DRAFT CAAP 42V-3(0)

Civil Aviation Advisory Publication August 2006

This publication is advisory and provides information and guidance to the aviation industry in support of particular Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988). Always read this advice in conjunction with the appropriate regulations. Note: This CAAP should also be read in conjunction with ASTM-E-1444 and ASTM-E 709. Contents
Preamble 3

Magnetic Particle Inspection - Use and Implementation of ASTM-E-1444

The relevant regulations and other references
Regulation 2A of the Civil Aviation Regulations (CAR) 1988 Regulation 42V of the Civil Aviation Regulations (CAR) 1988 AS 3669-05: Non-destructive testing Qualification and registration of personnel - Aerospace American Society for Testing Materials ASTM-E-1444: Standard Practice for Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) American Society for Testing Materials ASTM-E-709: Standard Guide for Magnetic Particle Examination Civil Aviation Order (CAO) Part 108.8: Process Control Magnetic Particle Inspection

Who this CAAP applies to

All persons associated with the maintenance of aircraft or aircraft components.

1. Personnel Qualifications and Authorisations 3 2. Documentation 3. Magnetic Particle Inspections (MPI) 4. MPI Bench Fixed Line Facility 4 5 8

Why this CAAP was written

This CAAP applies to the actions required for completion of Magnetic Particle Inspection tasks for: Component Maintenance; and On Aircraft Maintenance.

5. MPI Portable Hand-held Yokes 9 6. Quality Control Equipment Magnetic Particle 7. Use of the Procedures attached to this CAAP

10 10

Status of this CAAP

This is the first CAAP written on this subject.

Appendix A Procedure for Magnetic Particle Inspection Utilising a Fixed Line Bench 12 Appendix B Procedure for Magnetic Particle Inspection Utilising a Portable Magnetic Yoke 15

For further information

Telephone the CASA Office closest to you on 131757.

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

Abbreviations

AC AS ASTM AVTUR CAAP CAO CAR DC DoD IAW LAME MPI MPT NANDTB

Alternating Current Australian Standard American Society for Testing Materials Aviation Turbine Fuel Civil Aviation Advisory Publication Civil Aviation Orders Civil Aviation Regulations Direct Current Department of Defence In Accordance With Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer Magnetic Particle Inspection Magnetic Particle Technician National Aerospace Non-destructive Testing Board Non-destructive Inspection Non-destructive Testing Original Equipment Manufacturer Root Mean Square Watt

NDI NDT OEM RMS W

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

Preamble e

Standard practice documents produced by the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTMs) are replacing Military Standards (Mil-Std). ASTM-E-709 and ASTM-E-1444 have now become the accepted American Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) published standards for Magnetic Particle Inspections (MPI). ASTM-E-709 and ASTM-E-1444 standard practice details are the minimum requirements for conducting Magnetic Particle Inspections and replace and supersede the use of Australian CAO 108.8. The ASTM Standards were not specifically drafted for the aerospace industry. Indeed, the Standard requires clarification where aspects conflict with current Regulations. This CAAP documents the requirements for the use of the ASTM-E-709 and ASTM-E-1444 and where necessary harmonises the Standard with the CARs and best practices.

1. Personnel Qualifications and Authorisations

1.1 NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING (NDT) QUALIFICATIONS Personnel carrying out Magnetic Particle Inspections must be qualified to a minimum of NDT Level 1 in accordance with AS 3669. In addition, personnel must posses a current CASA NDT Airworthiness Authority for Magnetic Particle Inspection or an authorisation under CAR 42ZC(6). Note: Possession of a current CASA Airworthiness Authority in Magnetic Particle Technician (MPT) and Licensed Aircraft Mechanical Engineer (LAME) privilege of the licence do not necessarily assure compliance to AS 3669. Airworthiness Authorities issued by CASA for MPT do not reference NDT Technician Levels. 1.2 HARMONISATION OF CASA-ISSUED AIRWORTHINESS AUTHORITIES WITH AS 3669, NAS 410 & EN 4179 For the purpose of this CAAP, a person holding a MPT Airworthiness Authority for more than two years which has "nil restrictions" annotated against the MPT entry is deemed equivalent to a Level 2 NDT Technician. It is a requirement for all CAR 30 organisations employing personnel responsible for carrying out MPT tasks to ensure a system of compliance to AS 3669 is in place and operational by 30 September 2007. This system will operate independently of the Airworthiness Authorities issued by CASA until the implementation of the CASA regulations.

