You are on page 1of 30

1 BROWN RUDNICK LLP

CAMILLE M. VASQUEZ, #273377


2 cvasquez@brownrudnick.com
LEO J. PRESIADO, #166721
3 lpresiado@brownrudnick.com
SAMUEL A. MONIZ, #313274
4 smoniz@brownrudnick.com
2211 Michelson Drive, 7th Floor
5 Irvine, California 92612
Telephone: (949) 752-7100
6 Facsimile: (949) 252-1514

7 BROWN RUDNICK LLP


JESSICA N. MEYERS (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
8 jmeyers@brownrudnick.com
7 Times Square
9 New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 209-4800
10 Facsimile: (212) 938-2880

11 Attorneys for Defendant


GLORIA DE LOS ANGELES TREVINO RUIZ
12 aka GLORIA TREVI

13
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
14
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
15

16 JANE DOE K.C. 1, an individual; and JANE CASE NO. 22GDCV01128


DOE A.H. 2, an individual,
17 ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE
Plaintiffs, HON. RALPH C. HOFER, DEPT. D
18 vs.
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-
19 GLORIA DE LOS ANGELES TREVINO COMPLAINT FOR
RUIZ aka GLORIA TREVI, an individual; (1) SEXUAL ASSAULT;
20 SERGIO GUSTAVO ANDRADE SANCHEZ (2) AIDING AND ABETTING SEXUAL
aka SERGIO ANDRADE, an individual; ASSAULT;
21 MARIA RAQUENEL PORTILLO JIMENEZ (3) SEXUAL BATTERY;
aka MARY BOQUITAS and MARY (4) AIDING AND ABETTING SEXUAL
22 RAQUENEL, an individual; and DOES 4 BATTERY;
through DOE 50, inclusive, (5) BATTERY;
23 (6) AIDING AND ABETTING
Defendants. BATTERY;
24 (7) INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS;
25 GLORIA DE LOS ANGELES TREVINO (8) NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF
RUIZ, an individual, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; AND
26 (9) INDEMNITY
Cross-Complainant,
27 vs. ACTION FILED: December 30, 2022
TRIAL DATE: TBD
28 SERGIO GUSTAVO ANDRADE SANCHEZ

DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT


1 aka SERGIO ANDRADE, an individual;
JANE DOE K.C. 1, an individual; JANE DOE
2 A.H. 2, an individual; JANE ROE J.P. 1, an
individual; CONEXIONES AMERICANAS,
3 S.A. de C.V., a Mexican company, and DOES
1 through 100, inclusive,
4
Cross-Defendants.
5

6 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
2
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 Defendant and Cross-Complainant Gloria de Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz (“Cross-

2 Complainant” or “Ms. Trevi”), hereby alleges as follows:

3 INTRODUCTION

4 1. This case has a true predator at its center: Defendant and Cross-Defendant Sergio

5 Gustavo Andrade Sanchez (“Andrade” or “Sergio Andrade”). A successful musician, manager, and

6 producer in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, Andrade helped orchestrate the rise of multiple young

7 musical talents, particularly in Mexico. He was sometimes dubbed “Mr. Midas” for his ability to

8 recognize and promote talented artists – especially young, female artists – and turn them into stars.

9 Andrade, whose brother was a senator, was also well connected with the Mexican business and

10 political elite and occupied a position of significant cultural power and influence. That position

11 allowed him to draw many young girls into his sphere of influence, who gathered around him in the

12 hopes that he would guide, mentor, and launch their careers in entertainment, as he had previously

13 done for others. But once these young girls and women had been drawn into his sphere by dreams

14 of stardom, he subjected them to total control and sadistic abuse – mental, financial, physical, and

15 sexual. Ms. Trevi was one of those young women.

16 2. Ms. Trevi rose from obscurity to become a world-class musical talent, sometimes

17 referred to as the “Mexican Madonna,” in the late 1980s and 1990s. A revolutionary and dazzling

18 performer, she is adored by millions, particularly in Latin America. Unbeknownst to the public,

19 however, when she was offstage, she was little more than a prisoner: controlled, mentally and

20 physically tortured, and effectively enslaved by Andrade. Ms. Trevi was certainly not alone in

21 being abused by Andrade but, because she had risen to such stardom, she was his most valuable

22 asset and was, thus, the one woman he was most determined to control and subjugate.

23 3. Ms. Trevi encountered Andrade and came under his control as a child, in her early

24 teens, when she was first trying to break into the Mexican music industry as a singer and performer.

25 Andrade evidently recognized that he could exploit her undeniable talent for enormous profit. He

26 took charge of her career, which soon took off (riding her coattails to ever greater success himself).

27 But Andrade also recognized Ms. Trevi as an isolated and vulnerable girl who was easy prey to his

28 / / /
3
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 manipulation, control, and abuse. He took full advantage, subjecting the rising child superstar that

2 he had taken on to grotesque abuse calculated to break her spirit.

3 4. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that there were many other

4 women and girls that Andrade controlled and abused over the years, but Ms. Trevi was his true star

5 – and, thus, the girl he most needed and wanted to dominate and control. To that end, Andrade

6 controlled all aspects of Ms. Trevi’s life, with the assistance of other entities and young women

7 such as Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Jane Doe A.H. 2 (“Cross-Defendant A.H.”) and Plaintiff and

8 Cross-Defendant Jane Doe K.C. 1 (“Cross-Defendant K.C.,” and collectively, “Plaintiffs”), whom

9 he subjugated and then enlisted to perpetuate his abuse. Ms. Trevi was consistently watched by

10 multiple young women that had been similarly subdued by Andrade to ensure that she stayed in

11 line, never spoke freely to men other than Andrade, and never rebelled against his abuse. She had

12 no control over the money generated from her performances and record sales, which was diverted

13 to Andrade through his company, Cross-Defendant Conexiones Americanas S.A. de C.V.

14 (“Conexiones Americanas”). Instead of living the lifestyle of the rich and famous that one might

15 expect of the “Mexican Madonna,” Ms. Trevi, in private, was often dressed in old rags, sometimes

16 forced to sleep naked for days on a cold bathroom floor. She was generally forbidden from

17 speaking to any men other than Andrade (although she was sometimes allowed and instructed to

18 participate in interviews with men under Andrade’s supervision). Instead, she was surrounded by

19 other young women and girls who, like herself, were controlled by Andrade and did his bidding by

20 watching her and reporting any supposed disobedience or imagined transgression against his

21 authority to Andrade, which would result in sadistic punishments. She was forced into extreme and

22 grueling exercises at Andrade’s command. She was starved at his whim. She was brutally beaten,

23 sometimes to the point of unconsciousness, as “punishment” for made-up transgressions. And she

24 was sexually assaulted by him—raped repeatedly and sometimes brutally. The mental, sexual, and

25 other abuse inflicted by Andrade eventually drove Ms. Trevi to attempt suicide.

