Professional Documents
Culture Documents
36 HigherDerivatives
36 HigherDerivatives
2 2
= f (2)(x)g (0)(x) + f (1)(x)g (1)(x)
0 1
2 (0)
+ f (x)g (2)(x)
2
(3)
f (x)g(x) = f (3)(x)g(x) + 3f (2)(x)g 0(x)
+ 3f 0(x)g (2)(x) + f (x)g (3)(x)
3 (3) 3 (2)
(0)
= f (x)g (x) + f (x)g (1)(x)
0 1
3 (1) (2) 3 (0)
+ f (x)g (x) + f (x)g (3)(x)
2 3
Leibnitz’ Formula:
n
(n) X n (k)
f (x)g(x) = f (x)g (n−k)(x)
k
k=0
X n
= f (k)(x)g (n−k)(x)
all k
k
To complete the proof for higher n’s, assume that
(n) X n
f (x)g(x) = f (k)(x)g (n−k)(x) for any n :
all k
k
(n+1) d X n (k)
f (x)g(x) = f (x)g (n−k)(x)
dx all k k
X n
= f (k+1)(x)g (n−k)(x)
all k
k
X n
+ f (k)g (n−k+1)(x)
all k
k
X n
= f (j+1)(x)g (n−j)(x)
all j
j
X n
+ f (j+1)(x)g (n−j)(x)
all j
j+1
substituting k = j in ↑ and, in ↑, k = j + 1, k − 1 = j,
Assuming
(n) X n
f (x)g(x) = f (k)g (n−k)(x) for any n, we have :
all k
k
!
(n+1) X n n
f (x)g(x) = + f (j+1)(x)g (n−j)(x)
all j
j j+1
X n + 1
= f (j+1)(x)g (n−j)(x)
all j
j+1
X n + 1
= f (j+1)(x)g ((n+1)−(j+1))(x)
all j
j+1