simple, and may require some algebra to transform the expression: Example 6. Find the limit of the expression for the average rate of change at a for the function f (x) = x. Click here for help

A combination of similar techniques will show that the theorem for derivatives of power functions, d n x = nxn1 , dx

16

CONTENTS

is true for any xed rational power n. In fact,as already pointed out, the theorem is true for any xed real power whatsoever; but proving that requires other methods.

Derivatives of Exponential Functions (Section 3.1 in Stewart)

We will now turn to a calculation of the derivative of the exponential function ex . There are several ways to introduce the number e. The one we will use denes e as that number which is just right so that the derivative of ex at x = 0 is equal to 1. In other words, among the exponential functions bx for b = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, etc there is one base b = e just right that the slope of its graph, where it crosses the vertical axis, is precisely equal to 1. (You may remember from your high school course that this results in an irrational number, like . The value of e is approximately 2.718 .) 2x e (0.5)x (1.5)x
x

1x

This way of introducing the number e immediately tells us that if f (x) = ex then f (0) = 1.

DERIVATIVES OF EXPONENTIAL FUNCTIONS Concept Question 5. Which of the following limits expresses this fact? A. B. C. ea+x ea =1 x0 x lim (e0 + ex ) e0 =1 x0 x lim ex 1 =1 x0 x lim Click here for help

17

We will now use this information to prove d x (e ) = ex dx In other words, at every point, the value of the function ex is precisely equal to its rate of change. Theorem:

If you have had some study of exponential growth in high school, this will sound very familiar. When something grows exponentially, it means that the rate at which a function increases is proportional to is value.

18

CONTENTS

Example 7. Use the denition of the derivative as a limit of average rates of increase to prove this theorem. Click here for help

DERIVATIVES OF COMBINATIONS OF FUNCTIONS

19

Derivatives of Combinations of Functions (Sections 3.1 and 3.2 in Stewart)

In order to dierentiate eectively, we should develop a kind of arithmetic of dierentiation, which includes not only the derivatives of certain key functions, but which also includes ways to calculate derivatives of combinations of functions whose derivatives we already know. Here is the rst such theorem:

The Constant Multiple Rule: If c is a constant and f is a dierentiable function, then so is cf , and d d [cf (x)] = c f (x) dx dx or, equivalently, (cf ) = cf

Note that when we speak of the function cf we mean the function whose value at an input x is equal to the product cf (x). If we evaluate this function at a we get cf (a); if we evaluate it at a + x we get cf (a + x). Thus the average rate of change of cf between a and a + x is cf (a + x) cf (a) . x This factors immediately to become f (a + x) f (a) . x To nd the derivative of cf we have to take the limit of this as x 0. But since c is constant we can take the limit of the fraction and multiply by c afterwards - it will come to the same thing (think about this!) Therefore c f (a + x) f (a) = cf (a) . x0 x If now we replace a by x we have a proof of the theorem. (cf ) (a) = c lim

20

CONTENTS

The next theorem tells us how to dierentiate the sum of two functions whose derivatives we know already. Notice that it tells us to go ahead, dierentiate each function, and add the results afterward. The Sum Rule: If the functions f and g are both dierential, then so is f + g, and d d d [f (x) + g(x)] = f (x) + g(x) dx dx dx or, equivalently, (f + g) = f + g

Notice that we have already seen instances illustrating the sum rule, for when we dierentiated polynomials we found that it amounted to dierentiating each of the polynomials terms separately and then adding (or subtracting) them. Concept Question 6. What is the correct expression for the average rate of increase of the function f (x) + g(x) between a and a + x? A. B. C. (f (a) + g(a)) + x (f (a) + g(a)) x f (a + x) f (a) g(a + x) g(a) + x x (f (a + x) + g(a + x)) (f (a) + g(a)) x Click here for help

DERIVATIVES OF COMBINATIONS OF FUNCTIONS

21

We are now ready to prove the Sum Rule, by taking the limit of this expression as x 0: (f (a + x) + g(a + x)) (f (a) + g(a)) x0 x f (a + x) f (a) g(a + x) g(a) + = lim x0 x x f (a + x) f (a) g(a + x) g(a) + lim = lim x0 x0 x x lim

(f + g) (a) =

= f (a) + g (a) .

Example 8. Calculate the derivative of 5ex + 3x2 + 5x7 . Click here for help

22

CONTENTS

The following rule for nding derivatives of combined functions is proved in the same way as the Sum Rule: The Dierence Rule: If the functions f and g are both dierential, then so is f g, and d d d [f (x) g(x)] = f (x) g(x) dx dx dx or, equivalently, (f g) = f g

Example 9. Find the slope of the graph of the function g(x) = + 7x 3x8 + 0.5x3 2ex at the point (0, 2) Click here for help

Now that we know how to dierentiate the sum and the dierence of two functions whose derivatives we already know, it is time to turn to their product. Here the product of f and g is thought of as a new function whose value, at input x, is given by f (x)g(x). In other words, (f g)(x) = f (x)g(x) .