26 5. With assistance from others, including without limitation Conexiones Americanas

27 and various young women under his control such as Cross-Defendant K.C. and Cross-Defendant

28 A.H., Andrade successfully hid, for many years, the fact that he had gathered around him a group
4
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 of young women that he controlled, physically and mentally abused, and raped. Eventually, he was

2 discovered and finally convicted in Mexico and imprisoned on charges of rape, corruption of

3 minors, and kidnapping. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Andrade has

4 long-since been released from prison and is living free in Mexico – and has access, once again, to

5 young girls.

6 6. Over time, Ms. Trevi has painstakingly rebuilt her life and career. She has a family

7 and continues to be recognized as a major musical talent and performer. Her success is undeniable

8 and impressive. Unfortunately, her success has also made her a target for those with motive to

9 destroy her and her career. False rumors, orchestrated by T.V. Azteca, S.A. de C.V., Patricia

10 Chapoy, Cross-Defendant A.H. and others, have long circulated and been spurred by salacious and

11 irresponsible reports in certain media, that Ms. Trevi participated in the horrors perpetrated by her

12 abuser. Since 2009, Ms. Trevi has been prosecuting a defamation lawsuit against T.V. Azteca,

13 S.A., de C.V., Patricia Chapoy and others in Texas for instigating these false rumors.1 The

14 Complaint filed by Plaintiffs to commence the above-captioned action seeks to perpetuate and take

15 advantage of that false narrative, by knowingly and wrongfully attributing blame to Ms. Trevi for

16 wrongs done by Andrade.

17 7. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint to seek justice against Andrade for
18 committing sexual assault, pursuant, inter alia, to California Code of Civil Procedure § 340.16(e).

19 By this Cross-Complaint, Ms. Trevi seeks to hold Andrade accountable for his vicious acts of abuse

20 against her. In addition, to the extent that Ms. Trevi is deemed liable in any amount for any wrongs

21 committed by Andrade (or anyone else) in this action – which she denies – Ms. Trevi is entitled to

22 indemnity from Andrade and the other Cross-Defendants named herein, all of whom are

23 responsible, in whole or in part, for any harm complained of by Plaintiffs in this action.

24 8. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint with great sadness. For many years, she has
25 remained silent about the horrific abuse she endured at Andrade’s hands, both because she did not

26

27
1
Gloria De Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, et al v. Azteca America, et al, Cause No. C-1027-09-C, pending in the
28 139th District Court, Hidalgo County, Texas.
5
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 wish to relive the awful experiences, and because she wished to protect her children while they

2 were underage. But her children are now grown, and false attacks against Ms. Trevi persist in

3 blaming her for the acts of the very man who inflicted horrific abuse on her. The time has now

4 come to set the record straight and to hold Andrade accountable for his actions.

5 PARTIES

6 9. Ms. Trevi is an individual over the age of eighteen and currently resides in the State

7 of Texas.

8 10. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant and Cross-

9 Defendant Sergio Andrade is a Mexican citizen over the age of eighteen, who currently resides in

10 Mexico.

11 11. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Cross-Defendant

12 Conexiones Americanas is an entity organized and existing under the laws of Mexico with its

13 principal place of business in Mexico.

14 12. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Cross-Defendant A.H. is

15 a Mexican citizen over the age of eighteen, who currently resides in Mexico. Cross-Defendant

16 A.H. is the individual who commenced this action under the pseudonym Plaintiff Jane Doe A.H. 2.

17 Cross-Defendant A.H. is provisionally named herein under a pseudonym, pending a determination

18 by the Court whether she may be publicly designated as a plaintiff and cross-defendant under her

19 own name.

20 13. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Cross-Defendant K.C. is

21 a Mexican citizen over the age of eighteen, who currently resides in Mexico. Cross-Defendant

22 K.C. is the individual who commenced this action under the pseudonym Plaintiff Jane Doe K.C. 1.

23 Cross-Defendant K.C. is provisionally named herein under a pseudonym, pending a determination

24 by the Court whether she may be publicly designated as a plaintiff and cross-defendant under her

25 own name.

26 14. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Cross-Defendant Jane

27 Roe J.P. 1 (“Roe J.P. 1”) is a Mexican citizen over the age of eighteen, who currently resides in

28 Mexico. Roe J.P. 1 is Cross-Defendant A.H.’s mother. Roe J.P. 1 is provisionally named herein
6
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 under a pseudonym, pending a determination by the Court whether she may be publicly designated

2 as a plaintiff and cross-defendant under her own name.

3 15. Ms. Trevi is ignorant of the true names and capacities of Cross-Defendants sued

4 herein as Does 1-100, inclusive, and therefore sues these Does by such fictitious names. Ms. Trevi

5 will amend this Complaint to allege the Does’ true names and capacities when ascertained. Each of

6 the Does is in some manner responsible for some or all of the damages, acts and/or omissions

7 alleged herein. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that one or more of the

8 Does assisted Andrade, Conexiones Americanas, and/or the other Cross-Defendants named herein

9 in facilitating and covering up Andrade’s serial abuse and sexual assault of young women,

10 including Ms. Trevi. Ms. Trevi is further informed and believes and thereon alleges that one or

11 more of the Does are officers, directors, employees, or agents of one or more entities that assisted

12 Andrade, Conexiones Americanas, and/or the other Cross-Defendants named herein in facilitating

13 and covering up Andrade’s abuse and sexual assault of young women, including Ms. Trevi.

14 Andrade, Conexiones Americanas, Cross-Defendant A.H., Cross-Defendant K.C., Roe J.P. 1, and

15 Does 1-100 are collectively referred to herein as “Cross-Defendants.” Each of the Cross-

16 Defendants named herein is in some manner legally responsible for the damages, acts, and/or

17 omissions alleged herein.

18 16. At all times relevant, Cross-Defendants were the agents, servants, employees,

19 employers, partners, principals, representatives and/or alter egos of each other and in doing the

20 things alleged herein were acting within the course and scope of their authority as such agents,

21 servants, employees, partners, principals, representatives and/or alter egos with the permission and

22 consent of the remaining defendants.

23 JURISDICTION AND VENUE

24 17. Jurisdiction exists and venue is proper in the State of California, County of Los
25 Angeles pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §§ 395 and 395.2, because the actions and injury

26 complained of herein occurred, in part, in Los Angeles, California.

27 / / /

28 / / /
7
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

2 18. As a child in the 1980s, Ms. Trevi traveled alone from her home in Monterrey to

3 Mexico City, with the goal of breaking into the music industry. At the time, Andrade was already

4 established as a successful producer and was credited with the rise of other young artists. Ms.

5 Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, at this time, Andrade had already

6 committed acts of sexual and other abuse against young girls with whom he had worked, and had

7 covered up the same with the assistance of various persons and entities in the music industry and

8 otherwise. When Ms. Trevi first met Andrade, he was gathering together five inexperienced young

9 girls to form a new musical group called Boquitas Pintadas, with the stated goal of training and

10 forming them into a successful rock group. Ms. Trevi was one of the final recruits. Boquitas

11 Pintadas also included another teenage girl, Defendant Maria Raquenel Portillo Jimenez (“Mary

12 Boquitas”). Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, during this period,

13 Andrade secretly married Mary Boquitas, who, like Ms. Trevi, was an underage girl and easy prey

14 to his influence, manipulation, and abuse.

