Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Content Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Dritan Zaimi
    21 views2 pages
    This document provides a form for evaluating speakers at a communications seminar. It asks evaluators to rate the speaker on interest, selection and continuity of content, use of words, and provide any other comments. Specifically, it prompts for comments on whether the commentary was interesting, covered multiple aspects, and had entertainment value. It also asks if all important aspects were covered, and if the commentary was well constructed. Finally, it requests feedback on the speaker's use of simple language, explanation of technical terms, expression of ideas, and use of dates.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a form for evaluating speakers at a communications seminar. It asks evaluators to rate the speaker on interest, selection and continuity of content, use of words, and provide any other comments. Specifically, it prompts for comments on whether the commentary was interesting, covered multiple aspects, and had entertainment value. It also asks if all important aspects were covered, and if the commentary was well constructed. Finally, it requests feedback on the speaker's use of simple language, explanation of technical terms, expression of ideas, and use of dates.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    21 views2 pages

    Content Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Dritan Zaimi
    This document provides a form for evaluating speakers at a communications seminar. It asks evaluators to rate the speaker on interest, selection and continuity of content, use of words, and provide any other comments. Specifically, it prompts for comments on whether the commentary was interesting, covered multiple aspects, and had entertainment value. It also asks if all important aspects were covered, and if the commentary was well constructed. Finally, it requests feedback on the speaker's use of simple language, explanation of technical terms, expression of ideas, and use of dates.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    COMMUNICATIONS SEMINAR

    CONTENT EVALUATION (for each other)


    SPEAKER_______________________________________________________________
    INTEREST
    Was the commentary interesting? Were anecdotes and human interest points used? Were
    several aspects covered, e.g. history, art/architecture, topical? Did it have entertainment
    value?
    COMMENTS
    _______________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________
    ___
    SELECTION AND CONTINUITY
    Were all important aspects covered? Were there too many or too few facts or was the
    balance about right? Was the commentary well constructed with a beginning, a middle
    and an end?
    COMMENTS
    _______________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________
    ___
    USE OF WORDS
    Were simple words used? Were jargon and technical terms explained? Were ideas
    expressed in an interesting way? Were there any colorful adjectives? How were dates
    handled?
    COMMENTS
    _______________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________
    ___

    ANY OTHER COMMENTS


    _______________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________
    __

    You might also like