Cults that try to sever themselves from the body of Christ, to some extent, also try to sever themselves from society. Many do not care what goes on in the world around them, because they’ve been falsely taught their “little group” is better than the other Christians and will be given a “special pass” to exit before the rest. Branhamism is prime example, because the “little bride” is supposed to go into the “rapture” before the other Christians who are “kind to the little bride.”
Most of their divisions are from trying to follow the "letter of the law," even though they preach against their followers doing so. This presents a problem, because many portions of the book are no longer in effect or no longer part of our culture. For instance: we would never stone our children for disobeying – yet under the Old Covenant, we are instructed to do so. Pastors no longer wash their hands in brass basins before entering the congregation. Countries with tennis shoes no longer have sand to wash off their feet. Men do not gird up their loins – there are shorts and other apparel pre-girded.
To create a religion that lives by the “letter of the law,” as these cults have, you have to compromise. You literally have to go through the book, chapter by chapter, verse by verse, and decide which verse applies to our culure and society. Which ones are the vilest of sins, that must be obeyed even though it breaks our society?
Cults that try to sever themselves from the body of Christ, to some extent, also try to sever themselves from society. Many do not care what goes on in the world around them, because they’ve been falsely taught their “little group” is better than the other Christians and will be given a “special pass” to exit before the rest. Branhamism is prime example, because the “little bride” is supposed to go into the “rapture” before the other Christians who are “kind to the little bride.”
Most of their divisions are from trying to follow the "letter of the law," even though they preach against their followers doing so. This presents a problem, because many portions of the book are no longer in effect or no longer part of our culture. For instance: we would never stone our children for disobeying – yet under the Old Covenant, we are instructed to do so. Pastors no longer wash their hands in brass basins before entering the congregation. Countries with tennis shoes no longer have sand to wash off their feet. Men do not gird up their loins – there are shorts and other apparel pre-girded.
To create a religion that lives by the “letter of the law,” as these cults have, you have to compromise. You literally have to go through the book, chapter by chapter, verse by verse, and decide which verse applies to our culure and society. Which ones are the vilest of sins, that must be obeyed even though it breaks our society?
Cults that try to sever themselves from the body of Christ, to some extent, also try to sever themselves from society. Many do not care what goes on in the world around them, because they’ve been falsely taught their “little group” is better than the other Christians and will be given a “special pass” to exit before the rest. Branhamism is prime example, because the “little bride” is supposed to go into the “rapture” before the other Christians who are “kind to the little bride.”
Most of their divisions are from trying to follow the "letter of the law," even though they preach against their followers doing so. This presents a problem, because many portions of the book are no longer in effect or no longer part of our culture. For instance: we would never stone our children for disobeying – yet under the Old Covenant, we are instructed to do so. Pastors no longer wash their hands in brass basins before entering the congregation. Countries with tennis shoes no longer have sand to wash off their feet. Men do not gird up their loins – there are shorts and other apparel pre-girded.
To create a religion that lives by the “letter of the law,” as these cults have, you have to compromise. You literally have to go through the book, chapter by chapter, verse by verse, and decide which verse applies to our culure and society. Which ones are the vilest of sins, that must be obeyed even though it breaks our society?
Video
available
here:
http://youtu.be/VhaqKdbLRjY
Think
of
how
chaotic
the
congested
interstate
systems
of
America
would
be
if
there
were
no
speed
limits.
Or
how
the
traffic
in
the
big
cities
would
come
to
a
dead
stand-still
if
all
of
the
traffic
lights
in
the
city
went
out.
Without
these
things,
travelling
would
be
a
complete
mess.
Traffic
laws,
and
all
of
the
tools
associated
with
them,
are
there
for
a
reason.
They
are
there
for
our
good.
To
the
farmer
carrying
loads
of
grain,
there
is
no
intention
of
breaking
the
speed
limit;
his
load
would
be
spilled.
To
the
elderly
couple
with
failing
vision,
they
have
no
desire
to
even
meet
the
speed
limit.
But
the
younger,
wilder,
generation,
not
yet
experienced
in
life
would
literally
kill
themselves
without
these
laws.
At
the
same
time,
these
laws
are
legitimately
broken.
A
mother
going
into
labor
is
rushed
to
the
hospital
to
welcome
the
newborn
sometimes
even
with
police
escort.
If
the
flow
of
traffic
is
ten
miles
above
the
speed
limit,
the
poor
soul
who
sees
the
law
as
a
rigid,
hard-lined
set
of
rules
may
kill
himself
trying
to
drive
the
speed
limit.
In
this
case,
the
officer
might
ticket
the
driver
FOR
obeying
the
speed
laws,
because
he
is
disrupting
the
flow
of
traffic
and
is
a
danger
to
the
group
of
drivers
as
a
whole.
The
problem
with
this
last
example
is
that
he
is
living
by
the
letter
of
the
law.
To
him,
obeying
the
clearly
defined
rules
is
more
important
than
the
reason
the
rules
are
enforced.
