Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Production Analysis - Real Case 1: Compare Productivity Index (PI) From

    Uploaded by

    KRLISJR
    4 views2 pages
    You are a service company representative who has designed a fracturing treatment for a vertical well with the following parameters: - Wellbore radius of 0.354 ft - Formation conductivity of 262.5 md*ft - Fracture conductivity of 8,000 mD*ft - Fracture half length of 328.1 ft - Net pay of 52.5 ft Compare the productivity index of the vertical well with and without hydraulic fracturing, considering formation permeability is reduced to 0.4 of the original near the fracture face over a thickness of 12 inches. Also consider fines migration that reduces fracture conductivity to 2400 mD*ft over a length of 10m.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Ejercicios Extra

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    You are a service company representative who has designed a fracturing treatment for a vertical well with the following parameters: - Wellbore radius of 0.354 ft - Formation conductivity of 262.5 md*ft - Fracture conductivity of 8,000 mD*ft - Fracture half length of 328.1 ft - Net pay of 52.5 ft Compare the productivity index of the vertical well with and without hydraulic fracturing, considering formation permeability is reduced to 0.4 of the original near the fracture face over a thickness of 12 inches. Also consider fines migration that reduces fracture conductivity to 2400 mD*ft over a length of 10m.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Production Analysis - Real Case 1: Compare Productivity Index (PI) From

    Uploaded by

    KRLISJR
    You are a service company representative who has designed a fracturing treatment for a vertical well with the following parameters: - Wellbore radius of 0.354 ft - Formation conductivity of 262.5 md*ft - Fracture conductivity of 8,000 mD*ft - Fracture half length of 328.1 ft - Net pay of 52.5 ft Compare the productivity index of the vertical well with and without hydraulic fracturing, considering formation permeability is reduced to 0.4 of the original near the fracture face over a thickness of 12 inches. Also consider fines migration that reduces fracture conductivity to 2400 mD*ft over a length of 10m.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Production Analysis Real Case 1

    You are a service company representative who has designed the following fracturing treatment for a vertical well:
    Wellbore radius (rw): 0.354 ft Formation conductivity: 262.5md*ft Design Fracture Conductivity (kf*w): 8,000 mD*ft Fracture half length (xf) = 328.1 ft Net pay: 52.5 ft Compare Productivity Index (PI) from: Vertical well Vertical well with a hydraulic fracture Consider the effect of reduced formation permeability on the face of the fracture:

    Data: Thickness of the zone of reduced permeability: 12 Ratio of the permeability in the damaged zone to the Interval: 3635-3720m permeability in the formation : 0.4 Oil gravity: 23.4 API GOR: 61.4m3/m3 Consider fines migration in the fracture: Specific gas gravity: 0.829 Pr: 7285psi Damage Length (fracture length with the reduced conductivity due to fine migration) : 10m BHT: 101.3 C Damage Conductivity (permeability reduction due to fines Porosity: 18% migration) : 2400 md*ft Casing: 9 5/8 @ 3880m Tubing: 3 @ 3635m re: 300m Pressure Downstream considering a choke diameter 40/64: 370psi Skin= 1.5, Turb coeff= 0

    You are a service company representative who has designed the following fracturing treatment for a horizontal gas well. Advise your client about the optimum number of fractures along the horizontal well
    Fluid Type: Dry gas Temperature at surface conditions: 70 F Top of the formation (TVD): 2000m Bottom of the formation (TVD): 2050m BHT: 60 C Directional Survey: MD[m] TVD [m] 0.0 0.0 500.0 470.0 3000.0 2025.0 4000.0 2025.0 Wellhead pressure: 1000 psi Casing: 9 5/8 @ 3000m Tubing: 3 @ 2500m

    Production Analysis Real Case 2

    Fracture Conductivity (kf*w): 8,000 mD*ft Fracture half length (xf) = 328.1 ft Net pay: 52.5 ft

    Reservoir Pressure: 7000psi Formation permeability: 0.1 md Porosity: 18% Vertical anisotropy (Kh/Kv): 10 Horizontal anisotropy (Kx/Ky): 1 Net pay: 50m Length of drainage area (Lx = lx): 1000m Width of drainage area (Ly=ly): 1000m Borehole diameter: 6in Measured depth to heel : 3000mD Distance from length edge to centre of well (Xw): 500m Distance from width edge to centre of well (Yw): 500m Distance from bottom of reservoir to centre of well (Zw): 25m Length of well (L): 500m

    You might also like