DRAFT August 2006

4 1.3

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

VISUAL ACUITY

The vision examination for all levels shall assure that the applicants near vision and colour perception meet the requirements of Table 1. Near vision tests shall be administered annually and colour perception tests shall be administered prior to approval or re-approval. These tests shall be administered by personnel designated by the responsible Level 3, National Aerospace Non-destructive Testing Board (NANDTB), or the outside agency utilised for the qualification examination of personnel. Any limitations in colour perception shall be evaluated by the responsible Level 3 prior to approval and this shall be documented. TABLE 1 VISION REQUIREMENTS Near Vision Jaeger No 1 or equivalent, at a distance of not less than 30 cm in at least one eye natural or corrected or near vision acuity shall permit reading, a minimum of Times Roman N4.5 or equivalent letters (Times Roman of 4.5 points vertical height where 1 point = 1/72" or 0.3528 mm) at not less than 30 cm with one or both eyes, either corrected or uncorrected.

Personnel shall be capable of adequately distinguishing and differentiating colours used in the process involved. Note: It is the responsibility of the employer to ensure currency and documentation of colour perception and near vision acuity tests.

Colour perception

2. Documentation

2.1

PRECEDENCE OF DOCUMENTATION

The precedence order of data is: 2.2 Approved under Regulation 2A of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988; Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Civil Aviation Advisory Publication (CAAP); American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) PROCEDURE NOT STATED BY OEM

Where the OEM states "carry out a magnetic particle/magnaflux liquid inspection" (or something similar) and does not refer to a written practice or procedure, ASTM-E-1444 must be used as the default inspection procedure. Where a generic European Standard or the Department of Defence (DoD) is referred to in the approved data, ASTM-E-1444 is deemed an equivalent standard and is to be utilised in conjunction with this CAAP.
DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

3. Magnetic Particle Inspections

3.1 MECHANICAL CLEANING OF COMPONENTS PRIOR TO A MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION (MPI) Cleaning of components in some circumstances requires the use of blasting media ranging from glass bead, aluminium oxide or plastic media. Generally, blasting media that do not cause plastic deformation (profiling) of the part surface are suitable for precleaning. Aluminium oxide 120 grit has been found to be suitable. Ensure hard chromed surfaces are not cleaned utilising abrasive blasting (plastic media is the exception). Note: Garnet grit is highly likely to cause plastic deformation of a part's surface, and therefore, is not suitable for cleaning aircraft quality steel. 3.2 VAPOUR DEGREASING

Increasingly, the use of the chemicals suitable for use in vapour degreasers is being phased out for environmental reasons. Ardrox 6333 is an aqueous-based approved alternate to vapour degreasing. Generally this chemical is suitable for use in mechanical washers. CAUTION: Serviced industrial mechanical cleaners may contain highly caustic compounds which may be detrimental to aluminium and magnesium parts. 3.3 SELECTION OF A MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION METHOD When selecting a magnetic particle inspection method, the following guide should be used: FIXED MAGNETIC PARTICLE BENCH Forged, cast or machined magnetic components irregular or regular in shape with defect orientation unknown and with a geometry that allows the use of a MPI bench: o Fluorescent wet continuous method utilizing AC or DC current, magnetised in two directions circular and longitudinal. Magnetic tensile or shear bolts and pins: o Fluorescent wet continuous method utilising AC or DC current magnetised with longitudinal magnetism (coil). Magnetic brake stators and rotors: o Fluorescent wet continuous method utilising AC or DC current on a central conductor (in direct contact circular magnetism) or longitudinal (coil) AC or DC utilising two shots 90o apart.

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

HAND HELD MAGNETIC YOKES Magnetic tubular structures such as engine, fuselage or helicopter frames weld or tube inspections either fitted or removed from the aircraft: o Fluorescent wet continuous method utilising AC or DC current with two shots per inspection area 90o apart.