DERIVATIVES OF COMBINATIONS OF FUNCTIONS

23

The Product Rule: If f and g are both dierentiable functions, then so is f g, and d d d [f (x)g(x)] = f (x) [g(x)] + g(x) [f (x)] dx dx dx or, equivalently, (f g) = f g + gf

You are probably wondering why the formula is so complicated. This will become clear when we look at the proof: Example 10. Prove the Product Rule. Click here for help

24

CONTENTS

At the beginning of this short course on dierentiation we introduced the derivative as the rate of change of the linear function that best approximates the function near a particular point a. Later we moved to a more formal denition of the derivative as a limit of average rates of change, and used this more formal approach to prove our theorems. To indicate how the earlier, less formal, approach can help us form good intuition in many situations, we will now give an alternative (less precise but still instructive) proof of the Product Rule: We know that (near a) f (a + x) f (a) + f (a)x g(a + x) g(a) + g (a)x Therefore, (f g)(a + x) = f (a + x)g(a + x) (f (a) + f (a)x)(g(a) + g (a)x) = f (a)g(a) + [f (a)g (a) + g(a)f (a)]x + (f (a))(g (a))(x)2 f (a)g(a) + [f (a)g (a) + g(a)f (a)]x Notice that the coecient of the linear term in this expression is f (a)g (a) + g(a)f (a). That is, (f g) (a) = f (a)g (a) + g(a)f (a)

DERIVATIVES OF COMBINATIONS OF FUNCTIONS

25

After adding, subtracting and multiplying functions, we should divide them next. As is the case with numbers, when you start dividing you have to be a bit more careful. Whereas you can add, subtract or multiply any two numbers, you cannot divide them if the second one is zero. Something just like it happens when we try to divide one dierentiable function, f by another, g. The new function that results when we do this division is denoted by the f symbol , and its value at an input x is g f g (x) = f (x) g(x)

The domain of this new function does not include those input values at which the denominator g gives the value 0.

Quotient Rule: If f and g are dierentiable functions, then the quotient function f /g is dierentiable at the points x where g(x) = 0; and at those points,
d d g(x) dx [f (x)] f (x) dx [g(x)] d f (x) = dx g(x) [g(x)]2

or, equivalently, f g = f ggf g2

Again, when we prove this theorem we will see why the Quotient Rule has this strange form. Example 11. Prove the Quotient Rule. Click here for help

26

CONTENTS

DERIVATIVES OF COMBINATIONS OF FUNCTIONS Example 12. Calculate the derivative of ex . x2

27

Click here for help

Example 13. Find an equation of the tangent line to the graph y = at the point (1, 0.5). Click here for help

x x+1

28

CONTENTS

Example 14. Determine, from the expression we found for its derivative, whether the graph has a low point, high point, or inection point at x = 1. Click here for help

Here is a picture of this graph, generated using Maple by entering the command > plot(sqrt(x)/(x+1), 0..2);

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0 0 0.5 1 x 1.5 2

DERIVATIVES OF COMBINATIONS OF FUNCTIONS

29

Example 15. (From Section 3.7 in Stewart) If a tank holds 5000 liters of water, which drains from the bottom of the tank in 40 minutes, then Torricellis law give the volume V of the water remaining after t minutes as t V = 5000 1 40
2

0 t 40

Find the rate at which water is draining from the tank after 5 minutes, and after 30 minutes. Click here for help

30

CONTENTS

The Chain Rule (Section 3.4 in Stewart)

Computer help for this topic is available on the course website

If you go to the course web site and click computer-assisted learning in the column on the left, it will take you to MathQs a set of interactive learning devices. One of these is on the topic of the chain rule. Try it out! We have studied derivatives of constant multiples, sums, dierences, products and quotients of functions. Another important way to combine functions is through composition. If f and g are functions, the composite f g is the function that for the input x gives the output f (g(x)). In other words, (f g)(x) = f (g(x)) x and g(x) = x2 + 1. Then the

Concept Question 7. Suppose f (x) = composition f g is A. x + 1 2 x(x + 1) B. x2 + 1 C. D. x x2 + 1