15 19. Boquitas Pintadas was not a success and soon dissolved. Andrade then became

16 focused on Ms. Trevi. As a much older and established figure with extensive connections, Andrade

17 was able to help advance her career and arrange for her appearance on television and radio. Under

18 Andrade’s direction and supervision, Ms. Trevi began performing and recording. She was an

19 undeniable talent, giving dazzling and revolutionary performances. She soon gained a wide and

20 enthusiastic audience.

21 20. Offstage, however, Andrade continued to exercise pervasive, coercive control over

22 Ms. Trevi. The fact that she was such a success made it that much more important for his

23 domination of her to be complete. His “training” of her was vicious. He required her to engage in

24 extreme forms of exercise, controlled her intake of food, and controlled where and when she slept.

25 As punishments, he would sometimes force her to sleep on a cold bathroom floor. Other times, he

26 would beat her with closed fists and whip her with belts or cables. And both before and after she

27 reached the age of eighteen, he subjected her to sexual abuse. As part of his pattern of controlling

28 Ms. Trevi, Andrade used an entity under his control, Conexiones Americanas, to run the business
8
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 side of her career, depriving her of control over the financial fruits of her labors. It was

2 Conexiones Americanas – not Ms. Trevi – that entered into contracts related to her performances

3 and received payments for her work. The revenues from her work were directed to Conexiones

4 Americanas and, indirectly, to Andrade.

5 21. In addition to Mary Boquitas and Ms. Trevi, Andrade accumulated other young

6 women around him as well. Cross-Defendant A.H. came to Andrade as a teenager with her mother,

7 Roe J.P. 1. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Andrade soon became

8 focused on Cross Defendant A.H. and, eventually, with the knowledge and express written consent

9 and permission of her mother, Roe J.P. 1, Andrade married Cross-Defendant A.H. while she was a

10 minor, replacing Mary Boquitas as his wife.

11 22. Andrade exercised extensive control over the young women who were brought into

12 his circle, controlling and abusing them and using them as agents to impose his will on other

13 victims. For instance, it was Cross-Defendant A.H. who suggested to Andrade bringing Cross-

14 Defendant K.C. (among others) into his circle, and it was Cross-Defendant A.H. who introduced

15 Cross-Defendant K.C. to him. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, even

16 while Cross-Defendant A.H. was married to Andrade, she would procure other underage girls for

17 her husband and listen outside the door as he assaulted and abused them and/or would participate in

18 the abuse herself. Further, Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Cross-

19 Defendant K.C., in turn, brought other victims to Andrade, including but not limited to her own

20 sisters. Cross-Defendant K.C. assisted Andrade in other ways as well. For instance, Andrade

21 named Cross-Defendant K.C. and her sister as officers or agents of Conexiones Americanas and

22 used them as instruments of his own control over Ms. Trevi and her finances and career. Thus,

23 Cross-Defendant K.C. and her sister were put in positions of authority over Ms. Trevi and the

24 money generated from her wildly successful career and materially assisted Andrade in keeping Ms.

25 Trevi in a state of servitude and submission. As one example of this control, if Ms. Trevi was

26 required to sign a document, Cross-Defendant K.C. and/or her sister would, as adults and at

27 Andrade’s instruction and/or behest, watch Ms. Trevi to compel her to sign it.

28 / / /
9
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 23. Andrade traveled with a group of these young women and girls to Los Angeles,

2 California on certain occasions. His abuse and sexual assaults against Ms. Trevi continued in

3 California, as elsewhere. By way of example, on one occasion in California, Andrade decided to

4 punish Ms. Trevi for an imagined transgression by beating her repeatedly with a belt. There was a

5 sadistic game that Andrade would play with such beatings: a preset number of blows had to be

6 endured and accepted by Ms. Trevi in silence. If Ms. Trevi were to cry out, gasp, or make any

7 other sign of distress, Andrade would treat that as a new punishable offense, and the beating would

8 start all over again from the beginning. During the course of the beating in question, Ms. Trevi

9 passed out. She regained consciousness on the ground, to find Andrade on top of her, sexually

10 assaulting her.

11 24. Andrade, assisted by one or more entities, including without limitation Conexiones

12 Americanas, went to great lengths to cover up his sexual assaults and pattern of horrific abuse,

13 including covering up incidents of abuse that occurred prior to his even meeting Ms. Trevi, as well

14 as acts of abuse against Ms. Trevi and others that preceded the incidents described herein. For

15 instance, Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Andrade, Conexiones

16 Americanas, and/or other entities under Andrade’s control made one or more payments to Cross-

17 Defendant A.H. and/or her mother, Roe J.P. 1., to buy their silence and maintain the secrecy of his

18 pervasive abuse of young women. As another example, Andrade impregnated dozens of young

19 women and girls and then, with the assistance of others, forced, coerced, or otherwise pressured

20 them into abortions. Those abortions were motivated, in whole or in part, to maintain the secrecy

21 of his sexual abuse. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes that these forced abortions were directed

22 and facilitated by Andrade with the assistance and funding of other persons and entities, including

23 without limitation Conexiones Americanas and its officers and agents.

24 25. Ms. Trevi herself was the victim of such coverup abortions. For instance, at one

25 point in the 1990s, while in Mexico, Ms. Trevi discovered that she was pregnant by Andrade as a

26 result of his ongoing sexual abuse. Andrade ordered Ms. Trevi to cross the border into the United

27 States where she could covertly terminate the pregnancy. Ms. Trevi was reluctant to do so. To

28 ensure that Ms. Trevi followed through in terminating the pregnancy in accordance with his
10
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 command, Andrade sent Cross-Defendant K.C. and Mary Boquitas to escort her into the United

2 States to watch her and prevent any disobedience on her part. The night before Ms. Trevi

3 underwent the abortion, Cross-Defendant K.C., who was taller and stronger than Ms. Trevi, slept in

4 Ms. Trevi’s room by the door to ensure that Ms. Trevi did not attempt to escape. Ms. Trevi is

5 informed and believes and thereon alleges that Cross-Defendant K.C. did so on instructions from

6 Andrade and in her capacity as an agent of Andrade and Conexiones Americanas.

7 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

8 (Sexual Assault Against Andrade)

9 26. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as

10 though set forth in full.

11 27. For many years, Andrade exercised pervasive control over Ms. Trevi’s life,

12 subjecting her to prolonged mental and physical abuse. Andrade used that abusive control – and

13 the vulnerable mental state it induced in Ms. Trevi – to commit multiple acts of sexual abuse and

14 assault against her, before and after her eighteenth birthday, and inside and outside of the State of

15 California. Those acts of abuse include, without limitation, the incident in California alleged

16 above, when Andrade beat Ms. Trevi until she lost consciousness and then sexually assaulted her.

17 28. The pattern of conduct alleged herein by Andrade constitutes sexual assault within

18 the meaning of, inter alia, California Code of Civil Procedure § 340.16(b)(1), because, for

19 example, Andrade touched Ms. Trevi in a sexual manner and without consent or through duress,

20 and engaged in sexual intercourse with her while she was unconscious and/or through duress and

21 without valid consent.