Demagnetisation of aircraft after lightning strike or similar: o AC current applied at the part surface and withdrawn to a distance of 900 mm. Note: Portable magnetising yokes are not designed as an alternative to a magnetic particle bench. Extreme heat build up can occur in small parts repeatedly magnetised with a yoke. 3.4 USE OF PRODS ON AIRCRAFT

Prods are not to be used on aircraft or aircraft components due to the high risk of arcing. 3.5 DRY POWDER MAGNETIC PARTICLES

Dry powder magnetic particles should not be used on aircraft due to the inability to retrieve the particles from the aircraft. 3.6 PAINTED/PLATED SURFACES

Provided that paint and plating is in good condition, there is no requirement to remove it prior to an MPI. An exception being: a part that requires direct contact (circular) magnetisation must have the paint removed in the contact areas, otherwise arcing will result. 3.7 NICKEL PLATED COMPONENTS

Although it is not necessary to remove nickel plating from an inspection surface prior to inspection, operators should be aware that nickel is magnetic and may present misleading indications. 3.8 BLACK INK MAGNETIC PARTICLES

It is permissible to use black magnetic ink for spot inspections with a hand held yoke where the background provides adequate contrast. An example being: defect verification on a steel undercarriage that is painted white.

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

3.9 BLACK LIGHT INTENSITIES AND VERIFICATION PERIOD Black lights used for the inspection stage of a MPI are required to have their black light intensity output checked at no longer than the maximum intervals as listed below. The following light intensity verification plan may be used: Black light intensity @ 15" Above 2,500W/cm2 2,000 to 2,500W/cm2 1,500 to 2,000W/cm2 1,000 to 1,500W/cm
2

CAAP Requirement 3 Monthly Monthly Weekly Daily or before use

Note: The justification for the deviation from ASTM-E-1444 is based upon a conservative approach from black light intensities recorded over the past ten years from a number of large organisations. 3.10 BLACK LIGHT AND WHITE LIGHT INTENSITY METER CALIBRATION Black light and white light intensity meters should have the calibration interval of six months. This may be increased to: As recommended by the meter manufacturer; or One year, where the meter has a low usage (less than once a week).

3.11 USE OF THE TOOL STEEL (KETOS) RING FOR SYSTEM PERFORMANCE TEST ASTM-E-1444 Appendix XI details the use of the Ketos ring as a means of a system performance test. Tables X 1.1 and X 1.2 detail the current types and amperages to be used. The result should be a number of holes detected according to the tables. Unfortunately, the standard does not stipulate whether the current measurements are Peak or RMS values. In Australia there are a large number of MPI benches, some reading RMS value and others peak value. It is common for MPI benches not to perform as per the requirements of ASTM-E-1444 Appendix XI. A suitable use for the Ketos ring would be to determine the amperages required for a hole or holes to become visible on a particular MPI bench and use this information as a trend monitoring tool. It is noted in the ASTM-E-1444 that the use of the tool steel (Ketos) rings is not mandatory.

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

3.12 USE OF FLEXIBLE LAMINATED STRIPS (CASTROL TYPE II OR EQUIVALENT) For the purpose of this CAAP, the Castrol Type 2 Strips (or equivalent) should be used to determine field direction and strength for all inspections. The formulas for determining the current required as stated in ASTM-E-709 should only be used as a guide to obtain a ballpark amperage prior to using the laminated strips. 3.13 CURRENT TYPE

This CAAP applies to aircraft and aircraft components that have been released by the manufacturer. The majority of defects encountered in-service initiate at the parts surface. Given this, Technicians should consider that the AC wet continuous method is most suited for locating small surface defects.

4. Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) Bench Fixed Line Facility Facility

4.1

PRE CLEANING

Vapour degreasing is the preferred method; however, environmental factors are rapidly causing the demise of the chemicals used in this type of equipment. An environmentally friendlier option is a water-based cleaner such as Ardrox 6333 (approved as an alternate to vapour degreasing for MPI) or the approved solvent cleaner for the penetrant system (usually dispensed via an aerosol can) should be used. 4.2 MAGNETIC PARTICLE BENCH

A MPI bench is generally a self-contained unit capable of magnetising ferrous components. The bench can be divided into the following components: Heads: The heads provide a means of circularly magnetising a component via copper contact pads located on each head. The left hand head is usually fixed which contains an air ram (or similar) used to clamp the part between the heads. The right hand head is usually moveable to accommodate various lengths of the test parts. This head slides on a bed and can be locked into position. It is important that the condition of the contact pads is monitored regularly (usually daily or before use). If they become frayed the risk of arcing to the test part increases. Note: Ensure the part is firmly clamped between the heads prior to engaging the current. Central Conductors: Central conductors (also known as threader bars) are used between the heads. They provide an indirect means of producing circular magnetism. The central conductors should be covered with electrical heat shrink to reduce the likelihood of arcing. The heat shrink should be terminated approximately 5 mm from each end of the central conductor.
DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