Click here for help

THE CHAIN RULE

3

31

Concept Question 8. We want to express the function k(x) = ex +5 as a composition of two functions f and g; that is we want k = f g. What should f and g be? A. f (x) = x3 + 5 and g(x) = ex B. f (x) = x3 and g(x) = 5 + ex C. f (x) = ex and g(x) = x3 + 5 D. f (x) = ex
3 +5

and g(x) = x3 + 5 Click here for help

Though composition is, conceptually, probably the most complicated way to combine functions, the theorem for calculating the derivative of a composition is one of the simplest: The Chain Rule: If f and g are both dierentiable and F = f g is the composite function dened by F (x) = f (g(x)), then F is also dierentiable, and F is given by the product F (x) = (f g) (x) = f (g(x))g (x) Another way to put this: If y = f (x) and u = g(x) are both dierentiable, then dy du dy = dx du dx Notice, however, that the two factors on the right are not fractions! Each represents a derivative.

32

CONTENTS

The idea behind the chain rule is very simple. The following diagram illustrate this. Imagine starting at some initial input x, as illustrated on the left of the diagram. The function g turns x into u, which f then turns into y. Composing the two functions f and g is a little like building a box around the two components f and g to make a new input-output machine called F (dashed line in the diagram). Suppose we change x by a small amount x. This produces a small change u in the output of g, where the relationship between the two small changes is given (approximately) by the derivative: u g (x) x Since u is also the input to f , the small change u in its input in turn produces a small change y in the output of f , again related to u by the derivative of f : y f (u) u The derivative of F at x is (approximately) the ratio of the two small changes: y u y = x u x

F (x)

u = g(x)

produces
u x

produces
y u

g (x)

f (u)

so,

THE CHAIN RULE

33

y f (g(x)) g (x) . x
y u u x

While the equations in this discussion are all in the form of approximate y y u , and all represent average rates equalities, in that the ratios u x x of change, and therefore only approximate the instantaneous rates, these approximations get better and better as x (and therefore also u) tend to zero. In the limit, therefore the equality becomes an exact equality combining derivatives. y Notice that lim represents the derivative of f at u = g(x); that is, it u0 u is equal to f (u) = f (g(x)). This accounts for the form of the rst factor in the formula for the chain rule: F (x) = f (g(x))g (x) Example 16. Calculate the derivative of x2 + 1

Click here for help

34 Example 17. Find the derivative of 4ex

3 +5

CONTENTS .

Click here for help

Example 18. Find the derivative of F (x) = e(x

2 +3x+8)7

Click here for help

INVERSE FUNCTIONS

35

Inverse Functions (Section 1.6 in Stewart)

Our next goal and nal goal in this short introduction to derivatives is to present the formulas for the derivatives of logarithmic functions. In order to do this we have included a brief review of the theory of inverse functions (this section) followed by the denition of logarithmic functions (the next section), before we discuss their derivatives in the last section. Note the following indication that there is computer help for this topic on the course web site. This computer help is interactive and designed not only to test whether you remember the facts about inverse functions, but also to help you understand them. Computer help for this topic is available on the course website A function f is one-to-one if no two inputs (values in its domain) have the same output (values in its range). The following graphs illustrate this.

y f (x) Not one-to-one

x1

x2

The graph shows that the points x1 and x2 produce the same output (i.e. f (x1 ) = f (x2 )), therefore the function f (x) is not one-to-one. We can geometrically check to see if a function is one-to-one if no horizontal line intersects the graph of the function at more than one point.

36 y

CONTENTS

g(x) One-to-one

x satises horizontal line test

The graph of g(x) illustrates that there are no two distinct points in its domain that produce the same output (i.e. g(x1 ) = g(x2 ), whenever x1 = x2 ). Suppose we have a function f with domain D and range R. We want to look for a function g that undoes what f does. If such a function g exists for f , then it is called the inverse of f . In symbols this can be written as g(y) = x f (x) = y. This can be illustrated with the following diagram:

x D x

y R

Then g(f (x)) = x, and f (g(x)) = x.

INVERSE FUNCTIONS

37

Concept Question 9. Suppose f (x) = x + 5. What should the inverse function g be? A. g(y) = y + 5 B. g(x) = 1/(x + 5) C. g(x) = x 5 Click here for help

38

CONTENTS

Example 19. Suppose f (x) = 1/x, then what is its inverse g(x)? Click here for help

Concept Question 10. Suppose f (x) = x2 , then what is the inverse of f ? A. g(x) = x

B. It has no inverse C. g(x) = x2 Click here for help

INVERSE FUNCTIONS

39

Example 20. In the Haber-Bosch reaction for the production of ammonia, a nitrogen molecule combines with three hydrogen molecules to produce two molecules of ammonia. The reaction can be written as

N2 + 3H2 2NH3 . If the reaction is started with the concentration of hydrogen (in moles per litre) three times as high as the concentration of nitrogen, then the amount of ammonia (in moles) produced after t minutes is given by the formula A(t) = 2 1
3

1 83

, + kt

where is the initial concentration of nitrogen and k is a constant depending on temperature. (a) Find the inverse of A.