22 29. Andrade went to great lengths to cover up his abuse and sexual assaults of Ms.

23 Trevi, as well as his prior abuse and sexual assaults of other young women. Andrade used various

24 methods to accomplish this, including without limitation the use of fear, threats, and intimidation

25 against multiple young women and girls, including Ms. Trevi; the payment of hush money; and the

26 arrangement of numerous forced abortions for the women and girls under his control, including Ms.

27 Trevi. Andrade was materially assisted in these assaults and coverups by, inter alia, Cross-

28 Defendant K.C. and Conexiones Americanas. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon
11
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 alleges that Conexiones Americanas provided assistance and funding for coverup activities, and

2 further engaged in coercive activities and enforced silence by and through its agents, including

3 without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C. and her sister, who, among other conduct, monitored and

4 spied on Ms. Trevi to ensure her ongoing servitude and submission to Andrade’s will. Ms. Trevi is

5 further informed and believes and thereon alleges that other entities similarly under Mr. Andrade’s

6 influence or control assisted him in covering up prior incidents of sexual assault and abuse.

7 30. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, at all times relevant,

8 Conexiones Americanas was Andrade’s alter ego, and that Conexiones Americanas and its agents,

9 including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C., conspired, cooperated, and materially assisted

10 him in perpetuating the systemic control and sexual and other abuse of Ms. Trevi.

11 31. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Does 1-100 include

12 other entities and persons in positions of power with whom Andrade had business or personal

13 relationships, who were aware of his systematic abuse of young women and protected him and

14 prevented it from becoming publicly known.

15 32. As a result of the acts complained of herein, Ms. Trevi suffered and is entitled to an

16 award of damages in an amount subject to proof but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this

17 Court, including but not limited to physical pain and emotional distress.

18 33. The acts complained of herein were done with malice, oppression, and fraud, such

19 that Ms. Trevi is entitled to an award of exemplary damages.

20 34. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint timely pursuant to California Code of Civil

21 Procedure § 340.16(e), which revives claims for damages for adult sexual assault and related torts.

22 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

23 (Aiding And Abetting Sexual Assault Against Conexiones Americanas,


24 Cross-Defendant K.C., and Does 1-100)
25 35. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as
26 though set forth in full.

27 36. For many years, Andrade exercised pervasive control over Ms. Trevi’s life,
28 subjecting her to prolonged mental and physical abuse. Andrade used that abusive control – and
12
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 the vulnerable mental state it induced in Ms. Trevi – to commit multiple acts of sexual abuse and

2 assault against her, before and after her eighteenth birthday, and inside and outside of the State of

3 California. Those acts of abuse include without limitation the instance alleged above in which

4 Andrade beat Ms. Trevi until she lost consciousness and then sexually assaulted her.

5 37. The pattern of conduct alleged herein by Andrade constitutes sexual assault within

6 the meaning, inter alia, of California Code of Civil Procedure § 340.16(b)(1), because, for

7 example, Andrade touched Ms. Trevi in a sexual manner and without consent or through duress,

8 and engaged in sexual intercourse with her while she was unconscious and/or through duress and

9 without valid consent.

10 38. Andrade went to great lengths to cover up his abuse and sexual assaults of Ms.

11 Trevi, as well as his prior abuse and sexual assaults of other young women. Andrade used various

12 methods to accomplish this, including without limitation the use of fear, threats, and intimidation

13 against multiple young women and girls, including Ms. Trevi; the payment of hush money; and the

14 arrangement of numerous forced abortions for the women and girls under his control, including Ms.

15 Trevi. Andrade was materially assisted in these assaults and coverups by, inter alia, Cross-

16 Defendant K.C. and Conexiones Americanas, and other persons and entities. Ms. Trevi is informed

17 and believes and thereon alleges that Conexiones Americanas provided assistance and funding for

18 coverup activities, and further engaged in coercive activities and enforced silence by and through

19 its agents, including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C. and her sister, who, among other

20 conduct, monitored and spied on Ms. Trevi to ensure her ongoing servitude and submission to

21 Andrade’s will.

22 39. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, at all times relevant,

23 Conexiones Americanas was Andrade’s alter ego, and that Conexiones Americanas and its agents,

24 including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C., conspired, cooperated, and materially assisted

25 him in perpetuating the systemic control and sexual and other abuse of Ms. Trevi.

26 40. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Does 1-100 include

27 other entities and persons in positions of power with whom Andrade had business or personal

28 / / /
13
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 relationships, who were aware of his systematic abuse of young women and protected him and

2 prevented it from becoming publicly known.

3 41. As a result of the acts complained of herein, Ms. Trevi suffered and is entitled to an

4 award of damages in an amount subject to proof but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this

5 Court, including but not limited to physical pain and emotional distress.

6 42. Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. knew that Andrade was

7 routinely engaged in the abuse and control of Ms. Trevi, and that his abusive conduct toward her

8 included sexual assault.

9 43. Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. gave substantial assistance or

10 encouragement to Andrade, including by assisting him in controlling Ms. Trevi, keeping her in a

11 state of financial and other servitude, and covering up Andrade’s abuse.

12 44. The conduct of Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. was a substantial

13 factor in causing Ms. Trevi harm.

14 45. The acts complained of herein were done with malice, oppression, and fraud, such

15 that Ms. Trevi is entitled to an award of exemplary damages.

16 46. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint timely pursuant to California Code of Civil

17 Procedure § 340.16(e), which revives claims for damages for adult sexual assault and related torts.

18 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

19 (Sexual Battery Against Andrade)


20 47. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as
21 though set forth in full.

22 48. For many years, Andrade exercised pervasive control over Ms. Trevi’s life,
23 subjecting her to prolonged mental and physical abuse. Andrade used that abusive control – and

24 the vulnerable mental state it induced in Ms. Trevi – to commit multiple acts of sexual abuse and

25 assault against her, before and after her eighteenth birthday, and inside and outside of the State of

26 California, including without limitation the instance alleged above in which Andrade beat Ms.

27 Trevi until she lost consciousness and then sexually assaulted her.

28 / / /
14
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 49. Andrade’s conduct alleged herein constitutes sexual battery within the meaning,

2 inter alia, of Code of Civil Procedure § 340.16 and other statutes referenced therein, including

3 without limitation California Penal Code § 243.4 and California Civil Code § 1708.5. Andrade

4 intended to cause offensive and/or harmful sexual contacts with intimate parts of Ms. Trevi’s body

5 without Ms. Trevi’s consent, and did cause such harmful and/or offensive contacts.

6 50. Ms. Trevi did not consent to such physical contact and was not in a position to give

7 valid consent. Indeed, due to the pervasive abuse and control exerted by Andrade, Ms. Trevi was

8 entirely subject to the whims of Andrade and unable to give valid consent.

9 51. Andrade went to great lengths to cover up his abuse and sexual assaults of Ms.

