Daily Notes

60 possible points

4 The student provided the necessary daily notes about their countrys specific events. Notes present thorough understanding of material. 15 out of 15 daily notes. The presentations given by the student have been clear, well thought out, and organized. The student had a clear understanding of the specific event and was able to articulate it exquisitely. Additionally, the student had the necessary daily notes. This student brought in propaganda, props, or other additional artifacts that really made their presentation pop. This student was able to make their individual country really come to life in

3 The student has provided almost all daily notes about their countrys specific events. Notes present a good understanding of material. 10 out of 15 daily notes. The presentations by the student were clear and organized. The student had a sufficient understanding of the specific event and was able to articulate it to the class. This student also had the necessary daily notes.

2 The student has only provided half of the daily notes. Notes present a minimal understanding of the material. 7 out of 15 daily notes.

1 The student has not provided any of the daily notes. If any notes, the student has not presented an understanding of the material. 3 out of the 15 daily notes. The presentations by the student were not clear, not organized, nor comprehendible. The student did not have any understanding of the specific event. Additionally, the student did not turn in the necessary daily notes.

Oral Presentation

60 possible points

The presentations by the student were not very clear nor organized. The student had the minimal understanding of the specific event. This student did not have all the necessary daily notes.

Creativity

60 possible points

This student brought in propaganda as well as other artifacts to accompany the oral presentation. This student might have brought the same artifact in twice or has brought

This student did the necessary amount of work when it came to the oral presentations. This student brought in one or two pieces of propaganda and no other additional artifacts

This student did the minimal amount of work when it came to the oral presentation. There was no use of propaganda nor any other means of additional artifacts for the students

the classroom. Participation

60 possible points

Group Continuity

60 possible points

something in every other day. This student This student gave at least one gave at least one oral presentation oral presentation on a specific on a specific event of their event of their country during country during WWI. This WWI. This student also student actively moderately participates in participates in class discussions class discussions when their when their country is one of country is one of the topics. the topics. The group that This group the student was works very well associated with with one exemplified another. Every what it means to student appears work as a group. to be working on Not one student their necessary took on the role with the whole project by group. Two or themselves. three students Everyone in the might have group presented twice; participated thus, there seems equally and were to be some able to work inequality in the together with work. great ease. Nevertheless, this group has not had too many road blocks.

pertaining to their country. This student gave one oral presentation or half a presentation on a specific event during WWI. This student accomplishes the bare minimum during class discussions about WWI. This group had moderate trouble communicating with one another before class. A minimum of two students are doing a bunk of the presenting. There is inequality in the dividing of the work. Only a couple students in the group have a clear understanding of the material.

country. This student did not give a single oral presentation about a specific event of their country during WWI. Additionally, this student does not actively participate during class discussions. This group had great trouble communicating with one another before class. One student took the role as the primary informant. None of the other students appeared to know the material or appeared to have done the necessary work.