Click here for help

40

CONTENTS

(b) What does the inverse function tell you?

INVERSE FUNCTIONS

41

Graphs of Inverse Functions

Suppose g is the inverse of f and that D and R are the domain and range of f , respectively. Then R and D are the domain and range of g, respectively. This means that the domain of f equals the range of g and that the range of f is the same as the domain of g.

y1

x1

Example 21. Sketch the graph of the inverse of f on the axes given above. Click here for help

42

CONTENTS

Usually we write f 1 , rather than g, for the inverse. Note that this means that f 1 (x) is not the same as (f (x))1 ! The former is the inverse function applied to x, while the latter is the reciprocal of f (x). To understand the eect of the inverse function g of a function f whose graph is before you, you do not have to reect the graph of f to produce the graph of g! The eect of the function f is shown by going from a point x1 on the horizontal axis via a vertical line to the graph of f , and then moving horizontally towards the vertical axis, reaching it at y1 = f (x1 ). The eect of g is seen on the same picture (without drawing the graph of g) by reversing this procedure: start at a point y1 , then travel horizontally to the graph of f and then vertically to reach the horizontal axis at x1 = g(y1).

LOGARITHMIC FUNCTIONS

43

Logarithmic Functions (Section 1.6 in Stewart)

One of the most important applications of the theory of inverse functions is the introduction of Logarithmic Functions. From its graph we know that ax (a > 1) is increasing, and therefore has an inverse. The inverse of the function ax is the logarithm to the base a, loga (x). Recall the relationship between a function f and its inverse g. We expressed it in three dierent but equivalent ways: g(y) = x f (x) = y , g(f (x)) = x , f (g(x)) = x .

Concept Question 11. Let f (x) = ax and g(x) = loga (x). Which of the following statements is true? ( means if and only if ) [i. ] loga (y) = x ax = y [ii. ] a(loga )x = x [iii. ] loga (ax ) = x [iv. ] aloga (x) = x [v. ] loga (y) = ax x = y [A. ] i,ii, and iii [B. ] ii, iii, and v [C. ] i, iii, and iv [D. ] i, ii, and iv [E. ] iii, iv, and v

Click here for help

44 The graph of loga x:

CONTENTS

y ax

loga x 1 x 1

What is the domain of loga x ? What is the range of loga x ?

Counterpart of Laws of Exponents

1. loga (xy) = loga (x) + loga (y);

2. loga (x/y) = loga (x) loga (y); 3. loga (xy ) = y loga (x).

You might say that logarithms turn products into sums, quotients into differences and powers into products. These laws are a direct consequence of the laws of exponents on page 57 in the textbook. MAKE SURE YOU KNOW THESE LAWS VERY WELL.

LOGARITHMIC FUNCTIONS

45

Example 22. Evaluate log5 200 3 log5 2. Click here for help

Example 23. Solve for x in the expression log6 x + log6 (x + 1) = 1. Click here for help

46 The natural logarithm is the logarithm loge (x). Special notation: ln x (n for natural). Note the following: ln x = y ey = x; ln ex = x; eln x = x ln(e) = 1. (if x > 0);

CONTENTS

Example 24. Solve for x in the expression ln

x2 x1

= 1 + ln

x3 x1

Click here for help

LOGARITHMIC FUNCTIONS

47

Example 25. Since a = eln(a) , therefore ax = eln(a)x . Use this to nd a formula for the derivative of ax . Click here for help

48

CONTENTS

Derivatives of Log Functions (Section 3.6 in Stewart)

Example 26. We know that x = aloga (x) . Using the Chain Rule for the right hand side, dierentiate both sides and then use the result to calculate the derivative of loga x. Click here for help

Notice that in this proof, as in several other proofs in this introduction to dierentiation, we glossed over some ne points. In this case we used the Chain Rule, which, if you go back to check, assumes that both functions in the composition are dierentiable in the rst place. Here we quietly assumed that we knew this to be true, when in fact we did not prove that loga (x) is a dierentiable function. In a more rigorous treatment of Calculus this issue would be addressed. A special case for this formula is 1 d (ln(x)) = . dx x You should MEMORIZE these formulas, as they will appear many times.

DERIVATIVES OF LOGARITHMIC FUNCTIONS

49

Example 27. Graph the function ln |x|. Click here for help

Example 28. Find a formula for

d dx

ln |x|.

Click here for help

50

CONTENTS

Example 29. Calculate the derivative of ln(| x3 + 2x 7 |). Click here for help