10 Trevi, as well as his prior abuse and sexual assaults of other young women. Andrade used various

11 methods to accomplish this, including without limitation the use of fear, threats, and intimidation

12 against multiple young women and girls, including Ms. Trevi; the payment of hush money; and the

13 arrangement of numerous forced abortions for the women and girls under his control, including Ms.

14 Trevi. Andrade was materially assisted in these assaults and coverups by, inter alia, Conexiones

15 Americanas. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Conexiones Americanas

16 provided assistance and funding for coverup activities, and further engaged in coercive activities

17 and enforced silence by and through its agents, including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C.

18 and her sister, who, among other conduct, monitored and spied on Ms. Trevi to ensure her ongoing

19 servitude and submission to Andrade’s will.

20 52. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, at all times relevant,

21 Conexiones Americanas was Andrade’s alter ego, and that Conexiones Americanas and its agents,

22 including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C., conspired, cooperated, and materially assisted

23 him in perpetuating the systemic control and sexual and other abuse of Ms. Trevi.

24 53. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Does 1-100 include

25 other entities and persons in positions of power with whom Andrade had business or personal

26 relationships, who were aware of his systematic abuse of young women and protected him and

27 prevented it from becoming publicly known.

28 / / /
15
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 54. As a result of the acts complained of herein, Ms. Trevi suffered and is entitled to an

2 award of damages in an amount subject to proof but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this

3 Court, including but not limited to physical pain and emotional distress.

4 55. The acts complained of herein were done with malice, oppression, and fraud, such

5 that Ms. Trevi is entitled to an award of exemplary damages.

6 56. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint timely pursuant to California Code of Civil

7 Procedure § 340.16(e), which revives claims for damages for adult sexual assault and related torts.

8 FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

9 (Aiding and Abetting Sexual Battery Against Conexiones Americanas,

10 Cross-Defendant K.C., and Does 1-100)


11 57. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as
12 though set forth in full.

13 58. For many years, Andrade exercised pervasive control over Ms. Trevi’s life,
14 subjecting her to prolonged mental and physical abuse. Andrade used that abusive control – and

15 the vulnerable mental state it induced in Ms. Trevi – to commit multiple acts of sexual abuse and

16 assault against her, before and after her eighteenth birthday, and inside and outside of the State of

17 California, including without limitation the instance alleged above in which Andrade beat Ms.

18 Trevi until she lost consciousness and then sexually assaulted her.

19 59. Andrade’s conduct alleged herein constitutes sexual battery within the meaning,
20 inter alia, of California Civil Code § 1708.5. Andrade intended to cause offensive and/or harmful

21 sexual contacts with intimate parts of Ms. Trevi’s body without Ms. Trevi’s consent, and did cause

22 such harmful and/or offensive contacts.

23 60. Ms. Trevi did not consent to such physical contact and was not in a position to give
24 valid consent. Indeed, due to the pervasive abuse and control exerted by Andrade, Ms. Trevi was

25 entirely subject to the whims of Andrade and unable to give valid consent.

26 61. Andrade went to great lengths to cover up his abuse and sexual assaults of Ms.
27 Trevi, as well as his prior abuse and sexual assaults of other young women. Andrade used various

28 methods to accomplish this, including without limitation the use of fear, threats, and intimidation
16
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 against multiple young women and girls, including Ms. Trevi; the payment of hush money; and the

2 arrangement of numerous forced abortions for the women and girls under his control, including Ms.

3 Trevi. Andrade was materially assisted in these assaults and coverups by, inter alia, Conexiones

4 Americanas. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Conexiones Americanas

5 provided assistance and funding for coverup activities, and further engaged in coercive activities

6 and enforced silence by and through its agents, including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C.

7 and her sister who, among other conduct, monitored and spied on Ms. Trevi to ensure her ongoing

8 servitude and submission to Andrade’s will.

9 62. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, at all times relevant,

10 Conexiones Americanas was Andrade’s alter ego, and that Conexiones Americanas and its agents,

11 including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C., conspired, cooperated, and materially assisted

12 him in perpetuating the systemic control and sexual and other abuse of Ms. Trevi.

13 63. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Does 1-100 include

14 other entities and persons in positions of power with whom Andrade had business or personal

15 relationships, who were aware of his systematic abuse of young women and protected him and

16 prevented it from becoming publicly known.

17 64. Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. knew that Andrade was

18 routinely engaged in the abuse and control of Ms. Trevi, and that his abusive conduct toward her

19 included sexual assault.

20 65. Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. gave substantial assistance or

21 encouragement to Andrade, including by assisting him in controlling Ms. Trevi, keeping her in a

22 state of financial and other servitude, and covering up Andrade’s abuse.

23 66. The conduct of Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. was a substantial

24 factor in causing Ms. Trevi harm.

25 67. As a result of the acts complained of herein, Ms. Trevi suffered and is entitled to an

26 award of damages in an amount subject to proof but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this

27 Court, including but not limited to physical pain and emotional distress.

28 / / /
17
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 68. The acts complained of herein were done with malice, oppression, and fraud, such

2 that Ms. Trevi is entitled to an award of exemplary damages.

3 69. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint timely pursuant to California Code of Civil

4 Procedure § 340.16(e), which revives claims for damages for adult sexual assault and related torts.

5 FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

6 (Battery Against Andrade)

7 70. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as

8 though set forth in full.

9 71. For many years, Andrade exercised pervasive control over Ms. Trevi’s life,

10 subjecting her to prolonged mental and physical abuse. Andrade used that abusive control – and

11 the vulnerable mental state it induced in Ms. Trevi – to commit multiple acts of sexual abuse and

12 assault against her, before and after her eighteenth birthday, and inside and outside of the State of

13 California, including without limitation the instance alleged above in which Andrade first beat Ms.

14 Trevi until she lost consciousness and then sexually assaulted her. As part of this pattern of abuse

15 and control, Andrade frequently used physical violence against Ms. Trevi.

16 72. In doing the acts complained of above, Andrade made physical contact with Ms.

17 Trevi with the intent to cause physical and mental harm.

18 73. Ms. Trevi did not consent to such physical contact and was not in a position to give

19 valid consent. Indeed, due to the pervasive abuse and control exerted by Andrade, Ms. Trevi was

20 entirely subject to the whims of Andrade and unable to give valid consent.

21 74. Ms. Trevi was harmed by the physical contact described above, and other similar

22 conduct by Andrade.

23 75. A reasonable person in Ms. Trevi’s position would have found the physical contact

24 inflicted by Andrade offensive.

25 76. Andrade went to great lengths to cover up his abuse and sexual assaults of Ms.

26 Trevi, as well as his prior abuse and sexual assaults of other young women. Andrade used various

27 methods to accomplish this, including without limitation the use of fear, threats, and intimidation

28 against multiple young women and girls, including Ms. Trevi; the payment of hush money; and the
18
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 arrangement of numerous forced abortions for the women and girls under his control, including Ms.

2 Trevi. Andrade was materially assisted in these assaults and coverups by, inter alia, Conexiones

3 Americanas. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Conexiones Americanas

4 provided assistance and funding for coverup activities, and further engaged in coercive activities

5 and enforced silence by and through its agents, including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C.

