Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Lewis Richardson (1881-1953) was a meteorologist in Britain. A man of wide interests and abilities, he made contributions to science in the areas of meteorology, uid dynamics, fractals and chaos theory. During World War I, he served for France in their medical corps and saw rst hand the horrors of warfare. After the war,being concerned that the arms buildups going on in Europe would lead to another global conict, he began to think analytically about modeling the process. The data he gathered and the mathematical model he developed are the subject of this presentation.
A Simple Example
We start by considering a system of only three nations, denoted A, B, and C. A is quite aggressive and war-prone. B is neutral and rather passive. C is a reluctant foe of nation A. Suppose we assign variables x, y, and z to them respectively, which indicate the amount of arms that each nation has. A convenient unit of measurement is the money value of the arms that each nation possesses.
The amount of arms they already had at time t = k. The amount of arms they might build in response to the other nations arms levels. The amount of arms they might have gotten rid of due to their internal tendencies. (As we have seen in the US, maintaining armed forces can be expensive and sometimes is the subject of cutbacks in peacetimes due to other priorities or budget decits.) If they are particularly warlike or hold grievances against other nations, the amount of arms they would build anyway, even if no other nations presented a threat.
MA 2071 A 05 Bill Farr Richardsons Arms Race Model
A Linear Model
These four principles allow us to generate the following system of three equations for our three hypothetical nations, xk+1 = f1 xk + a12 yk + a13 zk + g1 yk+1 = f2 yk + a21 xk + a23 zk + g2 zk+1 = f3 zk + a31 xk + a32 yk + g3 where the fi are the fatigue coecients described in item 3 above, the gi are the grievances described in item 4 above, and the aij represent the response of nation i to the arms level of nation j.
Matrix Form
In matrix form, we could write this model as xk+1 = Axk + g where the entries in the matrix A f1 A = a21 a31 for our example would be a12 a13 f2 a23 a32 f3
Steady States
One important question in such a model is whether there can ever be a steady state, that is, values for the arms levels that dont change. This can only happen if xk+1 = xk . To determine if this can happen, we denote the steady state vector by xs and see if we can solve for it in the equation xs = Axs + g which we can writen in a more familiar form as (In A)xs = g This is a nonhomogeneous system, so there are three possibilities. 1 There might be no solution. 2 There might be a unique solution, if (I A) is invertible. n 3 The solution might exist, but have some negative components, which would not make any physical sense.
MA 2071 A 05 Bill Farr Richardsons Arms Race Model
Simulation
Another approach to investigating such a model is by computing values of xk for k = 1, 2, 3, . . .. Doing so produces the following sequence of equations. x1 = Ax0 + g x2 = Ax1 + g = A2 x0 + Ag + g x3 = Ax2 + g = A3 x0 + A2 g + Ag + g or, in general, xk = Ak x0 + Ak1 g + . . . + Ag + g
One can imagine results like the following coming out of such simulation.
1
The magnitude of xk might tend to innity, indicating an unstable arms race. The vector xk might go to the steady state, indicating a stable situation. The vector xk might go to zero, indicating complete disarmament.
where the nations, in order, are Czechoslovakia, China, France, Germany, England, Italy, Japan, Poland, the USA, and the USSR.
MA 2071 A 05 Bill Farr Richardsons Arms Race Model