Coil: The coil provides a means of longitudinally magnetising a component. The coil is generally a four or five turn coil. Some new generation coils contain numerous turns of smaller diameter lower current carrying coils and are rated as an effective four or five turn coil. Control Panel: The control panel generally contains: An ammeter for displaying the applied magnetising current. Current selector for dialling the required amperage AC/DC selector switch (optional) Head/coil selector switch Demagnetisation button (optional) Magnetisation button

Sump: The sump contains the magnetic particle fluid. Sumps will vary in size from 20 litres (newer generation) to 200 litres for the older style of benches. The sump contains a pump and applicator nozzle. Note: The use of AVTUR as a magnetic particle carrier fluid is not permitted due to the high risk of fire. Black light: The black light is usually mounted on the bench via an arm to allow hands-free operation of the bench. Note: Black light should not be operated with cracked, chipped or missing filters. Failure to comply may result in injury. 4.3 POST CLEANING

Usually a solvent bath is provided near the MPI bench for rinsing of the part to remove residual magnetic particles. After the rinse, the parts are cleaned and inhibited (if required) in a similar manner to the pre-cleaning process.

5. Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) Portable Hand-held Yokes

5.1

EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS

To carry out MPI on an aircraft in-situ, the following equipment is required: Black light (capable of 1000W/cm2 @ 15 inches); Light protective cloak approx 1 metre square; Approved marking media, mirror and rule; Lint free cloth and cleaning solvent; Hand held AC/DC magnetic yoke; Castrol Type II strips (or equivalent); Ardrox 8561 MPI fluid in aerosol can (or equivalent); and Field indicator or gauss meter.
DRAFT August 2006

10

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

6. Quality Control Equipment Magnetic Particle

6.1 THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF EQUIPMENT REQUIRED: Black and white light meter; 100 ml pear-shaped centrifuge; Tool steel ring (Ketos ring) is optional Flexible laminated strips (Castrol strips); Field indicator; Shunt meter for bench verification; Dead weight 4.5 kg for permanent and AC yokes; and Dead weight 13.5 kg for DC yokes. APPROVED DATA

7. Use of the Procedures attached to this CAAP

7.1

Attached as Appendixes to this CAAP are two Magnetic Particle Procedures. These procedures have CAR 2A (4) approval and should be used in the absence of approved OEM data or where approved data refers an inspection to be carried out in accordance with ASTM-E-1444 (or a European equivalent). 7.2 QUALIFICATIONS

A Level 2 MPI Technician should select the most suitable MPI Method Procedure based on the information contained at paragraph 3.3 of this CAAP. If a Level 1 MPI Technician is to perform the inspection, a person qualified to Level 2 or 3 MPI is to nominate which procedure is appropriate.

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

11

APPENDIX A TO CAAP 42V-3(0)

CASA/MPI/1 ISSUE 1

PROCEDURE FOR MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION UTILISING A FIXED LINE BENCH

INTRODUCTION 1 ASTM-E-1444 establishes a requirement to use a dedicated procedure for the inspection of parts. In the absence of an approved procedure, this procedure has CAR 2A (4) approval and is an acceptable means of compliance for the completion of Magnetic Particle Inspections utilising a fixed line magnetic particle bench as detailed in CAAP 42V-3.

Note: This procedure does not supersede or replace procedures supplied by an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM).
PROCEDURE NOMINATION 2 This procedure must be accepted by a Level 2 or 3 MPI Technician prior to use on a particular component. OPERATOR LEVEL 3 Personnel carrying out this procedure must posses a current CASA NDT Airworthiness Authority or an authorisation under CAR 42ZC (6). In addition, personnel must be qualified to a minimum of AS 3669 NDT Level 1. Note: When approved data (usually the OEM) requires a Technician to be qualified to Level 2

MPI to carry out an inspection in accordance with ASTM-E-1444, this takes precedence over the Operator Level stated in this procedure.
APPLICABILITY 4 This procedure must be used in conjunction with CAAP 42V-3 and is applicable to all component types as listed at Selection of a Magnetic Particle Inspection Method in CAAP 42V-3(0). LIMITATIONS 5 This procedure should detect surface breaking defects of 2 mm (0.080") in length or greater and may detect some near surface defects (less than 3 mm into the parent material) of 5 mm in length. This procedure may detect smaller defects than stated and technicians should not ignore these indications if located. PRE-INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 6 Ensure the parts are removed from the aircraft, disassembled and cleaned utilising an appropriate cleaning method or methods. Note: Paint in good condition does not have to be removed unless the risk of arcing exists.