6 and her sister, who, among other conduct, monitored and spied on Ms. Trevi to ensure her ongoing

7 servitude and submission to Andrade’s will.

8 77. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, at all times relevant,

9 Conexiones Americanas was Andrade’s alter ego, and that Conexiones Americanas and its agents,

10 including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C., conspired, cooperated, and materially assisted

11 him in perpetuating the systemic control and sexual and other abuse of Ms. Trevi.

12 78. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Does 1-100 include

13 other entities and persons in positions of power with whom Andrade had business or personal

14 relationships, who were aware of his systematic abuse of young women and protected him and

15 prevented it from becoming publicly known.

16 79. As a result of the acts complained of herein, Ms. Trevi suffered and is entitled to an

17 award of damages in an amount subject to proof but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this

18 Court, including but not limited to physical pain and emotional distress.

19 80. The acts complained of herein were done with malice, oppression and fraud, such

20 that Ms. Trevi is entitled to an award of exemplary damages.

21 81. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint timely pursuant to California Code of Civil

22 Procedure § 340.16(e), which revives claims for damages for adult sexual assault and related torts.

23 SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

24 (Aiding and Abetting Battery Against Conexiones Americanas,


25 Cross-Defendant K.C., and Does 1-100)
26 82. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as
27 though set forth in full.

28 / / /
19
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 83. For many years, Andrade exercised pervasive control over Ms. Trevi’s life,

2 subjecting her to prolonged mental and physical abuse. Andrade used that abusive control – and

3 the vulnerable mental state it induced in Ms. Trevi – to commit multiple acts of sexual abuse and

4 assault against her, before and after her eighteenth birthday, and inside and outside of the State of

5 California, including, without limitation, the instance alleged above in which Andrade first beat

6 Ms. Trevi until she lost consciousness and then sexually assaulted her. As part of this pattern of

7 abuse and control, Andrade frequently used physical violence against Ms. Trevi.

8 84. In doing the acts complained of above, Andrade made physical contact with Ms.

9 Trevi with the intent to cause physical and mental harm.

10 85. Ms. Trevi did not consent to such physical contact and was not in a position to give

11 valid consent. Indeed, due to the pervasive abuse and control exerted by Andrade, Ms. Trevi was

12 entirely subject to the whims of Andrade and unable to give valid consent.

13 86. Ms. Trevi was harmed by the physical contact described above, and other similar

14 conduct by Andrade.

15 87. A reasonable person in Ms. Trevi’s position would have found the physical contact

16 inflicted by Andrade offensive.

17 88. Andrade went to great lengths to cover up his abuse and sexual assaults of Ms.

18 Trevi, as well as his prior abuse and sexual assaults of other young women. Andrade used various

19 methods to accomplish this, including without limitation the use of fear, threats, and intimidation

20 against multiple young women and girls (including Ms. Trevi); the payment of hush money; and

21 the arrangement of numerous forced abortions for the women and girls under his control. Andrade

22 was materially assisted in these assaults and coverups by, inter alia, Conexiones Americanas. Ms.

23 Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Conexiones Americanas provided

24 assistance and funding for coverup activities, and further engaged in coercive activities and

25 enforced silence by and through its agents, including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C. and

26 her sister who, among other conduct, monitored and spied on Ms. Trevi to ensure her ongoing

27 servitude and submission to Andrade’s will.

28 / / /
20
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 89. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times relevant,

2 Conexiones Americanas was Andrade’s alter ego, and that Conexiones Americanas and its agents,

3 including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C., conspired, cooperated, and materially assisted

4 him in perpetuating the systemic control and sexual and other abuse of Ms. Trevi.

5 90. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Does 1-100 include

6 other entities and persons in positions of power with whom Andrade had business or personal

7 relationships, who were aware of his systematic abuse of young women and protected him and

8 prevented it from becoming publicly known.

9 91. Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. knew that Andrade was

10 routinely engaged in the abuse and control of Ms. Trevi, and that his abusive conduct toward her

11 included sexual assault.

12 92. Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. gave substantial assistance or

13 encouragement to Andrade, including by assisting him in controlling Ms. Trevi, keeping her in a

14 state of financial and other servitude, and covering up Andrade’s abuse.

15 93. The conduct of Conexiones Americanas and Cross-Defendant K.C. was a substantial

16 factor in causing Ms. Trevi harm.

17 94. As a result of the acts complained of herein, Ms. Trevi suffered and is entitled to an

18 award of damages in an amount subject to proof but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this

19 Court, including but not limited to physical pain and emotional distress.

20 95. The acts complained of herein were done with malice, oppression and fraud, such

21 that Ms. Trevi is entitled to an award of exemplary damages.

22 96. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint timely pursuant to California Code of Civil

23 Procedure § 340.16(e), which revives claims for damages for adult sexual assault and related torts.

24 SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

25 (Intentional And/Or Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Against Andrade,


26 Conexiones Americanas, Cross-Defendant K.C., and Does 1-100)
27 97. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as
28 though set forth in full.
21
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 98. For many years, Andrade exercised pervasive control over Ms. Trevi’s life,

2 subjecting her to prolonged mental and physical abuse. Andrade used that abusive control – and

3 the vulnerable mental state it induced in Ms. Trevi – to commit multiple acts of sexual abuse and

4 assault against her, before and after her eighteenth birthday, and inside and outside of the State of

5 California, including without limitation the instance alleged above in which Andrade first beat Ms.

6 Trevi until she lost consciousness and then sexually assaulted her.

7 99. Andrade’s conduct described herein was extreme and outrageous.

8 100. Andrade and the other Cross-Defendants named herein committed the acts described

9 above with the intent to cause emotional distress, or acted with reckless disregard or negligence as

10 to the probability that it would cause emotional distress. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and

11 thereon alleges that emotional distress was in fact a primary purpose of Andrade’s conduct – by

12 abusing and causing great mental anguish to the young women and girls under his control,

13 including Ms. Trevi, he was able to keep them under his control and continue to abuse them.

14 101. Andrade went to great lengths to cover up his abuse and sexual assaults of Ms.

15 Trevi, as well as his prior abuse and sexual assaults of other young women, including without

16 limitation through the use of fear, threats, and intimidation against multiple young women and girls

17 (including without limitation Ms. Trevi), the payment of hush money, and the arrangement of

18 numerous forced abortions for the women and girls under his control. Andrade was materially

19 assisted in these assaults and in the coverups by, inter alia, Conexiones Americanas and other

20 entities or persons. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Conexiones

21 Americanas provided funding for coverup activities, and further engaged in coercive activities by

22 and through its agents, including without limitation Cross-Defendant K.C.

23 102. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times relevant

24 Conexiones Americanas was Andrade’s alter ego, and that it and its agents, including without

25 limitation Cross-Defendant K.C., conspired, cooperated, and materially assisted him in

26 perpetuating the systemic control and abuse of Ms. Trevi that included, without limitation,

27 Andrade’s sexual assaults of her.

28 / / /
22
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 103. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Does 1-100 include

2 other entities and persons in positions of power with whom Andrade had business or personal

3 relationships, who were aware of his systematic abuse of young women and protected him and

4 prevented it from becoming publicly known.