In
fact,
he
is
breaking
the
very
motive
behind
the
creation
of
the
rules!
He
is
creating
danger
by
following
the
letter
of
the
law!
Works-righteous,
legalistic
cults,
like
the
cult
of
William
Branham
is
no
different
from
this
example.
Like
the
Jews
at
the
time
of
Christ,
the
focus
becomes
so
intent
on
the
words
in
the
scriptures
that
they
overlook
the
message
that
the
writer
is
trying
to
convey.
And
while
they
know
that
we
are
no
longer
under
the
Mosaic
Law,
they
see
the
entire
book
as
a
Law,
thinking
that
the
letters
of
the
book
are
the
Word
instead
of
the
combination
of
letters
and
instructions
given
by
God
through
the
writers.
This
presents
a
problem,
because
many
portions
of
the
book
are
no
longer
in
effect
or
no
longer
part
of
our
culture.
For
instance:
we
would
never
stone
our
children
for
disobeying
yet
under
the
Old
Covenant,
we
are
instructed
to
do
so.
Pastors
no
longer
wash
their
hands
in
brass
basins
before
entering
the
congregation.
Countries
with
tennis
shoes
no
longer
have
sand
to
wash
off
their
feet.
Men
do
not
gird
up
their
loins
there
are
shorts
and
other
apparel
pre-girded.
Copyright
2013,
www.seekyethetruth.com
1
The
Letter
of
the
Law
To
create
a
religion
that
lives
by
the
letter
of
the
law,
as
these
cults
have,
you
have
to
compromise.
You
literally
have
to
go
through
the
book,
chapter
by
chapter,
verse
by
verse,
and
decide
which
verse
applies
to
our
culure
and
society.
Which
ones
are
the
vilest
of
sins,
that
must
be
obeyed
even
though
it
breaks
our
society?
Sadly,
like
other
false
religion
and
pagan
religions
of
the
past,
the
women
are
typically
the
ones
who
suffer
most
from
works-righteous
faith.
The
Muslim
women
are
veiled
in
public.
The
Catholic
nun
wears
long
black.
The
Branhamite
woman
dresses
like
the
catholic
nun,
without
the
hood
and
with
colors.
Cults
that
try
to
sever
themselves
from
the
body
of
Christ,
to
some
extent,
also
try
to
sever
themselves
from
society.
Many
do
not
care
what
goes
on
in
the
world
around
them,
because
theyve
been
falsely
taught
their
little
group
is
better
than
the
other
Christians
and
will
be
given
a
special
pass
to
exit
before
the
rest.
Branhamism
is
prime
example,
because
the
little
bride
is
supposed
to
go
into
the
rapture
before
the
other
Christians
who
are
kind
to
the
little
bride.
How
many
resurrections
are
in
the
Bible
again?
1
Timothy
2
is
a
good
example
of
the
balance
that
Christians
should
have
in
their
lives.
This
single
chapter
combines
culture,
peaceful
living
in
the
society
we
live
in,
balance,
and
Truth.
First
of
all,
then,
I
urge
that
supplications,
prayers,
intercessions,
and
thanksgivings
be
made
for
all
people,
for
kings
and
all
who
are
in
high
positions,
that
we
may
lead
a
peaceful
and
quiet
life,
godly
and
dignified
in
every
way.
Paul
does
not
instruct
us
to
sever
ourselves
from
the
body
of
Christ,
ignoring
all
that
is
going
on
around
us.
He
does
not
tell
us
to
belittle
and
mock
our
president,
even
if
we
disagree
with
his
actions.
We
are
to
intercede
for
these
people
in
prayer
from
the
devout
Christian
to
the
ungodly
kings.
Our
peace
and
comfort
in
the
world
we
live
in
revolves
around
the
things
that
we
ask
God
for
and
cult
leaders
have
promoted
the
idea
that
we
should
stand
firm
against
these
things
rather
than
interceding
in
prayer.
This
is
good,
and
it
is
pleasing
in
the
sight
of
God
our
Savior,
who
desires
all
people
to
be
saved
and
to
come
to
the
knowledge
of
the
truth.
While
cult
leaders
of
Gnostic
faith
teach
that
God
is
hidden
in
mystery
and
that
mysteries
must
be
revealed
to
bring
rapturing
faith,
Paul
says
that
God
is
pleased
by
our
intercession
for
others.
He
says
that
God
wants
ALL
people
to
be
saved.
He
wants
ALL
people
to
have
the
knowledge
of
the
Truth.
This
is
in
direct
contrast
with
cult
leaders.
Some
sermons
they
preach
are
only
for
the
bride,
such
as
William
Branhams
sermon
on
Marriage
and
Divorce.
If
this
were
Copyright
2013,
www.seekyethetruth.com
2
The
Letter
of
the
Law
such
a
substantial
truth
as
the
cult
claims,
why
would
God
not
want
it
spread
to
the
entire
world?
Why
would
a
man,
claiming
to
be
a
prophet
of
God,
only
speak
the
Word
of
the
Lord
to
a
specific
little
church
in
a
specific
little
city
of
one
single
state
in
only
one
country
of
the
world?