DRAFT August 2006

12

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS 7 The equipment applicable to this procedure is: a Fixed wet Magnetic Particle Inspection Bench; WARNING: DO NOT USE BLACK LIGHTS WITH CRACKED OR MISSING FILTERS. HARMFUL ULTRA VIOLET RADIATION EMITTED CAN DAMAGE EYES. b c d e Black light with a minimum intensity of 1,000W/cm2 @ 40 cm (15"); Castrol flux indicator strips (or equivalent); Permanent marking pen and field indicator; Lint free cloth and approved cleaning solvent.

INSPECTION PROCEDURE 8 After a minimum of one minute dark adaptation, carry out the inspection as follows:

Circular Magnetism (when required) a Place the part between the heads, preferably on a central conductor (geometry permitting) to reduce the risk of arcing. b Utilising a Type II Castrol Strip (or equivalent) in accordance with the manufacturers instructions, magnetise the part utilising 800-1,000 amps per 25 mm of cross-section utilising AC or DC wet continuous method. Ensure correct flux density is evident on the Castrol strip. Adjust the magnetising current if necessary. Three distinct lines should be evident on the flux indicator strip.

Note: Calculate and obtain the correct current requirements for the thinner sections first, working to the larger diameters (higher amperages) as the inspection progresses, utilising the Castrol strips each time there is a significant change in part geometry.
c Once adequate flux density has been obtained, carry out the wet continuous method utilising AC or DC. Inspect the part for defect indications. Defect indications will appear as sharp, well-defined lines. Conversely, non-relevant indications will generally appear broad and fuzzy and generally follow part geometry. d Mark any suspect defect indications for further visual/optical evaluation.

Longitudinal Magnetism e Place the part in the coil. Effective magnetising length is approximately 150 mm either side of the coil, hence several shots may be required on longer parts such as crankshafts, etc. f Establish the approximate current requirement utilising the following formula: I = K (constant 45,000) L x N D Where: L is the length-to-diameter ratio D and N refers to the number of effective number of turns in the coil.

Note: The formula stated provides a guide and is based on the part cross-section being less than 10% of the coil opening and having a length to diameter ratio of less than 15.

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

13

g Utilising a Type II Castrol Strip (or equivalent) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, magnetise the part utilising the resultant amperage derived from subparagraph f. utilising AC or DC wet continuous method. Ensure correct flux density is evident on the Castrol strip. Adjust magnetising current if necessary. Three distinct lines should be evident on the flux indicator strip. h Once adequate flux density has been established, carry out the wet continuous method utilising AC or DC. For the required number of shots, inspect the part for defect indications between each shot. Defect indications will appear as sharp, well-defined lines. Conversely, non-relevant indications will generally appear broad and fuzzy and generally follow part geometry. i Mark any suspect defect indications for further visual/optical evaluation. j Demagnetise the part to where the residual magnetism shown on a field indicator does not exceed three divisions either side of zero. ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION CRITERIA 9 Any confirmed defect indication is cause for part rejection.

BACKUP PROCEDURE 10 Perform a visual inspection utilising a binocular microscope or other suitable magnifying device. POST-INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 11 Ensure the parts are cleaned with a suitable cleaning method to remove all traces of MPI particles. RECORDING PROCEDURE 12 Procedure compliance is to be recorded in the relevant worksheet, NDI Report or aircraft maintenance log. 13 An example of a typical worksheet entry for a Sensitivity Level 3 Inspection is: "MPI carried out IAW CASA/MPT/1 Method A, Sensitivity Level 3, in conjunction with ASTM-E-1444. Nil cracking evident." "Mr B.A.Bethany A522148 15 May 06"

