Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 1
(INTRODUCTION)
1. INTRODUCTION
DEPT OF EEE, VIST Page 1
CHAPTER 2
(SMART GRID CHARACTERISTICS)
CHAPTER 3
(THE STATE OF THE ART)
Most distribution system analysis tools can perform full 3-phase analysis; some, such as EPRIs OpenDSS, can go well beyond three phases. Most utility distribution system analysis is performed using tools originally designed to assess power delivery at one point in time. A few tools have the capability to perform simulations over periods of time such as a day, week, month or year.
Tools and techniques are designed for uniprocessors,which is generally satisfactory for present needs.Many tools, particularly those designed for the North American market, exploit the typical radial nature of medium- and low-voltage distribution systems for certain simulation efficiencies even if they also offer meshed network analysis.
DEPT OF EEE, VIST Page 8
Meshed network solutions are handled as easily as radial circuit solutions. Modeling of controllers is separate from circuit elements, better enabling modeling of various Smart Grid controller functionality such as volt-var control of solar PV generation. Advanced, flexible load and generation modeling. Detailed, high-phase order circuit modeling capability to enable analysis of such things as
Page 9
CHAPTER 4
(ROLE OF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS)
CHAPTER 5
(MODELING CAPABILITIES NEEDED FOR SMART GRID)
Distribution System Analysis and the Future Smart Grid 5.1. Modeling for Distributed Generation
The addition of DG to the electrical distribution system has been one of key drivers in the evolution of distribution system analysis tools over the last 15 years. Three-phase circuit modeling and other advanced features have been added to accommodate the needs of DG modeling. Introducing DG into existing systems requires that it be carefully integrated with the power system operating practices. The key concerns include: 1) Voltage rise and regulation, 2) Voltage fluctuations, 3) Protective relaying and control functions, 4) Impact on short-circuit analysis, 5) Impact on fault location and clearing practices, 6) Need for an interconnection transformer, 7) Transformer configuration, 8) Harmonics, 9) Response to system imbalances such as open-conductor faults due to failing splices. The authors are actively involved in research projects in high penetration DG. Of particular interest as of this writing is solar PV generation. One possible result of higher penetrations of DG on the Smart Grid is that distribution system designs will evolve to better accommodate DG. For example, voltage regulators may be set a few percent lower to allow for voltage rise (as well as drop) due to DG output. If not, situations like that shown in Fig. 1 will occur for solar ramping events.
Solar
PV
is subject to transients. cloud the sun, the ramps down a drop in the the cloud passes, the PV
After timing out, the regulators tap up to correct for the drop in voltage. When output ramps back up with the regulator tap too high for the power level. The voltage is pushed over 105% when the solar output recovers from a cloud transient until the regulators again compensate by tapping down. This analysis requires a series of solutions at a time step of 1 second and an accurate regulator model. A typical finding in our ongoing research in highpenetration PV is that utility regulator targets will have to be set 1-to-2 percent lower to provide sufficient headroom to accommodate this kind of power swing.DG analysis will likely require further enhancements to Regulator taps up to compensate for voltage drop Voltage overshoots as power output ramps up distribution system analysis tools, such as better meshed network analysis for modeling spot networks, dynamics analysis, etc. This is already apparent by observing the new features showing up in the major distribution system analysis packages. 5.2. Time Series Simulations
DEPT OF EEE, VIST Page 1 15
The duration of these simulations will be from a few minutes to days and years. In any case, key requirements for distribution system analysis software will be: 1) perform fast solutions and 2) be able to capture and process voluminous results.
5.3. Modeling for Unbalances The differences between a symmetrical component model and an unbalanced hase-domain model can yield quite different results. A symmetrical component model uses only the positive- and zero-sequence impedances to represent overhead and cable line segments as balanced impedances.However, asymmetries in the mutual coupling between adjacent phases, adjacent feeders, and conductors yield impedances that are not balanced between phases. DSA has come a long way over the years because most distribution system analysis tools can perform full 3-phase analysis; however, few programs exist that can go beyond 3-phases.More and more of the circuits the authors have analyzed include multiple feeders sharing right-of-ways with as many as 17 conductors on the same pole sharing a common neutral (as well as several communications messengers). Heavily-Loaded Feeder A and Feeder B Sharing Same Pole Construction with Full-Phase Model Results As an example, consider two heavily-loaded, long feederssharing the same pole construction and static wire like that shown in Fig.. This should be modeled with at least 6 coupled conductors to properly model the coupling between the two adjacent feeders. The currents computed for each phase using a detailed 6x6 impedance matrix is shown on the figure. Fig. 3 shows the results computed for a positivesequence model of each feeder. All line currents in the symmetrical component model come out balanced.
