Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chances and risks of REDD regarding climate change and the role of the European Union
European Seminar on Sustainable Development Sinaia, Romania April 2013 Group RED
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
Forestry sector responsible for 20% of GHG emissions Deforestation as a main contributer 47% of all forests located in humid tropics Logging and land use change as income source for indigenous people Discrepancy between economic and ecologic interests
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
2. Option: Mitigation REDD and REDD+ UN-Programme: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) Enhanced by aspects of sustainable development (REDD+) Compensating opportunity cost from avoiding deforestation and forest degradation
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
Group members
David R. Maas Leuphana Universitt Lneburg Germany Business Administration/ Sustainability Sciences
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
Hypotheses
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
3b. Research: Method Literature based Application of the four module approach (Parker et al. 2009)
Scope Reference level Financing Distribution
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
Market-linked approach
E.g. auctioning of credits
Fund-based approach
Voluntary or compulsory Constraint in usage E.g. UN-REDD Programme Fund, FCPF funds,
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
4. Answers: How REDD is built. No global mechanism yet Most actions take sustainable aspects in consideration (REDD+). Actions mostly implemented on a national level. Also efforts on sub-national level. Actions publicly funded. Mostly fund-based, phased approach being implemented. Negotiations on all factors are going on.
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
4a. Answers: The coherences within SD Ecologic: Supports climate change mitigation Social: Cooperation with indigenous people Economic: Change to a greener economy Reduced deforestation and forest degradation will improve quality of life for current and future generations in developed and developing countries.
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
4b. Answers: The stakeholders United Nations Organization Funding governments European Union Receiving governments The private sector NGOs
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
Time
(Indonesia)
TCG
Key:
USA
AOSIS
COMIFAC UNO
Norway Australia
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
Financing
UNO Brazil
Key:
AOSIS
The EU
* Additional Distribution
Mechanism
Norway CfRN
Canada Japan
Indonesia
Scope RED
REDD+
REDD
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
4f. Answers: Achievements and chances Case study: Brazil Strong government Redistribution of work to a subnational level Supporting citizens Consequent law enforcement
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
4g. Answers: How can the EU foster a global agreement on REDD that contributes to climate change mitigation and SD? Improvement of EUs difficult negotiation position Global agreement needed REDD can be an effective policy to mitigate climate change and promote SD
12-EIP-RO BUCURES 09
5. Testing of hypotheses
1) REDD is an efficient and effective policy to counteract climate change on a global level. 2) The EU can play a decisive role with regard to a successful implementation of REDD by providing financial resources and knowledge, alongside participation in framing, furthering and maintaining the necessary policy. 3) REDD offers economic alternatives to destructive land use practices to developing countries.