You are on page 1of 24

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT (ICA), 1872

What is a contract?
Section 2(h) An agreement enforceable by law is a contract. Thus, Contract = Agreement + Enforceability at Law

Agreement?
Section 2(e)
Promise/(s) Promise/(s)

= Agreement
(in exchange for)

Promise?
Section 2(b) Promise = Proposal/Offer + Acceptance

Proposal?
Section 2(a) Expression of willingness With a view to seek the assent of the other Thus, mere expression of willingness doesnt constitute offer/proposal.

Acceptance
Section 2(b) Giving of assent to the proposal. Enforceability by Law Agreements which are not enforceable Illegal/unlawful agreements, e.g., to smuggle/to kill Social Agreements (Balfour vs. Balfour)

Agreements Declared Void under ICA


e.g. Agreement with or by a minor Agreement in restraint of trade Marriage brokerage contract Wagering/Betting Agreements

Kinds of Contracts
From the point of view of Enforceability

Void Voidable Valid

Void Agreement vs. Void Contract


Void Agreement

i.e., void-ab-initio i.e. unenforceable from the very beginning Becomes void (Void Contract) Voidable i.e., void + able i.e., capable of being declared void (unenforceable) at the option of one of the parties to the contract but not at the option of the other.

Valid Contract
Section 10 To be a valid contract, it must satisfy the following: 1. Offer and Acceptance 2. Consensus-ad-idem (Meeting of minds) i.e., persons must agree to the same thing in the same sense and at the same time. 3. Intention to create legal relationship as against social relationship or illegal/unlawful relationship.

4. Free and Genuine Consent, i.e., free from

coercion undue influence fraud misrepresentation mistake 5. Parties competent to contract 6. Lawful consideration and object, i.e., something in return and that must be lawful.

Valid Contract
(Object and Consideration usually overlap. However, there may be difference at times e.g., object may be to kill competition and for that purpose in view, a senior manager of the competitor may be paid a certain amount to give unrealistically high quotation.) Here: Object is to kill competition. Consideration is : (i) payment of money (ii) giving high quotations

Valid Contract
7. Agreement not declared void.

8. Certainty of Meaning: e.g. sale and

purchase of 100 tonnes of oil. But which oil? Thus, agreement being uncertain not valid. But, if the seller deals only in one kind of oil and one variety, then it shall be valid since it is capable of being made certain.

Valid Contract
9. Possibility of performance:

Impossibility whether known to the parties or not, renders a contract invalid. 10. Necessary legal formalities: e.g. sale-deed of immovable property.

Void vs. Illegal Agreements


Void Agreement Illegal Agreement 1. Unenforceable 1. Unenforceable 2. Not Punishable 2. Punishable (fine or imprisonment or 3. Collateral both) transactions unaffected. 3. Collateral transactions are also void.

Specific and General Offer


Specific Offer:
made

to a specified person or a group of persons. can be accepted only by the person to whom made.

Thus, if offer is addressed to A, B cannot accept it. Case Law: Boulton vs. Jones

Specific and General Offer


General Offer:
which

is not a specific offer. made to the world at large. can be accepted by anyone by complying with the terms of the offer.
Case Law: Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke

Ball Co.

Offer vs. Invitation to offer


Illustrations of Invitation to Offer:
Prospectus

issued by a college. Prospectus issued by a company. Invitation of bids in an auction. Price-catalogues, price lists, quotations Display of goods with a price-tag in a shop window.

Special Terms in a Contract


Examples: Dry cleaners receipt, couriers receipt, shipment receipt, insurance policy, etc. Binding if communicated or attention drawn to the fact that there are certain special terms and conditions. Not binding if attention is not drawn and the other party not aware of.

Cross Offers & Counter Offers


Cross Offers

Identical offers cross each other and none of the parties is aware of the same. Doesnt result in a contract unless one of them is accepted. Counter Offer Instead of accepting an offer, the offeree makes a counter offer, i.e., accepts the same subject to certain conditions or qualification.

Contracts through Post


Communication of Offer

is complete when the offeree has the knowledge of the same. Communication of Acceptance It has two aspects, viz., As against the proposer As against the acceptor

As against the proposer


Communication is complete as soon as a

duly addressed letter of acceptance is put into the course of transmission. Whether the same reaches the proposer or not.

As against the acceptor


Communication is complete only when the

proposer has received the letter and learnt the contents thereof.

Communication of Revocation
Communication of revocation (of offer

or acceptance) is complete:
As

against the person who makes it when it is put into the course of transmission. As against the person to whom it is made, when it comes to his knowledge.

Comparing offer to a train of

gunpowder and acceptance to a lighted match stick How far correct? William Ansons observation though valid in the English context doesnt hold good in India since in India acceptance is revocable.

Claim for Damages


Damages U/S Section 73
Special Damages (No claim for consequential loss unless in the Contemplation of the parties (Hedley v. Baxendale

Damages U/S Section 74

Only damages naturally flowing From breach (Ordinary Damages)

Pre-fixed Damages

Exemplary Damages

Nominal Damages

Penalty

Liquidated Damages (What can be recovered is actual loss or amount prefixed, whichever is less)

You might also like