Fig. 2. Symmetrical Component model of Feeder A and Feeder B Fig. 4 shows the differences between these two models for the phase voltages computed at Bus A (at the end of Feeder A). In the detailed model, the voltages vary from 0.972 pu on phase A to 1.026 pu on phase B, which may prove to be too much unbalance for some threephase loads. In the positivesequence model, the computed phase voltage is approximately 1.0 pu on all three phases, which would indicate no problems for three-phase loads. The impacts of unequal phase impedances become a greater issue as line currents are increased on the feeders sharing commonconstruction over a significant distance.
Fig. 3. Bus Voltage at End of Radial Feeder A This is just one illustration of a coupled set of conductors requiring more than 3-phase solutions to get the correct
DEPT OF EEE, VIST Page 18
? ? ? ? ?
Low X/R ratios Phase unbalances Prevalence of current magnitude, voltage magnitude, and demand Communication latency and bandwidth Non-simultaneous samples
interval measurements
Still not enough measurements to make the feeder observable DSE will be
a key component of Distribution Management Systems (DMS). It is also likely to ecome a key component of distribution planning. In fact, DSE, DMS and distribution planning functions are expected to merge.
Distribution System Analysis and the Future Smart Grid 5.8. Modeling Controllers
Controllers are a key component of Smart Grid visions.Whether smart or dumb, they can have significant impact on the solution. Controllers in common usage today include capacitor switch, load tap changer (LTC), voltage regulator, tie switches, reclosers, sectionalizers, and breaker controls. Various visions of the Smart Grid would add such things such as generator dispatch, energy storage control, microgrid control, electric vehicle control, and demand response control. Modeling of controllers is weak and inconsistent in todays distribution system analysis tools. For example, it is common to assume that the substation LTC can correct the voltage to the desired level without actually simulating it to see if it is possible. Also, the state of controllers is not easy to determine with a static power flow solution. It is frequently necessary to simulate the daily load shape to get all the voltage regulation devices (principally capacitor and regulators) to arrive at the proper values. The desire to have this type of simulator is likely to increase with the introduction of more controlled devices in a Smart Grid implementation.
CHAPTER 6
(CONCLUSION)
6. CONCLUSIONS
The ability to accurately model distribution systems with Smart Grid components and associated behaviors will require distribution system analysis tools to evolve significantly to meet the challenges. Key challenges include: Merging planning and real-time analysis Very large system models System communication simulation Handling a large volume of AMI data AMI-based decision making Time series simulations Distribution State-Estimation Detail modeling (service transformers, service wiring) Distribution models including the effects of multiple feeders, transmission, subtransmission systems DG integration and protection Generator and inverter models Regulatory time pressures Newer, faster computing methods will continue to be a key emphasis of tool development in distribution system analysis to support the Smart Grid. The ready availability of multiprocessor computers will likely play a key role. Software to exploit these machines for distribution system analysis needs to be developed. This may require looking at distribution system analysis methods in completely different ways than the way it is done today. While this paper deals mostly with simulation capabilities, user interface will have to evolve with the capabilities.EPRI is cooperating with and helping lead IEEE PES efforts in assessing distribution software tools and developing test benchmarks. The creation of new test feeders will include the expanding capabilities of distribution system analysis software tools, particularly those capabilities necessary to support Smart Grid components and behaviors.
DEPT OF EEE, VIST Page 27
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] R. C. Dugan, R. F. Arritt, T. E. McDermott, S. M. Brahma, Sr., and K. Schneider. Distribution System Analysis to Support the Smart Grid IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting Conference Proceedings, 2010. [2] R. C. Dugan and W. H. Kersting, Induction machine test case for the 34-bus test feeder description, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE PES General Meeting, July 2006 [3] W. H. Kersing, Distribution System Modeling and Analysis, CRC Press, 2007. [4] OpenDSS Program, Available on the Internet through SourceForge.net, http://sourceforge.net/projects/electricdss. [5] T. E. McDermott, Working Group on Recommended Practice for Distribution System Analysis P1729, Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE PES General Meeting, Pittsburgh, July 2008. . [6] W. H. Kersting and R. C. Dugan, Recommended Practices for Distribution System Analysis, Proceedings of 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, October 2006, pp 499504. [7] IEEE PES Distribution Systems Analysis Subcommittee Radial Test Feeders, http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pes/dsacom/testfeeders.html. [8] W. H. Kersting, A Comprehensive Distribution Test Feeder,Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, April 2010. [9] R. F. Arritt and R. C. Dugan, The IEEE 8500-Node Test Feeder,Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, April 2010. [10] S. M. Brahma, Protecting Distribution Systems with Distributed Generation Are We There Yet? Power Industry International - Volume 2 - Issue I, June 2008.