For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave himself as a ransom for all, which is the testimony given at the proper time. 7 For this I was appointed a preacher and an apostle (I am telling the truth, I am not lying), a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth.
Notice,
we
have
two
separate
points
here,
both
of
which
are
God:
There
is
ONE
God.
Paul
says
AND
there
is
one
mediator
between
God
and
men,
which
is
the
Man,
Christ
Jesus.
Many
cult
leaders
try
to
limit
the
Godhead.
Some,
like
William
Branham,
lie
to
you
about
what
other
churches
in
the
Christian
faith
BELIEVE
about
the
Godhead.
While
Branham
claimed
that
Trinitarians
believe
in
three
Gods,
Trinitarians
will
stand
firmly
on
the
foundation
of
One
God.
Their
hymns
are
even
stating
the
words,
these
Three
are
One!
But
the
strongest
point
that
Paul
makes
here
is
that
he,
Paul,
is
telling
the
Truth.
He
firmly
stands
on
truth,
and
does
not
lie.
How
does
this
compare
with
William
Branham,
who
lied
even
about
his
own
birthdate
and
childhood?
Paul
says
that
the
men
should
spread
peace:
I
desire
then
that
in
every
place
the
men
should
pray,
lifting
holy
hands
without
anger
or
quarreling;
Afterwards,
in
the
same
sentence,
Paul
makes
the
statement
that
is
twisted
out
of
context
in
many
cults
and
even
in
many
sects
of
the
Christian
faith:
Modesty.
Women
in
these
cults
are
taught
that
modesty
means
to
dress
from
cultures
and
days
gone
by.
They
are
taught
that
modesty
means
dressing
in
a
way
that
does
not
look
like
the
culture.
Yet,
with
some
of
the
form-fitting
dresses
and
tops
that
these
women
wear,
if
they
were
to
travel
back
in
time
just
a
few
years,
sinful
men
would
grab
cash
from
their
wallets
thinking
they
were
prostitutes!
There
is
a
good
bit
of
culture
in
the
statement
Paul
makes,
and
these
cult
pastors
do
not
read
the
scriptures
to
teach
it
in
its
fullness.
While
staying
with
the
letter
of
the
law
in
one
aspect,
they
are
breaking
the
letter
of
the
law
in
another:
[a]
Copyright
2013,
www.seekyethetruth.com
3
The
Letter
of
the
Law
likewise
also
that
women
should
adorn
themselves
in
respectable
apparel,
with
modesty
and
self-control,
not
with
braided
hair
and
gold
or
pearls
or
costly
attire,
but
with
what
is
proper
for
women
who
profess
godlinesswith
good
works.
The
word
used
here
in
the
King
James
Version
translates
modest
apparel.
This
part
is
ground
down
into
the
dirt,
sermon
after
sermon,
but
with
each
individual
pastors
idea
of
modesty.
One
Branhamite
cult
pastor
in
Arizona
speaks
against
open-toed-shoes.
Do
the
men
in
his
city
have
foot
fetishes?
Others
speak
against
slits
in
the
long
skirts
functional
dresses
that
allow
women
to
move
about
without
tripping
on
their
own
skirts.
Yet
their
wives
wear
skirts
shorter
than
the
top
of
the
slits!
But
notice:
Paul
also
says,
not
with
braided
hair!
Not
with
gold!
Not
with
pearls!
When
we
study
the
culture
Paul
was
speaking
to,
we
find
that
women
in
pagan
worship
were
deeply
involved
with
the
worship.
Large,
braided
hair,
gold,
pearls,
and
expensive
clothing
were
part
of
the
worship
of
the
false
gods
and
Paul
wanted
them
to
know
that
worship
of
the
One
True
God
did
not
require
these
things.
He
did
not
want
others
to
see
their
worship
and
think
they
were
following
a
false
god!
Yet,
we
find
MANY
women
in
these
legalistic
religions
braiding
their
hair.
We
find
many
wearing
gold
or
pearl
necklaces.
Some
of
their
wardrobes
cost
twice
what
other
women
in
other
churches
wear,
and
quite
frankly
are
less
modest
than
even
some
of
the
women
wearing
pants
and
modest
tops!
Why
do
these
cult
pastors
apply
limited
culture
their
own
culture
to
a
God
who
has
no
culture?
Can
the
Eskimo
woman
survive
the
arctic
temperature
wearing
a
dress?
Can
the
Amazon
woman
survive
the
intense
heat
wearing
long,
hot
clothing?
Does
God
even
WANT
them
to?
If
a
Northern
Alaskan
woman
converted
to
Christ,
and
a
cult
pastor
tried
to
enforce
a
thin
skirt
with
no
pants
underneath,
what
would
happen?
Would
the
woman
laugh
at
the
pastor,
whos
wife
braided
her
hair?
Would
she
point
to
the
gold
necklace
and
double
over
with
deep
belly
laughs?
Shouldnt
we
do
the
same?