5 104. The conduct alleged herein was extreme and outrageous.

6 105. As a result of the conduct alleged herein, Ms. Trevi suffered emotional distress.

7 106. The conduct by Andrade alleged herein, with the assistance of Conexiones

8 Americanas, Cross-Defendant K.C., and her sister and Does 1-100, was a substantial factor in

9 causing Ms. Trevi emotional distress.

10 107. As a result of the acts complained of herein, Ms. Trevi suffered and is entitled to an

11 award of damages in an amount subject to proof but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this

12 Court, including but not limited to physical pain and emotional distress.

13 108. The acts complained of herein were done with malice, oppression and fraud, such

14 that Ms. Trevi is entitled to an award of exemplary damages.

15 109. Ms. Trevi brings this Cross-Complaint timely pursuant to California Code of Civil

16 Procedure § 340.16(e), which revives claims for damages for adult sexual assault and related torts.

17 EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION

18 (Indemnity And Contribution Against Andrade and Does 1-100)


19 110. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as
20 though set forth in full.

21 111. On or about December 30, 2022, Plaintiffs commenced the above-captioned action
22 seeking damages against Andrade, Ms. Trevi, and Mary Boquitas for abuse they allege they

23 suffered either primarily or solely at Andrade’s hands. Both Plaintiffs allege that Ms. Trevi was in

24 some manner responsible for introducing them to Andrade and/or for some aspects of abuse they

25 suffered at Andrade’s hands. Ms. Trevi denies that she introduced either of them to Andrade and

26 further denies that she is responsible in any manner for any acts by Andrade that caused either

27 Cross-Defendant K.C. or Cross-Defendant A.H. any damages. Ms. Trevi is a survivor of abuse, not

28 a perpetrator, and denies that she owes any liability to either of them.
23
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 112. To the extent that Ms. Trevi is found at trial to have any legal responsibility for any

2 damages to either Cross-Defendant K.C. or Cross-Defendant A.H., such liability is required to be

3 reduced or eliminated by the liability of Andrade, who was responsible for any harm suffered by

4 either of them for any abuse he inflicted. Any damages for such harm should equitably be paid by

5 Andrade alone.

6 113. Accordingly, in the event of any finding of responsibility against her in this action,

7 Ms. Trevi will be entitled to a judgment of indemnity in her favor and against Andrade and Does 1

8 through 100 for all or part of such amount.

9 NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION

10 (Indemnity And Contribution Against Cross-Defendant A.H.,


11 Cross-Defendant K.C., and Does 1-100)
12 114. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as
13 though set forth in full.

14 115. On or about December 30, 2022, Plaintiffs commenced the above-captioned action
15 seeking damages against Andrade, Ms. Trevi, and Mary Boquitas for abuse they allege they

16 suffered either primarily or solely at Andrade’s hands. Both Plaintiffs allege that Ms. Trevi was in

17 some manner responsible for introducing them to Andrade and/or for some aspects of abuse they

18 suffered at Andrade’s hands. Ms. Trevi vigorously denies that she introduced either of them to

19 Andrade and further denies that she is responsible in any manner for any acts by Andrade that

20 caused either Cross-Defendant K.C. or Cross-Defendant A.H. any damages. Ms. Trevi further

21 denies that she owes any liability to either of them.

22 116. To the extent that Ms. Trevi is found at trial to have any legal responsibility for any
23 damages to Cross-Defendant K.C., such liability is required to be reduced or eliminated by the

24 liability of Cross-Defendant A.H. To the extent that anyone other than Andrade is deemed

25 responsible for abuse he caused and inflicted, Cross-Defendant A.H. must be deemed to share a

26 portion of the blame. Cross-Defendant A.H. introduced Cross-Defendant K.C. to Andrade and

27 arranged for Cross-Defendant K.C. to join the group that was subjugated by Andrade, encouraging

28 and abetting Andrade in adding Cross-Defendant K.C. to those suffering his abuse. Ms. Trevi is
24
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 also informed and believes and thereon alleges that Cross-Defendant A.H. coordinated,

2 participated, and/or otherwise assisted her husband Andrade in any acts of abuse committed against

3 Cross-Defendant K.C., including, on information and belief, via participating in sexual conduct

4 with Cross-Defendant K.C. herself. If Ms. Trevi is held liable in any amount for Cross-Defendant

5 K.C.’s alleged damages, such liability should be reduced or eliminated by Cross-Defendant A.H.’s

6 liability which should equitably be borne by Cross-Defendant A.H.

7 117. To the extent that Ms. Trevi is found at trial to have any legal responsibility for any

8 damages to Cross-Defendant A.H., such liability is required to be reduced or eliminated by the

9 liability of Cross-Defendant K.C. To the extent that anyone other than Andrade is deemed

10 responsible for abuse he caused and inflicted, Cross-Defendant K.C. must be deemed to share a

11 portion of the blame. Cross-Defendant K.C. introduced several underaged women to Andrade and

12 arranged for them to join the group that was subjugated by Andrade. Ms. Trevi is also informed and

13 believes and thereon alleges that Cross-Defendant K.C. coordinated, participated, and/or otherwise

14 assisted Andrade in any acts of abuse committed against Cross-Defendant A.H. Ms. Trevi is

15 informed and believes and thereon alleges that Cross-Defendant K.C. participated directly in sexual

16 conduct by Andrade involving Cross-Defendant A.H. If Ms. Trevi is held liable in any amount for

17 Cross-Defendant A.H.’s alleged damages, such liability should be reduced or eliminated by Cross-

18 Defendant K.C.’s liability which should equitably be borne by Cross-Defendant K.C.

19 118. Accordingly, in the event of any finding of responsibility against her in this action,

20 Ms. Trevi will be entitled to a judgment of indemnity in her favor and against Cross-Defendants

21 A.H., K.C., and Does 1 through 100 for all or part of such amount.

22 TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

23 (Indemnity Against Roe J.P. 1 and Does 1-100)


24 119. Ms. Trevi repeats and incorporates by this reference the foregoing paragraphs as
25 though set forth in full.

26 120. On or about December 30, 2022, Plaintiffs commenced the above-captioned action
27 seeking damages against Andrade, Ms. Trevi, and Mary Boquitas for abuse they allege they

28 suffered either primarily or solely at Andrade’s hands. Both Plaintiffs allege that Ms. Trevi was in
25
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 some manner responsible for introducing them to Andrade and/or for some aspects of abuse they

2 suffered at Andrade’s hands. Ms. Trevi vigorously denies that she introduced either of them to

3 Andrade and further denies that she is responsible in any manner for any acts by Andrade that

4 caused either Cross-Defendant K.C. or Cross-Defendant A.H. any damages. Ms. Trevi further

5 denies that she owes any liability to either of them.