DRAFT August 2006

14

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

15 APPENDIX B TO CAAP 42V-3(0)

CASA/MPI/2 ISSUE 1

PROCEDURE FOR MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION UTILISING A PORTABLE MAGNETIC YOKE

INTRODUCTION 1 ASTM-E-1444 establishes a requirement to use a dedicated procedure for the inspection of parts. In the absence of an approved procedure, this procedure has CAR 2A (4) approval and is an acceptable means of compliance for the completion of Magnetic Particle Inspections utilising a portable magnetic yoke as detailed in CAAP 42V-3. Note: This procedure does not supersede or replace procedures supplied by an OEM. PROCEDURE NOMINATION 2 This procedure must be accepted by a Level 2 or 3 MPI Technician prior to use on a particular component. OPERATOR LEVEL 3 Personnel carrying out this procedure must posses a current CASA NDT Airworthiness Authority or an authorisation under CAR 42ZC (6). In addition, personnel must be qualified to a minimum of AS 3669 NDT Level I. Note: When approved data (usually the OEM) requires a Technician to be qualified to Level 2 MPT to carry out an inspection in accordance with ASTM-E-1444, this takes precedence over the Operator Level stated in this procedure. APPLICABILITY 4 This procedure must be used in conjunction with CAAP 42V-3 and is applicable to all component types as listed at Selection of a Magnetic Particle Inspection Method in CAAP 42V-3. LIMITATIONS 5 This procedure should detect surface breaking defects of 2 mm (0.080") in length or greater and may detect some near surface defects (less than 3 mm into the parent material) of 5 mm in length. This procedure may detect smaller defects than stated and technicians should not ignore these indications if located. PRE-INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 6 Ensure the parts to be inspected are clean and free from loose or flaking paint. Note: Paint in good condition does not have to be removed unless required by the relevant maintenance data.

DRAFT August 2006

16

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS
7 The equipment applicable to this procedure is: a b Portable magnetic yoke which complies to the requirements of ASTM-E-1444; Light exclusion hood/sheet; WARNING: c d e f g DO NOT USE BLACK LIGHTS WITH CRACKED OR MISSING FILTERS.

HARMFUL ULTRAVOILET RADIATION EMITED CAN DAMAGE EYES Black light with a minimum intensity of 1,000W/cm2 @ 40cm (15"); Ardrox 8561 Fluorescent MPI fluid in a spray can (or equivalent); Castrol flux indicator strips (or equivalent); Permanent marking pen and field indicator; Lint free cloth and approved cleaning solvent.

INSPECTION PROCEDURE 8 After a minimum of one minute dark adaptation; carry out the inspection as follows: a Place the yoke legs on the inspection area with the yoke legs spaced approximately 100 mm apart. b Test the inspection area for adequate flux density utilising a Type II Castrol Strip (or equivalent) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. It is important that the magnetising current is applied whilst simultaneously spraying the MPI fluid onto the flux indicator strip. A minimum of three second magnetising is recommended. Three distinct lines should be evident on the flux indicator strip.

Note: If difficulty is experienced in gaining an adequate flux density, reduce the yoke leg spacing and maximize the yoke contact area to the test part. In extreme cases, pole pieces contoured to the part surface may be required.
c Once adequate flux density has been obtained carry out the wet continuous method utilising the yoke with either AC or DC current. Inspect the part for defect indications. Defect indications will appear as sharp, well-defined lines. Conversely, non-relevant indications will generally appear broad and fuzzy and generally follow part geometry. d Mark any suspect defect indications for further visual/optical evaluation. e Where defect orientation is unknown, rotate the yoke through 90o and repeat subparagraph c and d.

Note: In-service bolts and shear pins only require magnetising through the longitudinal axis of the bolt. Do not repeatedly magnetise a bolt or similar item in rapid succession as the part may become excessively heated.
f When the inspection is complete, ensure the residual magnetism in the part does not exceed three divisions either side of zero on a field indicator.

DRAFT August 2006

CAAP 42V-3(0): Magnetic Particle Inspection

17

ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION CRITERIA 9 Any confirmed defect indication is cause for part rejection.

BACKUP PROCEDURE 10 Perform a visual inspection utilising a binocular microscope or other suitable magnifying device. POST-INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 11 Ensure the parts are cleaned with a suitable cleaning method to remove all traces of MPI particles.

RECORDING PROCEDURE 12 Procedure compliance is to be recorded in the relevant worksheet, NDI Report or aircraft maintenance log. 13 An example of a typical worksheet entry for a Sensitivity Level 3 Inspection is: "MPI carried out IAW CASA/MPT/1 Method A, Sensitivity Level 3, in conjunction with ASTM-E-1444. Nil cracking evident." "Mr B.A.Bethany A522148 15 May 06"

DRAFT August 2006