6 121. To the extent that Ms. Trevi is found at trial to have any legal responsibility for any

7 damages to Cross-Defendant A.H., such liability is required to be reduced or eliminated by the

8 liability of Roe J.P. 1. To the extent that anyone other than Andrade is deemed responsible for

9 abuse he caused and inflicted on Cross-Defendant A.H., Roe J.P. 1 must be deemed to share a

10 portion of the blame. She was Cross-Defendant A.H.’s mother, and consented to, ratified, and

11 authorized Andrade’s sexual conduct with her minor daughter. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes

12 and thereon alleges that Roe J.P. 1 was on notice of Andrade’s conduct, but nonetheless approved

13 Cross-Defendant A.H.’s participation, including participation in California, allowing Cross-

14 Defendant A.H. to travel to California under Andrade’s supervision. Roe J.P. 1 also traveled to

15 California while Cross-Defendant A.H. was present there. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and

16 thereon alleges that Roe J.P. 1 was on notice and believed that Andrade was engaged in sexual

17 conduct with her minor daughter in California, but nonetheless left her daughter there with Andrade

18 without taking reasonable steps as a parent to protect her. Indeed, Roe J.P. 1 ratified Andrade’s

19 past sexual conduct with her daughter, and approved such further conduct, by consenting to a

20 marriage between Cross-Defendant A.H. and Andrade while Cross-Defendants A.H. was a minor.

21 122. Ms. Trevi is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Roe J.P. 1 acted

22 negligently and/or intentionally, in allowing Cross-Defendant A.H. to marry and engage in sexual

23 conduct with Andrade. As a parent, Roe J.P. 1 had a clear duty of care to Cross-Defendant A.H.,

24 and is responsible, in part, for any harm alleged to have occurred to Cross-Defendant A.H. If Ms.

25 Trevi is held liable in any amount for Cross-Defendant A.H.’s alleged damages, such liability

26 should not be borne by Ms. Trevi alone, and should be reduced or eliminated by Roe J.P. 1’s

27 liability.

28 / / /
26
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 123. Accordingly, in the event of any finding of responsibility against her in this action,

2 Ms. Trevi will be entitled to a judgment of indemnity in her favor and against Roe J.P. 1 for all or

3 part of such amount.

4 PRAYER FOR RELIEF

5 WHEREFORE, Ms. Trevi prays for judgment in her favor as follows:

6 ON THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION:

7 1. For compensatory damages according to proof, in an amount in excess of the

8 jurisdictional minimum of this Court;

9 2. For punitive damages;

10 ON THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION:

11 3. For compensatory damages according to proof, in an amount in excess of the


12 jurisdictional minimum of this Court;

13 4. For punitive damages;


14 ON THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION:

15 5. For compensatory damages according to proof, in an amount in excess of the


16 jurisdictional minimum of this Court;

17 6. For punitive damages;


18 ON THE FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION:

19 7. For compensatory damages according to proof, in an amount in excess of the


20 jurisdictional minimum of this Court;

21 8. For punitive damages;


22 ON THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION:

23 9. For compensatory damages according to proof, in an amount in excess of the


24 jurisdictional minimum of this Court;

25 10. For punitive damages;


26 ON THE SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION:

27 11. For compensatory damages according to proof, in an amount in excess of the


28 jurisdictional minimum of this Court;
27
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
1 12. For punitive damages;

2 ON THE SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION:

3 13. For compensatory damages according to proof, in an amount in excess of the

4 jurisdictional minimum of this Court;

5 14. For punitive damages;

6 ON THE EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION:

7 15. For a judgment of indemnity and contribution in the event that Ms. Trevi is found

8 liable for any amount in this action, up to and including the full amount of any such liability;

9 ON THE NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION:

10 16. For a judgment of indemnity and contribution in the event that Ms. Trevi is found
11 liable for any amount in this action, up to and including the full amount of any such liability;

12 ON THE TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION:

13 17. For a judgment of indemnity and contribution in the event that Ms. Trevi is found
14 liable for any amount in this action, up to and including the full amount of any such liability;

15 ON ALL CAUSES OF ACTION:

16 18. For attorneys’ fees, to the extent permitted by law;


17 19. For costs; and
18 20. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
19

20 DATED: December 27, 2023 BROWN RUDNICK LLP


21

22 By:
CAMILLE M. VASQUEZ
23
In Association With
24 RAYMOND L. THOMAS
RAY THOMAS, PC
25
Attorneys for Defendant
26 GLORIA DE LOS ANGELES TREVINO RUIZ
aka GLORIA TREVI
27

28
28
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
PROOF OF SERVICE
1

2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

3 COUNTY OF ORANGE

4 At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am
employed in the County of Orange, State of California. My business address is 2211 Michelson
5 Drive, Seventh Floor, Irvine, CA 92612.

6 On December 27, 2023, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as
DEFENDANT GLORIA TREVI’S CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR (1) SEXUAL ASSAULT;
7 (2) AIDING AND ABETTING SEXUAL ASSAULT; (3) SEXUAL BATTERY; (4) AIDING
AND ABETTING SEXUAL BATTERY; (5) BATTERY; (6) AIDING AND ABETTING
8 BATTERY; (7) INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; (8)
NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; AND (9) INDEMNITY on the
9 interested parties in this action as follows:

10 SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST


11 BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the document(s) to be sent
from One Legal’s e-service system to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List.
12
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
13 foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this
Court at whose direction the service was made.
14
Executed on December 27, 2023, at Irvine, California.
15

16

17 CASEY SUDA
18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
SERVICE LIST
1 JANE DOE K.C. 1, ET AL. VS GLORIA DE LOS ANGELES, ET AL
TREVINO RUIZ, ETC., ET AL.
2 CASE NO. 22GDCV01128
3
Karen Barth Menzies Attorney for Plaintiffs
4 KBM Law Corp. JANE DOE K.C. 1 and JANE DOE A.H. 2
6701 Center Drive West, Suite 1400
5 Los Angeles, CA, 90045
Telephone: (310) 363-0030
6 Facsimile: (310) 861-0168
kbm@kbmlaw.com
7 mae@kbmlaw.com
8 Ari Wilkenfeld Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Laura Nagel JANE DOE K.C. 1 and JANE DOE A.H. 2
9 Caroline Whitlock
Alan Lescht and Associates, P.C.
10 1825 K Street, NW, Suite 750
Washington, DC 20006
11 Telephone: (202) 315-1736
Facsimile: (202) 463-6067
12 ari.wilkenfeld@leschtlaw.com
laura.nagel@leschtlaw.com
13 caroline.whitlock@leschtlaw.com
14 Raymond L. Thomas Attorney for Defendant
Ray Thomas, PC GLORIA DE LOS ANGELES TREVINO
15 4900-B N. 10th Street RUIZ aka GLORIA TREVI
McAllen, TX 78504
16 Telephone: (956) 632-5033
rthomas@raythomaspc.com
17 lespinosa@raythomaspc.com
18 Maria Raquenel Portillo Jimenez Defendant
5008 Chesebro Road, Suite 100
19 Agoura Hills, CA 91301
Telephone: (818) 533-6571
20 Facsimile: (818) 450-0600
raquenelm@gmail.com
21 edna@ednafelix.law
22

23

24

25

26

27

28

You might also like